在少子化的情形之下，大學的創新教學及多元學習管道已是重要課題，眾多的大學校院，若無思考學生學習未來的新趨勢，想必將也遭受到排擠。數位學習浪潮也漸漸朝向大學，將學習無國界、空間、時間阻饒之MOOCs線上學習模式，帶領大學另類學習風氣，引領新生態學習風格。
大學實施多元教學策略，將大學先修(Advanced Placement, AP )課程應用MOOCs線上學習之系統教學，提供課程能「抵免學分」、「修課費用全免費」、「開課多元化」、「無需到校」四大特色來吸引已考取來自不同背景之學生，利用等待入學這段期間能提早體驗自己考取的學校教學模式及培養自主學習良好習慣，迎接大學新生活。根據教育部資料來源於103年開始推動大學MOOCs計畫，截至106年，推展了341門MOOCs課程，超過50萬人註冊，平均完課率僅12.02％，使得MOOCs出現註冊人數比較多、低完課率的問題。
故本論文主要以(Davis, 1989)提出的科技接受模式(Technology Acceptance Model, TAM)做為整個研究架構的基礎，以認知有用性與認知易用性、使用態度、使用行為意向四大構面來探討應用MOOCs AP課程線上教學系統之意圖與行為，並以學生個人資訊學習背景變項及點選學習影片流覽排序前80%觀看比率作為完課的判定，並進行之行為分析，進而了解學生修習MOOCs AP課程影響完課率之因素，透過問卷調查法，蒐集資料並量化統計資料，然後分析各變項之間的相關性，根據研究結果具體建議提供MOOCs AP授課之相關單位參考。

Many universities and colleges are exploring using technologies for constructing new teaching and learning channels these years. Therefore, MOOCs learning platforms are widely used in many universities for providing students to learn actively at anywhere and anytime. In the time of low fertility, innovative instruction and diverse learning channel of universities have become important issues.
Many universities now implement diverse instructional strategies by providing courses with “credit exempt,” “free course fees,” “courses diversity,” and “study at home” for the systematic instructions of MOOCs online learning with applications in Advanced Placement (AP) courses. These courses are intended to attract students coming from different background who have passed the entrance examination. Students will have the opportunity to experience the instructional model of the school early and develop good study habits while waiting for entrance to their school and new college life. According to the data released by the Ministry of Education, the university MOOCs program has been launched since 2014 and as of 2017, 341 MOOCs courses were released. Over 500,000 people have registered with only 12.02% in average of course completion rate, resulting in the problems with more applicants for MOOCs registration and low course completion rate.
This thesis mainly adopts the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) proposed by Davis (1989) as the research framework, and analyzes the intent and behavior in the application of online instruction system from MOOCs AP courses through four constructs, including perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use, attitude toward using, and user behavior intention. This thesis also discusses course completion using the learning background variables of students’ personal information and the top 80% watching/reading rate. This thesis also conducts behavioral analysis to further comprehend the factors affecting course completion rates for students taking MOOCs AP courses. Moreover, this thesis applies questionnaire survey to collect data and quantify the statistical data, analyzing the correlation between variables and providing specific suggestions of reference for departments offering MOOCs AP instructions according to the research results.

中文部分
王履梅、朱純瑜、劉安之(2018)。磨課師的創新與應用論文專書 MOOCs發展計畫之評估與實證研究，11。出版地點：台灣 國立宜蘭大學
何是勳、林明宏、黃美華(2017)。以能力集合與科技接受模式探討健身APP開發之研究，習慣領域期刊，8(1)，89-119。
何榮桂(2014)。大規模網路開放課程（MOOCs）的崛起與發展，台灣教育(686)，2-8。
林信志、湯凱雯、賴信志(2010)。以科技接受模式探討大學生學習以網路教學系統製作數位教材之意圖和成效.數位學習科技期刊， 2(1)，60-78。
林惠如、黃玉雯、靖永皓、林宥甄、吳柏樺(2018)。磨課師的創新與應用論文專書 線上課程的推展：慈濟大學「天空學院」，69，出版地點：台灣 國立宜蘭大學。
林惠茹、黃玉雯(2018c)。磨課師的創新與應用論文專書 MOOCs課程設計：以「現代柯南-跟著瑪斯一起探索檢驗世界」課程為例.，176，出版地點：台灣 國立宜蘭大學。
趙丹(2010)。美國先修课程計畫追求教育公平的實踐研究，基礎教育，7(11)，52-55。
國家通訊傳播委員會、原住民族委員會 (2017)。普及偏鄉寬頻接取環境計畫。民106年7月，取自：https://pse.is/GLHDM
張金鐘(2002)。以科技接受模式探討教師與學生採用數位化教材的態度，國立中山大學，高雄市。
張瑞雄(2013)。MOOCs的現況與未來，師友月刊(550)，36-40。
張靖翊(2017)。中華開放教育聯盟磨課師課程發展與推動系列報導(二) 民106年4月6日。
教育部(2016)。新一代數位學習計畫─ 105 年度綱要計畫書，臺北市。
陳美樺（2016)。以TAM (科技接受模式) 探討國小教師及國小高年級學童使用即時通訊軟體之研究。南華大學資訊管理學系碩士論文，嘉義縣。
陳雅芬(2011)。走入主流：美國大學先修（AP）中文考試2007－2010結果分析，臺灣華語教學研究(1)，57-71。
黃國倫(2013)。智慧型手機行動銀行使用行為影響因素之探討. 淡江大學企業管理學系碩士在職專班學位論文，1-68。
楊鎮華(2016)。磨課師時代下的人才培育。
鄒宜君（2012）。數位學習平台使用者滿意度之研究－以嶺東科技大學為例。嶺東科技大學經營管理研究所碩士論文，台中市。
劉安之(2018)。磨課師的創新與應用論文專書，出版地點：台灣 國立宜蘭大學。
劉怡甫（2013a）。與全球十萬人作同學：談MOOC現況及其發展，評鑑雙月刊，42，41-44。
劉怡甫(2014b)。從anti-MOOC風潮談MOOCs轉型與SPOCs擅場，評鑑雙月刊，48，36-41。
劉怡甫(2013c)。以 Coursera 為例談 MOOC 教學設計了些什麼?，評鑑雙月刊，45，34-38。
羅英凱(2013)。應用行動裝置於課程提醒之研究: 行動課程秘書，中原大學資訊工程研究所學位論文，1-69。
蘇郁婕(2010)。台灣電影發行商的數位行銷策略，淡江大學資訊傳播學系碩士班學位論文，1-202。
英小美(2017)。AP課程是什麼？為什麼這麼多人想讀國際高中？，民106年11月2日。
余明融(2018）。透過獎勵機制提升線上課程的完課率-以程式設計課程為例，實踐大學資訊科技與管理學系碩士班碩士論文，台北市。
吳志倫（2016）。透過視覺化影片瀏覽行為分析提升磨課師課程之完課率，國立中央大學軟體工程研究所碩士論文，桃園縣。
吳俊毅(2000)。科技接受模型之實徵研究—從動機角度， 未出版之碩士論文，國立中央大學資訊管理研究所，桃園市。
吳建清(2017)。以科技接受模式探討國中生使用Google Classroom之行為意向研究-以公民科學習為例，東海大學教育研究所在職專班碩士論文，台中市。
黃俊堂（2016）。透過適時介入輔導提升磨課師課程之完課率，國立中央大學資訊工程學系碩士論文，桃園縣。
黃若菱（2012）。使用科技接受模式探討國中生使用線上英語測驗網之行為及學習成效，中華大學科技管理學系碩士班碩士論文，新竹市。
葉國毅(2015)。MOOC 使用者人格特質與其完成率之相關性.，中央大學企業管理學系學位論文，1-42。
邱皓政(2006)。量化研究與統計分析，五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
李宗倫(2015)。探討擴增實境融入學習單的學習動機，學習成效與使用意願之研究，宜蘭大學多媒體網路通訊數位學習碩士在職專班學位論文，1-78。
余民寧(2006)。潛在變相模式：SIMPLIS的應用，台北市：高等教育。
鄭兆君(2018)。以科技接受模式探討國小學生創客教育scratch程式之成效，遠東科技大學行銷與流通管理系碩士班碩士論文，台南市。
蕭富聯(2017)。以科技接受模式探討高職學生使用專業英文詞彙能力線上測評系統之行為，國立臺灣師範大學工業教育學系碩士論文，台北市。
許永慶(2015)。以科技接受模式探討電子教科書融入英文教學之學習滿意度，中華大學科技管理學系碩士班碩士論文，新竹市。
姚佩婷(2015)。以科技接受模式探討使用LearnMode數位學習平台對國中生學習動機與滿意度之研究，中華大學科技管理學系碩士班碩士論文，新竹市。
英文部分
Adams, D. A., Nelson, R. R., & Todd, P. A. (1992). Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: A replication. MIS quarterly, 16( 2),227-247.
Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. Action control (pp. 11-39): Springer.
Anderson, J. Q. (2013). Individualisation of higher education: How technological evolution can revolutionise opportunities for teaching and learning. International social science journal, 64(213-214), 305-316.
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sage focus editions, 154, 136-136.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 16(1), 74-94.
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological methods & research, 21(2), 230-258.
Barbour, M., & Mulcahy, D. (2013). Examining enrollment trends in schools participating in online learning in Newfoundland and Labrador. Technology-Mediated Learning, 66-76.
Chau, P. Y. K. (1996). An empirical assessment of a modified technology acceptance model. Journal of management information systems. 13(2) , 185-204.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.
Cheng, P., & Chu, C. (1996). Kernel estimation of distribution functions and quantiles with missing data. Statistica Sinica,6(1) , 63-78.
Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern methods for business research, 295(2), 295-336.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly,13(3) , 319-340.
Davis, F. D., & Venkatesh, V. (1996). A critical assessment of potential measurement biases in the technology acceptance model: three experiments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45(1), 19-45.
Diamantopoulos, A., & Siguaw, J. A. (2006). Formative versus reflective indicators in organizational measure development: A comparison and empirical illustration. British Journal of Management, 17(4), 263-282.
Doll, W. J., Hendrickson, A., & Deng, X. (1998). Using Davis's perceived usefulness and ease‐of‐use instruments for decision making: a confirmatory and multigroup invariance analysis. Decision sciences, 29(4), 839-869.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, Mass.: Addison Wessley.
Gefen, D., Straub, D., & Boudreau, M.-C. (2000). Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of the association for information systems, 4(1), 7.
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., & Black, W. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis, Prentice Hall. Upper Saddle River, NJ, 730.
Hoy, M. B. (2014). MOOCs 101: an introduction to massive open online courses. Medical reference services quarterly, 33(1), 85-91.
Igbaria, M., Zinatelli, N., Cragg, P., & Cavaye, A. L. (1997). Personal computing acceptance factors in small firms: a structural equation model. MIS quarterly,21(3), 279-305.
Juan, C. R., Chiu, C. M., & Francisco, J. M. (2006). Understanding e-learning continuance intention: An extension of the technology acceptance model. Human-computer studies, 64, 683-696.
Jordan, K. (2014). Initial trends in enrolment and completion of massive open online courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(1).133-160.
Johnston, S., & Barbour, M. K. (2013). Measuring success: Examining achievement and perceptions of online advanced placement students. American journal of distance education, 27(1), 16-28.
Kang, S. (1998, January). Information technology acceptance: Evolving with the changes in the network environment. In Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.1(1), 413-423.
Kennedy, J. (2014). Characteristics of massive open online courses (MOOCs): A research review, 2009-2012. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 13(1),1-16.
Kop, R., Fournier, H., & Mak, J. S. F. (2011). A pedagogy of abundance or a pedagogy to support human beings? Participant support on massive open online courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(7), 74-93.
Lim, K. H. B., L. (2000). The effect of multimedia on perceived equivocality and perceived usefulness of information system. MIS quarterly, 24, 449-471.
Lin, J. C. L., H. . (2000). Towards an understanding of the behavioural intention to use a web site. International journal of information management. 20, 197-208.
Lytras, M. D., Mathkour, H. I., Abdalla, H., Ai-Halabi, W., Yanez-Marquez, C., & Siqueira, S. W.M. (2015). An emerging-social and emerging computing enabled philosophical paradigm forcollaborative learning systems: Toward high effective next generation learning systems forthe knowledge society. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 557-561.
Literat, I. (2015). Implications of massive open online courses for higher education: mitigating or reifying educational inequities? Higher Education Research & Development, 34(6), 1164-1177.
Mathieson, K. (1991). Predicting user intentions: comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Information systems research, 2(3), 173-191.
Morris, M. G., & Dillon, A. (1997). How user perceptions influence software use. IEEE software, 14(4), 58-65.
Ngai, E. W., Poon, J., & Chan, Y. H. (2007). Empirical examination of the adoption of WebCT using TAM. Computers & education, 48(2), 250-267.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory: 2d Ed: McGraw-Hill.
Najafi, H., Evans, R., & Federico, C. (2014). MOOC integration into secondary school courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(5),306-322.
Pappano, L. (2012). The Year of the MOOC. The New York Times, 2(12), 2012.
Riley, R. W. (1999). New Challenges, a New Resolve: Moving American Education into the 21st Century. The Sixth Annual State of American Education Speech.
Szajna, B. (1994). Software evaluations and choice: predictive validation of the technology acceptance instrument. MIS quarterly, 18, 319-324.
Segars, A., & Grover, V. (1993). Re-Examining Perceived Ease of Use and Usefulness: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis. MIS Quarterly,. 517-525.
Van der Heijden, H., Verhagen, T., & Creemers, M. (2003). Understanding online purchase intentions: contributions from technology and trust perspectives. European journal of information systems, 12(1), 41-48.
Venkatesh, V. M., M. G. (2000). Why don’t men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence ,and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS quarterly, 24, 115-139.