中文摘要
本研究目的在了解大學生的愛情忠誠態度，研究工具為「愛情關係量表」及自編的「愛情關係忠誠態度量表」。710份有效樣本，來自新竹以北12所大專院校的日間部一到四年級學生。將所得資料以相依樣本單因子變異數分析、二因子混合變異數分析、逐步迴歸分析等統計方法驗證假設。達顯著的結果如下：
一、在「行為」差異方面，無論是自己與第三者的行為，或者伴侶與第三者的行為，大學生最無法接受與第三者「有身體親密或產生感情」，其次為「一起從事類似約會的活動」，最能接受與第三者「互相關懷扶持」。
二、在「性別」差異方面，「男性」比「女性」更能接受伴侶和第三者互相關懷扶持、從事約會活動、有身體親密或產生感情，男性也更能接受自己和第三者從事約會活動、有身體親密或產生感情。意即女性的愛情忠誠標準比男性嚴格。
三、在「當事者」差異方面，大學生較能接受「自己」與第三者互相關懷扶持、從事約會活動、有身體親密或產生感情，較不能接受「伴侶」與第三者有同樣行為。意即大學生對伴侶的愛情忠誠標準比對自己更為嚴格。
四、在「戀愛狀態」差異方面，「空窗」者比「戀愛中」者，更能接受自己與第三者互相關懷扶持、從事約會活動、有身體親密或產生感情，「空窗」者也更能接受伴侶與第三者有上述行為，意即目前戀愛中的大學生，愛情忠誠標準較嚴格。
五、在「戀愛經驗」差異方面，「無戀愛經驗」者比「有戀愛經驗」者，更能接受伴侶和第三者互相關懷扶持、從事約會活動、有身體親密或產生感情，「無戀愛經驗」者也更能接受自己與第三者有身體親密或產生感情。意即有戀愛經驗的大學生，對伴侶的愛情忠誠標準較嚴格。
六、在「情感投入」的預測力方面，大學生對男女朋友情感投入程度，能預測對自己與第三者互相關懷扶持、從事約會活動、有身體親密或產生感情的接受度，也能預測對伴侶與第三者有上述行為的接受度。情感投入越多，越無法接受自己或伴侶與第三者互相關懷扶持、從事約會活動，以及有身體親密或產生感情。意即越愛男女朋友的大學生，愛情忠誠的標準越嚴格。
七、在「戀愛次數」的預測力方面，大學生的戀愛次數，僅能預測對自己或伴侶，與第三者有身體親密或產生感情的接受度。談過越多次戀愛，越能接受自己或伴侶，和第三者有身體親密或產生感情。意即談過越少次戀愛的大學生，愛情忠誠的標準越嚴格。

Abstract
The purpose of this study is to investigate the college students’attitude toward fidelity in love relationship. The instrument adopted in this study is “The Attitude toward Fidelity in Love Relationship” Scale. A toal of 710 valid participants was sampled from 12 colleges in the north of Hsinchu. The data were analyzed by using One-Way ANOVA, Two-Way ANOVA, and Multi-Stepwise Regerssion Analysis. The significant findings are as follows:
1.The behavior which college students can’t accept their partners or themselves do with opposite-sex friends most is “having sexual contact and falling in love”, the behavior they can accept most is “concern or support”, the acceptance of “dating” is in the middle.
2.“Male” can accept his partner dating, having sexual contact or falling in love with, and concern about or support opposite-sex friends more then “female” does. “Male” can accept himself dating, having sexual contact or falling in love with others more then “female” does. Therefore, female is stricter than male in love fidelity.
3.College students can accept “themselves” dating, having sexual contact or falling in love with, and concern about or support opposite-sex friends more then “partners” do. Accordingly, they are stricter with their partners than with themselves in love fidelity.
4.College students who are “not in love relationships” can accept their partners or themselves dating, having sexual contact or falling in love with, and concern about or support opposite-sex friends more then those who are “in love relationships”. Thus, those are in love relationships are stricter than those are not in love relationships in love fidelity.
5.College students who “have no dating experience” can aceept their partners dating, having sexual contact or falling in love with, and concern about or support opposite-sex friends more then those who “have dating experience”. They also can accept themselves having sexual contact or falling in love with others. Thus, those who have dating experience are stricter than those have no dating experience in love fidelity.
6.The more the college students “love their partners”, the more they can not accept their partners or themselves dating, having sexual contact or falling in love with, and concern about or support opposite-sex friends. In other words, the more they love their partners, the stricter they are in love fidelity.
7.The more “dating experiences” the college students have, the more they can accept themselves or their partners having sexual contact or falling in love with others. Consequently, the less dating experiences they have, the stricter they are in love fidelity.
Key Words : College students, love relationship, Attitude toward fidelity

參考文獻
中文部分：
王智勇、王志弘、林相如（民國97年12月19日）。三角戀，大學男冷血輾死　　　
女友，來回衝撞，備五桶汽油「我要同歸於盡」。蘋果日報。引自壹蘋果網絡http://1-apple.com.tw/index.cfm?Fuseaction=Article&Sec_ID=2&ShowDate=20081219&IssueID=20081219&art_id=31244183&NewsType=1&SubSec=6

王輔天（民74）。夫妻角色認知、感情惡化情況及丈夫外遇行為。國立台灣大學社會學研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。

王慶福（民84）：大學生愛情關係徑路模式之分析研究。國立彰化師範大學輔導學系博士論文，未出版，彰化。

王慶福、王鬱茗（民92）。性別、性別角色取向及愛情關係的分析研究。中山醫學雜誌，14，71-82。

王慶福、林幸台、張德榮（民84）。愛情關係及其影響因素的分析研究。中華輔導學報，3，92-126。

王慶福、林幸台、張德榮（民85）。愛情關係發展與適應之評量工具編制。中國測驗學會測驗年刊，43，227-240。

王鵬捷（民國97年11月27日）。清華大學情殺案大事紀。中央日報。引用自中央日報電子報網頁http://www.cdnews.biz/cdnews_site/docDetail.jsp?coluid=108&docid=100588566

任明玥（民國97年8月19日）。疑女友劈腿，趁熟睡一刀斃命，男子殺女友自殘，送醫急救。台視新聞。引用自台視新聞網頁http://www.ttv.com.tw/097/08/0970819/09708194921901I.htm

吳秀碧主講（民82）（許仁榮整理）。作一個健康的亞當和夏娃。輔導通訊，5-9。

李怡玲（民90）。臺北市高中學生愛情態度及相關因素之研究。台灣師範大學人類發展與家庭學系在職進修碩士論文。未出版，臺北市。

李明朝（民國97年10月2日）。男友劈腿被殺棄屍，女子一家人一起下手。中廣新聞網。引自新浪新聞網http://news.sina.com.tw/article/20081002/912988.html

李美枝（民71）。兩性之間的喜歡、愛情與婚前性行為容許度。中華心理學刊，25，121-135。

李茂興，余伯泉（譯）（1995）。社會心理學。E.Aronson, T. Wilson, & R. Akert著。台北：揚智。

李香盈（民96）。一位未婚成年女性的多重戀情之敘說研究---「尋求被接納與允許自我存在的空間」。政治大學心理學研究所碩士論文。未出版，臺北市。

杜仲傑（民78）。大學生人際親密的評量與身心適應：親子、情人、異性朋友、同性朋友四種角色的相關分析。國立台灣大學心理學研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。

沈利君（民91）：台北縣國中愛情態度研究。國立台灣師範大學家政教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。

卓紋君（民89）。台灣人愛情發展的歷程初探兼論兩性輔導之重點。諮商輔導文粹—高師輔導所刊，5，1-30。

卓紋君（民93）。台灣人愛情風格之分析研究。中華輔導學報，16，71-117。

周玉貞（民91）。成人個案求助心理諮商之問題內容分析。彰化師大輔導學報，23，49-76。
周知融（民95）。「掙脫」與「陷入」-女婚外情當事人的主體敘說。國立彰化師範大學諮商與輔導研究所碩士論文，未出版，彰化。

林宜旻（民82）。愛情類型、嫉妒與關係滿意度之相關研究。政治大學心理學系碩士論文。未出版，臺北市。

林淑貞（譯）（1994）。S.Hite著。海蒂報告：深情之愛。台北市：張老師文化。

邱育姿（民96）。大學生異性友誼和愛情之探討。高雄師範大學輔導與諮商研究所碩士論文。未出版，高雄。

洪蘭譯（2003）。心理學（下）。G. Henry著。臺北：遠流。

高蘭馨、柯清心（譯）（1998）。J.A.Spring, & M.Spring著。外遇的男女心理：如何走出創傷與重建信任。臺北市：天下文化。

張文雄 (民82)。 從類型論的觀點探討大學生的愛情觀。東海學報，34，449-462。

張老師月刊（民87）。「情人再見」問卷調查分析報告。張老師月刊，251， 61-65。

張芳熒（民93）。愛情關係中對方衝突管理方式與自身關係滿意度之關聯。輔仁大學心理學系碩士論文，未出版，臺北縣。

張春興（民91）。現代心理學。臺北市：東華。

張菀真（民92）。台灣婦運的外遇與婚姻論述---以通姦除罪化議題為例(1990-2003)。國立清華大學社會學研究所碩士論文。未出版，新竹市。

曹中瑋（民81）。大專學生嫉妒心理之分析與介入策略效果之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所博士論文，未出版，臺北市。

清華大學高等教育研究中心（民88）。大學生感情生活調查分析。大學新鮮人問卷調查，13-16。引用自http://www.cher.nthu.edu.tw/analyze/

許耀雲、孫孚桓（譯）（1994）。B.E.Weil, & R.Winter著。外遇：可寬恕的罪。臺北市：遠流。

陳程振（民國97年5月29日）。 殺死情敵載屍八小時後投案，疑女友劈腿，持刀砍斷情敵動脈。台視新聞，引用自台視新聞網頁http://www.ttv.com.tw/097/05/0970529/09705294550002L.htm

彭莉惠（民91）。女性婚外情慾歷程之研究。東吳大學社會系碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。

黃可欣（民95）。戀愛中大學生之性別角色特質、人格特質與愛情態度之相關研究。新竹教育大學教育心理與諮商學系碩士論文，未出版，新竹市。

黃敬婷（民95）。情侶關係中的背叛：面臨愛人移情別戀之分手經驗分析。國立新竹教育大學教育心理與諮商學系碩士論文，未出版，新竹市。

新苗編輯小組（譯）（民90）。D.Then著。男人出軌真相。臺北：新苗文化。

楊茜如，（民89）。大學生愛情觀、性別角色與兩性關係及相關因素之研究。國立彰化師範大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，彰化。

葉高芳（民69）。婚前準備與輔導。臺北：道聲出版社。

賈馥茗主編（民91）。教育大辭書。臺北：文景。

劉添財、吳典蓉(民國91年11月13)。立院同僚盼鄭「快刀斬亂麻」。中國時報。引用自中時電子報網頁http://forums.chinatimes.com/report/2002ten/internet/92010805.htm

蕭英玲（民92）。女性外遇：動機、發展歷程、與態度。中華心理衛生學刊，15(4)，1-29。

謝孟潔（民91）。妻子面對丈夫外遇後的心理歷程之研究。國立高雄師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文。未出版，高雄。

謝淑萍（民92）。當代台灣女性外遇發展之社會學研究。世新大學社會發展研究所碩士論文。未出版，臺北市。

簡春安（民85）。外遇的分析與處置。臺北市：張老師文化。

英文部分：
Allport, G. W. (1953). Attitudes. In M.Fishbein (Ed.), Readings in attitude theory and measurement (pp. 3-13). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Arrindell, W. A., & Luteijn, F. (2000). Similarity between intimate partners for personality traits as related to individual levels of satisfaction with life.Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 629-637.

Athanasiou, R., Shave, P., & Tavris, C. (1970). Sex (a report to Psychology Today readers). Psychology Today, 4(July), 39-52.

Banfield, S., & McCabe, M. P. (2001). Extra relationship involvement among women: Are they different from men? Archives of Behavior, 30, 119-142.

Barelds, D. P. H., & Barelds-Dijkska, P. (2007). Relations between different types of jealousy and self and partner perceptions of relationship quality. Clinical psychology and psychotherapy, 14, 176-188.

Bem, S. L. (1993). The lenses of gender. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Berscheid , E., & Fei, J. (1977). ‘Romantic love and sexual jealousy’, in G. Clanton 7 L. G. Smith (eds) Jealousy, pp. 101-109. Englewood Cliff, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Boekhout, B. A., Hendrick, S. S., & Hendrick, C. (2003). Exploring infidelity: Developing the relationship issue scale. Journal of Loss & Trauma, 8(4) , 283-306.

Brehm, S. S. (1992). Intimate relationships（2ed.）. New York: Random House

Buss, D. M. (1995). Evolutionary psychology: A new for psychological science. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 1-30.
Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (1997). Susceptibility to infidelity in the first year of marriage. Journal of Research in Personality, 31, 193-221.

Buss, D. M., Larsen, R., Westen, D., & Semmelroth, J (1992). Sex differences in jealousy: Evolution, psysiology, and psychology. Psychological Science, 3, 251-255.

Buss, D. M., Shackelford, T. K., Kirkpatrick, L. A., Choe, J. C., Lim, H. K., & Hasegawa, M. (1999). Jealousy and the nature of beliefs about infidelity: Tests of competing hypotheses about sex differences in the United States, Korea, and Japan. Personal Relationships, 6, 125-150.

Buunk, B. (1980). Extramarital sex in the Netherlands: Motivation in social and marital context. Alterative Lifestyles, 3, 11-39.

Buunk, B. (1987). Conditions that promote breakups as a consequence of extradyadic involvements. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 5, 271-284.

Buunk, B. P., & Dijkstra, P. (2001). Extradyadic relationships and jealousy. In C. Hendrick, & S. S. Hendrick (Eds), Close relationships: A sourcebook (pp. 316-329). London: Sage publications.

Buunk, B. P., Angleitner, A., Oubaid, V., & Buss, D. M. (1996). Sex differences in jealousy in evolutionary and cultural perspective: Tests from the Netherlands, Germany, and the United states. Psychological Science, 7, 359-363.

Buunk, B., & Bakker, A. (1995). Extradyadic sex: The role of descriptive and injunctive norms. Journal of Sex Research, 32, 313-318.

Buunk, B., & Hupka, R. B. (1987). Cross-cultural Differences in the Elicitation of sexual Jealousy. The Journal of Sex Research, 23(1), 12-22.

Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd eds.). NY: Academic Press.

DeSteno, D. A., Bartlett, M. Y., Braverman, J., & Salovey, P. (2002). Sex differences in jealousy: Evolutionary mechanism or artifact of measurement? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1103-1116.

Drigotas, S. M., & Barta, W. (2001). The cheating heart: Scientific explorations of infidelity. American Psychological Society, 10(5), 177-180.

Drigotas, S. M., & Rusbult, C. E.(1992). Should I Stay or Should I Go? A Dependence Model of Breakups. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 62(1), 62-87.

Eldridge, W. B. (1983). Therapists’use of information and dynamics from extramarital relationships to stimulate growth in married couple. Family therapy, 10, 1-11.

Engel, J. F., Blackwell, R. D., & Miniard, P. W. (1995). Consumer Behavior. New York: The Dydden.

Feldman, S. S., & Cauffman, E. (1999). Sexual betrayal among late adolescents: Perspectives of the perpetrator and the aggrieved. Journal of Youth and Adolescents, 28, 235-257.

Feldman, S.S., Cauffman, E., Jenson, L. A., & Arnett, J. (2000).The (un)acceptability of betrayal: A study of college students’ evaluation of sexual betrayal by a romantic partner and betrayal of a friend’s confidence. Journal of Youth and Adolescents, 29(4), 499-523.

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Glass, S. P. (1981). Sex difference in the relationship between satisfaction with various aspects of marriage and types of extramarital involvements. (Doctoral dissertation, Catholic University, 1980). Dissertation Abstracts International, 41(10), 3889B.

Glass, S. P., & Wright, T. L. (1992).Justification for extramarital relationships: The association between attitudes, behaviors, and gender. The Journal of Sex Research, 29(3), 361-387.

Hansen, G. L. (1987). Extra dyadic reactions during courtship. J. Sex Res., 23, 382-390.

Harris, C. R. (2000). Psychophysiology responses to imagine d infidelity: The specific innate modular view of jealousy reconsidered. Journal of Personality and social Psychology, 78, 1082-1091.

Harris, C. R. (2003). Factors associated with jealousy over real and imagined infidelity: An examination of the social –cognitive and evolutionary psychology perspectives. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27, 319-329.

Hendrick, C., & Hendrick, S. S. (1986). A theory and method of love. Journal of Social and Personal Relationship, 50, 392-402.

Hendrick, S. S., Hendrick, C., & Adler, N. L.（1988）. Romantic relationships: Love, satisfaction, and staying together. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 980-988.

Henline, B. H., Lamke, L. K., & Howard, M. D. (2007). Exploring perspections of online infidelity. Personal Relationships, 14, 113-128.

Hertlein, K. M., Ray, R., Wetchier, J. L., & Kiliner, J. M. (2003). The role of difference in extradyaduc relationship. Journal of Couple & Relationship , 14, 113-128.

Hertlein, Ray, Wetchier, & Kilimer (2003). The role of differentiation in extradyadic relationships. Journal of couple & Relationship Therapy. 2(4), 33-50.

Hupka, R. (1981). Cultural determinants of jealousy. Alternative Lifestyles , 4, 310-356.

Huston, A.C., & Wright, J. (1998). Mass media and children development. In Damon, W. (Series ed.) and Sigel, I. S., and Renninger, K. A. (Vol. Eds.). Handbook of Child Psychology: Vol. 4. Child Psychology in Practice (5th Ed.), Wiley, New York, pp. 999-1058.

Johnson, R. E. (1970). Extramarital sexual intercourse: A methodological note. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 32(2), 249-255.

Kitzinger, C., & Powell, D. (1995). Engendering infidelity: Essentialist and social constructionist readings of a story completion task. Feminism and Psychology, 5, 345-372.

Lawson, A. (1988). Adultery: An analysis of love and betrayal. NY: Basic Book.

Lee, J. A.（1973）. The colors of love: An exploration of loving. Don Mills, Ont. : New Press.

Lewin, B. (2000). Sexual intercourse and partners. In B. Lewin (Ed.) , Sex in Sweden. On the Sweden sexual life (pp. 76-79). Stockholm, Sweden: National Institute of Public Health.
Lieberman, B. (1988). Extramarital intercourse: Attitudes toward a neglected sexual behavior. Journal of Sex Research. 24, 291-299.

Marelich, W. D. (2002). Effects of behavior settings, extradyadic behaviors, and interloper characteristics on romantic jealousy. Social behavior and personality, 30(8), 785-794.

Mcalister, A. R., Pachana N., & Jackson C. J. (2005). Predictors of young dating adults’ inclination to engage in extradyadic sexual activities: A multi-perspective study. British Journal of Psychology, 96, 331-350.

McAlister, Pachana, & Jackson (2005). Predictors of young dating adults’ inclination to engage in extradyadic sexual activities: A multu-perspective study. British Journal of Psychological Socirty. 96, 331-350.

Monsour, M. (1992). Meanings of intimacy in cross-and same-sex friendships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 9, 277-295.

Nunnally, J.C. (1978). Psychometric Theory .New York: McGraw-Hill.

Pfeiffer, S. M., & Wong, P. T. (1989). Multidimentional jealousy. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 6, 181-196.

Roscoe, B., Cavanaugh, L. E., & Kennedy, D. R. (1988). Dating infidelity: Behaviors, reasons and consequences. Adolescence, 23(89), 35-43.

Rubin, Z.（1970）. Measure of romantic love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 265-273.

Russell, E. B., & Harton, H. C. (2005). The “other factors”: Using individual and relationship characteristics to predict sexual and emotional jealousy. Current Psychology: Developmental•Learnig•Personality•Social, 24(4), 242-257.,

Rydell & Bringle (2007). Differentiating reactive and suspicious jealousy. Social Behavior and Personality. 35(8), 1099-1114.

Schmookler, T., & Bursik, K. (2007). The value of monogamy in emerging adulthood: A gendered perspective. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 24(6). 810-835.
Seal, D. W., Agostinelli, G., & Hannett, C. A. (1994). Extradyadic romantic involvement: Moderating effects of sociosexuality and gender. Sex Roles, 31(1-2), 1-22.

Sears, D. O., Peplau, L. A., & Taylor, S. E.（1991). Social Psychology, 7th ed., Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice Hall.

Shackelford, T. K., Voracek, M., Schmitt, D. P., Buss, D. M., Weekes- Shackelford, V. A., & Michalski, R. L. (2004). Romantic jealousy in early adulthood and in later life. New Jersey Human Nature, 15(3), 283-300.

Sheppard, V., Nelson, E., & Andreoli-Mathie, V. (1995). Dating relationships and infidelity: Attitudes and behavior. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 21, 202-212.

Spanier, G. B., & Margolis, R. L. (1983). Marital separation and extramarital sexual behaviou. The journal of Sex Research, 19(1), 1-22.

Sternberg, R. J.（1986）. A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review, 93, 119-135.

Taylor, C. J.（1986）. Extramarital sex: Good for the goose? Good for the gender? Women and therapy, 5, 289-295.

Thompson, A. P. (1984). Emotional and sexual components of extramarital relations. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 46, 35-42.

Træen, B., Holmen, K., & Stigum, H. (2007). Extradyadic sexual relationship in Norway. Arch Sex Behav, 36, 55-65.

Weis, D. L., & Felton, J. R. (1987). Marital exclusivity and the potential for marital conflict. Social Work, 32, 45-59.

Weis, D. L., & Slosernick, M. (1981). Attitudes toward sexual and nonsexual extramarital involvements among a sample of college students. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 43(2), 349-358.
Werking, K. (1997). We’re just good friend: Women and men in nonromantic relationships. New York : The Guilford Press.

White, G. L., & Mullen, P. E. (1989). Jealousy: Theory, research, and clinical strategies. NY: Guilford Press.

Wiederman, M. W. (1997). Extramarital sex: Prevalence and correlates in a national survey. Journal of Sex Research, 34, 167-174.

Yarab, P. E., & Allgeier, E. (1998). Don't even think about it: The role of sexual fantasies as perceived unfaithfulness in heterosexual dating relationships. Journal of Sex Education & Therapy. 23(3), 246-254.

Yarab, P. E., Allgeier, E. R., & Sensibaugh, C. C. (1999). Looking deeper: Extradyadic behaviors, jealousy, and perceived unfaithfulness in hypothetical dating relationships. Personal Relationships. 6(3), 305-316.

Yarab, P. E., Sensibaugh, C. C., & Allgeier, E. R. (1998). More than just sex: Gender differences in the incidence of self-defined unfaithful behavior in heterosexual dating relationships. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality. 10(2), 45-57.