台灣的經濟發展歷史中，傳統產業中小企業一直扮演著舉足輕重的角色，傳統產業中小企業通常以家庭經營或小規模工廠形式存在，其組織結構相對簡單，資本規模較小，但具備較強的靈活性和適應能力。這些企業為國內外市場提供了大量優質產品，長期以來是台灣經濟的基石。然而，在與東南亞國家和中國同行的海外市場競爭中，他們面臨著越來越大的挑戰，導致市占率和成本競爭力的喪失。本研究旨在探討傳統行業中小企業如何找到突破外界環境限制的關鍵配置，最終實現創業取向和組織績效的途徑。
本研究選擇了台灣金屬模具製造業中的T公司作為研究對象。旨在探討台灣傳統產業中小企業以創業網絡和資源拼貼作為生存策略的研究。首先，本文將回顧台灣傳統產業中小企業的發展歷史和當前面臨的主要挑戰。接著，通過文獻回顧和案例分析，詳細介紹創業網絡和資源拼貼的概念及其應用，並探討這些策略在提升企業競爭力方面的具體成效。最後，總結研究發現，並提出針對台灣傳統產業中小企業的未來發展建議。
通過這項研究，我們期望能夠提供一個有價值的視角，幫助台灣傳統產業中小企業在競爭激烈的市場環境中持續發展和創新。在技術變遷的背景下，這些企業如何運用創業網絡和資源拼貼，將是決定其未來生存與成功的關鍵。希望本文的研究能夠為政策制定者、企業經營者及學術界提供有益的參考和啟示。
關鍵詞：傳統產業、中小企業、創業網絡、資源拼貼

In the history of Taiwan's economic development, small and medium-sized enterprises in traditional industries have always played a decisive role. Traditional industrial small and medium-sized enterprises usually exist in the form of family operations or small-scale factories. Their organizational structures are relatively simple. Their capital scale are small, but they are highly flexible and adaptable. These enterprises provide a large number of high-quality products for domestic and foreign markets and have long been the cornerstone of Taiwan's economy. However, they face increasing challenges in overseas market competition with Southeast Asian countries and Chinese counterparts, resulting in the loss of market share and cost competitiveness. This study aims to explore how small and medium-sized enterprises in traditional industries find key configurations that break through the limitations of the external environment and ultimately achieve entrepreneurial orientation and organizational performance.
This study selected Company T in Taiwan's metal mold manufacturing industry as the research object. This study aims to explore the use of entrepreneurial networks and resource bricolage as survival strategies by small and medium-sized enterprises in traditional industries in Taiwan. First, this article will review the development history and main challenges currently faced by small and medium-sized enterprises in Taiwan's traditional industries. Next, through literature review and case analysis, the concepts and applications of entrepreneurial networks and resource bricolage are introduced in detail, and the specific effectiveness of these strategies in improving corporate competitiveness is discussed. Finally, the research findings are summarized and suggestions for the future development of small and medium-sized enterprises in Taiwan's traditional industries are proposed.
Through this study, we hope to provide a valuable perspective to help Taiwanese traditional industry SMEs continue to develop and innovate in a highly competitive market environment. In the context of technological change, how these companies use entrepreneurial networks and resource bricolage will be the key to determining their future survival and success. It is hoped that the research in this article can provide useful reference and inspiration for policy makers, business operators and academic circles.
Keywords: traditional industries, small and medium-sized enterprises, entrepreneurial network, resource bricolage

Bourdieu, P. (2018). The forms of capital. In The sociology of economic life (pp. 78-92). Routledge.
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American journal of sociology, 94, S95-S120.
Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic management journal, 10(1), 75-87.
Daily, C. M., McDougall, P. P., Covin, J. G., & Dalton, D. R. (2002). Governance and strategic leadership in entrepreneurial firms. Journal of management, 28(3), 387-412.
Davidsson, P., & Honig, B. (2003). The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of business venturing, 18(3), 301-331.
Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of management review, 25(1), 217-226.
Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S. W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of management review, 27(1), 17-40.
Kirzner, I. M. (1983). Perception, opportunity, and profit. Chicago, IL, USA: Chicago University Press.
Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of management review, 25(1), 217-226.
Baron, R. A. (2006). Opportunity recognition as pattern recognition: How entrepreneurs “connect the dots” to identify new business opportunities. Academy of management perspectives, 20(1), 104-119.
Grégoire, D. A., Barr, P. S., & Shepherd, D. A. (2010). Cognitive processes of opportunity recognition: The role of structural alignment. Organization science, 21(2), 413-431.
Aldrich, H., Zimmer, C., & Jones, T. (1986). Small business still speaks with the same voice: a replication of ‘the voice of small business and the politics of survival’. The Sociological Review, 34(2), 335-356.
Beck, T., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Levine, R. (2006). Bank concentration, competition, and crises: First results. Journal of banking & finance, 30(5), 1581-1603.
Ayyagari, M., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Maksimovic, V. (2011). Do Phoenix miracles exist? Firm-level evidence from financial crises. Firm-Level Evidence from Financial Crises (September 1, 2011). World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, (5799).
Acs, Z. J., & Audretsch, D. B. (1988). Innovation in large and small firms: an empirical analysis. The American economic review, 678-690.
Tether, B. S. (1998). Small and large firms: sources of unequal innovations?. Research policy, 27(7), 725-745.
Berger, A. N., Saunders, A., Scalise, J. M., & Udell, G. F. (1998). The effects of bank mergers and acquisitions on small business lending. Journal of financial Economics, 50(2), 187-229.
Beck, T., & Demirguc-Kunt, A. (2006). Small and medium-size enterprises: Access to finance as a growth constraint. Journal of Banking & finance, 30(11), 2931-2943.
Storey, D. J. (1994). New firm growth and bank financing. Small Business Economics, 6, 139-150.
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of management review, 23(2), 242-266.
Hoang, H., & Antoncic, B. (2003). Network-based research in entrepreneurship: A critical review. Journal of business venturing, 18(2), 165-187.
Burt, R. S. (2018). Structural holes. In Social stratification (pp. 659-663). Routledge.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture and organizations. International studies of management & organization, 10(4), 15-41.
Stuart, T. E., & Sorenson, O. (2007). Strategic networks and entrepreneurial ventures. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(3‐4), 211-227.
Uzzi, B. (1997). Towards a network perspective on organizational decline. International journal of sociology and social policy, 17(7/8), 111-155.
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American journal of sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380.
Krackhardt, D. (1999). The ties that torture: Simmelian tie analysis in organizations. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 16(1), 183-210.
Davidsson, P., & Honig, B. (2003). The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of business venturing, 18(3), 301-331.
Aldrich, H., Zimmer, C., & Jones, T. (1986). Small business still speaks with the same voice: a replication of ‘the voice of small business and the politics of survival’. The Sociological Review, 34(2), 335-356.
Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., Johnson, J. C., & Agneessens, F. (2022). Analyzing social networks using R. Sage.
Katila, R., Thatchenkery, S., Christensen, M. Q., & Zenios, S. (2017). Is there a doctor in the house? Expert product users, organizational roles, and innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 60(6), 2415-2437.
Aldrich, D. P., & Meyer, M. A. (2015). Social capital and community resilience. American behavioral scientist, 59(2), 254-269.
Hatak, I., Harms, R., & Fink, M. (2015). Age, job identification, and entrepreneurial intention. Journal of managerial psychology, 30(1), 38-53.
Mateus, S., & Sarkar, S. (2024). Bricolage–a systematic review, conceptualization, and research agenda. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 1-22.
Baker, T., & Nelson, R. E. (2005). Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 329-366.
Baker, T., Miner, A. S., & Eesley, D. T. (2003). Improvising firms: Bricolage, account giving and improvisational competencies in the founding process. Research Policy, 32(2), 255-276.
Williams, T. A., Zhao, E. Y., Sonenshein, S., Ucbasaran, D., & George, G. (2021). Breaking boundaries to creatively generate value: The role of resourcefulness in entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 36(5), 106141.
An, W., Zhao, X., Cao, Z., Zhang, J., & Liu, H. (2018). How bricolage drives corporate entrepreneurship: The roles of opportunity identification and learning orientation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 35(1), 49-65.
Ferneley, E., & Bell, F. (2006). Using bricolage to integrate business and information technology innovation in SMEs. Technovation, 26(2), 232-241.
De Bernardi, C., & Pedrini, M. (2020). Entrepreneurial behaviour: Getting eco-drunk by feeling environmental passion. Journal of Cleaner Production, 256, 120367.
Witell, L., Gebauer, H., Jaakkola, E., Hammedi, W., Patricio, L., & Perks, H. (2017). A bricolage perspective on service innovation. Journal of Business Research, 79, 290- 298.