自1995年至今，台灣博物館持續有蓬勃發展的趨勢，並且同時隨著近年數位電子看板的運用普及，博物館中的展示手法在國內外皆漸漸建立起新的互動模式，甚至將活潑的遊戲元素加入，恰好適合博物館中最為常見的家庭觀眾，因此本研究於國立自然科學博物館中的特定展場內，實地藉著紙本問卷填寫與口語訪談，蒐集家庭觀眾與博物館工作人員的感受、觀點與建議，以探討互動遊戲式數位展示運用實情以及所形成之影響，也針對在此類型展示前之家庭觀眾的互動關係進行探討，最後再進一步提出對於未來博物館中互動數位展示的設計與配置之相關建議。
研究結果顯示，展場內不僅物理環境設計上普遍妥善，另外，對於觀眾的學習認知，多數家庭觀眾與工作人員認為相較於傳統展示手法，互動遊戲式的數位展示提升了參觀動機、注意力、對內容的理解與記憶等等，同時也容易喚起相關背景知識或生活經驗；在人際互動方面，藉著某些手法在互動遊戲展示中的運用，提昇了家人之間或陌生觀眾之間言語及肢體上的互動關係。為要真正達到寓教於樂的目的，一面館方的策劃須要謹慎、靈活並平衡的運用不同元素，另一面亦須要陪同孩子的家長積極從旁引導、說明，以盡可能降低互動遊戲式數位展示潛藏的負面效果。

The establishment of the museum in Taiwan flourished continuously since 1995. At the same time, the use of digital signage has been growing largely in recent years. Museums establish new models of interaction such as mingling exhibitions with some game elements accordingly. This is the best model that suits the most common type of visitors in museums, family groups. The primary methods of this study include questionnaire and interview in National Museum of Natural Science in order to achieve the main objectives of the research: (1) investigate the operating situation and the impacts of the interactive digital exhibitions in museums (2) investigate the main impacts of the game-based interactive digital exhibitions on family-group visitors’ interaction (3) provide suggestions for future design and configurations of the interactive digital signage on museum exhibitions.
The result shows that the design of environmental context is appropriate, and the game-based interactive digital exhibitions improve the cognitive learning behaviors of visitors, including their motivation, attention, duration, comprehension, memory, and even evoke their background knowledge or experiences in daily life. In the aspect of personal interaction, the game-based interactive digital exhibitions enhance the verbal and physical interaction between family members or other unfamiliar visitors. In order to achieve the main purpose of education and reduce the negative impacts of the game-based interactive digital exhibitions, museum staffs have to arrange different elements carefully, masterly and keep them balanced. On the other hand, parents have to play the guiding role and explain the information in the game-based interactive digital exhibitions for children during the visiting.

王啟祥（2004）。 國內博物館觀眾研究知多少。博物館學季刊，18（2），95-104。 行政院文化建設委員會文化統計（2009）。台灣博物館成立年代統計。線上檢 索日期：2014年1月7日。網址：http://www.cam.org.tw/big5/resource6_01.htm 行政院文化建設委員會文化統計（2013）。全國博物館總數統計。線上檢索日 期：2014年1月7日。網址：http://museum.cca.gov.tw/ 吳淑華（2011）。影響參觀博物館展示因素與滿意度關係之研究。科技博物， 15（2），105-134。 吳淑華（2008）。 論博物館展示方法面面觀，科技博物， 12（１）， 57-73。 宋曜廷、張國恩（2005）。行動載具在教學與學習的運用：近十年研究的批判 整合。教育部電子計算機中心委託專題研究報告。 宋曜廷、張國恩、于文正（2006）。行動載具在博物館學習的應用：促進 [人— 機—境] 互動的設計。博物館學季刊，2（01），17-34。 林金定、嚴嘉楓、陳美花（2005）。質性研究方法: 訪談模式與實施步驟分析. 身心障礙研究季刊， 3（2），122-136. 李如菁（2000）。兒童觀眾和參與式展品互動之探-家庭觀眾中的兒童成員。科 技博物，4（6），46-60。
105
耿鳳英（2006）。虛與實：新世紀的博物館展示趨勢。博物館學季刊，20（1）， 81-96。 陳雪雲（2000）。經驗、自我與學習。社會教育學刊，29，57-92。 陳莞鈞（2012）。 以虛擬化身為媒介之多模式 3D 商品互動展示對使用者認知 影響之研究。成功大學工業設計學系學位論文，1-117。 陳玫岑、朱耀明（2013）。 科技博物館策展研究：科技詮釋與展示概念的形成。 科技博物， 17（4），27-56。 許文凌（2012）。 樣本選擇的方法。家庭教育雙月刊，（38），88-95。 許博超（1994）。 博物館觀眾研究的評鑑類型與原則。國立臺灣師範大學美 術研究所碩士論文。 張美珍、方榮爵（2008）。觀眾與互動展品：非制式學習環境中的發現學習。 科技博物，12（1），5-29。 張崇山（2009）。博物館互動式展示之思與辨。科技博物，13（4），1-16。 黃智琪、許義忠（2009）。博物館觀眾研究分析-1992~ 2006。運動與遊憩 研究，3（3），97-114。
106
郭世文（2013）。 博物館展示如何落實科學傳播：以國立科學工藝博物館 [防 疫戰鬥營] 黃金戰士為例。科技博物，17（4）， 117-145。 黃湘武（1993）。皮亞傑理論在科學教育上的應用研究。西方社會科學理論的 移植與應用，台北：遠流出版社，53-62。 楊龍立（1997）。建構主義教學的檢討。教育資料與研究，第18期，頁1-5。 劉婉珍（2011）。研究方法與工具。博物館觀眾研究，頁209。台北市：三民。 經濟部技術處（2011）。台灣產業科技前瞻研究計畫。2020關鍵報告科技篇下， 1-2-1-13。 漢寶德（2000）。展示規劃：理論與實務，臺北市：田園城市。 謝繼昌（1981）。中國家族的定義：從一個臺灣鄉村談起。中國的民族、社會與文化。台北：食貨．第57-66 頁． 顏鎮榮（2006）。國立自然科學博物館家庭觀眾參觀行為研究。科技博物，10 （4），5-22。 顏鎮榮（2009）。家庭觀眾參觀博物館展示親子間之互動探討。嶺東學報，（25）， 11-24。
107
顏鎮榮（2010）。家庭觀眾對參觀博物館展示態度之調查研究。嶺東學報，（27）， 115-152。 羅綸新. (1994). 電腦軟體使用者滿意度之因素探討. 行政院國家科學委員會 專題研究成果報告 (編號: NSC82-0301-H130-008), 未出版. 數位典藏與數位學習國家型科技計畫（2012）。計畫簡介與清單。線上檢索日 期：2014年5月27日。網址：http://teldap.tw/Introduction/introduction_5.html

Abdullah, A., & Zainab, A. N. (2007). Are Malaysian students ready to be authors of digital contents? A case study of digital library stakeholders’ readiness. Journal of Educational Media & Library Sciences, 45(1)
Al Mahmud, A., Mubin, O., Octavia, J. R., Shahid, S., Yeo, L., Markopoulos, P., & Aliakseyeu, D. (2007). Affective tabletop game: a new gaming experience for children. In Horizontal Interactive Human-Computer Systems, 2007. TABLETOP'07. Second Annual IEEE International Workshop on (pp. 44-51). IEEE.
Alt, F., Schneegass, S., Girgis, M., & Schmidt, A. (2013). Cognitive effects of
interactive public display applications. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM
International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (pp. 13-18). ACM.
Antle, A. N., Bevans, A., Tanenbaum, J., Seaborn, K., & Wang, S. (2011). Futura:
design for collaborative learning and game play on a multi-touch digital
tabletop. In Proceedings of the fifth international conference on Tangible,
embedded, and embodied interaction (pp. 93-100). ACM.
Blud, L. M. (1990). Social interaction and learning among family groups visiting a museum. Museum Management and Curatorship, 9(1), 43-51.
Blud, L. M. (1990). Sons and daughters: observations on the way families interact
during a museum visit. Museum Management and Curatorship, 9(3), 257-264.
109
Borsook, T. K. & Higginbotham-Wheat, N. (1991). Interactivity: What is it and what
can it do for computer-based instruction? Educational Technology, 31(10),
11-17.
Borun, M., Dritsas, J., Johnson, J., Peter, N., Wagner, K., Fadigan, K., Jangaard, A., Stroup, E., & Wenger, A. (1998). Family learning in museums: The PISEC perspective. Philadelphia: The Franklin Institute.
Brignull, H., & Rogers, Y. (2003). Enticing people to interact with large public
displays in public spaces. In Proceedings of INTERACT (Vol. 3, pp. 17-24).
Buisine, S., Besacier, G., Aoussat, A., & Vernier, F. (2012). How do interactive
tabletop systems influence collaboration?. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(1),
49-59.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond Boredom and Anxiety. San Fransisco:
Jossey-Bass.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity. Cambridge University Press.
Davis, J., & Gardner, H. (1993). Open windows, open doors. Museum News, 72(1) 34–37, 57–58
110
Dempsey, J. V., Lucassen, B., Haynes, L., & Casey, M. (1996). Instructional
applications of computer games. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.
ED394500.
DeVries, R., Zan, B., Hildebrandt, C., Edmiaston, R., & Sales, C. (2002).Developing Constructivist Early Childhood Curriculum: Practical Principles and Activities. Early Childhood Education Series. Teachers College Press, PO Box 20, Williston, VT 05495-0020.
Dewey, J. (1938). In Experience and Education, The Kappa Delta Pi Lecture Series.
Dierking, L. D., & Falk, J. H. (1994). Family behavior and learning in informal science settings: A review of the research. Science Education, 78(1), 57-72.
Dierking, L. D., Falk, J. H., Rennie, L., Anderson, D., & Ellenbogen, K. (2003). Policy statement of the “informal science education” ad hoc committee. Journal of research in science teaching, 40(2), 108-111.
Diamond, J. (1986). The behavior of family groups in science museums. Curator: The Museum Journal, 29(2), 139-154.
111
Dini, R., Paternò, F., & Santoro, C. (2007). An environment to support
multi-user interaction and cooperation for improving museum visits through
games. In Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Human computer
interaction with mobile devices and services (pp. 515-521). ACM.
Doise, W. (1988). Individual and social identities in intergroup relations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18(2), 99-111.
Ebner, M., & Holzinger, A. (2007). Successful implementation of user-centered game based learning in higher education: An example from civil engineering.Computers & education, 49(3), 873-890.
Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (1992). The museum experience. Whalesback books. Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2000). Learning from museums: Visitor experiences and the making of meaning. Altamira Press.
Fox, E., & Riconscente, M. (2008). Metacognition and self-regulation in James, Piaget, and Vygotsky. Educational Psychology Review, 20(4), 373-389.
Garris, R., Ahlers, R., & Driskell, J. E. (2002). Games, motivation, and learning: A
research and practice model. Simulation & Gaming, 33, 441-467.
Giddens, A. (1992). The Transformation of Intimacy. Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies, Polity Press. Cambridge, UK.
112
Henderson, A. & Watts, S. (2000). Learning how they learn. Museum News, Nov./Dec., 41-45
Hinrichs, U., & Carpendale, S. (2011). Gestures in the wild: studying multi-touch
gesture sequences on interactive tabletop exhibits. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI
Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 3023-3032). ACM.
Hood, M. (1989). “Leisure Criteria of Family Participation and Non-Participation in
Museums.” In B. Butler and M. Sussman (Eds.). Museum Visits and Activities
for Family Life Enrichment. New York, NY The Haworth Press. pp. 151-169.
Hope, T., Nakamura, Y., Takahashi, T., Nobayashi, A., Fukuoka, S., Hamasaki, M., &
Nishimura, T. (2009). Familial collaborations in a museum. In Proceedings of
the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp.
1963-1972). ACM.
Horn, M., Atrash Leong, Z., Block, F., Diamond, J., Evans, E. M., Phillips, B., &
Shen, C. (2012). Of bats and apes: an interactive tabletop game for natural
history museums. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM annual conference on Human
Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2059-2068). ACM.
Hornecker, E. (2008). “I don’t understand it either, but it is cool”-visitor interactions
with a multi-touch table in a museum. In Horizontal Interactive Human
Computer Systems, 2008. TABLETOP 2008. 3rd IEEE International Workshop
on (pp. 113-120). IEEE.
113
Hornecker, E., & Nicol, E. (2012). What do lab-based user studies tell us about
in-the-wild behavior?: insights from a study of museum interactives. In
Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (pp. 358-367).
ACM.
Hornecker, E., & Stifter, M. (2006). Learning from interactive museum installations
about interaction design for public settings. In Proceedings of the 18th Australia
conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Design: Activities, Artefacts and
Environments (pp. 135-142). ACM.
Isenberg, P., Hinrichs, U., Hancock, M., & Carpendale, S. (2010). Digital tables for
collaborative information exploration. In Tabletops-Horizontal Interactive
Displays (pp. 387-405). Springer London.
Kelly, L. (2008). Visitors and learners: Adult museum visitors' learning identities. In
Hadwig Kraeutler (Ed.), Heritage learning matters: Museums and universal
heritage (pp. 107-120). Vienna: Holzhausen.
Kennedy, J. (1990). User Friendly: Hands-on Exhibits That Work. Washington, DC: Association of Science Technology Centers.
Kiili, K. (2005). Digital game-based learning: Towards an experiential gaming
model. Internet & Higher Education, 8(1), 13-24.
114
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development (Vol. 1). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Kropf, M. B., & Wolins, I. S. (1989). How families learn: Considerations for program development. Marriage & family review, 13(3-4), 75-86.
Lakota, R.A. (1975). The Efficacy of Three Visitor Learning Support Systems in
Producing Cognitive and Affective Outcomes in an Art Museum. PhD thesis,
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
Laine, T. H., Sedano, C. A. I., Joy, M., & Sutinen, E. (2010). Critical factors for technology integration in game-based pervasive learning spaces. Learning Technologies, IEEE Transactions on, 3(4), 294-306.
Loomis, R. J. (1993). Planning for the visitor: the challenge of visitor studies. Museum visitor studies in the 90s, 13-23.
Marshall, P. (2007). Do tangible interfaces enhance learning? In Proceedings of the
1st international conference on Tangible and embedded interaction (pp.
163-170). ACM.
Martin, M., Brown, S., & Russell, T. (1991). A study of child-adult interaction at a
natural history centre. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 17(2), 355-369.
115
McManus, P. M. (1987). It's the company you keep…: The social determination of
learning‐related behaviour in a science museum. Museum Management and
Curatorship, 6(3), 263-270.
McManus, P. M. (1988). Good companions: More on the social determination of learning-related behaviour in a science museum. International Journal of Museum Management and Curatorship, 7(1), 37-44.
Moschini, E. (2006). Designing for the smart player: usability design and user-centred design in game-based learning. Digital Creativity, 17(3), 140-147.
Palan, K. M., & Wilkes, R. E. (1997). Adolescent-parent interaction in family decision making. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(2), 159-169.
Piaget, J. (1964). Part I: Cognitive development in children: Piaget development and learning. Journal of research in science teaching, 2(3), 176-186.
Plain, C., Build an Affinity for K-J Method, Quality Progress, Vol. 40, No. 3, Mar 2007, pp. 88.
Prensky, M. (2001). Fun, play and games: What makes games engaging. Digital game-based learning, 5, 1-05.
116
Price, S., Rogers, Y., Scaife, M., Stanton, D., & Neale, H. (2003). Using ‘tangibles’ to promote novel forms of playful learning. Interacting with computers,15(2), 169-185.
Rick, J., Marshall, P., & Yuill, N. (2011). Beyond one-size-fits-all: how interactive
tabletops support collaborative learning. In Proceedings of the 10th International
Conference on Interaction Design and Children (pp. 109-117). ACM.
Rogers, Y., & Lindley, S. (2004). Collaborating around vertical and horizontal large
interactive displays: which way is best?. Interacting with Computers, 16(6),
1133-1152.
Rollings, A., & Adams, E. (2003). Andrew Rollings and Ernest Adams on game design. New Riders.
Rosenfeld, S.B. (1980). Informal Learning in Zoos: Naturalistic Studies of Family
Groups. PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley.
Rouse, R. (2001). Game design, Theory and Practice. Plano. Texas, Wordware.584.
Rubegni, E., Memarovic, N., & Langheinrich, M. (2011). Talking to Strangers: Using
Large Public Displays to Facilitate Social Interaction. In Design, User
Experience, and Usability. Theory, Methods, Tools and Practice (pp. 195-204).
Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
117
Sandifer, C. (2003). Technological novelty and open‐endedness: Two characteristics of interactive exhibits that contribute to the holding of visitor attention in a science museum. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,40(2), 121-137.
Sawyer, B., & Rejeski, D. (2002). Serious games: Improving public policy through game-based learning and simulation. Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars Retrieved December 24, 2007, from http://wwics.si.edu/foresight/game/index.htm
Screven, C. G. (1990). Uses of evaluation before, during and after exhibit design. ILVS review, 1(2), 36-66.
Smith, L., & Mann, S. (2002). „Playing the Game: A Model for Gameness in Interactive Game Based Learning‟. In proceedings of the 15th annual NACCQ (pp. 397-402).
Sweetser, P., & Wyeth, P. (2005). GameFlow: a model for evaluating player enjoyment in games. Computers in Entertainment (CIE), 3(3), 3-3.
van Dijk, E. M., Lingnau, A., & Kockelkorn, H. (2012). Measuring enjoyment of an
interactive museum experience. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM international
conference on Multimodal interaction (pp. 249-256). ACM.
118
Wishart, J., & Triggs, P. (2010). MuseumScouts: Exploring how schools, museums
and interactive technologies can work together to support learning. Computers &
Education, 54(3), 669-678.
Yiannoutsou, N., & Avouris, N. (2012). Mobile games in Museums: from learning
through game play to learning through game design. ICOM Education,23, 79-86.
Yiannoutsou, N., Papadimitriou, I., Komis, V., & Avouris, N. (2009). Playing with
museum exhibits: designing educational games mediated by mobile technology.
In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Interaction Design and
Children (pp. 230-233). ACM.
Zaharias, P., Michael, D., & Chrysanthou, Y. (2013). Learning through Multi-touch
Interfaces in Museum Exhibits: An Empirical Investigation. Journal of
Educational Technology & Society, 16(3).