研究生: |
吳文慧 WU, WEN-HUI |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
大陸研發中心區位選擇與經營管理:以台灣A公司為例 Locational Selection and Management of R&D Sites in Mainland China : A Case Study of A Taiwanese Company |
指導教授: | 張元杰 |
口試委員: |
何秀青
周雅燕 胡美智 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
科技管理學院 - 高階經營管理碩士在職專班 Executive Master of Business Administration(EMBA) |
論文出版年: | 2012 |
畢業學年度: | 100 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 56 |
中文關鍵詞: | 研發國際化 、區位優勢 、分析層級程序法(AHP) 、中國大陸 |
外文關鍵詞: | R&D globalization, Location advantages, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Mainland China |
相關次數: | 點閱:2 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
在全球競爭環境愈趨激烈與產品生命週期越來越短的狀況下,跨國企業必須透過研發分權,在全球各地設立研發中心。有助於企業妥善、有效地運用全球科技資源,進而更能鞏固全球競爭優勢之地位。研發中心位置的選擇已經是一個重要的議題,足以影響公司長遠策略的發展與競爭力。然而,因為其複雜的特性,對於決策者來說,要選擇一個最佳的位置是很困難。
中國大陸自1979年推行經濟改革開放政策以來,挾其豐富之資源、低廉之勞力與巨大市場規模與潛力全球許多大型跨國企業紛紛搶進大陸成立研發中心,對於如何在其眾多發展城市選擇研發據點,實為重要的問題。因此,本研究以台灣某網通DMS 設備大廠為案例,以經營管理面的角度,探討台灣廠商至中國大陸設立海外研發中心所需考量之重點進行完整分析。
本研究建構一決策模式來輔助決策者做決策以提昇決策之品質與效率,進而協助本研究個案公司之決策者作出最適合的研發區位的選擇。決策模式使用分析層級程序法(AHP),收集相關文獻與專家意見,採用四個構面,包括提供最具競爭力的產品、供應商、研發費用、區位政策等。建立層級結構,透過問卷蒐集資料,建立評估屬性與各屬性下不同方案的成對比較矩陣,計算各屬性之相對權重和各方案的相對評估,一致性檢驗,得出研發中心設立的最佳位置,並訪談整理個案公司至大陸設立研發中心之經營管理心得與成功經驗匯集整理,藉以提供我國跨國企業高層主管日後在海外設立研發中心佈局與經營管理之借鏡與參考,並使台商在海外的研發投資能獲得更確實的保障。
The fierce global competition and the shortened product life-cycle leave multinational companies no choice but decentralize establish R&D centers globally. It is crucial for these companies to manage global technology resources properly and efficiently so as to consolidate their advantageous position in the worldwide competitiveness. Many multinational companies have been attracted to establish R&D centers in China by its abundant resources, low labor cost, and potential tremendous market volume, since China tried to carry out the Reform and Open-up Policy in 1979.
How to choose R&D sites thus becomes an important topic because it influences the long term strategic development and competitiveness of a company. However, due to its complexity, it is difficult for a decision maker to choose a best location for an R&D center. This thesis takes a networking DMS company in Taiwan (hereinafter: A-Company) as an example to discuss the issues of establishing and managing an R&D site in China.
To pick out a best location to establish an R&D center in China, the study collect related literature and opinions from experts. I adopt Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to analyze the four aspects: (1) products, (2) vendors, (3) R&D expenses, and (4) local government policies. For alternative locations are compared: Tianjin, Suzhou, Shanghai and Shenzhen. This study interviews some senior managers in A-Company and summarizes their reflections on the management and the successful experience of establishing an R&D center in China.
The research provides a useful strategy for decision makers, and by following the strategy, they can make efficient and qualified decisions. It helps A-Company to pick out one suitable proposal; and therefore, get the most appropriate location for R&D. The strategy is a tool for chief managers in multinational companies in Taiwan to manage and allocate R&D centers overseas, and it also secures their global R&D investment. Finally, hopes this research can be well valued in decision making by Taiwanese businessmen who plan to establish R&D centers in China.
中文
1. 簡禎富 (2009),決策分析與管理。雙業書廊,台北,頁64 – 84,頁224 -253。
2. 秦子閔 (2009),海外研發中心與創新績效:以地主國區位優勢之觀點。國立清華大學碩士論文。
3. 沈宗毅 (2006),研發國際化的組織與策略:以國外在台半導體研發中心為例,國立清華大學碩士論文。
4. 陳信宏、劉孟俊 (2003) ,跨國企業海外研發與發展中國家區位優勢 – 以台灣為個案。科技發展政策報導 SR9207,頁539 -546。
5. 王學呈 (2011) ,十二五規劃逐商機–2011中國大陸地區投資環境與風險調查。商週,台北。
英文
1. Bas, C. L. and Sierra, C.(2002), "Organizational Tension in International R&D Management: The Case of Japanese Firms", Research Policy, 30, pp.735-757
2. Chen, H., & Chen, T. J. (1998), “Network linkages and location choice in foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies”, 29 (3): 445-468.
3. Chen, S.-H. (2004), “Taiwanese IT firms’ offshore R&D in China and Connection with the Global Innovation Network”, Research Policy, 33, 337-349.
4. Chiesa, V. (1996), “Managing the internationalization of R&D activities”, Transaction on Engineering Management, 43d(1), 7-23.
5. De Myer, A. & Mizushima, A. (1989), “Global R&D management”, R&D Management,19(2), 135-146.
6. Dunning, John H. and Pearce, Robert D. (1985), “The World's Largest Industrial Enterprises 1962-1983”, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
7. Dunning J. H., (2000), “Regions, Globalization and the Knowledge-Based Economy”, Oxford :Oxford University Press.
8. Fors, G., & Zejan, M. (1996), “Overseas R&D by multinationals in foreign centers of excellence. Working paper no. 111”, The Economic Research Institute, Estocolmo: Stockholm School of Economics.
9. Gassmann, O. & von Zedwitz, M. (1998), “Organization of industrial R&D on a global scale” R&D Management, 28(3), 147-161
10. Grandstrand, O., Hakanson, L. & Sjolander, S. (1992), “Technology Management and International Business – Internationalization of R&D and Technology”, Chichester, UK, Wiley.
11. Greatwall (2002), “R&D Yongbao Zhongguo(R&D Embracing China)”, Nannin:Guangxi Renmin.
12. Guellec D. & van Pottelsberghe B. (2001), “The internationalization of technology analysed with patent data”, Research Policy, 30, 1253–1266.
13. Kumar,N. (1996), “Intellectual property protection, market orientation and location of overseas R&D activities by multinational enterprises”, World Development 24(4), 673-688.
14. Kumar N. (2001), “Determinants of location of overseas R&D activity of multinational enterprises: The case of US and Japanese corporations”, Research Policy, 30, 159-174.
15. Lu, L. Y. Y., & Liu, J. S. (2004), “R&D in China: An empirical study of Taiwanese IT companies”, R&D Management, 34 (4): 453-465.
16. Makino, S., Lau, C., & Yeh, R. (2002), “Asset-exploitation versus asset-seeking: Implications for location choice of foreign direct investment from newly industrialized economies”, Journal of International Business Studies, 33 (3): 403-421.
17. Odagiri, H. & Yasuda H. (1996), “The determinants of overseas R&D by Japanese firms: an empirical study at the industry and company levels”,Research Policy
18. Patel P. & Vega M. (1999), “Patterns of internationalisation of corporate technology: location vs. home country advantages”, Research Policy, 28(2-3), 145-155.
19. Paoli M. & Guercini S. (1997), “R&D internationalisation in the strategic behaviour of the firm”, Steep Discussion Paper No. 39, Sussex: Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex.
20. Perrino, A. & Tipping, J. (1991), “Global management of technology: a study of 16 multinationals in the USA, Europe and Japan” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 3(1), 87-97.
21. Reddy,P. (2000), “Globalization of Corporate R&D: Implications for Innovation Systems in Host Countries”, London, Routledge.
22. Ronstadt R.C. (1978), “International R&D: The Establishment and Evolution of R&D Abroad by Seven U.S.MNCS”, Journal of International Business Studies, Spring-Summer, 7-74.
23. Rugman, A. (1981), “Research and development by multinational and domestic firms in Canada” Canadian Public Policy, 7(4), 604-616.
24. UNCTAD (2005), World investment report 2005: Transnational corporations and internationalization of R&D . Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
25. Vernon, R. (1966) “International investment and international trade in the product cycle”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80(2), 190-207
26. von Zedtwitz, M. (2004), “Managing foreign R&D laboratories in China”, R&D Management, 34 (4): 439-452.
27. von Zedtwitz M. & Gassimann O. (2002), “Market versus technology drive in R&D internationalization: four different patterns of managing research and development”, Research Policy, 31, 569-588.
28. Westney E. (1992), “Organizational change and the internationalization of R&D”, In T. A. Kochan & M. Useem, (Eds.), Transforming Organization, New York: Oxford University Press. pp.245-60
29. Xue, L. and Wang. S. (2001), “Globalization of R&D by multinational corporations in China: an empirical analysis”, paper presented at Sino U. S. Conference on Technological Innovation, April 24-26, Beijing.
30. Zejan ,M.C. (1990), “R&D activities in affiliates of Swedish multinational enterprises”, Scandinavian Journal of Economics 92(3), 487-500.