簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 孫哲昱
Sun, Zhe-Yu
論文名稱: 臺灣後殖民工業遺產的區位分析與再利用之探討
Location Analysis and Reuse of Taiwan's Post-colonial Industrial Heritage
指導教授: 曾慈慧
Tseng, Tzu-Huia
口試委員: 丁志堅
Ding, Tsu-Jen
朱健銘
Chu, Chien-Min
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 竹師教育學院 - 環境與文化資源學系所
Department of Enivonmental and Cultural Resources
論文出版年: 2023
畢業學年度: 111
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 176
中文關鍵詞: 工業遺產遺產再利用遺產管理遺產觀光後殖民
外文關鍵詞: industrial heritage, heritage reuse, heritage management, heritage tourism, post-colonial
相關次數: 點閱:39下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 工業遺產代表了人類文明的發展在工業時代,隨著城市發展帶來的都市化與現代化,大部分工業遺址失去其原有使用價值後,變成了城市的閒置空間,這些廢棄的、功能失調的和空置的工業區被描述為棕地(Brownfield Site)。
    臺灣自1895年後,經歷六十多年的殖民統治,自此臺灣的殖民工業(colonial industry)迅速發展,但在二十世紀六十年代因為時代變遷、都市更新、政治等等原因,最終被遺棄、拆除。這些眾多的工業遺產有不同的利用方式與管理模式,但少有研究由空間區位與特性關係來討論其優缺與成效。
    因此本研究之目的在於探討後殖民工業遺產的分佈特徵,及其再利用方式與區位之間的關係。基於工業景觀規劃理論,通過使用空間地理資訊系統(Geographic Information Systeam,GIS)對臺灣後殖民工業遺產進行區位資料的收集,以量化的方式進行資料的整合與研究,利用IBM SPSS軟體以相關方程式作爲資料分析方法,收集116處後殖民工業遺產,主要變項中區位與在地特性由「現在人口密度」、「鐵路站點距離」、「工業遺產面積」、「港口距離」、「市中心距離」「收入」六個測量變項構成;日治時期環境特性分爲「日治時期人口密度」、「日治時期市中心距離」兩個測量變項;觀光特性為「Google評論量」、「Google評分」。所得結果如下:
    一、後殖民工業遺產的再利用方式與區位在地特性之間有顯著關係,人口密度與收入越高,遺產的再利用程度越高,同時再利用方式為創意產業模式和遺產觀光模式,都處於人口密集處和收入較高區域。
    二、後殖民工業遺產類型與再利用方式之間有直接顯著差異,其中創意產業模式和遺產觀光模式是遺產利用的主要模式,而重工業和電業屬於工業棕地大多為繼續使用或現地保存。
    三、日治時期市中心距離與遺產再利用有顯著關係,遺產再利用滿足了人們對於多元文化遺產觀光的需求,以及通過旅行體驗對過去的懷舊之情。
    四、後殖民工業遺產管理與觀光特性有顯著關係,遺產管理方式會影響工業遺產的觀光人次。
    因此遺產在成功的轉型與再利用中需要瞭解本身的定位,使用合適的再利用方式可,透過管理方式的强化、觀光的連接、地方感的强化,能讓遺產本身發揮更大價值,達到在觀光效益、遺產保護、社會價值等諸多面嚮的發展。
    關鍵詞:工業遺產、遺產再利用、遺產管理、遺產觀光、後殖民


    Abstract
    Industrial heritage represents the development of human civilization. In the industrial age, with urbanization and modernization brought about by urban development, most industrial sites lost their original use value and became idle spaces in cities. These abandoned and dysfunctional and vacant industrial areas described as brownfield sites (Brownfield Site).
    Taiwan has experienced more than 60 years of colonial rule since 1895. Since then, Taiwan's colonial industry has developed rapidly. Abandoned, demolished. These numerous industrial heritages have different ways of utilization and management, but few studies have discussed their advantages, disadvantages and effectiveness based on the relationship between spatial location and characteristics.
    Therefore, the purpose of this study is to explore the distribution characteristics of post-colonial industrial heritage, and the relationship between its reuse mode and location. Based on the theory of industrial landscape planning, through the use of Geographic Information System (GIS) to collect location data on Taiwan's post-colonial industrial heritage, to integrate and study the data in a quantitative way, and to use IBM SPSS software to use relevant equations as Data analysis method, collecting 116 post-colonial industrial heritage sites, the location and local characteristics of the main variables are "current population density", "distance from railway station", "area of industrial heritage", "distance from port", "distance from city center" "" and "income" are composed of six measurement variables; the environmental characteristics during the Japanese occupation period are divided into two measurement variables: "population density during the Japanese occupation period" and "distance from the city center during the Japanese occupation period"; the tourism characteristics are "Google comment volume", " Google Ratings". The results obtained are as follows:
    1. There is a significant relationship between the reuse mode of post-colonial industrial heritage and the local characteristics of the location. The higher the population density and income, the higher the degree of heritage reuse. At the same time, the reuse mode is creative industry mode and heritage tourism mode, both In densely populated and high-income areas.
    2. There are direct and significant differences between post-colonial industrial heritage types and reuse methods. Among them, the creative industry mode and heritage sightseeing mode are the main modes of heritage utilization, while heavy industry and electrical industry belong to industrial brownfields, and most of them are continued to be used or preserved on site.
    3. The distance from the city center during the Japanese colonial period had a significant relationship with heritage reuse. Heritage reuse met people’s needs for multicultural heritage sightseeing and nostalgia for the past through travel experiences.
    4. Post-colonial industrial heritage management has a significant relationship with tourism characteristics, and heritage management methods will affect the number of tourists to industrial heritage.
    Therefore, in the successful transformation and reuse of heritage, it is necessary to understand its own positioning. Using appropriate reuse methods, through the strengthening of management methods, the connection of sightseeing, and the strengthening of the sense of place, can make the heritage itself play a greater value and achieve greater value in the world. Tourism benefits, heritage protection, social value and many other aspects of development.
    Keywords: industrial heritage, heritage reuse, heritage management, heritage tourism, post-colonial

    目錄 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 4 第三節 研究流程 5 第二章 文獻回顧 7 第一節 後殖民與工業遺產 7 (一)殖民與後殖民的定義 7 (二)工業遺產的定義 11 (三)工業遺產再利用 15 (四)棕地理論 18 (五)區位空間與遺產分佈關係 28 第二節 遺產觀光與管理 33 (一)遺產觀光的定義 33 (二)遺產觀光的效益 38 (三)遺產管理 42 第三章 研究設計 52 第一節 研究假設及架構 52 (一)研究假設 52 (二)研究架構 54 (二)研究設計 58 第二節 研究資料 60 (一)研究文獻 60 (二)研究範圍界定與圖資選擇 60 (三)資料來源 61 第三節 研究工具 62 (一)空間分析軟體 62 第四節 資料分析方法 63 (一)敘述統計 63 (二)統計檢定 63 第四章 研究結果 68 第一節 工業遺產的類型與分佈 68 (一)交通運輸業 70 (二)電力業 75 (三)重工業 79 (四)商品業 82 (五)總結 104 第二節 量化分析成果 106 (一)工業遺產類型與再利用和管理方式的關係 106 (二)工業遺產類型與相關特性之差異分析 112 (三)工業遺產再利用與相關特性之差異分析 125 (四)工業遺產管理與相關特性之差異分析 136 第五章 結論與建議 142 第一節 研究結果與討論 142 (一)工業遺產區位分析 142 (二)工業遺產類型與再利用和管理方式關係分析討論 143 (三)工業遺產類型與相關特性關係分析討論 144 (四)工業遺產再利用與相關特性關係分析討論 145 (五)工業遺產管理與相關特性關係分析討論 146 (六)總結 146 第二節 研究建議 148 (一)工業遺產的轉型與再利用 148 (二)工業遺產管理的强化 149 (三)工業遺產與觀光的連結與增强 150 第三節 研究限制與後續研究建議 152 (一)研究範圍的擴大與增加 152 (二)空間型構法的應用 152 (三)不同變項目的探討 153 參考文獻 154 一,中文部分 154 二、英文部分 156 【附錄一】台灣后殖民工業遺產區位與再利用、管理方式統計 160 【附錄二】台灣後殖民工業遺產相關特性統計 169

    王曉曉、張曉枝。(2007)。遺產旅遊真實性理解差異與遺產地管理。旅遊科學,21(1) ,12-16。
    林曉薇(2012)。世界遺產案例對臺灣產業文化資產保存策略之啟發。文化資產保存學刊,21,23-38。
    施國隆(2012)。從世界遺產看臺灣文化資產永續發展的經驗與因應策略。文化資產保存學刊,(21),5-22。
    施國隆(2018)。臺灣工業遺產轉型為文創園區初探—以台中文化創意產業園區為例。明志科技大學工業設計系工業設計雜誌,7(138) ,18-26。
    夏鑄九(2000)。殖民的現代性營造-重寫日本殖民時期臺灣建築與城市歷史。臺灣社會研究季刊,40,47-82。
    夏鑄九(2006) 。對臺灣當前工業遺產保存的初期觀察:一點批判性反思。國立臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究學報,13,91-106。
    張文宇、陳尉平、張曜麟、董志明、陳佳欣(2013)。台南市路網空間型構與古跡便捷值敏感度分析。嘉南學報,39,19-26。
    張淑娟(2011)。從世界文化遺產觀光經驗思考臺灣文化觀光的發展。文資學報,6,1-1-126。
    傅朝卿(2012)。國際文化遺產保存與經營管理。研考雙月刊,36(1),40-51。
    曾慈慧、沈進成、陳麗如。(2011)。礦業遺產觀光中真實性對觀光意象、地方感與遊後行為意圖之影響。戶外遊憩研究,24(3) ,79-111。
    曾燦, 李伯華, 黃曉杰, 曹揚意。 (2022) 。國家工業遺產時空分佈特徵及影響因素——以中國四批國家工業遺產名單為例. 熱帶地理, 42(5), 740-750。
    黃龍興(2010)。工業遺產保存再利用探討-以花蓮創意產業文化園區為例。文化資產保護學刊,12,67-82。
    榮芳杰、傅朝卿。(2008)。古跡委外經營制度對文化遺產管理功能之影響:以R.O.T與O.T模式為例。建築學報, (66) ,167-188。
    薑曄(2011)。工業遺產保護初探。大連理工大學學報,32(3) ,47-52。
    顏宏旭。(2013)。文化遺產認知價值對願付價格影響效果。戶外遊憩研究,26(3) ,47-69。
    顔宏旭、林志慧(2013) 。探訪工業遺產感知價值與支付意願的關係-以糖廠遺產再生項目爲例。國立虎尾科技大學學報,31(2) ,27-40。
    陳佳德(2022)。日治時期臺灣的官設埤圳與水利公共化(1899-1934)。國史館館刊,(71), 35-45。
    李光中、陳勤忠、劉鎮輝、林曉薇、高筱婷、周德清(2021)。臺灣煤礦產業遺產之系統性文化景觀研究。文化資產保存學刊,(57),49-70。
    吳宜臻(2015)。應用空間型構法則於都市商業空間結構之研究。國立成功大學都市計劃學系碩士論文,台南市。
    陳幼倩、林佳逸、鄧博維(2004)。金九地區文化觀光深度提昇之探討。景文科技大學旅運管理系,臺灣地方鄉鎮觀光產業發展與前瞻學術研討會論文集,70-80。景文科技大學旅運管理系。
    許松根(2015)。日治臺灣製造業的產業成長肇因與特色─兼論日治臺灣工業政策的績效。東吳經濟商學學報,(91),1-59。
    高淑媛 (2008) 。日治後期臺灣產業政策的轉換--米穀管理政策的重要意義。臺灣文獻, 105-138
    姚鶴年(2011),〈臺灣林業歷史課題系列之(九)-臺灣百年林業之軌跡(1895~2000)〉,臺灣林業, 37 (1), 81-89。
    張崑振(2013)。《臺灣產業文化資產體系與價值—菸、茶、糖篇》。臺中:文化部文化資產局。
    林文凱(2017)。晚近日治時期臺灣工業史研究的進展:從帝國主義論到殖民近代化論的轉變。《臺灣文獻》,68(4),117-146
    張志明(2011)。日治時期農業統制下的臺灣米穀政策研究(1933~1945) 。日本語文學系碩士論文,臺北市。
    卓瑜玉(2015)。建立臺灣褐地再開發流程及排序評估工具。國立臺灣大學環境工程學研究所碩士論文,臺北市。
    胡力人(2009)。日治時期臺灣煙草專賣制度下葉煙草產業設施發展歷程之研究。中原大學建築學系碩士論文,桃園市。
    翁梓綺(2018)。金門傳統聚落商業與宗族信仰空間聚集現象之研究 -以空間型構法則為分析工具。東海大學建築學系碩士論文,台中市。
    張文宇(2012)。台南市路網空間型構與古蹟景點之關連性研究。嘉南藥理科技大學休閒事業管理研究所碩士論文,台南市。
    許育誠(2002)。棕地再發展之研究─都市計畫內工業區更新之新方向。國立臺北大學都市計劃研究所碩士論文,新北市。
    陳麗如(2010)。真實性觀光意象及地方感影響之探討—以礦業遺產觀光忠黃金博物館園區為例。新竹:國立新竹教育大學研究所碩士論文。
    陳麗婷(2012)。應用空間型構法則於商業土地使用模型之建立。國立成功大學都市計劃學系碩博士班碩士論文,台南市。
    榮芳杰(2008)。文化遺產管理之常道:一個管理動態變化的維護觀點。台南:成功大學建築大學建築學系。
    劉秉承(2015)。空間結構分析與形態推演一種結合空間型構分析與參數化衍生的 設計方法論。東海大學工業工程與經營資訊學系博士論文,台中市。
    蔡毓慈(2021)。空間型構理論視角下之臺北市空間構成演變分析。國立臺北科技大學建築系建築與都市設計碩士班碩士論文,臺北市。
    張雅雯(2003)。文化產業之特性與其空間結構關係之研究。逢甲大學土地管理所碩士論文,台中市。
    林文龍(2014)。日治時期台灣陸路交通建設之研究。國立中央大學歷史研究所碩士論文, 桃園市。
    王麗夙(2004)。日治時期臺灣電力設施之研究。中原大學建築研究所碩士論文桃園市。

    二、英文部分
    Zhang, J., Cenci, J., & Becue, V. (2021). A Preliminary Study on Industrial Landscape Planning and Spatial Layout in Belgium. Heritage, 4(3), 1375-1387.
    Berkenbosch, K., Groote, P., & Stoffelen, A. (2022). Industrial heritage in tourism marketing: legitimizing post-industrial development strategies of the Ruhr Region, Germany. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 17(3), 327-341.
    Ringel, F. (2020). Ruins of pre-gentrification: Schrotthäuser and urban standstill in a postindustrial city. Time & Society, 29(2), 563-580.
    Loures, L.(2008).Post-industrial Landscapes as renaissance locis:the case study research method. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, ISSN: 1743-3541 .
    Yang, X. (2016). Industrial heritage tourism development and city image reconstruction in Chinese traditional industrial cities: a web content analysis. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 12(3), 267-280.
    Delconte, J., Kline, C. S., & Scavo, C. (2016). The impacts of local arts agencies on community placemaking and heritage tourism. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 11(4), 324-335.
    Oevermann, H., Degenkolb, J., Dießler, A., Karge, S., & Peltz, U. (2016). Participation in the reuse of industrial heritage sites: the case of Oberschöneweide, Berlin. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 22(1), 43-58.
    Wu, Y., Fan, P., & You, H. (2018). Spatial Evolution of Producer Service Sectors and Its Influencing Factors in Cities: A Case Study of Hangzhou, China. Sustainability, 10(4).
    Chin, T. (2020). Industrial Ecologies: Manufacturing the Post-industrial Landscape. In (pp. 69-76). Springer International Publishing.
    He, J., Liu, J., Xu, S., Wu, C., & Zhang, J. (2015). A GIS-Based Cultural Heritage Study Framework on Continuous Scales: A Case Study on 19th Century Military Industrial Heritage. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 215-222.
    Leung, M. W. H. (2009). Fates of European Heritage in Post-Colonial Contexts: Political Economy of Memory and Forgetting in Hong Kong : Fates of European Heritage in Post-Colonial Contexts: Political Economy of Memory and Forgetting in Hong Kong. 97(1), 24-42.
    Parkinson, A., Scott, M., & Redmond, D. (2015). Negotiating postcolonial legacies: shifting conservation narratives and residual colonial built heritage in Ireland. Town Planning Review, 86(2), 203-228.
    Loures, L. (2008). Industrial Heritage: The past in the future of the city. 4.
    Wang, Y., & Bramwell, B. (2012). Heritage protection and tourism development priorities in Hangzhou, China: A political economy and governance perspective. Tourism Management, 33(4), 988-998.
    Yu. (2009). Space syntax analysis of Foshan historic areas in contemporary urban transformation. Thesis (M.Phil.)--Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2009.
    Xu, Y., Rollo, J., Jones, D. S., Esteban, Y., Tong, H., & Mu, Q. (2020). Towards Sustainable Heritage Tourism: A Space Syntax-Based Analysis Method to Improve Tourists’ Spatial Cognition in Chinese Historic Districts. Buildings, 10(2).
    Prayag, G., & Del Chiappa, G. (2021). Nostalgic feelings: motivation, positive and negative emotions, and authenticity at heritage sites. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 1-16.
    Zhou, J., Xiang, K., Cheng, Q., & Yang, C. (2021). Psychological and Behavioural Consistency Value Seeking of Tourists in Niche Tourism: Nostalgia, Authenticity Perception, and Satisfaction. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, Volume 14, 1111-1125.
    Silberberg, T. (1995). Cultural tourism and business opportunities for museums and heritage sites. Tourism Management, 16(5), 361-365.
    Zhao, C. (2021). The Construction of the Derivative Value of Heritage Tourism on the Basis of Symbolic Consumption. E3S Web of Conferences, 251, 01090.
    Zhang, J., Cenci, J., & Becue, V. (2021). A Preliminary Study on Industrial Landscape Planning and Spatial Layout in Belgium. Heritage, 4(3), 1375-1387.
    Rey, E., Laprise, M., & Lufkin, S. (2022). Urban Brownfields: Origin, Definition, and Diversity. In Neighbourhoods in Transition , 7-45.
    Belausteguigoitia, J. (2007). Urban Recycling l Reinvigorating the Brownfield Intervention's Contribution to More Sustainable Urban Design Urban Recycling l Reinvigorating the Brownfield.
    Ruoss, E., Alfare, L., Vallone, R., Moscatelli, M., Zumaglini, M., Grünner, R., Klementschitz, R., & Richard, L. (2013). GIS as Tool for Cultural Heritage Management. In (pp. 42-46).
    Poria, Y & Butler, R & Airey, D. (2003). The core of heritage tourism. Annals of Tourism Research. 30. 238-254.
    Ran Ben-Malka & Yaniv Poria (2020). Compensation for elimination: an innovative technique for evaluating the monetary value of cultural heritage sites. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 15(2), 228-231,
    Francis-Lindsay, J. (2009). The Intrinsic Value of Cultural Heritage and its Relationship to Sustainable Tourism Development: The Contrasting Experiences of Jamaica and Japan. Caribbean Quarterly, 55, 151-168.
    Silberberg, T. (1995). Cultural tourism and business opportunities for museums and heritage sites. Tourism Management, 16(5), 361-365.
    Salazar, B. (2013). 1972-2012: Forty years of World Heritage Convention.Time to take tourism seriously.
    Palaiologou, G., Griffiths, S. (2019). The Uses of Space Syntax Historical Research for Policy Development in Heritage Urbanism. In: Obad Šćitaroci, M., Bojanić Obad Šćitaroci, B., Mrđa, A. (eds) Cultural Urban Heritage. The Urban Book Series. Springer, Cham.
    Taylor, K (2004). Cultural heritage management: A possible role for charters and principles in Asia. International Journal of Heritage Studies. 10. 417-433.
    Yang, X., Xu, H., & Wall, G. (2019). Creative destruction: the commodification of industrial heritage in Nanfeng Kiln District, China. Tourism Geographies, 21(1), 54-77.
    Xue, L., & Zhang, Y. (2020). The effect of distance on tourist behavior: A study based on
    social media data. Annals of Tourism Research, 82.
    Tolia-Kelly, D. P. (2004). Materializing post-colonial geographies: examining the textural landscapes of migration in the South Asian home. Geoforum, 35(6), 675-688.
    Rattray, M. (2009). Mapping the post-colonial landscape project: A critical analysis. Jan, 1.
    Wang, M., Yang, J., Hsu, W.-L., Zhang, C., & Hsin-Lung, L. (2021). Service Facilities in Heritage Tourism: Identification and Planning Based on Space Syntax. Information, 12, 504.
    Porta, S., Strano, E., Iacoviello, V., Messora, R., Latora, V., Cardillo, A., Wang, F., & Scellato, S. 2009). Street centrality and densities of retail and services in Bologna, Italy. Environment and Planning B: Planning and design, 36(3), 450-465.
    Eldiasty, A., Sabry Hegazi, Y., & El-Khouly, T. (2021). Using space syntax and TOPSIS to evaluate the conservation of urban heritage sites for possible UNESCO listing the case study of the historic centre of Rosetta, Egypt. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 12(4), 4233-4245.
    Xu, Y., Rollo, J., Jones, D. S., Esteban, Y., Tong, H., & Mu, Q. (2020). Towards Sustainable Heritage Tourism: A Space Syntax-Based Analysis Method to Improve Tourists’ Spatial Cognition in Chinese Historic Districts. Buildings, 10(2).
    Nes, A. v., & Yamu, C. (2017). Space Syntax. In The Virtual and the Real in Planning and Urban Design , 136-150.
    Chen, Y., & Chen, J. (2021). Analysis and Research on the Node Space of Ancient Villages Based on Space Syntax.
    Refaat, A. M. (2019). Space Syntax Theory and Its Contribution to Urban Design. In Handbook of Research on Digital Research Methods and Architectural Tools in Urban Planning and Design,203-222.
    Karmilah, M., & Magfiroh, N. (2018). USING SPACE SYNTAX TO DETERMINE THE FORM AND PATTERN OF HERITAGE SITE (Case Study: Sangiran Heritage Site). Jurnal Planologi, 15, 81.
    Zaleckis, K., Doğan, H., & Lopez, N. (2022). Evaluation of the Interventions to Built Heritage: Analysis of Selected Façades of Kaunas by Space Syntax and Sociological Methods. Sustainability, 14.
    Hamdy, M. (2020). Space Syntax Introduction Application.
    Wang, C., & Wang, F. (2022). GIS-automated delineation of hospital service areas in Florida: from Dartmouth method to network community detection methods. Annals of GIS, 28(2), 93-109.
    Hillier, B. (1996). Space is the Machine: A Configurational Theory of Architecture. Cambridge University Press.
    Hillier, B. (1999). The Hidden Geometry of Deformed Grids: or, why space syntax works when it looks as though it shouldn't. Environment and Planning B, 26, 169-191.
    Hillier, B., Leaman A., Stansall P., & Bedford M. (1976). Space Syntax, Environment and Planning B, 3(2), 147-185
    Jiang, B., Claramunt, C., & Klarqvist, B. (2013). An Integration of Space Syntax into GIS for Modelling Urban Spaces. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2, 161-171.
    Hegazi, Y. S., Tahoon, D., Abdel-Fattah, N. A., & El-Alfi, M. F. (2022). Socio-spatial vulnerability assessment of heritage buildings through using space syntax. Heliyon, 8(3).
    Li, Y., Xiao, L., Ye, Y., Xu, W., & Law, A. (2016). Understanding tourist space at a historic site through space syntax analysis: The case of Gulangyu, China. Tourism Management, 52, 30-43.
    Liao, P., Gu, N., Yu, R., & Brisbin, C. (2021). Exploring the spatial pattern of historic Chinese towns and cities: A syntactical approach. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 10(3), 598-613.
    Dabbour, L. M. (2021). Morphology of quarters in traditional Arab Islamic city: A case of the traditional city of Damascus. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 10(1), 50-65.
    Dhimn D. (2006). Identifying the relationship between crime and street layout using space syntax technology, Doctoral Dissertation, University of Cincinnati.
    Zhang, T., Yin, P., & Peng, Y. (2021). Effect of Commercialization on Tourists’ Perceived Authenticity and Satisfaction in the Cultural Heritage Tourism Context: Case Study of Langzhong Ancient City. Sustainability, 13(12).
    Li, Y., Xiao, L., Ye, Y., Xu, W., & Law, A. (2016). Understanding tourist space at a historic site through space syntax analysis: The case of Gulangyu, China. Tourism Management, 52, 30-43.
    Wang, X., Zhang, J., Cenci, J., & Becue, V. (2021). Spatial Distribution Characteristics and Influencing Factors of the World Architectural Heritage. Heritage, 4(4).
    Zhang, J., Cenci, J., Becue, V., Koutra, S., & Liao, C. (2022). Stewardship of Industrial Heritage Protection in Typical Western European and Chinese Regions: Values and Dilemmas. Land, 11(6).
    Zhang, J., Cenci, J., Becue, V., & Koutra, S. (2022). Analysis of spatial structure and influencing factors of the distribution of national industrial heritage sites in China based on mathematical calculations. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 1-16.
    Zhang, J., Cenci, J., Becue, V., & Koutra, S. (2021). Research of the Industrial Heritage Category and Spatial Density Distribution in Walloon Region and Northeast China. WIT Transactions on the Built Environment, 203, 285.
    Csapó, J. (2012). The Role and Importance of Cultural Tourism in Modern Tourism Industry.
    Yuan, Zhu. (2022). Big Data Recommendation Research Based on Travel Consumer Sentiment Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 10.
    Wright, Jimmy & Gordon, Minor & Paprzycki, Marcin & Williams, Steve & Harrington, Patrick. (2023). Using the ebXML Registry Repository to Manage Information in an Internet Travel Support System.
    Zhu, Yue & Kan, Stanley. (2022). Analysis of Public Big Data Management under Text Analysis. Mathematical Problems in Engineering. 2022. 1-11.
    Yuan, Zhu. (2022). Big Data Recommendation Research Based on Travel Consumer Sentiment Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology. 13. 10.
    Stirparo, Davide & Penna, Beatrice & Kazemi, Mohammad & Shashaj, Ariona. (2022). Mining Tourism Experience on Twitter: A case study.

    QR CODE