研究生: |
林凱莉 Kelly Lin |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
國民小學校長正向領導、教師組織公民行為與學校組織創新關係之研究 A Study on Relationships among Principal positive Leadership, Teacher organizational citizenship behavior and School organizational innovation in Elementary |
指導教授: |
謝傳崇
曾文鑑 |
口試委員: | |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
|
論文出版年: | 2013 |
畢業學年度: | 101 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 110 |
中文關鍵詞: | 校長正向領導、、 、教師組織公民行為 、學校組織創新 |
外文關鍵詞: | principal positive leadership, teacher organizational citizenship behavior, school organizational innovation |
相關次數: | 點閱:3 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究旨在了解國民小學校長正向領導、教師組織公民行為與學校組織創新的現況,探討校長正向領導、教師組織公民行為與學校組織創新的關係情形,以及校長正向領導、教師組織公民行為對學校組織創新的影響。研究方法為文獻分析與問卷調查法。研究對象為臺灣地區公立國民小學校長、主任、組長及教師,共發出1509份問卷,有效樣本共1223份。問卷回收後分別以敘述統計、積差相關以及結構方程模式等統計方法進行分析。根據研究結果與分析歸納之研究結論如下:
一、校長正向領導現況知覺程度高。
二、教師組織公民行為現況知覺程度高。
三、學校組織創新現況知覺程度高。
四、校長正向領導與教師組織公民行為呈現中等正相關。
五、校長正向領導與學校組織創新呈現中等至高正相關存在。
六、教師組織公民行為與學校組織創新間具有高相關存在。
七、利學校行為、正向意義對整體學校組織創新最具有預測效果。
八、國民小學校長正向領導、教師組織公民行為對學校組織創新具有相互影響的關係
;教師組織公民行為具有中介效果。
本研究根據以上結論,提出幾點建議提供行政單位、國民小學校長、教師與未來相關研究者作參考。
關鍵字:校長正向領導、教師組織公民行為、學校組織創新
A Study on Relationships among Principal positive Leadership, Teacher organizational citizenship behavior and School organizational innovation in Elementary
Schools
Abstract
In this study, the main focus was to explore the current situations of the elementary school principal positive leadership, the teacher organizational citizenship behavior, and the school organizational innovation. After the initial exploration, the discussion moved on to the interrelationships among the elementary school principal positive leadership, the teacher organizational citizenship behavior, and the school organizational innovation. Finally, the study further explored the impact among the elementary school principal positive leadership, the teacher organizational citizenship behavior, and the school organizational innovation.
There were two researching methods introduced in this study— the literature research and the questionnaire survey methods. The questionnaires were given to a set of random sample which included 1,509 elementary school teachers across Taiwan. To be mention, within the 1,509 questionnaire surveys, 1,223 copies were valid. The data analysis was handled by following interments: descriptive statistics, Pearson’s product-moment, stepwise multiple regression analysis, and structure equation model (SEM). The research results were summed up as follows:
1. The awareness of the principals’ positive leadership were at the high degree.
2. The awareness of the teacher’s organizational citizenship behavior were at the high degree.
3. The awareness of the school organizational innovation were at the high degree.
4. There were medium-positive correlations between principal positive leadership and teacher organizational citizenship behavior.
5. The correlations between principal positive leadership and school organizational innovation had scored between medium-positive to high-positive.
6. There were high-positive correlations between teacher organizational citizenship behavior and school organizational innovation.
7. The pro-school behavior and the positive meaning had a high predicability to the effectiveness to the whole school organizational innovation.
8. Principal positive leadership and teacher organizational citizenship behavior had a two-way influence toward school organizational innovation. Teacher organizational citizenship behavior had the mediating effect between princaial positive leadership and school organizational innovation.
.
Keywords: principal positive leadership, teacher organizational citizenship behavior, school organizational innovation
壹、中文部分
丁英哲(2007)。國民小學校長轉型領導與教師組織公民行為關係之研究:以臺灣北部
地區三縣市為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
王娜玲(2009) 。臺北市國小校長領導行為與教師組織公民行為之研究。臺北市立教
育大學學報,40(1),119-156。
田福連(2009)。學校創新經營影響因素及其評量指標之研究-以國民小學為例。(未出版博士論文)。國立臺南教育大學,臺南市。
呂保岸、王瑞壎、洪明全(2010)。教師組織公民行為與創意學校經營之研究—以臺中縣國民小學為例。華醫人文與社會學報,22 ,133-158。
李玉美(2009)。新竹地區國民中學學校創新經營、教師組織公民行為與學校效能關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
阮奕峰(2009)。組織創新觀點運用於學校經營策略之研究。學校行政雙月刊,61,116。
吳明隆(2007)。SPSS 統計應用學習實務--問卷分析與應用統計。臺北市:知城。
吳明隆(2009)。結構方程模式—方法與實務應用。臺北市:麗文。
吳清山(2004)。學校創新經營與策略。教師天地,128,199。
吳清山、林天祐(2007)。教育名詞解釋。教育研究月刊,162,134。
吳政達(2010)。印象管理對教師組織公民行為影響之探討。教育研究月刊,200,53-71。
林水木(2010)。學校創新經營的發展背景與構面之探討。載於彰化縣政府主辦,彰化縣99年度教育專業人員論文發表暨學術研討會論文集,37-57。
林詩雁(2008)。國民小學實踐創新經營之研究~以花蓮縣兩所國小為例(未出版碩士論文)。國立花蓮教育大學,花蓮市。
林新發(2010)。正向領導的意涵與實施策略。國民教育, 50(3),1-5。
林新發(2010)。華人地區小學校長正向領導、學習文化對學校創新經營效能影響之研
究—以臺北市、上海市和香港地區為例(Ι)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計
畫。(報告編號:NSC 98-2410-H-152-001),未出版。
陳清檳、林慶瑋、陳穎謙(2009)。半導體產業所屬企業知識管理、知織管理績效與研發人員組織公民行為典型相關之研究。2009技職教育永續發展學術研討會,臺北市。
徐易男(2009)。國民小學公共關係、組織創新經營與學校效能關係之研究(未出版博士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
張明輝、顏秀如(2005)。學校創新經營的意涵與實施計畫。中等教育,56(3),31。
張善智(譯)(2006)。組織行為。臺北市:學富。
張芳全(2008)。統計就是要這樣跑。臺北市:心理。
張仁家、黃佳淇( 2010)。從學校創新經營的視角論有效提昇學校行政服務之品質。
學校行政雙月刊, 66,155-168。
陳玉萍(2012)。肯定式探詢打造成功團隊。
取自http://www.cpc.org.tw/consultancy/article/226
童惠玲、曾妤珮(2011)。知覺組織支持與服務導向組織公民行為:高績效人力資源實
務跨層次之調節效果。臺灣勞動評論,3(1),117-146。
黑幼龍、李桂芬(2001)。破局而出。臺北:天下文化。
黃秋鑾(2009)。臺灣地區國民中學校長知識領導、學習社群與學校創新經營效能關係之研究。(未出版博士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
黃春日(2012)。國民小學校長正向領導與教師專業承諾關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學,臺中市。
黃柏勳(2003)。國民中小學校長轉型領導、學校組織氣候與教師組織公民行為關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
黃天助(2011)。高職教師知覺校長轉型領導、組織創新氣氛對創新經營成效影響之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化市。
湯志民(2006)。政大附中創新經營的理念與策略。教育研究月刊,145,59-72。
湯志民(2010)。學校創新經營—空間領導之研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計
畫。(報告編號:NSC 98-2410-H-004-014),未出版。
單海林(2010)。話說賞識教育與欣賞式探詢。中國中小學心理健康教育,155(2),47。
MBA智庫百科,取自:
http://wiki.mbalib.com/zh-tw/%E8%82%AF%E5%AE%9A%E5%BC%8F%E6%
8E%A2%E8%AF%A2
楊雅鈞(2012)。教師組織公民行為對正向心理學之啟示─從利他行為的觀點談起。學校行政雙月刊,78,69-78。
詹孟傑(2010)。學校創新經營-以屏東縣僑勇國小為例。經營管理學刊,23,179-221。
榮泰生(2009)。Amos與研究方法。臺北市:五南。
劉瑞珠(2009)。新竹縣、市國民小學分布式領導與教師組織公民行為關係之研究
(未出版之碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學,新竹市。
蔡宜萱(2012)。國民中學校長正向領導、教師激勵與服務導向公民行為關係之研究。
(未出版之碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學,新竹市。
鄭崇趁(2006)。學校創新經營的積極策略。教育研究月刊,145,50-58。
蕭錫錡(2010)。領導理論。載於蕭錫錡(主編),學校領導理論與實務( 頁1-23)。臺北市:高等教育。
蕭錫錡、張仁家、宋欣雅與陳甦彰(2009)。專科學校組織創新評鑑指標建構之研
究。技術及職業教育學報,3,75-105。
蕭佳純、崔念祖(2010)。國民小學教師組織公民行為與學校創新經營關係之研究--以學習型學校為調節變項。嘉大教育研究學刊,27,81-112。
鍾晨芳(2007)。國民小學校長教學領導與教師組織公民行為關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學,新竹市。
謝傳崇(2007)。以平衡計分卡理念建構國民中小學創新經營效能指標之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
謝傳崇(譯)(2009)。變革時代卓越的校長領導:國際觀點。臺北市:心理。
謝傳崇(譯)(2011)。Kim Cameron著。正向領導。臺北市:巨流。
謝傳崇(2011)。校長正向領導理念、研究與實踐。臺北:高等教育。
謝傳崇(2011a)。國民小學校長正向領導與學校效能關係之研究。臺灣教育發展論壇
,3,49-66。
謝傳崇、王瓊滿(2011)。國民小學校長分佈式領導、教師組織公民行為對學生學習表
現影響之研究。新竹教育大學學報,27(1),35-66。
謝傳崇、李芳茹(2009)。應用結構方程模式探討學校創新經營與學校效能之關係。發
表於新竹教育大學舉辦之「社會變遷中的教育發展」臺灣教育學術研討會,新竹
市。
謝傳崇、呂浚瑀(2011)。國民小學校長正向領導對學校組織創新能力關係之研究—以團隊情感氛圍為中介變項。。論文發表於國立中山大學與臺灣教育研究學會合辦「2011臺灣教育研究學會」國際學術研討會,高雄市。
簡正一(2010)。國民小學教師知識管理、教師組織公民行為與學校創新經營效能之
關係研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
藍光炤(2006)。高雄市國民小學校長領導特質、教師組織公民行為與組織效能關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
貳、外文部分
Belogolovsky, E., & Somech, A. (2010).Teachers’ organizational citizenship behavior:
Examining the boundary between in-role behavior and extra-role behavior from the
perspective of teachers, principals and parents. Teaching and Teacher Education,
26(4), 914-923. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.10.032
Cameron, K. & Spreitzer, G. (Eds.) (2011). The Oxford Handbook of Positive Organizational
Scholarship. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cameron, K. S. (2008). Positive leadership: Strategies for extraordinary performance.
San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
Cameron, K., Mora, C., Leutscher, T., & Calarco, M. (2011). Effects of Positive Practices
on Organizational Effectiveness. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science ,47(3),266-308.
Cheolho Yoon (2009). The effects of organizational citizenship behaviors on ERP system success. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 421-428.
DiPaola, M. F., & Hoy, W. K. (2005). Organizational citizenship of faculty and achievement
of high school students. The High School Journal, 88(3), 35-44.
Donaldson, S.I. & Ko, I. (2010).Positive organizational psychology, behavior, and
scholarship: A review of the emerging literature and evidence base. Journal of
Positive Psychology, 5(3), 177-191.
Du Chatenier, E., Verstegen, J., Biemans, H., Mulder, M., & Omta, O. (2009). The
Challenges of Collaborative Knowledge Creation in Open Innovation Teams.
Human Resource Development Review, 8(3), 350-381.
Fredrickson, B.L. (2001).The role of positive emotions in positive psychology:The
broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist,
56(3), 218-226.
Fredrickson,B.L., Branigan, C. (2001). Positive emotions. In T. Mayne, & G. A.
Bonanno (Eds. ), Emotions: Current issues and future directions (pp. 123-151).
NY: Guilford Press.
Gergen, K. (1996).Social psychology as social construction: The emerging vision.
Gordon, J. (2008). The case for posive energy. Retrieved March 21, 2011, from
http://www.leader-values.com/Content/detail.asp?ContentDetailID=1207
Graham, J. w. (1995). Leadership, moral development, and citizenship behavior.
Business Ethics Quarterly, 5(1), 43-54.
Gregory A. Aarons , David H. Sommerfeld (2012). Leadership, innovation climate, and attitudes toward evidence-based practice during a statewide implementation .
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 51(4), 423-431.
Gumusluoglu, T., Ilsev, A. (2009). Transformational leadership, creativity and
organizational innovation, 62, 461-473.
Hogan, J., Hogan, R., & Busch, C. M. (1984). How to measure service orientation.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(1), 167-173.
Harun Sesen & Nejat H. Basim(2012). Impact of satisfaction and commitment on teachers’ organizational citizenship. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 32(4), 475-491.
Hsiao, H. C., Shen, C. H., Chou, C. M., & Chang, L. Y. (2010). Developing the evaluation
indices of organizational innovation in vocational high schools: the perspective of a
Taiwanese case. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 8( 1 ) ,
79-85.
Hoerr, T. R. (2005). The art of school leadership.Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Cur r i culum Development.
Jen-Chia, Chang(2012). Factors that may mediate the relationship between transformational
leadership and organizational innovation. African Journal of Business Management, 6(3),
1010-1018.
Konovsky,M.A., & Pugh, S.D. (1994).Citizenship behavior and social exchang. Academy of
Management Journal, 37(3), 656-669。
Luthans, F., Luthans, K.W., Hodgetts,R.M.,&Luthans,B.C.(2001). Positive approach to leadership(PAL) implications for today’s organizations. The Journal of Leadership Studies, 8(2), 1-20.
Lale Gumusluoglua & Arzu Ilsevb (2009). Transformational leadership, creativity, and organizational innovation. Journal of Business Research, 62 (4), 461-473.
Mark C. Bolino&William H. Turnley (2012). organizational citizenship behavior:A review of the policital perspecitive. Politics in Organizations: Theory and Research Considerations, 161.
Murley, L. D., Keedy, J. L., & Welsh, J. F. (2008). Examining school improvement through
the lans of principle and teacher flow of influence in high-achieving and high-poverty schools. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 7(4), 380-400.
McKenzie, Scott Gary (2011). Trust and organizational citizenship: A study of the relationship of the three referents of trust and the organizational citizenship of elementary school teachers. The university of texas at san Antonio, pp.267.
Nienke M. M., Alan J. D., & Peter J.C. S.(2010). Occupying the principal position: Examining relationships between transformational leadership, social network position, and schools’ innovative climate. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(5), 623-670.
Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good solider syndrome. syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexing Books.
Peterson, R. E. (2002). Establishing the creative environment in technology education. The Technology Teacher, 61(4), 7-10.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: a critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26, 513-564.
Podsakoff, Philip M., Ahearne, Michael&MacKenzie, Scott B. (1997). Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol 82(2), Apr 1997, 262-270. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.82.2.262
Robinson,S.L., &Morrison, E.W.(1995).Psychological contracts and OCB:the effect of unfulfilled obligations on civil virtue behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior,16(3), 289-298。
Robbins, S. P. (2006). Organizational Behavior, (12th Ed.), Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Sharma, R.(2001). Innovation in schools: Identifying a framework for initiating, sustaining and managing them. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, Washington.
Sharon, p. C. (1997). Innovation-resistion and Inovation-producing organizations. Journal of Bussiness, 4, 470-477.
Seaman, A. (2009). What is Positive Leadership? Retrieved June 10, 2011, from
http://www.positiveleadership.com/
Seligman, M., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction.
American Psychologist, 55 (1), 5–14.
Somech, A. & Ron, I (2007). Promoting Organizational Citizenship Behavior in School:
The Impact of Individual and Organizational Characteristics. Educational
Administration Quarterly, 43(1), 38-66.
Stadnick, P. (2008). Project portfolio management practices for innovation – A casestudy at
ABN AMRO – Brazil. Umea: Handels hogs kolan vid Umea universitet.
White, M. (1997). Narratives of therapists’ lives. Adelaide, South Australia: Dulwich Centre Publications.
Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational ommitment as predictors of organizational citizenship behavior and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17, 601-617.
Zedeck, Sheldon (Ed), (2011). Expanding the criterion domain to include organizational citizenship behavior: Implications for employee selection. APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, Vol 2: Selecting and developing members for the organization.APA Handbooks in Psychology, 281-323.