本研究探討運用產業研發聯盟進行分離式半導體產業的新材料(碳化矽/SiC)產品技術開發。透過對新材料產品技術的開發與掌握來提升台灣產業的競爭力;發展台灣自有完整的碳化矽產業價值鏈，以帶動台灣分離式半導體產業升級。
本研究發現，在價值鏈上具有高度垂直相依、低程度水平競爭的聯盟結構，基於聯盟的共同研發願景與共識下，極易建立研發聯盟的知識與技術合作共享平台;提供各組織所擅長的研究領域專長與資源。透過研發分工、合作並共同分擔研發成本及風險等機制下，確實可以加速碳化矽材料元件技術研究開發與商品化的速度，同時發展碳化矽材料的關鍵技術以建構完整的碳化矽產業價值鏈，進而提升台灣分離式半導體產業競爭力與促進台灣產業升級。
聯盟的發展必須建立在信任、互助與分享的基礎下，這正是社會資本理論發展基礎，因此本研究從社會資本的三構面：結構、認知及關係等三大構面觀察本產業研發聯盟的發展關係，期為未來企業進行創新技術開發產業研發聯盟時提供其參考。

The study is aimed to explore the application of Industry Research and Development Alliance to conduct the product technological development of new material (Silicon Carbide / SiC) in the Discrete Semiconductor Industry. The purpose of this research is to promote the competitiveness of Taiwan's industry through the development and master the product technology of new material; in the meantime, to develop Taiwan’s own inter value chain of silicon carbide industry to promote Taiwan Discrete Semiconductor Industry upgrading
In this case study, we discover the specific alliance structure existed high vertical dependency、low horizontal competition value chain relationship and under the common R&D vision and consensus that it will be easy to establish the R&D alliance knowledge and technology sharing platform, sharing the R&D expertise and resources of the organization unit. Through the approach of R＆D diversification、cooperation and cost-sharing and risk-sharing, this can not only expedite the new technology development but also speed up the product commercialization; meanwhile, it also can develop the key technology of silicon carbon to structure Taiwan’s own entire industrial value chain of silicon carbon. Furthermore, increase the competitiveness and promote industrial upgrading of Taiwan discrete semiconductor market.
The Alliance's development must been built on trust, cooperation and sharing, which is the foundation of social capital development. This research looked into the developing relationship of the Industry R&D Alliance from three dimensions of social capital theory – structure, cognitive and relationships in order to propose a reference model for the companies who take advantages of the Industry R&D Alliance to carry out an innovative technology exploration in future.

英文部分：
1. Bruce, M.L., Leverick, F. and Wilson, D.,(1995), “Success of Factor Collaboration Produce Development: A Study of Supplier of Information Communication, Technology”, R&D Management, 25(1), pp.33-34.
2. Bourdieu, P. (1985), “The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Eds.)”, Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education, New York: Greenwood, pp. 241-258.
3. Chua, A. (2002), “The Influence Of Social Interaction On Knowledge Creation”, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 3(4), pp.375-392.
4. Dinneen, G. P., (1988), “R&D Consortia: Are They Working?”, Research and Development , June, pp.62-66.
5. Doz, L.Y. & Paul, M. O. & Peter, S. R. (2000), “Formation process of R&D consortia: Which path to take? Where does it lead? ”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21, pp.239-266.
6. Evan, W. and Olk, P., (1990), “R&D Consortia—A new U.S. Organizational Form”, Sloan Management Review, pp.37-46.
7. Huysman, M. H. & de Wit, D. (2004), Practicles of Managing Knowledge Sharing：Towards a Second Wave of Knowledge management”, Knowledge and Process Management, 11(2), pp.81-92.
8. Inkpen, A. C. & Tsang, E. W. K. (2005), “Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer”, Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 148-165.
9. Katz. M. L. (1986), ”An Analysis of Cooperative Research and evelopment,” Rand Journal of Economics, 17, pp. 527-543.
10. Lee, M.K. and Lee, M.K., (1992), “High Technology Consortia: A Panacea for America’s Technological Competitiveness Problems?”, High Technology Law Journal, 6(2), pp.335-362.
11. Little, D. & Fiona, L. & Margaret, B. (1995), “Facter Affecting the
Process of Collaborative Product Development”, Journal of Product
Innovation Management, Vol. 12, pp.16-32.
12. Mandell, M., (1990), “The Consortium: An Idea Whose Time Has Come（or Gone?”, Across The Board, pp.30-35.
13. McLure Wasko, M. & Fasraj, S. (2005), “Why should I share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in electronic Networks of Practice.”, MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 35-57
14. Michael E. Porter, (1985), “Competitive Advantage”, The Free Press
15. Mothe, C. & Queilin, B.V. (2001), “Resource Creation andPartnership in R& D Consortia”, Journal of High Technology Management Research, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp.113-138.
16. Nahapiet, J. & Ghoshal, S. (1998), “Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and The Organizational Advantage”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp.242-266.
17. Park, S. H. & Ungson, G. R. (2001), “Interfirm Rivalry and Managerial Complesity : A Conceptual Framework of Alliance Failure”, Organization Science, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp.37-53.
18. Smilor, R. and Gibson, D., (1991), “Accelerating technology transfer in R&D consortia”, Research Technology Management,vol.35,no.1, pp.44-49
19. Stephen B. Bayne and Bejoy N Pushpakaran (2012), “Silicon Carbide Technology Overview”, Journal of Electrical Engineering & Electronic Technology
20. Souder, W.E. and Nassar, S., (1990), “Managing R&D Consortia for Success”, Research Technology Management, pp.44-50.
21. Souder, W.E. and Nassar, S., (1990), “Choosing an R&D Consortium”, Research Technology Management, pp.35-41.
22. Tsai, W. & Ghoshal, S. (1998), “Social Capital and Value Creation：The Role of Intrafirm” Networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41(4), pp.464-476
23. Tirole, T. (1988), “The Theory of Industrial Organization”, MIT Press.
24. Vinod, K., (1995), “The role of R&D consortia in technology development”, Occasional Paper, 3, pp.7-27.
25. Werner, J. and Bermer, J., (1991), “Hard lesson in cooperative research”, Issues in Science and Technology, pp.44-49.

中文部分:
1. 方世杰、邱志芳，2002。知識創新環境改善之研究－社會資本觀點，科技發展政策報導 SR9110。746~755。
2. 王健全，「產業特性對研發策略聯盟之影響」，台灣經濟研究月刊，1992 年 5 月。
3. 司徒達賢、陳隆麒、洪順慶，「中小企業互助合作與企業整合之研究與輔導-以電子業與機械業為例」，經濟部中小企業處，1992 年 6 月。
4. 吳 克，2005。策略夥伴選擇準則與聯盟不穩定性之研究-以台灣半導體製造業為例，東吳商學學報。第49期，71-110。
5. 林國棟，2006。社會資本建構公民社會的概念分析，陸軍官校政治系黃埔學報。第五十一期 19-29。
6. 徐木蘭、朱文儀，「產業聯盟管理面的挑戰－從國內企業共同研發談起」，台灣經濟研究月刊第十五卷第五期，1992 年 5 月，頁 42-43。
7. 袁立科、张宗益，2006。社会资本对研发联盟形成的影响研究，中国软科学。第8期，89-95。
8. 張永源(1992)，「產業策略聯盟的概況介紹」，輸出入金融月刊，
No.31，頁40-41。
9. 粘秀玉，2003。研發聯盟形成歷程與運作之研究—社會資本觀點。碩士論文，國立中央大學企業管理研究所。
10. 陳怡君、田畠真弓，2012。國際零售業之技術轉移與社會資本：以臺灣便利商店為例。 臺灣社會學會年會暨國科會專題研究成果發表會，國立東華大學社會暨公共行政學系社會學碩士班研究生
11. 黃延聰，2010。策略聯盟如何能成功？聯盟過程之管理，T&D飛訊第95期。
12. 陳雅美，2002。產業合作網絡形成原因的探討—以台灣半導體產業為例，運籌研究集刊。第一期 125~152頁。開南管理學院
13. 許雯淇，2011。社會資本與價值共創之研究-以億光電子為例。碩士論文，臺南大學經營與管理學系科技管理碩士班。
14. 楊台寧，2009。社會資本的形成、集團企業內部資源交換及成員創新成效之探討，華人經濟研究。
15. 楊雅嵐、江柏風，2010。新世代元件-我國碳化矽元件發展策略
16. 詹鎮鋒，2008。研發聯盟形成與運作機制之探討-以鋼鐵產業升級研發聯盟為例。碩士論文，國立中山大學企業管理學系研究所
17. 賴士葆、陳松柏、謝龍發，2004。科技管理概論 第八章。國立空中大學
18. 謝龍發，「科技管理」，國立空中大學，1997 年。
19. 羅耀民，2006。台灣高功率整流二極體產業經營策略之研究。碩士論文，國立台灣大學國際企業研究所
20. NIKKEI ELECTRONICS TAIWAN EDITION ，節能功率半導體，Green Device 特別報導， July 2009.
21. Rohm SiC 產品介紹 Sept 2010

其他部份:
1. http://www.researchandmarkets.com/
2. http://www.i-micronews.com/power-electronics/
3. http://www.nedo.go.jp/
4. http://www003.maillist.com.tw/maillist/file/nikkeibp/20120910094300.html
5. http://www.yole.fr/
6. http://big5.chinairn.com/
7. http://www.panjit.com/
8. http://www.ts.com.tw/home/en/index.php
9. http://www.liteonsemi.com/
10. http://www.netmba.com/strategy/value-chain/