簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 吳宜靜
Wu, Yi-Ching
論文名稱: 策略性利用組織外部知識: 以商品化能力為干擾變數
Benefiting from external knowledge: commercialization capability as a moderator
指導教授: 史欽泰
Shih, Chin-Tay
口試委員: 陳家祥
吳豐祥
袁建中
陳忠仁
洪世章
林博文
史欽泰
學位類別: 博士
Doctor
系所名稱: 科技管理學院 - 科技管理研究所
Institute of Technology Management
論文出版年: 2013
畢業學年度: 101
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 97
中文關鍵詞: 知識商業化專利交易知識所有權夥伴關係知識行銷
外文關鍵詞: knowledge commercialization, knowledge ownership, patent transaction, partnership linkage, knowledge marketing
相關次數: 點閱:4下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本論文主要探討如何策略性應用組織外部知識獲取企業利益。有關外部知識應用,過去研究大多關注在透過企業間合作關係來獲取及學習內隱性高且不易被模仿或授權使用的技術知識。不過,這也讓企業必須花費長時間在關係與信任的建立上,而無法立即提出解決方案來符合技術市場的需求。但若技術知識可以用外顯化,以明確的文字或圖示方式呈現,則可以像其他有價的有形資產一樣,以所有權方式快速地透過市場交易的機制來取得,就如同智慧財產權的概念。此外,雖然擁有大量的技術知識對公司的競爭優勢是有助益的,但若這些技術知識無法創造及實現經濟價值,則會對企業營運造成經濟負擔及成本耗損。因此,企業還必須去商業化他們的知識資源。基於此,本研究則進一步地探討技術知識所有權的市場交易模式及知識價值轉換為企業績效的機制。


    This thesis investigates how to strategically use external knowledge and thereby produce benefits. Prior studies focus on the use of inter-firm cooperation for accessing and learning knowledge that the level of tacitness is very high and unsuited to imitation or licensing. However, if technological knowledge can be articulated in an explicit form, it can work for other valuable tangible assets acquired easily from market transactions, likes IPR. Moreover, although more knowledge might be better for a firm, not all technological knowledge can create and realize economic value. Firms must commercialize their knowledge or resources. We therefore examine market transaction of knowledge ownership of technological knowledge as the form of the commercial products and services and the mechanism of translating those technological knowledge or innovative ideas into practice and improving performance.

    TABLE OF CONTENTS 謝誌 i 論文摘要 ii ABSTRACT iv TABLE OF CONTENTS vi LIST OF FIGURES viii LIST OF TABLES ix CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Background and Motive 1 1.2 Research Objectives 4 1.3 Research Procedure 5 1.3.1 The organization of this study 5 1.3.2 Research flow 6 CHAPTER II LITERATURE REVIEW AND HYPOTHESES 8 2.1 Knowledge Ownership 8 2.1.1 Firm strategies for exploring and capturing the value of knowledge ownership 10 2.1.2 New business models 14 2.2 Commercialization of Technological Knowledge 16 2.2.1 Barriers of knowledge commercialization 17 2.2.2 The relationship among technological knowledge, commercialization capability, and firm performance 19 CHAPTER III METHOLODY 33 3.1 Research Framework 33 3.2 Data Collection and Research Method of Trend Analysis 34 3.3 Sampling and Research Method of Empirical Analysis 38 CHAPTER IV RESEARCH RESULTS 43 4.1 Trends and Patterns in Patent Transactions 43 4.1.1 Overall trends of traded patents 44 .4.1.2 Comparisons between traded and non-traded patents from the viewpoint of technology 51 4.1.3 The typical business models of patent transactions 58 4.2 Technological Knowledge, Commercialization Capability, and firm performance 71 4.2.1 Correlation and descriptive statistics 72 4.2.2 Regression model 73 CHAPTER V CONCLUSION 76 5.1 Discussions and Conclusion 76 5.2 Managerial Implication 81 5.3 Limitations and Future Direction 82 REFERENCES 84

    Acemoglu, D., Aghion, P., Lelarge, C., Van Reenen, J., and Zilibotti, F., 2007. Technology, information and the decentralization of the firm. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122: 1759–1800.
    Ahuja, G., 2000. Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45: 425–455.
    Almeida, P., Song, J., and Grant, R.M., 2002. Are firms superior to alliances and markets? An empirical test of cross–border knowledge building. Organization Science, 13: 147–161.
    Andrade, G., M. Mitchell, and Stafford, E., 2001. New evidence and perspectives on mergers. Journal of Economic Perspectives 15: 103–20.
    Ang, J., Cheng, Y., and Wu, C., 2009. Does Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights Matter? Evidence form Financing and Investment Choices in the High Tech Industry. Working Paper. Florida State University: Tallahassee.
    Anokhin, S., Wincent, J., and Frishmmar, J., 2010. A conceptual framework for misfit technology commercialization. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 78: 1060-1071.
    Arora, A., Fosfuri, A., and Gambardella, A., 2001. Markets for Technology: The Economics of Innovation and Corporate Strategy. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
    Arora, A., Belenzon, S., and Rios, L.A., 2011. The Organization of R&D in American Corporations: The Determinants and Consequences of Decentralization. NBER Working Papers 17013, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    Arora, A., and Gambardella, A., 1994. Evaluating technological information and utilizing it: Scientific knowledge, technological capability, and external linkages in biotechnology. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 24: 91–114.
    Badaracco, J.L., 1991. The Knowledge Link. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
    Barney, J., 1986. Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck, and business strategy. Management Science, 32(10): 1231–1241.
    Barney, J. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17: 99–120.
    Belenzon, S., Berkovitz, T., and Bolton, P., 2010. Intracompany governance and Innovation. Working Paper No. 15304, NBER, Cambridge, MA.
    Benassi, M., and Di Minin, A., 2009. Playing in between: Patent brokers in markets for technology. R&D Management, 39(1): 68–86.
    Benner, M. J., and Tushman, M., 2002. Process management and technological innovation: A longitudinal study of the photography and paint industries. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47: 676–706.
    Bidault, F., 1989. Technology Pricing: From Principles to Strategy. St Martin’s Press, New York.
    Blind, K., Cremers, K., and Mueller, E., 2009. The influence of strategic patenting on companies' patent portfolios. Research Policy, 38: 428–436.
    Bolton, P., and Dewatripont, M., 1994. The firm as a communication network. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109: 809–839.
    Bognnor, W.C., and Bansal, P., 2007. Knowledge management as the basis of sustained high performance. Journal of Management Studies, 44: 165–188.
    Borg, A.E., 2001. Knowledge, information and intellectual property: Implications for marketing relationships. Technovation, 21(8): 515–524.
    Bröring, S., and Leker, J., 2007. Industry convergence and its implications for the front end of innovation: A problem of absorptive capacity. Creativity and Innovation Management, 16(2): 165–175.
    Burgelman, R.A., Christensen, C., and Wheelwright, S., 1996. Strategic management of technology and innovation (2nd Eds.). Irwin Mc-Graw-Hill., Boston.
    Burgelman, R.A., and Grove, A.S., 1996. Strategic Dissonance. California Management Review, 38(2): 8-28.
    Burgelman, R.A., and Grove, A.S., 2012. Strategic Dynamics: Three key Themes. Research Paper No.2096, Stanford Graduate School of Business.
    Ceccagnoli M., 2009. Appropriability, preemption, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30: 81–98.
    Chang, T., 1996. Cultivating global experience curve advantage on technology and marketing capabilities. International Marketing Review, 13 (6):22–42.
    Chen, Y.-S., and Chang, K.-C., 2010. The relationship between a firm's patent quality and its market value-The case of US pharmaceutical industry. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 77: 20–33.
    Chesbrough, H.W., 2003. Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
    Chesbrough, H.W., 2006. Open Business Model: How to Thrive in the New Innovation Landscape. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
    Chesbrough, H.W., 2007. Why Companies Should Have Open Business Models. MIT Sloan Management Review, 48 (2): 22–28.
    Chesbrough, H.W., and Appleyard, M.M., 2007. Open Innovation and Strategy. California Management Review, 50(1): 57–76.
    Chesbrough, H.W., and Crowther, K.A., 2006. Beyond high tech: Early adopters of open innovation in other industries. R&D Management, 36(3): 229–236.
    Chesbrough, H.W., and Di Minin, A., 2005. Technology souring and the management of intellectual property rights: Evidence from patent reassignment. Working paper. Haas School of Business, Center for Open Innovation, UC Berkeley.
    Chesbrough, H.W., and Rosenbloom, R.S., 2002. The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: Evidence from Xerox Corporation’s technology spinoff companies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(3): 529–556.
    Chesbrough, H.W., and Schwartz, K., 2007. Innovating business models with co-development partnerships. Research Technology Management, 50: 55–59.
    Chiesa, V., Gilardoni, E., and Manzini, R., 2003.The valuation of technology in buy-cooperate-sell decisions. Proceedings of the R&D Management Conference, Manchester, 1–11.
    Christensen, J.F., Olesen, M.H., and Kjaer, J.S., 2005. The industrial dynamics of open innovation-evidence from the transformation of consumer electronics. Research Policy, 34: 1533–49.
    Chung, K.H., and Pruitt, S.W., 1994. A simple approximation of Tobin’s Q. Financial Management, 23: 70–74
    Cohen, W.M., and Levinthal, D.A., 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 128–152.
    Collins, C.J., and Clark, K.D., 2003. Strategic human resource practices, top management team social networks, and firm performance: the role of human resource in creating organizational competitive advantage. Academic Management Journal, 46(6): 740–751.
    Cooper, G., 2000. Strategic marketing planning for radically new products. Journal of Marketing, 64: 1–16.
    Cooper R.G., and Kleinschmidt, E.J., 1990. New product success factors: a comparison of kills versus success and failures. R&D Management, 20: 168–84.
    Das, S., Sen, P.K., and Sengupta, S., 1998. Impact of strategic alliances on firm valuation. Academy of Management Journal, 41: 27–41.
    Das, T.K., and Teng, B.S., 2000. A resource-based theory of strategic alliances. Journal of Management, 26(1): 31–61.
    Day, G.S., 1994. The capabilities of market-driven organizations. Journal of Marketing, 58: 37–52.
    De Carolis, D.M., and Deeds, D.L., 1999. The impact of stocks and flows of organizational knowledge on firm performance: an empirical investigation of the biotechnology industry. Strategic Management Journal, 20: 953–968.
    DeLorme, R., 1998. Property Rights and Innovations: The Choice of Contract Form in R&D. Doctoral Dissertation. Simon Fraser University, Ottawa, Canada.
    Ding, X., and Huang, R., 2010. Effects of knowledge spillover on inter-organizational resource sharing decision in collaborative knowledge creation. European Journal of Operational Research, 201: 949–959.
    Dyer J.H., Singh H., 1998. The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of inter-organizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23: 660–697.
    Emden, Z., Calantone, R.J., and Droge, C., 2006. Collaborating for new product development: Selecting the partner with maximum potential to create value. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23: 330–41.
    Encaoua, D., Guellec, D., and Mart´ınez, C., 2006. Patent systems for encouraging innovation: Lessons from economic analysis. Research Policy, 35: 1423–1440.
    Enkel, E., Kausch, C., and Gassmann, O., 2005. Managing the risk of customer integration. European Management Journal, 33: 203–13.
    Erickson, G., and Jacobson, R., 1992. Gaining comparative advantage through discretionary expenditures: The returns to R&D and advertising. Management Science, 38: 1264-1279.
    Fontana R., Geuna A., and Matt M., 2006. Factors affecting university-industry R&D projects: The importance of researching, screening and signaling. Research Policy, 35: 309–323.
    Frishammar, J., Lichtenthaler, U., and Rundquist, J., 2012. Identify technology commercialization opportunities: The important of integrating product development knowledge. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29: 573–589.
    Fosfuri, A., 2006. The licensing dilemma: Understanding the determinants of the rate of technology licensing. Strategic Management Journal, 27(12): 1141–1158.
    Gambardella, A., and Torrisi, S., 1998. Does technological convergence imply convergence in markets? Evidence from the electronics industry. Research Policy, 27: 445–463.
    Gambardella, A., Giuri, P., and Luzzi, A., 2007. The market for patents in Europe. Research Policy, 36(8): 1163–1183.
    Garcia R., Calantone, R., and Levine, R., 2003. The role of knowledge in resource allocation to exploration versus exploitation in technologically oriented organizations. Decision Science,34(2):323–49.
    Gilsing, V., Nooteboom B., Vanhaverbeke W., Duysters G., and van den Oord, A., 2008. Network embeddedness and the exploration of novel technologies: Technological distance, betweenness centrality and density. Research Policy, 37: 1717–1731.
    Grant, R.M., 1996. Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organization Science, 7: 375–387.
    Greenstein, S., and Khanna, T., 1997. What does industry convergence mean? In Yoffie, D. (ed.), Competing in the Age of Digital Convergence. Harvard University Press, Boston, 201-226.
    Greve, H.R., 2003. Investment and the behavioral theory of the firm: Evidence from shipbuilding. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12: 1051–1076.
    Griffin A., and Hauser, J.R., 1996. Integrating R&D and marketing: A review and analysis of the literature. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 13: 191–215.
    Griliches, Z., 1990. Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 28: 1661–1707.
    Grove, A.S., 1997. Only the paranoid survive: How to exploit the crisis points that challenge every company. Bantam Dell Pub Group, Maryland.
    Gulati, R., 1999. Network location and learning: the influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal, 20: 397–420.
    Hagedoorn, J., 2003. Sharing intellectual property rights-An exploratory study of joint patenting amongst companies. Industrial Corporate Change, 12: 1035–1050.
    Hagedoorn, J. and Duysters, G., 2002. Learning in dynamic inter-firm networks-The efficacy of quasi-redundant contacts. Organization Studies, 23: 525–548.
    Hall, B.H., Jaffe, A.B., and Tratjenberg, M., 2001. The NBER patent citation data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools. Working Paper no. 8498. NBER, Cambridge, MA.
    Hall, B.H., and Ziedonis, R.H., 2001. The patent paradox revisited: An empirical study of patenting in the U.S. semiconductor industry, 1979–1995. RAND Journal of Economics, 32: 101–128.
    Harhoff, D., Scherer, F.M., and Vopel, K., 2003. Citations, family size, opposition and the value of patent rights. Research Policy, 32: 1343–1363.
    Henderson, R., and Cockburn, I., 1994. Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strategic Management Journal, 15: 63–84.
    Henkel, J., and Reitzig, M., 2008. Big picture-patent sharks. Harvard Business Review, 86 (1): 129–133.
    Hitt, M., Hoskisson, R., Ireland, R., and Harrison, J., 1991. Effects of acquisitions on R&D inputs and outputs. Academic Management Journal, 34: 693–706.
    Huizingh, E.K.R.E., 2011. Open innovation: State of the art and future perspectives. Technovation, 21: 2–9.
    Inkpen, A., 2000. Learning through joint ventures: a framework of knowledge acquisition. Journal of Management Studies, 37 (7), 1019–1043.
    Inkpen, A., and Dinur, A., 1998. Knowledge management processes and international joint ventures. Organization Science, 454–468.
    Jolly, V.K., 1997. Commercializing new technologies. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
    Jose, M.L., Lancaster, C., Stevens, J.L., and Jennings, J.A., 1996. Stability of excellence: revealed patterns in Tobin's Q-ratios. Journal of Applied Business Research, 12: 83–94.
    Kogut, B., 1988. Joint ventures: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. Strategic Management Journal, 9: 319–332.
    Koruna, S., 2004. External technology commercialization-policy guidelines. International Journal of Technology Management, 27: 241–254.
    Griliches, Z., 1990. Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 28: 1661–1707.
    Lado A.A., and Wilson, M.C., 1994. Human resource systems and sustained competitive advantage: a competency based perspective. Academy of Management Review, 19: 699–727.
    Lamoreaux, N.R., and Sokoloff, K.L., 1999. Inventive activity and the market for technology in the United States, 1840–1920. Working Paper No. 7107. NBER, Cambridge, MA.
    Levinthal, D., and March, J.G., 1993. The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14: 95–112.
    Lichtenthaler, U., 2009a. The role of corporate technology strategy and patent portfolios in low-, medium- and high-technology firms. Research Policy, 38: 559–569.
    Lichtenthaler, U., 2009b. Outbound open innovation and its effect on firm performance: Examining environmental influences. R&D Management, 39(4): 317–330.
    Lichtenthaler, U., 2008. Externally commercializing technology assets: An examination of different process stages. Journal of Business Venturing, 23: 445–464.
    Lichtenthaler, U., 2005. External commercialization of knowledge: Review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 7: 231–255.
    Lichtenthaler, U., and Ernst, H., 2009. The role of champions in the external commercialization of knowledge. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26: 371–87.
    Lin, B.-W., 2003. Technology transfer as technological learning: A source of competitive advantage for firms with limited R&D resources. R&D Management, 33: 327–41.
    Lin, B.-W., Lee, Y., and Hung, S.-C., 2006. R&D intensity and commercialization orientation effects on financial performance. Journal of Business Research, 59: 679–685.
    Lin, B.-W., Chen, C.-J., and Wu, H.-L., 2006. Patent portfolio diversity, technology strategy, and firm value. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 53: 17–26.
    Lin, B.-W., and Chen, J.-S., 2005. Corporate technology portfolios and R&D performance measures: A study of technology intensive firms. R&D management, 35: 153–166.
    Lin, B.-W., and Wu, C.-H., 2010. How does knowledge depth moderate the performance of internal and external knowledge sourcing strategies? Technovation, 30: 582–589.
    Lindenberg, E.B., and Ross, S.A., 1981. Tobin’s Q ratio and industrial organization. Journal of Business, 54: 1–32.
    Lockett, A., and Wright, M., 2005. Resources, capabilities, risk capital and the creation of university spin-off companies. Research Policy, 34: 1043–1057.
    Ma, Z., and Lee, Y., 2008. Patent application and technological collaboration in inventive activities: 1980–2005. Technovation, 28: 379–390.
    Mahoney, J.T., 1995. The management of resources and the resource of management. Journal of Business Research, 33: 91–101.
    March, J.G., 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2: 71–87.
    McConnachie, G., 1997. The management of Intellectual Assets. Journal of Knowledge Management, 1(1): 56-62.
    McGuire, J., and Dow, S., 2003.The persistence and implications of Japanese keiretsu organization. Journal of International Business Studies, 34: 374–388.
    Milgrom, P., and Roberts, J., 1990. The economics of modern manufacturing: technology, strategy and organization. America Economic Review, 80: 511–528.
    Miller, D.J., 2004. Firms’ technological resources and the performance effects of diversification: a longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal, 25: 1097–1119.
    Miotti, L., and Sachwald, F., 2003. Co-operative R&D: Why and with whom? An integrated framework of analysis. Research Policy, 32(8): 1481–1499.
    Moorman, C., and Slotegraaf, R.J., 1999. The contingency value of complementary capabilities in product development. Journal of Marking Research, 36: 239–257.
    Mowery, D., Oxley, J., and Silverman, B., 1996. Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 77–91.
    Mowery, D., and Rosenberg, N., 1989, Technology and the pursuit of economic growth. Cambridge Univisity Press, London, UK.
    Nambisan, S., and Sawhney, M., 2007. A buyer's guide to the innovation bazaar. Harvard Business Review, 85(6): 109–118.
    Nerkar, A., and Shane, S., 2007. Determinants of invention commercialization: An empirical examination of academically sourced inventions. Strategic Management Journal, 28: 155–1166.
    Nevens, T.M., Summe, G.L., and Uttal, B., 1990. Commercializing technology: What the best companies do. Harvard Business Review, 68(3): 154–163.
    Nohria, N., and Garcia-Pont, C., 1991. Global strategic linkages and industry structure. Strategic Management Journal, 12: 105–124.
    Nonaka, I., and Takeuchi, H., 1995. The knowledge creating company. Oxford University Press, New York.
    O’Brien, J., 2003. The capital structure implications of pursuing a strategy of innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 24: 415–431.
    OECD, 2008. Open Innovation in Global Networks. OECD Publishing, Paris, France.
    Oxford Analytica, 2009. International: Global Patent Market is Growing. Oxford Analytica Daily Brief Service, Oxford. June, 29.
    Oxley, J., and Sampson R., 2004. The scope and governance of international R&D alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 25(August–September Special Issue): 723–749.
    Perez-Bustamante, G., 1999. Knowledge management in agile innovative organisations. Journal of Knowledge Management, 3: 6–17.
    Peteraf, M.A., 1993. The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14(3): 179–191.
    Pfeffer, J., and Nowak, P., 1976. Joint ventures and interorganizational interdependence. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21: 398–418.
    Polanyi, M., 1958. Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
    Pourezzat, A.A., and Heydari, E., 2011. Using Q-methodology to study the challenges and barrier of knowledge commercialization: A case study in University of Tehran. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, 41: 73–83.
    Powell, W., Koput, K.W., and Smith-Doerr, L., 1996. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 116–146.
    Prahalad, C.K., and Hamel, G., 1990. The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68: 79–91.
    Reed, R., and DeFillippi, R.J., 1990. Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation, and sustainable competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 15: 88–102.
    Reitzig, M., 2004. The private values of “Thickets” and “Fences”-Towards and updated picture of the use of patents across industries. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 13: 457–476.
    Reitzig, M., Henkel, J., and Heath, C., 2007. On sharks, trolls, and their patent prey-Unrealistic damage awards and firms strategies of being infringed. Research Policy, 36: 134–154.
    Reitzig, M., Henkel, J., and Schneider, F., 2010. Collateral damage for R&D manufacturers: How patent sharks operate in markets for technology. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19: 947–967.
    Richardson, G.B., 1972. The organization of industry. The Economic Journal, 82(127): 883–896.
    Rivette, K.G., and Kline, D., 2000. Rembrandts in the Attic: Unlocking the Hidden Value of Patents. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Mass.
    Romijn, H., and Albaladejo, M., 2002. Determinants of innovation capability in small electronics and software firms in southeast England. Research Policy, 31: 1053–1067.
    Rothaermel, F., 2001. Incumbent’s advantage through exploring complementary assets via interfirm cooperation. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 687–699.
    Rothaermel, F., and Deeds, D., 2004. Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology: A system of new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 25: 201–221.
    Rumelt, R.P., 1984. Toward a strategic theory of the firm. In R. B. Lamb (Ed.), Competitive Strategic Management. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 556–570.
    Serrano, C.J., 2006. The Market for Intellectual Property: Evidence from the Transfer of Patents. Doctoral dissertation. University of Minnesota, Minnesota.
    Serrano, C.J., 2007. Technology transfer and the business cycle: Evidence from patent reassignments. Working paper, University of Toronto, Canada.
    Shan, W., Walker, G., and Kogut, B., 1994. Interfirm cooperation and startup innovation in the biotechnology industry. Strategic Management Journal, 15: 387– 394.
    Singh, J., 1986. Performance, slack, and risk taking in organizational decision making. Academy of Management Journal, 29: 562–585.
    Skyrme, D.J. (2003) Commercialization: the new phase of knowledge management. In Holsapple, C.W. (ed.), Handbook on knowledge management. Springer, New York , 639–654.
    Sorenson, O., Rivkin, J.W., and Fleming, L., 2006. Complexity, networks and knowledge flow. Research Policy, 35: 994–1033.
    Spender, J.C., 1996. Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17 (Winter Special Issue): 45–62.
    Stuart, T.E., 2000. Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: A study of growth and innovation rates in a high-technology industry. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 791–811.
    Svensson, R., 2007. Commercialization of patents and external financing during the R&D phase. Research Policy, 36: 1052–1069.
    Tan, J., and Peng, M., 2003. Organizational slack and firm performance during economic transitions: Two studies from an emerging economy. Strategic Management Journal, 24: 1249–1264.
    Teece, D.J., 1981. The market for know-how and the efficient international transfer of technology. Annals of the Academy of Political and Social Science, 458, 81–96.
    Teece, D.J., 1998. Capturing value from knowledge assets: The new economy, markets for know-how, and intangible assets. California Management Review, 40(3): 55–79.
    Teece, D., Pisano, G., and Shuen, A., 1997. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18 (7): 509–533.
    Thursby, J., Fuller, A.W. and Thursby, M., 2009. US faculty patenting: Inside and outside the university. Research Policy, 38: 14–25.
    Trajtenberg, M., Jaffe, A., and Henderson, R., 1997. University versus corporate patents: A window on the basicness of invention. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 5: 19–50.
    Tsai, K.-H., and Wang, J.-C., 2008. External technology acquisition and firm performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(1): 91–112.
    Tseng, C.-Y., 2009. Technological innovation and knowledge network in Asia: Evidence from comparison of information and communication technologies among six countries. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 76: 654–663.
    Van Wijk, R., Jansen, J.J.P., and Lyles, M.A., 2008. Inter- and intra-organizational knowledge transfer: A meta-analytic review and assessment of its antecedents and consequences. The Journal of Management Studies, 45: 830–853.
    Vanhaverbeke, W., Duysters, G., and Noorderhaven, N., 2002. External technology sourcing through alliances or acquisitions: An analysis of the application-specific integrated circuits industry. Organization Science, 13: 714–733.
    Vanhaverbeke, W., Beerkens, B., and Duysters, G., 2004. Explorative and exploitative learning strategies in technology-based alliance networks. Academy of Management Best Conference Paper. TIM, pp. J1–J6.
    Wang, B., 2005. Intellectual property management and value-added strategy of the Industrial Technology Research Institute. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 10: 376–381.
    Wernerfelt, B., 1984. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5: 171-180.
    Wright, P.M., Dunford, B.B., and Snell, S.A., 2001. Human resources and the resource-based view of the firm. Journal of Management, 27(6): 701–21.
    Wind, Y., 2005. Marketing as an engine of business growth: A cross-functional perspective. Journal of Business Research, 58: 863–873.
    Yiu, D., and Makino, S., 2002. The choice between joint venture and wholly owned subsidiary: An institutional perspective. Organization Science, 13: 667–683.
    Youndt, M.A., Snell, S.A., Dean, J.W., and Lepak, D., 1996. Human resource management, manufacturing strategy, and firm performance. The Academy of Management Journal, 39: 836–866.
    Yuan, B., 2004. The change of strategy for technology transfer in Taiwan-An ITRI case. The 13th International Conference on Management of Technology, (IAMOT 2004), Washington D.C..
    Zahra, S.A., and Hayton, J.C., 2008. The effect of international venturing on firm performance: The moderating influence of absorptive capability. Journal of Business Venturing, 23: 195–220.
    Zahra, S.A., and Nielsen, A.P., 2002. Sources of capabilities, integration and technology commercialization, Strategic Management Journal, 23: 377–397.
    Ziedonis, H.R., 2004. Don't fence me in: Fragmented markets for technology and the patent acquisition strategies of firms. Management Science, 50: 804–820.

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校內網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)

    QR CODE