台灣是一個島國，在有限的資源下政府為了改變國家的經濟、結構體質和提升國際領導地位，自1975年開始就積極投入國家資源在半導體的發展，由於半導體產業屬於高技術產業，台灣政府藉由派遣優秀人才赴國外學習、向國外招募一流人才回台灣工作，並在國內設置相關的產業、保護政策，讓其國內外專業人員及廠商相互合作、整合，歷經三十餘年，終有成效。
2019年全球因COVID-19造成部份產業衰退，以麥肯鍚的半導體產業分析報告指出，唯一產值未停滯便是以半導體為首的高科技產業，另外NATHAN和SIN於2016年的報告及Congressional Research Service的報告書: R4658 (October 26, 2020) 當中多次的指出各國針對半導體政策無不花費許多時間、投入無法估計的資源和金錢。本論文欲探討的是台灣政府在半導體產業所投入的策略和計畫，如何成就一個產業的地位，並針對不同的時期設定的政策、計畫來輔助半導體業來建立、鞏固其地位，進而再與世界半導體產業相互連結後逐一調整其輔助半導體產的政策和計劃。我們也透過訪問半導體產業的領導人物，深入檢視我國相關政策，並展望未來前景。

關鍵字：半導體、產業策略、技術策略、政府政策

Taiwan is an island with limited natural resources. In order to improve domestic economy, constitution and to promote the position of international leadership, Taiwanese government has been actively investing national resources in the development of semiconductors since 1975.
To align with the pace of this high-tech industry, Taiwanese government sends domestic talents to study abroad and recruits foreign talents to work in Taiwan. The government also sets up relevant regulations and protective policies for the industry for these professionals to cooperate and integrate the needed skills and know-hows. The positive result is now taking effect after more than three decades.
2016 Reports of NATHAN and SIN’s and Congressional Research Service report of R4658 (October 26, 2020) have constant indications that the majority of countries have spent a great deal of resources and national budgets on semiconductor policies. The results are fruitful: Though the COVID-19 outbreak has caused a principal decline in many parts of the global industries, the semiconductor industry is the only high-tech industry with non-stagnant growth, as pointed out by McKinsey’s Semiconductor Industry Analysis reports.
This paper discusses the semiconductor industry strategies and projects invested by Taiwanese government and how to achieve a leadership position from there. Contingency plans and projects for different periods to help the semiconductor industry build and establish its’ leadership position and links to the global chain to promote positive interlocutions as a mean of mutual support will also be discussed.
We have also conducted in-depth reviews of the domestic regulations and policies through interviews with leading figures of the semiconductor industry, with hopes of a more prospective future.

Keywords: Semiconductor, Industrial Strategy, Technology Strategy, Government Policy

吳仁淼 (1996):國立中正大學 “科技政策的效應分析:台灣半導體產業個案研究” 政治學研究所，1, 2.

陳明訓 (2005):國立暨南國際大學 “台灣半導體產業的發展－國民經濟的觀點” 公共行政與政策學系, 1,2. 碩士班

姜宜婷 (2017):國立清華大學”IoT產業聚落效益的探討：以台灣亞洲‧矽谷產業大聯盟為例” 經營管理碩士在職專班

戴佑軒 (2018):中華大學 “由國外政策與相關法令探討台灣幹細胞產業發展之改善策略” 科技管理學碩士

張翡舒（2006）”國立高雄第一科技大學 “台灣外資之投資偏好研究-兩兆雙星產業之實証” 金融營運所碩士班 1, 2.

莊秉煌(2009) 朝陽科技大學”應用模糊理論方法探討產業生命週期曲線-以台灣「兩兆雙星」產業為例 “工業工程與管理碩士專班 1,2.

工業技術研究院電子工業研究所，2000，”台灣半導體工業年鑑”，台北。
外國文獻
John A. Mathews and Dong-Sung Cho (2000): “Tiger Technology: The Creation of a Semiconductor Industry in East Asia” 1.7 Structure of the Taiwanese semiconductor industry 47-48.

Nathan Associates Inc. and Semiconductor Industry Association (May 16, 2016): ”Beyond: Borders The Global Semiconductor Value Chain, How an Interconnected Industry Promotes Innovation and Growth” 2.1 A Global Value Chain: Forged by Complexity and Competition 4 & 4 Conclusion and Recommendations 29

United States International Trade Commission Journal of International Commerce and Economics John VerWey (July, 2019):” Chinese Semiconductor Industrial Policy: Past and Present”

John F. Sargent et al (October 26, 2020): Congressional Research Service Semiconductors: U.S. Industry, Global Competition, and Federal Policy R46581 2,5-6,12,23,29,31,37,41,47,49