研究生: |
呂欣樺 Lu, Hsin Hua |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
跨性別者的成家權利 The Family Right of Transgenders |
指導教授: |
林昀嫺
Lin, Yun Hsien |
口試委員: |
王曉丹
Wang, Hsiao Tan 陳汝吟 Chen, Ju Yin |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
科技管理學院 - 科技法律研究所 Institute of Law for Science and Technology |
論文出版年: | 2015 |
畢業學年度: | 103 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 113 |
中文關鍵詞: | 跨性別者(變性人) 、變性手術 、性別變更登記 、家庭權 、生育權 、收養 |
外文關鍵詞: | Transgenders, Sex reassignment surgery, Gender recognition certificate, Right to family, Reproductive right, Adoption |
相關次數: | 點閱:1 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
跨性別者,乃是指在性的解剖生理構造上完全正常的人,在心理上卻認為自己應該屬於另一種性別,醫學上稱為「性別不安」或是「性別不一致」。隨著醫學技術的進步,讓人們有得以主宰自己性別的可能,世界各國亦紛紛對跨性別者的權利加以立法保護並規範。我國雖然沒有於跨性別者設立有專法,但也嘗試由行政命令或是法律的解釋,對跨性別者相關權利加以規定。
本文欲將重心置於跨性別者之成家權利,希望能將跨性別者在變性之後,可能涉及之身分法上關係,如結婚、收養子女,乃至於日後可能需借助於人工生殖技術的實施,進而孕育下一代,其中的法律議題加以討論,審究現行之規定是否合宜,以期勾勒出最能保障與包含跨性別者的憲法與法律。
Transgender is the state of one's gender identity or gender expression not matching one's assigned sex while one's sexual physiology structure is normal, and which we call “Gender Dysphoria” or“Gender Incongruence” in medicine. Advancements in medical technology have allowed people to master their own sex, thus Countries around the world have stipulated legislation to protect transgender people's rights. Although there is no law for transgender people in Taiwan now, the government still tries to regulate transgender people's rights by the Executive Order or explain the law.
In this article, I will focus on the transgender people's right to family. Hoping to discuss the family law issues that after transgender people complete the sex reassignment surgery, such as marriage, adoption of children, and even they may need the help of artificial reproductive technology to have the next generation in the future. We will see whether the provisions are appropriate through reviewing the law in operation, and try to outline the Constitution and the law which can protect transgender people effectively.
中文
專書
王澤鑑(2009)。《侵權行為法》。台北:三民書局。
司法院司法行政廳編輯(2011)。《司法研究年報第27輯<民事類>》。台北:司法院。
吳庚(2008)。《行政法之理論與實用》,增訂十版。台北:三民書局。
林秀雄(2013)。《親屬法講義》。台北:元照。
法治斌、董保城(2006)。《憲法新論》,三版第二刷。台北:元照。
莫里斯(1995)。《我是變性人 : 顛覆兩性者的自我告白》。台北︰日臻。
陳棋炎、黃宗樂、郭振恭合著。《民法親屬新論》,修訂十一版,台北:三民書局。
戴炎輝、戴東雄、戴瑀如(2007)。《親屬法》。台北:自刊。
期刊論文
文榮光、徐淑婷、柯乃熒(1996)。〈性別認同障礙與變性慾症之診療現況〉。《性治療工作坊手冊》。
王世賢(2006)。〈生育權之檢討〉,河北師範大學學報(哲學社會科學版),29卷3期,頁65-68。
王珍玲(2010)。〈行政規則之對外效力〉。《台灣本土法學雜誌》,166期,頁131-136。
王茂山(2005)。〈變性手術之發展〉。《臨床醫學》,56卷2期,頁81-87。
主講者:歐陽文貞/整理:戴瀅純(2013)。〈台灣精神醫學會年會DSM-5倫理與性別議題:精神疾病診斷系統中文化與性別議題〉,《DSM-5通訊》,第三卷第1期,頁25-26。
吳嘉苓(1999)。〈性別、醫學與權力〉。收於:王雅各主編《性屬關係》,頁385-418。台北:心理。
李念祖(2013),〈重新思考婚姻的憲法定義〉,《在野法朝》,16期,頁12-13。
李震山(2003)。〈論移民制度與外國人基本權利〉。《台灣本土法學雜誌》,第48期,頁51-65。
李震山(2004)。〈憲法意義下之「家庭權」〉。《中正法學集刊》,16期,頁61-104。
林民凱(2014)。〈我國收養制度評估服務執行問題之評析〉。《止善》,第十六期,頁85-101。
林昀嫺(2008)。〈論未成年人收養之國際趨勢與我國法制〉。《台灣國際法季刊》,第五卷第一期,頁83-110。
林昀嫺(2010)。〈我國人工生殖法之挑戰與契機〉。《中原財經法學》,第25期,頁63-111。
邱文聰(2007)。〈從「人工生殖法」的適用主體談生育自由的雙面性格〉。《法令月刊》,58卷8期,頁146-153。
徐淑婷、柯乃熒、方榮煌、文榮光(2003)。〈變性慾症患者變性手術後的身心社會適應〉。收於:何春蕤主編《跨性別》,桃園:中央大學性/別研究室。
張永明(2008)。〈德國變性人之醫療、法律與倫理分析〉。《臺灣法學雜誌》,118期,頁53-68。
張永明(2008)。〈德國變性人法案與著名憲法裁判簡介〉。《臺灣法學雜誌》,118期,頁53-68。
張永明(2011)。〈「變性是醫療問題還是法律問題」重點提示〉。《月旦法學教室》,109期,頁107-113。
張宏誠(2010)。〈法律的眼中,「我是誰?」──性別認同障礙與變更性別登記立法芻議〉。《全國律師》,14卷5期,頁57-86。
許耀明(2008)。〈歐盟關於結婚權與組成家庭權之保護:從歐洲人權法院與歐洲法院相關案例談起〉。《歐美研究》,38:4期,頁637-669。
郭德厚(2011)。〈性主體之法律管制策略初探——以司法院大法官解釋為中心〉。《成大法學》,22期,頁67-107。
陳宜倩(2007)。〈性/性慾特質、隱私權與同志人權─評析Lawrence V. Texas一案判決〉。收於:焦興鎧編《美國最高法院重要判決之研究:2000~2003》,頁151-188。台北:中央研究院歐美研究所。
陳宜倩(2010)。〈從性別自主決定權談跨性別族群人拳〉。《全國律師》,14卷5期,頁47-56。
陳宜倩(2011)。〈性別自主決定、婚姻自由與跨性別人權--試評德國聯邦憲法法院1 BvL 10/5 (2008)判決〉。《歐美研究》,41卷3期,頁801-848。
陳思原、楊友仕(2013)。〈人工生殖科技之現況及未來〉。《台灣醫學》,17卷6期,頁618-624。
彭南元(1999)。〈對美國一九九四年統一收養法之評析—兼論對我國收養法制之啟示〉。《歐美研究》,第二十九卷第一期,頁127-222。
甯應斌(2012)。〈性別權、能力取向與變性政治〉。《政治與社會哲學評論》,43期,頁37-80。
廖元豪(2008)。〈同性婚姻受憲法保障嗎?〉。《月旦法學教室》,第70期,頁8-9。
趙文宗(2011)。〈「是她、他也是妳和我」:由W訴婚姻登記處一案看香港跨性別法律機器〉。《台灣社會研究季刊》,83期,頁329-354。
劉俐君、武國璋(2011)。〈人工生殖技術的進展〉。《台灣醫界》,Vol.54No.11,頁16-18。
劉建宏(2007)。〈吸菸者與非吸菸者之人權保障:「吸菸自由」?─兼論「健康權」之內涵〉。《台灣本土法學雜誌》,總號:94,頁59-66。
賴澤涵(1982)。〈「我國家庭的組織及權力結構之變遷」〉。《歷史與社會變遷( 中國社會史 )研討會論文集》,頁99-118。台北:中央研究院三民主義研究所。
戴瑀如(2004)。〈論德國同性伴侶法〉。《月旦法學雜誌》,總號:10,頁145-165。
戴瑀如(2011)。〈從人權保障的觀點審視人工生殖法制所面對的難題-兼論幾則歐洲人權法院的判決〉。收於:《中央研究院法律學研究所 專書(15)》,頁299-339。
戴瑀如(2014)。〈由德國同性伴侶法的催生、影響與轉化檢視德國對同性人權之保障〉。《月旦法學雜誌》,總號:224,頁38-56。
韓毓傑(1992)。〈論「法之功能」及其研究方法-從「法律社會學」角度觀察〉。《國防管理學報》,13卷2期,頁33-45。
竇秀蘭(2012)。〈DSM-5中性別不安症(Gender Dysphoria)之主要改變〉。《DSM-5通訊》,第二卷第1期,頁9-12。
學位論文
吳佩蓉(2012)。《性別秩序的規訓與懲罰─論跨性別者難以跨越的性別鴻溝》,國立暨南國際大學公共行政與政策學系研究所碩士論文,南投。
吳采模(2012)。《跨性別族群之性別自主決定權─兼論國家規制法律性別之界限》,台灣大學法律學研究所碩士論文,台北。
林家慧(2008)。《他/她的故事敘說-一位跨性別主體的自我認同與社會適應研究》,國立屏東教育大學社會發展學系研究所碩士論文,屏東。
張千容(2011)。《變性人之性別自主權與健康權之研究》,國立高雄大學法律學系研究所碩士論文,高雄。
許昭元(2003)。《論生殖性複製與生殖自由》,政大法律研究所碩士論文,台北。
網路文獻
Abbygail Wu, Jiyi Wu, Zoe Ye(2014)。《跨性別者、陰陽人及性別不明者在性別登記及性別平等議題》。載於:http://www.istscare.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/ISTScare_shadow_report_2014_chinese.pdf
英文
專書
Ally Windsor Howell(2013). Transgender Gender Persons and the Law. American Bar Association.
American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition. WASHINGTON, DC:American Psychiatric Association.
Carson Strong (1997). Ethics in Reproductive and Perinatal Medicine: A New Framework. Pennsylvania:Yale University Press.
Courtney G Joslin、Shannon P. Minter、Catherine Sakimura (2014). Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Family Law, 2014ed. New York, NY:Thomson Reuters.
Gherovici Patricia(2010). Please select your gender : from the invention of hysteria to the democratizing of transgenderism. Philadelphia, PA: Routledge.
Salamon Gayle(2010). Assuming a body : transgender and rhetorics of materiality. New York, NY:Columbia University Press.
期刊論文
Alex Sharpe(2012).Transgender Marriage and the Legal Obligation to Disclose Gender History. The Modern Law Review, Vol. 75, No. 1, pp33-53.
Amanda Kennedy(2008). Because We Say So: The Unfortunate Denial of Rights to Transgender Minors Regarding Transition. Hastings Women's Law Journal, Vol. 19, Issue 2 , pp281-302.
ANDREW ALSTON (1999). TRANSGENDER RIGHTS AS LEGAL RIGHTS, ANDREW ALSTON. Canterbury Law Review, Vol. 7, Issue 2, pp. 329-342.
ANDREW N. SHARPE (2007). ENDLESS SEX: THE GENDER RECOGNITION ACT 2004 AND THE PERSISTENCE OF A LEGAL CATEGORY. Feminist Legal Studies, 15, pp57-84.
CARLA A. PFEFFER(2012). NORMATIVE RESISTANCE AND INVENTIVE PRAGMATISM: Negotiating Structure and Agency in Transgender Families. Gender and Society, Vol. 26, No. 4, pp574-602.
CHINYERE EZIE(2011). DECONSTRUCTING THE BODY: TRANSGENDER AND INTERSEX IDENTITIES AND SEX DISCRIMINATION-THE NEED FOR STRICT SCRUTINY. Columbia Journal of Gender and Law, Vol. 20, Issue 1 , pp141-200.
Coleman, E., Bockting, W., Botzer, M., Cohen-Kettenis, P., DeCuypere, G., Feldman, J.,Fraser, L., Green, J., Knudson, G., Meyer, W. J., Monstrey, S., Adler, R. K., Brown, G. R.,Devor, A. H., Ehrbar, R., Ettner, R., Eyler, E., Garofalo, R., Karasic, D. H., Lev, A. I.,Mayer, G., Meyer-Bahlburg, H., Hall, B. P., Pfaefflin, F., Rachlin, K., Robinson, B.,Schechter, L. S., Tangpricha, V., van Trotsenburg, M., Vitale, A., Winter, S., Whittle, S.,Wylie, K. R., &Zucker, K(2011). Standards of Care for the Health of Transsexual,Transgender, and Gender-Nonconforming People, Version 7, International Journal of Transgenderism, 13, pp165-232.
Cook, Rebecca J.; Mahmoud F. Fathalla (1996). Advancing Reproductive Rights Beyond Cairo and Beijing. International Family Planning Perspectives, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp 115-121.
Demoya R. Gordon(2009). Transgender Legal Advocacy: What Do Feminist Legal Theories Have to Offer?. California Law Review, Vol. 97, No. 6, pp 1719-1762.
Dr. DédéOetomo(2013). New Kids on the Block: Human Rights, Sexual Orientation, and Gender Identity in Southeast Asia. William S. Richardson School of Law University of Hawaii Asian-Pacific Law & Policy Journal, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp118-131.
ErezAloni, FROM PAGE TO PRACTICE: BROADENING THE LENS FOR REPRODUCTIVE AND SEXUAL RIGHTS: CLONING AND THE LGBTI FAMILY: CAUTIOUS OPTIMISM, New York University Review of Law & Social Change, 35 N.Y.U. Rev. L. & Soc. Change 1,2011.
Erika Skougard(2011). THE BEST INTERESTS OF TRANSGENDER CHILDREN. Utah Law Review, Vol. 2011, Issue 3. 1161-1202.
Francesco Paolo Busardò, Matteo Gulino, Simona Napoletano, Simona Zaami, and Paola Frati (2014). The Evolution of Legislation in the Field of Medically Assisted Reproduction and Embryo Stem Cell Research in European Union Members. BioMed Research International, Vol. 2014, Article ID 307160, 14 pages.
Franklin H. Romeo(2005). BEYOND A MEDICAL MODEL: ADVOCATING FOR A NEW CONCEPTION OF GENDER IDENTITY IN THE LAW, Columbia Human Rights Law Review Columbia Human Rights Law Review, Vol. 36, Issue 3, pp713-754.
Jillian T. Weiss(2010). GENDER AUTONOMY, TRANSGENDER IDENTITY AND SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS: FINDING A RATIONAL BASIS FOR LAWRENCE V. TEXAS. Journal of Race, Gender and Ethnicity Volume 5, Issue 1 , pp2-38
Julie A. Greenberg(2012). LGBT IDENTITY AND THE LAW: HEALTH CARE ISSUES AFFECTING PEOPLE WITH AN INTERSEX CONDITION OR DSD: SEX OR DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION?. Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, Vol.45, pp 849-908.
Kari J. Carter(2006). THE BEST INTEREST TEST AND CHILD CUSTODY: WHY TRANSGENDER SHOULD NOT BE A FACTOR IN CUSTODY DETERMINATIONS. Health Matrix: Journal of Law-Medicine, 16(1), pp209-236.
Levasseur, M. Dru(2015). Gender Identity Defines Sex: Updating the Law to Reflect Modern Medical Science Is Key to Transgender Rights. Vermont Law Review, Vol. 39, Issue 4, pp. 943-1004.
Loveday Hodson (2012). Ties That Bind: owards a Child-Centred Approach to Lesbian, Gay, i-Sexual and Transgender Families under the ECHR. InternationalJournal of Children's Rights , 20 , pp507-522.
Maureen Carroll(2009). TRANSGENDER YOUTH, ADOLESCENT DECISION MAKING, AND ROPER V. SIMMONS. UCLA LAW REVIEW, Vol. 56, Issue 3, pp. 725-754 .
Maya Sabatello(2010). Who's Got Parental Rights? The Intersection Between Infertility. Reproductive Technologies, and Disability Rights Law, Health and Biomedical Law Society, Volume 6 , pp227-260.
Maya Sabatello(2011). Advancing Transgender Family Rights through Science: A Proposal for an Alternative Framework. Human Rights Quarterly, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp43-75.
PETER DUNNE (2015). YY v TURKEY: INFERTILITY AS A PRE-CONDITION FOR GENDER CONFIRMATION SURGERY. Medical Law Review, doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwv019 First published online: May 14, 2015
Remah Moustafa Kamel(2013), Assisted Reproductive Technology after the Birth of Louise Brown. Journal of Reproduction & Infertility, 14(3), pp96-109.
Robert L. Stenger (1995). The Law and Assisted Reproduction in the United Kingdom and United States. Journal of Law and Health, Vol. 9, Issue 1, pp. 135-162.
Stacey M. Brumbaugh, Laura A. Sanchez, Steven L. Nock and James D. Wright(2008). Attitudes toward Gay Marriage in States Undergoing Marriage Law Transformation. Journal of Marriage and Family, Vol. 70, No. 2, pp345-359.
Suzanne M. Marks(2006). Global Recognition of Human Rights for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender People. Health and Human Rights, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp33-42.
Taylor Flynn(2001). “Transforming” the Debate: Why We Need to Include Transgender Rights in the Struggles for Sex and Sexual Orientation Equality. Columbia Law Review, Vol. 101, No. 2, pp392-420.
Timothy J. Biblarz and EvrenSavci(2010). Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Families. Journal of Marriage and Family, Vol. 72, No. 3, pp480-497.
網路文獻
Australian Government (2013). Australian Government Guidelines on the Recognition of Sex and Gender. https://www.ag.gov.au/Publications/Documents/AustralianGovernmentGuidelinesontheRecognitionofSexandGender/AustralianGovernmentGuidelinesontheRecognitionofSexandGender.PDF
Richard Köhler•AlecsRecher• Julia Ehrt (2013). Legal Gender Recognition in Europe. http://www.tgeu.org/sites/default/files/Toolkit_web.pdf
韓文
期刊論文
홍성필、이승현(2013).〈성전환자의법적성별변경허용시의료조치강제에대한국제법적평가- 서울서부지방법원 2013.3.15. 2012호파4225등결정을계기로-〉.《國際法學會論叢》,第58卷第2號(通卷第129號), pp131-160.