簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

回結果列表
研究生： 蕭鐵明
Sakavov, Temir
論文名稱： 具有自動載波同步功能的三相混合頻率並聯換流器系統
Three-Phase Hybrid-Frequency Parallel-Inverter Systems with Automatic Carrier Synchronization
指導教授： 吳財福
Wu, Tsai-Fu
口試委員: 潘晴財
梁從主
賴炎生
謝秉璇
張淵智
學位類別： 博士
Doctor
系所名稱： 電機資訊學院 - 電機工程學系
Department of Electrical Engineering
論文出版年： 2024
畢業學年度： 112
語文別： 英文
論文頁數： 114
中文關鍵詞： 混頻並聯換流器系統 、混頻並聯併網換流器 、混頻電流控制 、無線載波同步 、自動載波同步 、漣波衰減分析 、線上漣波建模
外文關鍵詞： Hybrid-frequency parallel-inverter system, hybrid-frequency parallel grid-connected inverter, hybrid-frequency current control, wireless carriers synchronization, automatic carriers synchronization, ripple attenuation analysis, online ripple modeling
相關次數： 點閱：3  下載：0 
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

    • 本論文介紹一系列混合頻率併聯的逆變器系統（HbFPIS）。這種逆變器系統利用基於寬能隙（WBG）材料器件的快速開關能力，以及具高導電性、更成熟、更具成本效益的矽基電晶體元件（如 IGBT）。HbFPIS 是單逆變器系統和相同開關頻率並聯逆變器系統的可行替代方案。可以優化的方面包括開關成本、動態響應和濾波器尺寸。在先前建立的 3P4W HbFPIS 設計技術 [61] 的基礎上，開發並提出了 3P3W HbFPIS 的新技術。
    通過詳細的元件設計、開關頻率探討、線上漣波模型和穩定性分析，我們對 HbFPIS 有了更廣闊的認識。本論文詳細介紹載波同步。根據測量波紋和建模波紋之間的比較，提出了載波自動無線同步演算法，從而實現了更加自主的系統。
    利用直接數位控制法則和機載漣波模擬，模組可以成功地跟蹤電流指令，為 3P3W 與 3P4W 拓撲提供了用於機載模擬的漣波模型。所提出的系統符合 IEEE-519 標準和漣波衰減函數的動態要求。最後，兩個穩定的三相系統 20 kVA 3P3W 和 30 kVA 3P4W HbFPIS驗證設計過程的完整性。經過證明，HFLPI 能夠自動將其載波與 LFHPI 模組對齊，這表示機載模擬可以多種方式使用，這種能力的主要成果之一是減少模組交互的複雜設計。這可用於自主HFLPI模組，該模組可作為先前非混合逆變器的附加模組運行。
    本論文的原創性貢獻包括以下項目：
    •  通過成功設計和實現 3P3W HbFPIS，延伸了混合頻率並聯逆變器系統的應用。
    •  實現並驗證具有更複雜結構的漣波衰減。
    •  提出確保穩定運行、優化漣波衰減和功率調節的設計。
    •  介紹基於即時操作紋波模擬和高頻採樣的自動無線載波同步方法，並在模擬和實驗中進行驗證。
    •  所提出的控制法、模組之間的互動、濾波器和頻率設計方法，確保輸出總諧波失真率，符合 IEEE-519 標準。

    This dissertation presents a family of Hybrid Frequency Parallel Inverter Systems (HbFPIS). Such inverter systems take advantage of the fast switching capability of wide band-gap (WBG) material-based devices and the great conductivity of more mature and more cost-effective silicon-based transistor devices (such as IGBT). HbFPIS is a feasible alternative to single-inverter systems and identical switching frequency parallel inverter systems. The dimensions of possible optimization are switch cost, dynamic response, and filter size. Based on previously established techniques of design of 3P4W HbFPIS [61], new techniques for 3P3W HbFPIS are developed and presented.
    With the detailed component design, switching frequencies discussions, online ripple models, and stability analysis, a wider view of HbFPIS is presented. A detailed look at the carrier synchronization is given in this work. With the proposed carrier automatic, the wireless synchronization algorithm based on a comparison between measured ripple and modeled ripple, a more autonomous system is achieved.
    Using direct digital control laws together with onboard simulation, the modules can track the current commands successfully. Models of the ripple that are being used for onboard simulation are provided for both 3P3W and 3P4W topologies. Systems resulting from the presented design techniques comply with IEEE-519 standards and with dynamic requirements for ripple attenuation functions. Finally, two examples of stable 20 kVA 3P3W and 30 kVA 3P4W HbFPIS systems have shown the completeness of the design process. The validated capability of HFLPI to autonomously align its carrier with the LFHPI module shows that onboard simulation can be used in multiple ways. One of the main outcomes of such capability is reduced need for complex design of module interaction. This can be used to produce an autonomous HFLPI module that can operate as an add-on module to the previously non-hybrid inverter.
    The original contributions of the dissertation include the following items:
     The family of hybrid-frequency parallel inverter systems was expanded with the successful design and implementation of a 3P3W HbFPIS.
     Ripple attenuation with a more complex ripple structure was achieved and verified.
     Design that ensures stable operation, optimized ripple attenuation, and power sharing, is presented.
     The method of automatic and wireless carrier synchronization based on onboard ripple simulation and high-frequency sampling, is presented and verified in simulations and laboratory tests.
     Derived control methods, methods of interaction between modules, filter and frequency design methods ensure the output Total Harmonic Distortion performance complies with IEEE-519 standards.

    TABLE OF CONTENTS 中文摘要 i ABSTRACT iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS v TABLE OF CONTENTS vi LIST OF FIGURES ix LIST OF TABLES xiii LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS xiv CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Background and Motivation 1 1.2 Review of Previous Work 4 1.3 Dissertation Outline 10 CHAPTER 2 CONTROL ALGORITHMS FOR THE 3P4W AND 3P3W HbFPIS 13 2.1 Control Laws for the GC 3P4W and 3P3W HbFPIS 13 2.1.1 Current Controls of 3P4W HbFPIS 15 2.1.2 Current Control of 3P3W HbFPIS 18 2.2 General Inverter Side Inductor Current Ripple Models 21 2.2.1 3P4W Inverter Side Inductor Current Ripple Model 22 2.2.2 3P3W Inverter Side Inductor Current Ripple Model 23 2.2.3 Proposed 3P3W HbFPIS with a Common DC Source Ripple Model 27 2.2.4 Proposed Connection between 3P3W and 3P4W Ripple Models and Concept of Controllability 32 2.3 Automatic Synchronization Based on Ripple Simulation 33 2.3.1 Proposed Time-Domain Cross-Correlation Ripple Matching-Based Synchronization Method 36 2.4 Preprocessing Reference Command 44 2.5 Grid Disturbance Cancellation. 47 2.6 Discussion 48 CHAPTER 3 PARAMETER DESIGN FOR HbFPIS TOPOLOGIES 49 3.1 Design of Switching Frequencies 49 3.2 Filter Parameter Design 53 3.2.1 Inverter-Side Inductance Design for 3P4W HbFPIS 53 3.2.2 Proposed Inverter-Side Inductance Design for 3P3W HbFPIS with Separate DC Sources 55 3.2.3 Proposed Inverter-Side Inductance Design for 3P3W HbFPIS with Common DC Source 56 3.2.4 Permeability Drop Effect 57 3.3 Design of Power-Distribution 58 3.4 Design Examples of 3P3W HbFPIS with Separate DC Sources and 3P4W HbFPIS 60 3.5 Discussion 65 CHAPTER 4 STABILITY ANALYSIS AND CURRENT TRACKING CAPABILITY OF 3P3W AND 3P4W HBFPIS 66 4.1 Proposed Analyses of the 3P3W HbFPIS with Separate DC Sources 66 4.1.1 Current Tracking Capability Analysis 68 4.1.2 Stability Analysis 70 4.2 Analyses of the 3P4W HbFPIS 73 4.2.1 Current Tracking Capability Analysis 74 4.2.2 Stability Analysis 76 4.3 Discussion 78 CHAPTER 5 SIMULATED AND EXPERIMENTAL VERIFICATIONS OF 3P3W AND 3P4W HBFPIS 79 5.1 Practical Considerations 81 5.2 Current Tracking, Ripple Attenuation and Wireless Synchronization Simulations 87 5.3 Grid Connected System Experimental Results 93 5.4 System Stability 96 5.5 Discussion 99 CHAPTER 6 CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE RESEARCH TOPICS 100 6.1 Conclusions 100 6.2 Future Researches 101 References 103 VITA 113 PUBLICATIONS 113   LIST OF FIGURES Fig. 1.1. The grid-connected (GC) converters in the distributed generation system. 3 Fig. 1.2. Half-bridge hybrid frequency structure. 7 Fig. 1.3. Three-phase three-wire Hybrid-Frequency Parallel-Inverter Systems. 8 Fig. 2.1. System configurations of 3-phase HbFPIS. 15 Fig. 2.2. Equivalent diagram of the 3P4W inverter. 16 Fig. 2.3. Reference values for 3P4W HbFPIS module controllers for full line cycle (A), and quarter cycle(B). 18 Fig. 2.4. Equivalent diagram of the 3P3W inverter. 18 Fig. 2.5. Reference values for 3P3W HbFPIS module controllers for full line cycle (A), and quarter cycle(B). 21 Fig. 2.6. 3P4W inverter side inductor current ripple model. 22 Fig. 2.7. 3P4W inverter side inductor current ripple model. 24 Fig. 2.8. Thévenin equivalent circuits for phase-R for each voltage vector Vi. 26 Fig. 2.9. Circulating current paths. 28 Fig. 2.10. Simplified diagram of circulating current path (A) and equivalent half-bridge connection (B). 29 Fig. 2.11. Simplified diagram of LFHPI current waveform affected by circulation. 29 Fig. 2.12. Synchronization of the carriers of HFLPI and LFHPI. 35 Fig. 2.13. Connection diagram for wired synchronization 36 Fig. 2.14. Connection diagram for wired synchronization 39 Fig. 2.15. Estimated search space for 3P3W ripples at λ=8. 43 Fig. 2.16. Estimated search space for 3P4W ripples at λ=8. 44 Fig. 2.17. From top to bottom: non-inverted control, Feedforward inversion with certain model, Feedforward using inverse and feedback for uncertain model. 45 Fig. 2.18. From top to bottom: full control block diagram, and simplified control block diagram. 46 Fig. 3.1. 3P3W and 3P4W ripples canceled with the same frequency ratio. 50 Fig. 3.2. The average error of reconstruction of ripple signal in 3P3W and 3P4W inverter side inductor. 52 Fig. 3.3. The average error of reconstruction of ripple signal in 3P3W and 3P4W inverter side inductance. 61 Fig. 4.1. System configuration of the Grid-Connected 3Φ3W HbFPIS. 67 Fig. 4.2. Control block diagram of the Grid-Connected 3Φ3W HbFPIS. 68 Fig. 4.3. Bode plots of (4.2) – (4.5) with the parameters as shown in Table 4.1. 70 Fig. 4.4. Small signal equivalent model of grid-connected HbFPIS. 71 Fig. 4.5. Nyquist diagram of open loop representation of grid-connected parallel inverters ηZs. 72 Fig. 4.6. Pole-zero plots of (4.2) – (4.5) transfer functions with the parameters as shown in Table 4.1. 72 Fig. 4.7. System configuration of the Grid-Connected 3Φ3W HbFPIS. 73 Fig. 4.8. Control block diagram of the Grid-Connected 3Φ4W HbFPIS. 74 Fig. 4.9. Bode plots of (4.19) – (4.22) with the parameters as shown in Table 4.1. 75 Fig. 4.10. Nyquist diagram of open loop representation of grid-connected parallel inverters ηZs. 77 Fig. 4.11. Zoomed-on pole-zero plots of (4.19) – (4.22) transfer functions with the parameters as shown in Table 4.2. 78 Fig. 5.1. Laboratory test setup. 79 Fig. 5.2. Experimental setup of GC HbFPIS. 82 Fig. 5.3. FFT of LFHPI inverter side inductor current. 85 Fig. 5.4. LFHPI inverter side current ripples. 86 Fig. 5.5. Superimposed oscilloscope measured ripples (Blue) vs. samples by HFLPI’s controller (Black). 87 Fig. 5.6. Output Voltage and Current (A), LFHPI inverter side current ripples (B) in 3P3W 20 kW GC HbFPIS with separate dc sources. 88 Fig. 5.7. Output Voltage and Current (A), LFHPI inverter side current ripples (B) in 3P4W 30 kW GC HbFPIS. 89 Fig. 5.8. Transient of initial synchronization when local extremum of metric is approached (A), and gradual synchronization is performed (B). 90 Fig. 5.9. Synchronization under rapidly shifting carriers λ=7.974 (A), and slowly shifting carriers λ=8.0065 (B). 91 Fig. 5.10. Output Voltage and Current (A), LFHPI inverter side current ripples (B) in 30 kW 3P3W GC HbFPIS with common dc source. 92 Fig. 5.11. Measured LFHPI and HFLPI inverter side inductor currents, and their sum without (A) and with (B) ripple attenuation. 93 Fig. 5.12. Measured LFHPI and HFLPI inverter side inductor currents, and their sum without (A) and with (B) ripple attenuation. 93 Fig. 5.13. Measured grid currents and capacitor voltage (A) without (iTHD=5.78%) and (B) with (iTHD=4.27%) ripple compensation. 94 Fig. 5.14. Measured LFHPI and HFLPI inverter side inductor currents, and their sum without (A) and with (B) ripple attenuation. 94 Fig. 5.15. Measured grid currents and capacitor voltage (A) without (iTHD=5.44%) and (B) with (iTHD=3.94%) ripple compensation. 95 Fig. 5.16. Transient of initial synchronization (A), and persistent synchronization over half line-cycle (B). 96 Fig. 5.17. Step-up and -down experiment. 97 Fig. 5.18. Mode transition experiment. 97 Fig. 5.19. Step-up and -down experiment. 98 Fig. 5.20. Mode transition experiment. 98   LIST OF TABLES Table 1.1. PRICE AND VOLUME COMPARISON TABLE BETWEEN CLASSIC AND PROPOSED INVERTER 8 Table 2.1. ACTIVE VOLTAGE VECTORS AND MOMENTS OF SWITCHING BETWEEN THEM VS. SORTED ESTIMATED DUTIES 24 Table 2.2. DC-VOLTAGE TERMS VS. VOLTAGE VECTOR 27 Table 3.1. 3P3W HbFPIS SPECIFICATIONS AND FILTER DESIGN 64 Table 3.2. SYSTEM SPECIFICATIONS AND FILTER DESIGN 65 Table 4.1. SYSTEM SPECIFICATIONS AND FILTER DESIGN 67 Table 4.2. SYSTEM SPECIFICATIONS AND FILTER DESIGN 73 Table 5.1. SYSTEM SPECIFICATIONS AND FILTER DESIGN OF 3P3W HBFPIS 80 Table 5.2. SYSTEM SPECIFICATIONS AND FILTER DESIGN OF 3P4W HBFPIS 81

    [1] IEA, IRENA, UNSD, World Bank, WHO. 2023. Tracking SDG 7: The Energy Progress Report. World Bank, Washington DC. © World Bank. License: Creative Commons Attribution—NonCommercial 3.0 IGO ( CC BY-NC 3.0 IGO )..
    [2] F. Blaabjerg, Y. Yang, D. Yang, and X. Wang, "Distributed Power-Generation Systems and Protection," in Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 105, no. 7, pp. 1311-1331, July 2017, doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2017.2696878.
    [3] F. Blaabjerg, R. Teodorescu, M. Liserre, and A. V. Timbus, "Overview of Control and Grid Synchronization for Distributed Power Generation Systems," in IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 1398-1409, Oct. 2006.
    [4] M. Korkali, J. Veneman, B. Tivnan et al., “Reducing Cascading Failure Risk by Increasing Infrastructure Network Interdependence,” Sci Rep 7, 44499 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep44499
    [5] Y. Zhang, N. Gatsis and G. B. Giannakis, "Robust Energy Management for Microgrids With High-Penetration Renewables," in IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 944-953, Oct. 2013, doi: 10.1109/TSTE.2013.2255135.
    [6] E. Dall'Anese, H. Zhu and G. B. Giannakis, "Distributed Optimal Power Flow for Smart Microgrids," in IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 1464-1475, Sept. 2013, doi: 10.1109/TSG.2013.2248175.
    [7] M. Liserre, R. Teodorescu and F. Blaabjerg, "Stability of Photovoltaic and Wind Turbine Grid-Connected Inverters for a Large Set of Grid Impedance Values," in IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 263-272, Jan. 2006, doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2005.861185.
    [8] M. P. Kazmierkowski and L. Malesani, "Current Control Techniques for Three-Phase Voltage-Source PWM Converters: a Survey," in IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 691-703, Oct. 1998, doi: 10.1109/41.720325.
    [9] N. Altin, S. Ozdemir, H. Komurcugil, and I. Sefa, "Sliding-Mode Control in Natural Frame With Reduced Number of Sensors for Three-Phase Grid-Tied LCL-Interfaced Inverters," in IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 2903-2913, April 2019, doi: 10.1109/TIE.2018.2847675.
    [10] Y. A.-R. I. Mohamed and E. F. El-Saadany, "Adaptive Decentralized Droop Controller to Preserve Power Sharing Stability of Paralleled Inverters in Distributed Generation Microgrids," in IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 2806-2816, Nov. 2008, doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2008.2005100.
    [11] T. Kawabata, T. Miyashita and Y. Yamamoto, "Dead Beat Control of Three Phase PWM Inverter," in IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 21-28, Jan. 1990, doi: 10.1109/63.45996.
    [12] M. A. Hannan, Z. A. Ghani, M. M. Hoque, P. J. Ker, A. Hussain, and A. Mohamed, "Fuzzy Logic Inverter Controller in Photovoltaic Applications: Issues and Recommendations," in IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 24934-24955, 2019, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2899610.
    [13] X. Chen, Y. Zhang, S. Wang, J. Chen, and C. Gong, "Impedance-Phased Dynamic Control Method for Grid-Connected Inverters in a Weak Grid," in IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 274-283, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2016.2533563.
    [14] W. Wu, Y. He and F. Blaabjerg, "An LLCL Power Filter for Single-Phase Grid-Tied Inverter," in IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 782-789, Feb. 2012, doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2011.2161337.
    [15] A. Reznik, M. G. Simões, A. Al-Durra, and S. M. Muyeen, "LCL Filter Design and Performance Analysis for Grid-Interconnected Systems," in IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 1225-1232, March-April 2014, doi: 10.1109/TIA.2013.2274612.
    [16] R. Juntunen, J. Korhonen, T. Musikka, L. Smirnova, O. Pyrhönen, and P. Silventoinen, "Comparative Analysis of LCL-filter Designs for Paralleled Inverters," 2015 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE), Montreal, QC, Canada, 2015, pp. 2664-2672, doi: 10.1109/ECCE.2015.7310034.
    [17] T.-F. Wu, M. Misra, L.-C. Lin, and C.-W. Hsu, "An Improved Resonant Frequency Based Systematic LCL Filter Design Method for Grid-Connected Inverter," in IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 64, no. 8, pp. 6412-6421, Aug. 2017, doi: 10.1109/TIE.2017.2682004.
    [18] Y. Han et al., "Modeling and Stability Analysis of LCL -Type Grid-Connected Inverters: A Comprehensive Overview," in IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 114975-115001, 2019, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2935806.
    [19] F. Liu, J. Zhang, H. Xu, X. Zhang, W. Zhao, and M. Wang, "LCL Filter Design Based on Non-Minimum-Phase Stability Region for Grid-Connected Inverters in Weak Grid," 2017 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE), Cincinnati, OH, USA, 2017, pp. 4978-4982, doi: 10.1109/ECCE.2017.8096842.
    [20] J. L. Agorreta, M. Borrega, J. López, and L. Marroyo, "Modeling and Control of N-Paralleled Grid-Connected Inverters with LCL Filter Coupled Due to Grid Impedance in PV Plants," in IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 770-785, March 2011, doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2010.2095429.
    [21] Y. He, H. S.-H. Chung, C.-T. Lai, X. Zhang, and W. Wu, "Active Cancelation of Equivalent Grid Impedance for Improving Stability and Injected Power Quality of Grid-Connected Inverter Under Variable Grid Condition," in IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 9387-9398, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2018.2793459.
    [22] M. Rahimo et al., "Characterization of a Silicon IGBT and Silicon Carbide MOSFET Cross-Switch Hybrid," in IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 4638-4642, Sept. 2015, doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2015.2402595.
    [23] J. He, R. Katebi and N. Weise, "A Current-Dependent Switching Strategy for Si/SiC Hybrid Switch-Based Power Converters," in IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 64, no. 10, pp. 8344-8352, Oct. 2017, doi: 10.1109/TIE.2017.2708033.
    [24] Z. Li, J. Wang, Z. He, J. Yu, Y. Dai, and Z. J. Shen, "Performance Comparison of Two Hybrid Si/SiC Device Concepts," in IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 42-53, March 2020, doi: 10.1109/JESTPE.2019.2947252.
    [25] C. Zhang, X. Yuan, J. Wang, W. Chen, B. Hu, and Z. J. Shen, "Adaptive Power Sharing and Switching Frequency Control for Power Loss Optimization in WBG/Si Hybrid Half-Bridge Converters," in IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 4440-4450, April 2023, doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2022.3230747.
    [26] C. Zhang et al., "WBG and Si Hybrid Half-Bridge Power Processing Toward Optimal Efficiency, Power Quality, and Cost Tradeoff," in IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 6844-6856, June 2022, doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2021.3138464.
    [27] N. Li, M. B. Macavilca, C. Wu, S. Finney, and P. D. Judge, "Converter Topology for Megawatt Scale Applications With Reduced Filtering Requirements, Formed of IGBT Bridge Operating in the 1000 Hz Region With Parallel Part-Rated High-Frequency SiC MOSFET Bridge," in IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 799-813, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2023.3323151.
    [28] C. Zhang et al., "A New PFC Design With Interleaved MHz-Frequency GaN Auxiliary Active Filter Phase and Low-Frequency Base Power Si Phase," in IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 557-566, March 2020, doi: 10.1109/JESTPE.2019.2955960.
    [29] N. Gao, Y. Zhang, X. Wu, J. Yang, Q. Guan, and Z. Li, "A Si/SiC Hybrid Five-Level ANPC Full-Bridge DAB Converter with Dedicated Modulation Strategy," 2022 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE), Detroit, MI, USA, 2022, pp. 1-8, doi: 10.1109/ECCE50734.2022.9947930.
    [30] C. Zhang, X. Yuan, J. Wang, B. Hu, X. Yin, and Z. J. Shen, "Optimization of Power Sharing and Switching Frequency in Si/WBG Hybrid Half-Bridge Converters Using Power Loss Models," in IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 2837-2849, June 2023, doi: 10.1109/JESTPE.2022.3226196.
    [31] Q.-X. Guan et al., "An Extremely High Efficient Three-Level Active Neutral-Point-Clamped Converter Comprising SiC and Si Hybrid Power Stages," in IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 33, no. 10, pp. 8341-8352, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2017.2784821.
    [32] T.-F. Wu, Y.-H. Huang, S. Temir, and C.-C. Chan, "3Φ4W Hybrid Frequency Parallel Uninterruptable Power Supply for Reducing Voltage Distortion and Improving Dynamic Response," in IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 906-918, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1109/JESTPE.2021.3099061.
    [33] T.-F. Wu, Y.-H. Huang and Y.-T. Liu, "3Φ4W Grid-Connected Hybrid-Frequency Parallel Inverter System With Ripple Compensation to Achieve Fast Response and Low Current Distortion," in IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 68, no. 11, pp. 10890-10901, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1109/TIE.2020.3032920.
    [34] T.-F. Wu, T. Sakavov and Y.-H. Huang, "Current Ripple Compensation Algorithm for Paralleled Three-Phase Three-Wire Hybrid Frequency Inverter Systems," 2021 IEEE 12th International Symposium on Power Electronics for Distributed Generation Systems (PEDG), Chicago, IL, USA, 2021, pp. 1-5, doi: 10.1109/PEDG51384.2021.9494261.
    [35] T.-F. Wu, T. Sakavov, C.-C. Hung, and J.-Y. Chiu, "3P3W Grid-Connected Hybrid-Frequency Parallel Inverter System With Wireless Synchronization," in IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 38, no. 12, pp. 14930-14941, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2023.3311401.
    [36] J. Zhang, L. Li, D. G. Dorrell, and Y. Guo, "Modified PI Controller with Improved Steady-State Performance and Comparison with PR Controller on Direct Matrix Converters," in Chinese Journal of Electrical Engineering, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 53-66, March 2019, doi: 10.23919/CJEE.2019.000006.
    [37] E. Twining and D. G. Holmes, “Grid Current Regulation of a Three-Phase Voltage Source Inverter with an LCL Input Filter,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 888–895, May 2003
    [38] T.-F. Wu, M. Misra, Y.-Y. Jhang, Y.-H. Huang, and L.-C. Lin, "Direct Digital Control of Single-Phase Grid-Connected Inverters with LCL Filter Based on Inductance Estimation Model," in IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 1851-1862, Feb. 2019.
    [39] T.-F. Wu, L.-C. Yu, Y.-H. Huang, Y.-Y. Jhang, and B.-T. Zeng, "SPWM-Based Direct Digital Control with Average-Voltage Model and D–Σ Process for Paralleled 3Ф3W Grid-Connected Converters to Reduce Circulating Currents," in IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 66, no. 6, pp. 4436-4446, June 2019.
    [40] J. Xu, S. Xie and J. Kan, "LCL-filter Design for Grid-Connected Inverter to Suppress Grid-Induced Low-Order Current Harmonics," 2015 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE), Montreal, QC, Canada, 2015, pp. 1178-1183, doi: 10.1109/ECCE.2015.7309824.
    [41] X. Yu and A. M. Khambadkone, "Reliability Analysis and Cost Optimization of Parallel-Inverter System," in IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 59, no. 10, pp. 3881-3889, Oct. 2012, doi: 10.1109/TIE.2011.2175670.
    [42] S. Xu, W. Cao, K. Liu, S. Wang and J. Zhao, "Analysis and Control of Switching Circulating Currents in Multi-Module Parallel SPWM Converters," in IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 32637-32648, 2018, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2839757.
    [43] D. Jiang and F. Wang, "Current-Ripple Prediction for Three-Phase PWM Converters," in IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 531-538, Jan.-Feb. 2014, doi: 10.1109/TIA.2013.2270224
    [44] Q. Li, D. Jiang and Y. Zhang, "Analysis and Calculation of Current Ripple Considering Inductance Saturation and Its Application to Variable Switching Frequency PWM," in IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 34, no. 12, pp. 12262-12273, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2019.2903884.
    [45] X. Pei, W. Zhou and Y. Kang, "Analysis and Calculation of DC Link Current and Voltage Ripples for Three-Phase Inverter With Unbalanced Load," in IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 30, no. 10, pp. 5401-5412, Oct. 2015, doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2014.2375353.
    [46] D. Jiang and F. Wang, "Variable Switching Frequency PWM for Three-Phase Converters Based on Current Ripple Prediction," in IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 28, no. 11, pp. 4951-4961, Nov. 2013, doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2013.2240701.
    [47] B. B. Johnson, S. V. Dhople, A. O. Hamadeh, and P. T. Krein, "Synchronization of Parallel Single-Phase Inverters With Virtual Oscillator Control," in IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 29, no. 11, pp. 6124-6138, Nov. 2014, doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2013.2296292.
    [48] M. Sinha, F. Dörfler, B. B. Johnson, and S. V. Dhople, "Synchronization of Liénard-type Oscillators in Uniform Electrical Networks," 2016 American Control Conference (ACC), Boston, MA, USA, 2016, pp. 4311-4316, doi: 10.1109/ACC.2016.7525600.
    [49] T. Xu and F. Gao, "Global Synchronous Pulse Width Modulation of Distributed Inverters," in IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 6237-6253, Sept. 2016, doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2015.2504361.
    [50] K. Acharya, S. K. Mazumder and M. Tahir, "A Wireless-Communication Based Circulating-Current Controller for Parallel Three-Phase Inverters," 2022 IEEE 23rd Workshop on Control and Modeling for Power Electronics (COMPEL), Tel Aviv, Israel, 2022, pp. 1-8, doi: 10.1109/COMPEL53829.2022.9830029.
    [51] S. K. Mazumder, K. Acharya and M. Tahir, ""Wireless" Control of Spatially Distributed Power Electronics," Twentieth Annual IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition, 2005. APEC 2005., Austin, TX, USA, 2005, pp. 75-81 Vol. 1, doi: 10.1109/APEC.2005.1452889.
    [52] E. Heiberg, T. Ebbers, L. Wigstrom, and M. Karlsson, "Three-Dimensional Flow Characterization Using Vector Pattern Matching," in IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 313-319, July-Sept. 2003, doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2003.1207439.
    [53] A. Amir, A. Levy, and L. Reuveni (2008), The Practical Efficiency of Convolutions in Pattern Matching Algorithms. Fundam. Informaticae, 84(1), 1–15.
    [54] K. O'Shea and R. Nash (2015), An Introduction to Convolutional Neural Networks.
    [55] X. Li, L. Qu, W. Ren, C. Zhang, and S. Liu, "Controllability of the Three-Phase Inverters Based on Switched Linear System Model," 2016 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT), Taipei, Taiwan, 2016, pp. 287-292, doi: 10.1109/ICIT.2016.7474766.
    [56] C. H. Houpis, ‎S. N. Sheldon and ‎J. J. D'Azzo. (2003). Linear Control System Analysis and Design with MATLAB®, Fifth Edition, Chapter 16, Marcel Decker, Inc.
    [57] J. Sun, "Impedance-Based Stability Criterion for Grid-Connected Inverters," in IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 26, no. 11, pp. 3075-3078, Nov. 2011, doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2011.2136439.
    [58] Chang Sung Corporation, "Soft Magnetic Powder Cores," ICN, Korea, 2018.
    [59] Chang Sung Corporation, “CH740060GT”, Korea, September 2020 .
    [60] IEEE Recommended Practice and Requirements for Harmonic Control in Electric Power Systems, in IEEE Std 519-2014 (Revision of IEEE Std 519-1992), vol., no., pp.1-29, 11 June 2014.
    [61] Y.-H. Huang, "Hybrid-frequency Parallel-inverter Systems", National Tsing Hua University, Taiwan, 2021.
    [62] S. Jiang, D. Cao, F. Z. Peng, Y. Li, and J. Liu, "Low THD, Fast Transient, and Cost-Effective Synchronous-Frame Repetitive Controller for Three-Phase UPS Inverters," 2011 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition, Phoenix, AZ, USA, 2011, pp. 2819-2826, doi: 10.1109/ECCE.2011.6064148.
    [63] T.-F. Wu, C.-C. Chan, Y.-H. Chang, J.-Y. Chiu, C.-C. Hung, and T.-H. Chuang, "Grid-side Current Improvement with Direct Digital Control and Capacitor Voltage Feedforward to Mitigate Distorted Grid Currents for 3Φ3W LCL Grid-Connected Inverter under Distorted Grid Voltages," in IEEE Open Journal of Power Electronics, doi: 10.1109/OJPEL.2023.3335220.
    [64] T.-F. Wu, Y.-T. Liu, H.-Y. Wu, and K.-C. Lin, "Coupled Current Tracking Capability and Stability Analyses of 3Φ3W LCL Converter With Decoupled Control and Variable Filter Inductances," in IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 4802-4813, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.1109/JESTPE.2020.3036957.
    [65] Y.-T. Liu, "Stability Analyses of Three Phase Converters", National Tsing Hua University, Taiwan, 2022.

    QR CODE