本研究以「虛擬恐龍館」為研究工具，並以準實驗研究法探討不同教學法對國小五年級學生學習成效及學習動機之影響，具體目的如下：（一）探討純發現教學組、引導發現教學組與指導說明教學組之間的學習成效之差異及其影響因素、（二）探討純發現教學組、引導發現教學組與指導說明教學組之間的學習動機之差異及其影響因素、（三）探討不同層次發現式教學法與指導說明教學法中，其受試者內的同儕互動為何。

本研究結果如下：

一、在「虛擬恐龍館數位教材」中，純發現教學法(實驗組一)、引導發現教學法(實驗組二)與指導說明教學法(控制組)的國小五年級學童，三組間的學習成就在教學後有達到顯著差異。

二、在「虛擬恐龍館數位教材」中，純發現教學法(實驗組一)、引導發現教學法(實驗組二)與指導說明教學法(控制組)的國小五年級學童，三組間的學習動機在教學後未達到顯著差異。

三、在「虛擬恐龍館數位教材」中，純發現教學法(實驗組一)及引導發現教學法(實驗組二)皆有明顯的同儕互動，而在學習動機上無明顯差異、在學習成就上有明顯差異。

英文摘要

This research studies as the tool "the hypothesized dinosaur hall"， and studies influence the result and the study motive by the accurate experimental methodology discussion different teaching method to the five grades student. The concrete goal is as follows：（1）discussing the difference of influence factor and the study result between the pure discovery teaching group、 guidance discovery teaching group and instruction explanation teaching group，（2）discussing the difference of influence factor and the study motive between the pure discovery teaching group、guidance discovery teaching group and instruction explanation teaching group，（3）discussing between different level discovery type teaching method and instruction explanation teaching method、and interact why do the trying in associates.

This findings are as follows：

（1） In the "hypothesized dinosaur hall several teaching materials" center，the five grades schoolchild of the pure discovery teaching group、 guidance discovery teaching group and instruction explanation teaching group，the study achievement after the teaching achieved reveals the difference.
（2） In the "hypothesized dinosaur hall several teaching materials" center，the five grades schoolchild of the pure discovery teaching group、 guidance discovery teaching group and instruction explanation teaching group，the study motive after the teaching achieved reveals the difference.
（3） In the "hypothesized dinosaur hall several teaching materials" center，the pure discovery teaching group and guidance discovery teaching group has all the obvious associates interaction；But in the study motive has no obvious difference， has the obvious difference in the study achievement.

參考文獻
中文部分
陳年興（2000）。網路教學與傳統教學之比較分析。遠距教育，15/16，153-163。

趙美聲、陳姚真（編譯）（1999）。遠距教育：系統觀。台北市：松岡電腦圖書公司。

岳修平(2000)，台灣大專院校遠距教學展望，台大教與學期刊電子報，3。

林奇賢（1998）。網路學習環境的設計與應用。資訊與教育，67，34-50。
楊家興（2005）。線上教學的帶領。教育科技與媒體，73，46-61。

粱朝雲、張弘毅（1998）。網路虛擬實境與情境學習的整合運用。教育資料與圖書館學，36（2），197-224。

許美鈴（1995）。虛擬實境應用簡介。資訊與教育，50，3-8。

毆陽明、吳建榕、陳敬謙（1995）。虛擬實境應用簡介。資訊與教育，50，16-23。

何敏煌（1994）。多媒體的明日之星—虛擬實境。資訊與教育，42，20-25。

鄭思堂（1999）。電腦動畫新領域~虛擬實境。資訊與教育，73，11-15。

唐文華、劉馨韓（2004）。虛擬網路恐龍館的建置方法研究。教學科技與媒體，69，39-54。

李峻德（2006）。嚴肅遊戲於學習科技之設計概念探討：可玩性與使用性觀點。教學科技與媒體，75，18-37。

胡植慶、徐世豪、陳雅琳、李逢春（2002）。九二一集集地震之虛擬地球
科學教室。中學教育學報，9，411-442。

林子超、陳五洲（2006）。虛擬實境應用於體育教學的探討。科技應用大
專體育，83，36-41。

王華沛、黃玲瑷、廖淑戎、蔡怡寧（2004）。虛擬實境在特殊教育之應用。國教天地，156，9-17。

陳彥智、徐新逸（2004）。模型式虛擬實境技術於中小學美術教育之應用。視聽教育雙月刊，45（4），23-34。

沈義訓、粱朝雲（2000）。網路虛擬實境博物館之互動展示設計研究。教育資料與圖書館學，37（3），275-298。

西文部份
Oinonen, P.（1995）.The challenge of the information society. Life and Education in Finland, 95(4), 36-42.

Berge, Z. (1997). Characteristics of online teaching in post secondary,formal education. Educational Technology, 37(3), 35-47.

Khan, B. (1997). Web-based instruction (WBI): What is it and why is it ? In Khan, B. H. (Ed.), Web-based Instruction (5-18). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

Cummins, J. (1988). From the inner city to the global village: The microcomputer as a catalyst for collaborative interchange. Language Culture and Curriculum, 1(1), 1-13.

Newman, D. (1990). Cognitive and technical issues in the design of educational computer networking, In L. Harasim (Ed.), Online education: Perspective on a new environment (pp.99-116). New York: Praeger.

Hootstein, E. (2002).Wearing Four Paris of Shoes：The Roles of E-Learning Facilitators. Retrieved Septtemper 30,2006, from http://www.learninggcircuits.
-org/2002/oct2002/elearn.html

Wilson, T.& Whitelock, D. (1997). Facilitation of on-line learn enviornments：what eorks when teaching distance learning computer science students. Information Research, 3(1). Retrieved Septtemper 30, 2006, from http://inform
-ationr.net/ir/3-1/paper33.html

Hill, J. R.& Hannafin, M. J. (1997). Cognitive strategies and learning from the World Wide Web. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(4), 37-64.
Perry, A.. B. (2004). A Discovery Oriented Technology Enhanced Abstract Algebra Course. Education, 124(4), 694-698.

Horiguchi Tomoya& Hirashima Tsukasa(2001). A Framework for Creating Counterexamples in Discovery Learning Environment. ERIC ED466174

Rick Jochen & Lamberty K. K. (2005). Medium-Based Design: Extending a Medium to Create an Exploratory Learning Environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 13 (3), 179-212.

Mayer, R. E. (2004). Should There Be a Three-Strikes Rule against Pure Discovery Learning? American Psychologist, 59 (1), 14-19.

Ball Matt(2001). Wilderness Survival and Outdoor Education. ERIC ED476478

Haines Annette M.(2003). Reading, Writing, and Mathematics: Explored and Discovered Rather than Taught. NAMTA Journal, 28(1), 43-55.

Wilson Magnus (2003). Discovery Listening: Improving Perceptual Processing. ELT Journal, 57(4), p335-43.

Vagnini Carol(2000). Transforming the Outdoor Environment. Spotlight: Physical Development. Montessori Life, 12(4), 36-37.

Kuo Elaine W.& Levis Marc R.(2002). A New Roman World: Using Virtual Reality Technology as a Critical Teaching Tool. ERIC ED467193

Placing Kaye& Fernandez Anne(2001). Virtual Experiences and the NSW Stage 6 Science Syllabuses. ERIC ED457024

Paul, K. (2006). Effects of 3D virtual reality of plate tectonics on fifth grade students’ achievement and attitude toward science. Interactive Learning Environments, 14, 25-34.

Jiman Juhanita(2002). Virtual Reality: The Future of Animated Virtual Instructor, the Technology and Its Emergence to a Productive E-Learning Environment. ERIC ED479558

Roy Loriene& Christal Mark(2000). Creating a Virtual Tour of the American Indian.. ERIC ED454014
Giardina Max(2002). The Avenor Virtual Trainer Project--A 3D Interactive Training Module on Energy Control Procedures: Development and First Validation Results. ERIC ED479461

Spudic Linda(2001). Virtual Quests As Learning Environments for K-12 Students. ERIC ED470117

Clark, Kenneth F., Hosticka Alice, Schriver Martha& Bedell Jackie(2002). Computer Based Virtual Field Trips. ERIC ED476987

Piburn, Michael D., Reynolds Stephen J., McAuliffe Carla, Leedy Debra E., Birk James P.& Johnson Julia K.(2005). The Role of Visualization in Learning from Computer-Based Images. International Journal of Science Education, 27 (5), 513-527.

Barnett, Michael,Yamagata-Lynch Lisa,Keating Tom,Barab Sasha A.& Hay Kenneth E.(2005). Using Virtual Reality Computer Models to Support Student Understanding of Astronomical Concepts. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 24 (4), 333-356.

Chen, Chwen Jen, Toh Seong Chong; Ismail& Wan Mohd Fauzy Wan(2005). Are Learning Styles Relevant to Virtual Reality? Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38 (2),123-141.