研究生: |
楊茨茵 Yang, Tzu-yin |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
Effects of Chinese Transliteration Systems on English Literacy Learning 中文音譯系統對英文讀寫能力影響之研究 |
指導教授: |
蘇怡如
Su, I-ru |
口試委員: | |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
人文社會學院 - 外國語文學系 Foreign Languages and Literature |
論文出版年: | 2009 |
畢業學年度: | 97 |
語文別: | 英文 |
論文頁數: | 80 |
中文關鍵詞: | 音韻覺識 、中文音譯系統 、注音符號 |
外文關鍵詞: | phonological awareness, Chinese transliteration system, Zhuyin Fuhao |
相關次數: | 點閱:3 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
過去的文獻顯示對於以英文為外語或是第二語言的中國學習者來說,學習者以音素為基礎的「拼音」經驗可以幫助他們發展位於音素階層的音韻覺識,而這樣子的能力可以正向轉移至學習者英文讀寫能力的學習。然而,對於以英文為外語的台灣學習者而言,我們仍不清楚學習者早期「注音符號」的經驗是否能夠幫助他們發展學習英文拼讀所必須的音韻覺識,並且幫助他們英文讀寫能力的學習。為了回答這項問題,本篇研究採用了Holm及Dodd (1996)的研究方法,旨在比較台灣學生是否與中國以及香港的學生在音韻覺識與英文讀寫能力方面有所差異。十位以英文為外語的台灣大學生參與了這項研究。所有的受試者皆接受了一連串音韻覺識測驗、英語非字拼讀測驗以及英語非字拼寫測驗。
研究結果顯示在音素階層的音韻覺識測驗中,台灣學生表現的比大陸的學生差,但表現的比香港的學生好。然而,在首音/尾韻階層的音韻覺識測驗中,台灣學生與大陸學生的表現並無顯著性差異,且這兩組學生皆表現的比香港的學生好。在英文非字讀寫測驗中,台灣學生在拼讀高頻率尾韻非字的表現與大陸學生無顯著性差異,且這兩組學生皆表現的比香港學生好。然而,在低頻率尾韻非字拼讀測驗以及非字拼寫測驗中,台灣學生表現的比大陸的學生差,但表現的比香港的學生好。本研究結果發現: (一)台灣學生注音符號的經驗可以幫助他們發展次音節階層的音韻覺識,但是首音/尾韻覺識提升的效果比音素覺識的效果佳;(二) 注音符號可以幫助學習者英文讀寫能力的學習,但其效果並沒有拼音來的好。
In the literature, it was found that China ESL or EFL learners’ experience with phoneme-based Pinyin would help learners develop phonological awareness at the phonemic level, and this skill could be positively transferred to learners’ English literacy acquisition. However, it still remains unclear whether Taiwan EFL learners’ early experience with Zhuyin Fuhao would help them develop phonological awareness that is required in reading and spelling English and facilitate their English literacy acquisition. The present research followed the methodology of Holm and Dodd’s study (1996) in order to examine whether Taiwan EFL learners differ from learners from China and Hong Kong in English phonological awareness skills and English literacy skills as measured by word reading and spelling. 10 Taiwan EFL learners at the college level participated in this study. All of the participants took a battery of phonological awareness tasks, a non-word reading task, and a non-word spelling task.
Results of the study showed that in the phonological awareness tasks aiming at the phonemic level, Taiwan learners performed worse than the China learners but better than the Hong Kong learners; however, in the phonological awareness task aiming at the onset-rime level, no significant difference was found between Taiwan and China groups, and both of them outperformed the Hong Kong group. In the English literacy tasks, it was found that in the reading task of non-words with high-frequency rimes, no significant difference was found between Taiwan and China groups, and both of them outperformed the Hong Kong group, while in the reading task of non-words with low-frequency rimes and non-word spelling task, Taiwan learners performed significantly worse than the China group but better than the Hong Kong group. The results of the study provide evidence that Taiwan EFL learners’ experience with Zhuyin Fuhao did help them develop phonological awareness at the sub-syllabic level, though the phonological awareness was enhanced more at the onset-rime level than at the phonemic level, and that Zhuyin Fuhao did facilitate English literacy learning, though not as well as Pinyin did.
Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Akamatsu, N. (1999). The effects of first language orthographic features on word recognition processing in English as a second language. Reading and Writing: an Interdisciplinary Journal, 11, 381-403.
Ashmore, R. A., Farrier, M. J., Paulson, L. H., & Chu, X. (2003). The effects of phonemic awareness drills on phonological awareness and word reading performance in the later learned alphabetic script, Reading Improvement, 40, 33-47.
Ball, E. W., & Blachman, B. A. (1991). Does phoneme awareness training in kindergarten make a difference in early word recognition & developmental spelling? Reading Research Quarterly, 25, 49-66.
Bertelson, P., Chen, H. C., & De Gelder, B. (1997). Explicit speech analysis and orthographic experience in Chinese readers. In H. C. Chen (Ed.), Cognitive processing of Chinese and related Asian language (pp.27-46). Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.
Bowey J. A. ,& Francis J. (1991), Phonological analysis as a function of age and exposure to reading instruction. Applied Psycholinguistics,12, 91–121.
Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. E. (1991). Phonological skills before and after learning to read. In S. A. Brady D. P. & Shankweiler (Eds.), Phonological processes in literacy: A tribute to Isabelle Y. Lieberman (pp. 37-45). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Brown, T. L., & Haynes, M. (1985). Literacy background and reading development in a second language. In T. H. Carr (Ed.), The development of reading skills (pp. 19–34). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Chen, J., & Yuen, C. (1991). Effects of pinyin and script type on verbal processing: Comparisons of China, Taiwan, and Hong Kong experience. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 14, 429-448.
Cheung, H. (2003). Pinyin and phonotactics affect the development of phonemic awareness in English-Cantonese bilinguals. In C. McBride-Chang, & H. C. Chen (Eds.), Reading development in Chinese children (pp. 229- 239). Westport, CT: Praeger.
Cheung, H., Chen, H. C., Lai, C. Y., Wong, O. C., & Hill, M. (2001). The development of phonological awareness: Effects of spoken language experience and orthography. Cognition, 81, 227–241.
Chomsky, N., & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.
De Francis, J. (1989). Visible speech: The diverse oneness of writing systems. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Dodd, B., Sprainger, N., & Oerlemans, M. (1989). The phonological skills of spelling disordered children. Reading and Writing: an Interdisciplinary Journal, 1, 333-355.
Ehri, L. C., & Wilce, L. S. (1980). The influence of orthography on readers' conceptualization of the phonemic structure of words. Applied Psycholinguistics, 1, 371-385.
Geva, E., & Siegel, L. S. (2000). Orthographic and cognitive factors in the concurrent development of basic reading skill in two languages. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 1-30.
Goswami, U. (1990). A special link between rhyming skills and the use of orthographic analogies by beginning readers. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 31, 301-311.
Goswami, U. (1993). Towards an interactive analogy theory of reading development : decoding bowel sounds in early reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 56 , 443–475.
Goswami, U. (2002). In the beginning was the rhyme? A reflection on Hulme, Hatcher, Nation, Brown, Adams and Stuart (2002). Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 82, 47-57.
Goswami, U., & Bryant, P. (1990). Phonological skills and learning to read. London: Erlbaum.
Goswami, U., & Mead, F. (1992). Onset and rime awareness and analogies in reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 152–162.
Goswami, U., Ziegler, J., Dalton, L., & Schneider, W. (2001). Pseudohomophone effects and phonological recoding procedures in reading development in English and German. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 648-664.
Hamada, M., & Koda, K. (2008). Influence of first language orthographic experience on second language decoding and word learning. Language Learning, 58(1), 1-31.
Hayashi, M. M., Ulatowska, H. K., & Sasanuma, S. (1985). Subcortical aphasia with deep dyslexia: a case study of a Japanese patient. Brain & Language, 25, 293-313.
Hempenstall, K. (1997). The role of phonemic awareness in beginning reading: A review. Behaviour Change, 14(4), 201-14
Ho, C. S. H., & Bryant, P. (1997). Development of phonological awareness of Chinese children in Hong Kong. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 26, 109-126.
Holm, A., & Dodd, B. (1996). The effect of first written language on the acquisition of English literacy. Cognition, 59, 119-147.
Hu, C. F., & Catts, H. W. (1998). The role of phonological processing in early reading ability: What we can learn from Chinese? Scientific Studies of Reading, 2, 55-79.
Huang, H. S., & Hanley, J. R. (1995). Phonological awareness and visual skills in learning to read Chinese and English. Cognition, 54, 73-98.
Huang, H. S., & Hanley, J. R. (1997). A longitudinal study of phonological awareness, visual skills, and Chinese reading acquisition among first-graders in Taiwan. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 20, 249-268.
Hulme, C., Hatcher, P. J., Nation, K., Brown, A., Adams, J., & Stuart, G. (2002). Phoneme awareness is a better predictor of early reading skill than onset–rime awareness. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 82, 2–28.
Jackson, N. E., Lu, W-H., & Ju, D. (1994). Reading Chinese and reading English: Similarities, differences and second-language reading. In V. W. Berninger (Ed.), The varieties of orthographic knowledge. I: Theoretical and developmental issues (pp. 73–109). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Ju, D., & Jackson, N. E. (1995). Graphic and Phonological Processing in Chinese Character Identification. Journal of Reading Behavior, 27(3), 299-313.
Katz, L., & Frost, R. (1992). The reading process is different for different orthographies: The orthographic depth hypothesis. In Frost, R. & Katz, L., (Eds.), Orthography, Phonology, Morphology, and Meaning (pp. 67-84). Amsterdam: Elsevier North Holland Press.
Kirtley, C., Bryant, P., MacLean, M., & Bradley, L. (1989). Rhyme, rime, and the onset of reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 48, 224-245.
Ko, H. & Lee J. R. (1997). Chinese children phonological awareness ability and later reading ability- A longitudinal study. Journal of National Chung Cheng University, 7, 49-66.
Koda, K. (1988). Cognitive process in second language reading: transfer of L1 reading skills and strategies. Second Language Research, 4, 133-156.
Koda, K. (1998). The role of phonemic awareness in second language reading. Second Language Research, 14, 194-215.
Koda, K. (2005). Insights into Second Language Reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
Kuo, C. C. (2006). Phonetic and phonological background of Chinese spoken languages. In C. H. Lee., H. Li, L. S. Lee, R. H. Wang, & Q. Huo (Eds), Advances in Chinese spoken language processing (pp. 33-55) USA: World Scientific.
Lazo, M. G., Pumfrey, P. D., & Peers, L. (1997). Metalinguistic awareness, reading and spelling: roots and branches of literacy. Journal of Research in Reading, 20(2), 85-104.
Leck, K. J., Weekes, B. S., & Chen, M. J. (1995). Visual and phonological pathways to the lexicon: Evidence from Chinese readers: Memory and Cognition, 21, 468-476.
Leong, C. K., Cheng, P. W., & Tan, L. H. (2005). The Role of Sensitivity to Rhymes, Phonemes and Tones in Reading English and Chinese Pseudowords. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 18, 1-26.
Leong, C. K., Tan, L. H., Cheng, P. W., & Hau, K. T. (2005). Learning to Read and Spell English Words by Chinese Students. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9(1), 63-84.
Lesaux, N. K., & Siegel, L. S. (2003). The development of reading in children who speak English as a second language. Developmental Psychology, 39 (6), 1005-1019.
Lieberman, I., Shankweiler, D., Fischer, F.W., & and Carter,B. (1974). Reading and the awareness of linguistic segments. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 18, 201-212.
Lin, A. M., & Akamatsu, N. (1997). The learnability and psychological processing of reading in Chinese and reading in English. In H. C. Chen (Ed.). Cognitive processing of Chinese and related Asian language (pp.369-387). Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.
Lin, Y. & Kuo, F. (2001). The effect of two instructional methods in teaching pronunciation to EFL adult learners in Taiwan: a case study. Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on English Teaching & Learning in the Republic of China (pp.186-201). Taipei: Crane.
Mann, V. A. (1985). A cross-linguistic perspective on the relation between temporary memory skills and early reading ability. Remedial and Special Education, 6(6), 37-42.
Mattingly, I. G. (1992). Linguistic awareness and orthographic form. In R. Frost & L.
Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology and meaning (pp. 11–26). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
McBride -Chang, C., Bialystok, E., Chong, K. K. Y., & Li, Y. (2004). Levels of phonological awareness in three cultures. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 89, 93-11.
McBride-Chang, C., Cho, J-R., Liu, H., Wagner, R. K., Shu, H., Zhou, A., Cheuk, C. S., & Muse, A. (2005). Changing models across cultures: Associations of phonological awareness and morphological structure awareness with vocabulary and word recognition in second graders from Beijing, Hong Kong, Korea, and the United States. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 92, 140-160.
McBride-Chang, C., & Ho, C. S.-H. (2000). Developmental issues in Chinese children's character acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 50-55
McDougall, S., Hulme, C., Ellis, A., & Monk, A. (1994). Learning to read: the role of short-term memory and phonological skills. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 58, 112–133.
McDowell, H. J., & Lorch, M. P. (2008). Phonemic awareness in Chinese L1 readers of English : Not simply an effect of orthography. TESOL Quarterly, 42, 495–513.
Muter, V., Hulme, C., Snowling, M., & Taylor, S. (1998). Segmentation, not rhyming, predicts early progress in learning to read. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 71, 3–27.
Nation, K., & Hulme, C. (1997). Phonemic segmentation, not onset-rime segmentation, predicts early reading and spelling skills. Reading Research Quarterly, 32, 154–167.
Perfetti, C. A., Liu, Y., & Tan, L. H. (2002). How the mind can meet the brain in reading: A comparative writing systems approach. In H. S. R. Kao, C-K. Leong, & D-G. Gao (Eds.), Cognitive neuroscience studies of the Chinese language (pp. 36-60). Hong Kong University Press.
Perfetti, C. A., & Tan, L. H. (1998). The time course of graphic, phonological, and semantic activation in Chinese character identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 101-118.
Perfetti, C. A., & Tan, L. H. (1999). The constituency model of Chinese word identification. In J. Wang & A. W. Inhoff (Eds.), Reading Chinese script: A cognitive analysis (pp. 115-134). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Perfetti, C. A., & Zhang, S. (1995). Very early phonological activation in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21 (1), 24–33.
Perfetti, C. A., Zhang, S., & Berant, I. (1992). Reading in English and Chinese: Evidence for a "universal" phonological principle. In R. Frost & J. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 227-248). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Read, C., Zhang, Y. F., Nie, H. Y., & Ding, B. Q. (1986). The ability to manipulate speech sounds depends on knowing alphabetic writing. Cognition, 24, 31-44.
Scarborough, H. S., Ehri, L. C., Olson, R. K., & Fowler, A. E. (1998). The fate of phonemic awareness beyond the elementary school years. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2, 115-142.
Shu, H., & Anderson, R. (1997). Role of radical awareness in the character and word acquisition of Chinese children. Reading Research Quarterly, 32, 78–89.
Shu, H., & Anderson, R. (2000). Phonetic awareness: knowledge of orthography-phonology relationships in the character acquisition of Chinese children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(1), 56–62.
Siok, W. T., & Fletcher, P. (2001). The role of phonological awareness and visual-orthographic skills in Chinese reading acquisition. Developmental Psychology, 37, 886-899.
Spector, J. E. (1995). Phonemic awareness training: application of principles of direct instruction. Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 11, 37-51.
Stolz, J. E., & Feldman, L. B. (1995). The role of orthographic and semantic transparency of the base morpheme in morphological processing. In L.B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 109–129). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Tan. L. H., Spinks. J. A., Feng. C.-M.. Siok, W. T., PerfetU. C. A., & Xiong, L. (2003). Neural systems of second language reading are shaped by native language. Human Brain Mapping, 18, 159-166.
Taylor, I. (2002). Phonological awareness in Chinese reading. In W. Li, J. S. Gaffney, & J. L. Packard (Eds.), Chinese children’s reading acquisition: Theoretical and pedagogical issues (pp. 39-58). London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Treiman, R., Goswami, U., & Bruck, M. (1990). Not all nonword are alike: Implications for reading development and theory. Memory & Cognition, 18, 559-567.
Treiman, R., & Zukowski, A. (1991). Levels of phonological awareness. In S. A. Brady & D. P. Shankweiler (Eds.), Phonological Processing in Literacy: A tribute to Isabelle Y, Liberman (pp.67-83). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Venezky, R. L. (1970). The structure of English orthography. The Hague: Mouton.
Wagner, R., Torgesen,J., & Rashotte, C. (1994). Development of reading-related phonological processing abilities: New evidence of bidirectional causality from a latent variable, Longitudinal study. Developmental psychology, 30(1), 73-87.
Wang, M., Koda, K., & Perfetti, C. A. (2003). Alphabetic and nonalphabetic L2 effects in English word identification: A comparison of Korean and Chinese English L2 learners. Cognition, 87, 129-149.
Wang, M., Perfetti, C. A., & Liu, Y. (2005). Chinese-English biliteracy acquisition: Cross language and writing system transfer. Cognition, 97, 67-88.
Wimmer, H., & Goswami, U. (1994). The influence of orthographic consistency on reading development: Word recognition in English and German children. Cognition, 51, 91-103
Zhou, Y. G. (1978). To what extent are the “phonetics” of present-day Chinese characters still phonetic? Zhongguo Yuwen, 146, 172-177.