當搬運人員連續重覆進行相似物件的人力搬運時，若某一個物件與上幾次所搬運之重量差距過大且不在人員預期中而做出相對應的準備時，很有可能會因此而增加肌肉骨骼傷害之風險。因此，對於物料外箱的重量標籤內容，進行優化設計，以提升標籤的識別性，對於保障作業人員的安全性是一值得深入研究的議題。本研究主要探討外箱標籤黏貼面(任貼一面/任貼兩面/任貼三面/任貼四面)，字型設計(標準字型/粗體字體)與字體大小(12 point/24 point)對於研究參與者搜尋辨識標籤總時間之影響。為了避免實驗分析結果的偏差，本研究另設定控制變項，包括紙箱大小，標籤尺寸，使用襯字字型，標籤欄位出現次序，紙箱每一面限貼一張標籤與標籤黏貼位置用以分析自變項與依變項間的交互作用。
　　實驗招募30位研究參與者，年齡為25~45歲之成年國人，男女各15名。實驗採全因子設計，標籤黏貼於紙箱的不同面，從排列組合中選取(C_1^5/C_2^5/ C_3^5 /C_4^5 ),加上字型設計2水準與字體大小2水準，研究設置四個模擬情境：模擬情境一為紙箱上五面任取一面黏貼一張標籤，共有C_1^5種排列組合，加上字型設計2水準與字體大小2水準，模擬情境一共有20個實驗組合(C_1^5 x 2 x 2)。模擬情境二為紙箱上五面任取二面黏貼兩張標籤，實驗組合共有40個實驗組合(C_2^5 x 2 x 2)。模擬情境三為紙箱上五面任取三面黏貼三張標籤，實驗組合為40組(C_3^5 x 2 x 2)，模擬情境四設定為紙箱任取四面黏貼四張標籤，則實驗組合為20組(C_4^5 x 2 x 2)，共計120種測試組合。研究者在各實驗組合下蒐集研究參與者的搜尋辨識總花費時間，結果分析使用IBM SPSS軟體統計，針對三自變項的交互作用，以Three-Way ANOVA進行三因子變異數分析。接著以成對樣本t檢定分別比較「標籤黏貼面」、「字型設計」與「字體大小」兩組成對資料之間平均數差異。
　　實驗結果顯示，在主效果方面，「標籤黏貼面」，「字型設計」與「字體大小」各自皆達顯著(p<0.05)。統計結果顯示隨著標籤黏貼面的增加，所需搜尋辨識總花費時間會跟著降低，但當標籤面到達三面後，再增加更多的標籤面對於搜尋辨認總花費時間並無顯著幫助。三因子「標籤黏貼面」、「字型設計」與「字體大小」交互作用無顯著(p>0.05)。「標籤黏貼面」與「字體大小」的交互作用、字型設計」與「字體大小」皆達顯著(p<0.05)。
若使用者想在紙箱上黏貼三張標籤時，研究結果建議將標籤貼於紙箱的開口頂部、紙箱正前方與左側，使用者能較快讀取標籤內容。在字型的選擇方面，標籤上重點強調的內容建議使用粗體會有較醒目的效果。在字體大小選擇方面，建議在重要文字內容盡量使用較大字體凸顯標籤內容。

關鍵字:標籤黏貼面、字型設計、字體大小、反應時間、可讀性

　During performing material-handling and assembling, if the weight of the material exceeds someone’s expected load which will cause imminent risk of fatality or very serious body injury. Manufacturers have responsibility to propose optimized conceptual layout of warning label designs to strengthening safety. The aim is to increase the effectiveness of box label in the study. The labels were placed in different place of the box: selection from un-ordered collection〖(C〗_1^5/C_2^5/ C_3^5 /C_4^5 ),Font(regular/bold, 2 levels) and Typeface (12 point/24 point, 2 levels). In order to avoid the deviation of the experimental results, we also set the controlled variables, including carton size, label size, use serif font type “Times New Roman”, the order of column filed in label, only a label can be affixed on each side of the box and label position to analyze the interaction between independent and dependent variables.
　　 A total of 30 participants (25~45 years old, 15 men and 15 women participated in the study. The experiment adopts a full factorial design and combining 4 simulation tests, on the experiment 1 has 20 combinations(C_1^5 x 2 x 2) that stick one label on any one side of box. There’re 40 combinations(C_2^5 x 2 x 2) on the second experiment that attach 2 labels on any two side of box. On the third experiment is to address 3 labels on any 3 sides of box, it’s including 40 combinations(C_3^5 x 2 x 2). On the experiment 4, it has 20 combinations(C_4^5 x 2 x 2) if stick 4 labels on any 4 side of box. Participants are asked to finish 120 sets in the test. Participant’s main task is to check the weight of the label on the package in 120 runs of response time measure. All results were analyzed by using SPSS software statistics. We further analyze three variables by Three-Way ANOVA. And, use the Paired Sample T-test to determine whether the mean difference between label placement and typeface, and also the font with the typeface.
　　Results showed there’s statically significant (p<0.05) of label placement. Significant difference was found in the response time measure of label amounts. Finding that increase label quantity can indeed reduce participant’s response time and there’s no significant difference between 3 and 4 labels. There’s a significant main effect of font (p<0.05). There’s a main effect of typeface. ANOVA showed three variables had no effect (p>0.05). There’s no interaction between label placement and font. Participant’s ability to identify label were significant influenced by label placement and typeface (p<0.05). There’s a significant main interaction of font and typeface.
　　If users would like to stick three labels on the box, result suggested that the they should be affixed on the top , the front and the left side of the box, in it, users can read the label faster. Regard to the font, it suggested using bold to highlight the key points in the label to eye-catching effect. For the typeface in the label, we suggested using bigger size for emphasis key content to help raise awareness.

Keywords: label placement, typeface, font size, response time, readability.

中文部分
1. 吳昭容（2019）；眼球追蹤技術在幾何教育的應用與限制。臺灣數學教育期刊，6（2），1-25。 doi: 10.6278/tjme.201910_6(2).001
2. 勞動部及勞動安全衛生研究所勞動檢查統計年報/107年職災分析. https://www.osha.gov.tw/1106/1164/1165/1168/25237/
3. 潘儀聰、游志雲(2014)；重複性肌肉骨骼傷病預防技術指引研究。第一版。新北：勞動部勞動及職業安全衛生研究所，2014；1-152。
英文部分
1. American Psychological Association. (2009). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
2. ANSI Z535 section 4 (1986). Committee voted for these revisions in its meeting of September 16-18.
3. ANSI Z535.4 Standard (1998). Product Safety Signs and Labels. American National Standard for Product Safety Signs and Labels. https://webstore.ansi.org/Standards/
4. Arditi, A., and Cho, J. (2005). Serifs and font legibility. Vision Research Volume 45, Issue 23, pages 2926-2933.
5. Argo, J.J., and Main, K.J. (2004) Meta-analyses of the effectiveness of warning labels. J Public Policy Mark. 2004;23(2):193-208.
6. Banerjee, J., Majumdar, D., Pal, M.S., and Majumdar, D. (2011). Readability, subjective preference and mental workload studies on young Indian adults for selection of o pointimum font type and size during onscreen reading. Al Ameen Journal of Medical Sciences 4 (2011), page 131–143.
7. Barthelson, M. (2002). Reading behavior in online news reading, graduation project. Lund University: Department of Cognitive Science.
8. Braun, C.C., Mine, P.B., and Silver, N.C.(1995).The influence of color on warning label perce pointions.International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. Volume 15, Issue 3, March 1995, Pages 179-187
9. Bauer, D.T., and Guerlain, S.(2011).Improving the usability of intravenous medication labels to support safe med.
10. Beymer, D., Russell,D., and Orton, P.(2008). An eye tracking study of how font size and type influence online reading. People and computers XXII : culture, creativity, interaction : proceedings of HCI 2008, the 22nd British HCI Group annual conference (Vol. 2). Presented at the 22nd British HCI Group annual conference, Liverpool John Moores University, UK: British Computer Society. Retrieved May 20, 2012, from http://www.bcs.org/upload/pdf/ewic_hc08_v2_paper4.pdf
11. Bhatia, S. K., Samal, A., Rajan, N, and Kiviniemi, M.T.(2011). Effect of font size, italics, and colour count on web usability. International Journal of Computational Vision and Robotics 2, 2 (2011), page 156–179.
12. Blackwell, G.R.(2017).The Electronic Packaging Handbook. Page14-40
13. Bleiker, C.(2016) Black lungs and rotting teeth to grace German cigarette packs. Deutsche Welle.
14. Buckingham, G., and Goodale, M.A.(2010b). Lifting without seeing: The role of vision in perceiving and acting upon the size weight Illusion. PLoS ONE, 5, e9709)
15. Bzostek J.A. and Wogalter ., M.S.(1999). Measuring Visual Search Time For A Product Warning Label As A Function Of Icon, Color, Column And Vertical Placement. Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society 43rd annual meeting. page.888~892.
16. Cabrera, M., Machin, L.,Arrúa, A., Antúnez, L.,, Cururchet, M.R., Giménez, A., and Ares, G.(2017).Nutrition warnings as front-of-pack labels: influence of design features on healthfulness perception and attentional capture. Page 3360-337.
17. Campos, S., Doxey, J., & Hammond, D.(2011). Nutrition labels on pre-packaged foods: A systematic review. Public Health Nutrition, 14, 1496-1506. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1368980010003290
18. Chae, B. and Hoegg, J.(2013) The Future Looks “Right”: Effects of the Horizontal Location of Advertising Images on Product Attitude by JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, Inc. Vol. 40.
19. Chandler, S.B.(2001).Comparing the Legibility and Comprehension of Type Size, Font Selection and Rendering Technology of Onscreen Type. Page 75~93.
20. Chapanis, A.(1994). Hazard associated with three signal words and four colors on warning signs. Ergonomics 37, page 265-275
21. Chaumillon, R., Blouin, J., and Guillaume, A.(2014). Eye dominance influences triggering action: The Poffenberger paradigm revisited Cortex, 58 page86-98. PMID: 24995596. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2014.05.009
22. Cho, H.J.(2016).Graphic health warning on tobacco products, regulatory reform committe and health advocacy. Health and Society. 2016(5). Page 62-69.
23. Cornelisse-Vermaat, J.R., Voordouw, J., Yiakoumaki, V., Theodoridis, G., Frewer, L.J.(2008).Food-allergic consumers’ labelling preferences: a cross-cultural comparison. European Journal of Public Health, Volume 18, Issue 2, April 2008, pages 115–120.
24. Dossou, G., Gallopel-Morvan, K., and Diouf, J-F.(2017). The effectiveness of current French health warnings displayed on alcohol advertisements and alcoholic beverages. Eur J Public Health. 2017;27(4). Page 699-704. doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckw263
25. Fong, G.T., Hammond, D., Hitchman, S.C.(2009).The impact of pictures on the effectiveness of tobacco warnings. B World Health Organ. 2009;87(8):640-643. doi:10.2471/blt.09.069575
26. Frantz, J.P., and Rhoades, T. P.(1993). A task-analytic approach to the temporal and spatial placement of product warnings. Human Factors, 35, page 719–730.
27. Friedman, J.J. (2009). A note on the type. Font designers imagine a better-looking web. Technology Review. Retrieved May 2, 2012, from http://www.technologyreview.com/article/23503/.
28. Gasser, M., Boeke, J., Haffernan, M., and Tan, R.(2005) The Influence of Font Type on Information Recall. North American Journal of Psychology; 2005, Vol. 7 Issue 2, page 181–188.
29. Geske, J.(1996). Legibility of Sans Serif Type for Use as Body Copy in Computer Mediated Communication. Presented at Annual Meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication 1996.
30. Graham, D. J. and Jeffery, R.W.(2011) Location, location, location: eye-tracking evidence that consumers preferentially view prominently positioned nutrition information. J Am Diet Assoc 111, page 1704–1711.
31. Greenberg, E.F.(2003).Should labels reflect everything that’s on our minds? Packaging Digest 2003;40(9).Page 38.
32. Halim,R.E.(2019).Warning Label Placement: The Difference Effect of Social Risk and Health Risk Consequences European Research Studies Journal Volume XXII, Issue 2,page 282-297.
33. Hastings, G., Stead, M., and Webb J.(2004). Fear appeals in social marketing: Strategic and ethical reasons for concern. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20043
34. Health and Safety Executive (UK). (2016). Warning signs. https://www.hse.gov.uk/comah/sragtech/techmeassigns.htm
35. Hojjati, N., and Muniandy, B.(2014).The Effects of Font Type and Spacing of Text for Online Readability and Performance. Contemporary Educational Technology, 5(2), page 161-174
36. Hwang, J.E., Yang, Y. S., Oh, Y.M., Lee, S. Y., Lee, J.E.. Cho, S.I.(2018).Differences in visual fixation duration according to the position of graphic health warning labels: An eye-tracking approach. Tob. Induc. Dis. 2018;16(September):39DOI: https://doi.org/10.18332/tid/94327
37. Institute for Safe Medication Practices.(2014). Principles of Designing a medication label for community and mail order pharmacy prescription packages. https://forms.ismp.org/tools/guidelines/labelFormats/comments/default.asp
38. Jacobs, S.A., de Beer, H., and Larney, M.(2011). Adult consumers’ understanding and use of information on food labels: a study among consumers living in the Potchefstroom and Klerksdorp regions, South Africa. Public Health Nutrition, 14, page 510-522. doi: 10.1017/S1368980010002430
39. Jain, A., Bansal, R., Kumar, A., and Singh K.D.(2015). A comparative study of visual and auditory reaction times on the basis of gender and physical activity levels of medical first year students.
40. Kang, EJ.(2017). Assessing health impacts of pictorial health warning labels on cigarette packs in Korea using DYNAMO-HIA. J Prev Med Public Health. 2017;50(4):251-261. doi:10.3961/jpmph.17.032
41. Karia, R.M., Ghuntla, T.P., Mehta, H.B., Gokhale, P.A., and Shah, C.J. (2012).Effect of gender difference on visual reaction time: A study on medical students of Bhavnagar region. IOSR-PHR. 2012;2:452–4.
42. Kosinski, R.J.(2012).A Literature Review on Reaction Time Kinds of Reaction Time Experiments. Computer science. Page 1-13.
43. Lai, M. L., Tsai, M. J., Yang, F. Y., Hsu, C. Y., Liu, T. C., Lee, S. W. Y., ...Tsai, C. C. (2013). A review of using eye-tracking technology in exploring learning from 2000 to 2012. Educational Research Review, 10, 90-115.
44. Laughery, K.R., Wogalter, M.S.,(1997). Warnings and risk perception. In: Salvendy, G. (Ed.), Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics, 2nd Edition. Wiley, New York, pp. 1175–1197.
45. Laughery, K. R.(2006). Safety communications: Warnings. Appl. Ergonomics, Page 467–478. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2006.04.020.
46. Laughery, K. R., Young, S. L., Vaubel, K.P.,and Brelsford, J.W.(1993).The noticeability of warnings on alcoholic beverage containers. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 12, page 38-56.
47. Laughery, K.R, Young, S.L, Vaubel, K.P., and Brelsford, J.W.(1993).Warning information. In: Proceedings of Human Factors Society 35th Annual Meeting. Human Factors Society, Santa Monica, CA, page 585–589.
48. Laughery, K.R., and Wogalter, M.S.(2011).A three-stage model summarizes product warning and environmental sign research. Saf. Sci. 2014;61:3–10. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2011.02.012.
49. LAWS of Malaysia-Food(Amendment) Regulations(2016). http://www.moh.gov.my/attach_download
50. Leigh, J.H., Zinkhan, G.M., and Swaminathan, V.(2006). Dimensional Relationships Of Recall And Recognition Measures With Selected Cognitive And Affective Aspects Of Print Ads. Journal of Advertising, 35(1), page 105-122.
51. Lidwell, W., Holden, K., and Butler, J.(2010) Universal principles of design, revised and updated: 125 ways to enhance usability, influence perception, increase appeal, make better design decisions, and teach through design. Rockport Pub; 2010.
52. Masin, S.(1988). Experimental demonstration of the sensory basis of the size-weight illusion.
53. McCarthy, M.S. and Mothersbaugh, D.L.(2002). Effects of typographic factors in advertising-based persuasion: A general model and initial empirical tests. Psychology &Marketing, 19(7-8), page 663-691.
54. McDonough, I.M., and Gallo, D.E.(2012).Illusory expectations can affect retrieval-monitoring accuracy.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, page 391-404.
55. Mercer, R., Young, M., Rimpeekool, W., Marshall, A., Hector, D., Dickson, J., and Phillips, R.(2013). Literature review on the impact of label format on consumers’ attention and comprehension for mandated label elements. Prepared For: Food Standards Australia New Zealand. Page 1~62.
56. Moriarty, S.E.,and Scheiner, E.C.(1984).A study of close-set text type. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(4), page 700–702. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.69.4.700
57. Mueller, M.L., Dunlosky, J., Tauber, S.K., Rhodes, M.G.(2014).The font-size effect on judgments of learning: Does it exemplify fluency effects or reflect people’s beliefs about memory? Journal of Memory and Language 70, page1-12
58. Obal, M.W., Kery, N., and Bushardt, C.(2015).Let's Get Engaged! Crossing the Threshold of Marketing’s Engagement Era: Proceedings of the 2014 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference.
59. Perea, M., Moret-Tatay, C., and Gómez, P.(2011).The effects of inter letter spacing in visual word recognition. Acta Pschologica, 137, page 345-351.
60. Purmehdi, M., Legoux, R., Carrillat, F.A, and Senecal, S.(2016). The Effectiveness of Warning Labels for Consumers: A Meta-Analytic Investigation into Their Underlying Process and Contingencies. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 36(1).
61. Rayner, K., and Well, A.D.(1996).Effects of contextual constraint on eye movements in reading: A further examination. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review volume 3, pages504–509.
62. Rebollar, R., Lidon, I., Martin, J., and Puebla, M.(2015). The identification of viewing patterns of chocolate snack packages using eye-tracking techniques. Food Qual Prefer. 2015;39. Page 251-258. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.08.002
63. Rello, L., Pielot, M., and Marcos, M.C.(2016).Make It Big!: The Effect of Font Size and Line Spacing on Online Readability. Computer Science. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
64. Rhodes, M. G., and Castel, A.D.(2008).Memory predictions are influenced by
perceptual information: Evidence for metacognitive illusions Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 137, page 615-625, 10.1037/a0013684
65. Rogers, W.A., Lamson, N., and Rousseau, G.K.(2000). Warning research: An integrative perspective. Human Factors, 42, page 102-102.
66. Romney, C.(2006). Improving the visual appeal of classroom handouts. JALT2005 Conference Proceeding. Tokyo: JALT.
67. Rønnow, H.N.(2020)The Effect of Front-of-Pack Nutritional Labels and Back-of-Pack Tables on Dietary Quality. Nutrients 2020, 12(6), page1704.
68. Ruiter, AC. R.,and Kok, G.(2005). Saying is not (always) doing: Cigarette warning labels are useless. European Journal of Public Health, 15(3), 329. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/cki095
69. Sanders, M.S., McCormick, E.J.(1993). Human Factors in Engineering and Design, 7th Edition. McGraw-Hill, New York.
70. Sans-serif -WIKIPEDIA. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sans-serif
71. Sathar, F., Dalvie, M.A., and Rother, H.A.(2016) Review of the Literature on Determinants of Chemical Hazard Information Recall among Workers and Consumers. Int J Environ Res Public Health.13(6), page 546. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph13060546
72. Shaikh, A.D.(2005). Psychology of onscreen type: Investigations regarding type face personality, appropriateness, and impact on document perce pointion. (Doctoral dissertation).
73. Singla, M.(2010). Usage and understanding of food and nutritional labels among Indian consumers. British Food Journal, 112, page3 83-92. doi:10.1108/00070701011011227
74. Smith-Jackson, T.L., and Wogalter, M.S.(2006).Method and procedures in warning research Handbook of warning. Page 23~28.
75. Sojourner, R.J.,Wogalter, M.S, (1998). The influence of pictorials on the comprehension and recall of pharmaceutical safety and warning information. Int. J. Cognitive Ergonomics 2, page 93–106.
76. Spink, J., Singh, J., and Singh, S.P.(2011). Review of Package Warning Labels and Their Effect on Consumer Behavior with Insights to Future Anticounterfeit Strategy of Label and Communication Systems. Paper Presented at IAPRI Symposium 2011, Berlin. Packaging Technology and Science, 24, page 469-484. Doi: 10.1002/ points.947
77. Sumrall, W., Sumrall, R., and Doss, D.A.(2016). A Review of Memory Theory. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science. Vol. 6, No. 5; Page 1-8.
78. Sunaga, T., Park, J., Spence, C.(2016). Effects of lightness-location congruency on consumers' pur-chase decision-making. Psychol. Market., 33, pp. 934-950
79. Taillie, L.S., Hall, M.G., Popkin, B.M., Shu, W.N., and Murukutla, N.(2020). Experimental Studies of Front-of-Package Nutrient Warning Labels on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages and Ultra-Processed Foods: A Scoping Review. Nutrients 2020, 12(2), page 569; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12020569
80. Tarasova, D.A , Sergeeva, S.P., Filimonova, V.V.(2015). Legibility of textbooks: a literature review. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 174.Page1300 – 1308.
81. The WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control.(2017).Discuss Paper. Page27~30.https://www.who.int/fctc/implementation/publications/who-fctc-undp-wntd-2017.pdf
82. Ursic, M. (1984) The Impact of Safety Warnings on Perception and Memory, Human Factors, 26:3, page 680.
83. US Failure Analysis Associates.(2013).Labeling, Warnings, and Advertising Claims in Food. https://www.exponent.com/knowledge/webinars/2013/claims-in-food/?pageSize=NaN&pageNum=0&loadAllByPageSize=true
84. Valenzuela, A., Raghubir P.(2015). Are consumers aware of top–bottom but not of left–right inferences? Implications for shelf space positions J. Exp. Psychol., page. 224-241
85. Velotta C.(1987). Safety Labels: What to Put in Them, How to Write Them, and Where to Place Them. IEEE transactions on professional communication. VOL. PC 30, NO. 3, page 121-125.
86. Wansink, B., Sonka, S.T., and Halser, C.M.(2004).Front-label health claims: when less is more. Food Policy 29 (2004) 659–667.
87. Welford, A.T.(1980).Choice reaction time: Basic conce points. In: Welford AT, editor. Reaction Times. New York: Academic Press; 1980. Page. 73–128.
88. Westinghouse Electric Corporation (1981). Product Safety Label Handbook: DANGER, WARNING, CAUTION
89. Wogalter, M.S., Brelsford, J.W.(1994). Incidental exposure to rotating warnings on alcoholic beverage labels. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 38th Annual Meeting. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, CA, pp. 374–378
90. Wogalter, M.S., Conzola, V.C., Smith-Jackson, T.L.(2002) Research-Based Guidelines for warning Design and Evaluation. Applied Ergonomics, 33, page 219-230.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-6870(02)00009-1
91. Wogalter, M.S., Kalsher, M.J., Racicot,B.M.(1992).The Influence of Location and Pictorials on Behavioral Compliance to Warnings. Proceeding a/ the human factors society 36th annual meeting, page 1029-1033
92. Wogalter,M.S., Dejoy,D.M., and Laughery, K.R.(2005). Organizing theoretical framework: a consolidated communication–human information processing (C-HIP) model. In Warnings and Risk Communication, page13–21.
93. Wright, L.T.(1997). Exploring the need for extended research: an investigation of consumer attitudes to product labeling. Journal of product and brand management, 6, page 417-427
94. Young, S.L, Wogalter, M.S.(1994). Enhancing warning compliance through alternative product label designs. Appl. Ergonomics 25, page 53–57.
95. Young, S.L, Wogalter, M.S.(2001). Evaluation of list vs. paragraph text format on search time for warning symptoms in a product manual. In: Bittner, A.C., et al. (Ed.), Advances in Occupational Ergonomics and Safety. IOS Press, Amsterdam, page 434–438.