本研究探討愛情諮商團體中，客體關係衝突之內容在不同團體階段的呈現與轉變。研究為準實驗單組團體歷程分析，以兩位團體領導者採非結構領導的方式，帶領十次愛情諮商團體，每次九十分鐘，並在團體帶領過程中提供課程訓練與督導。研究者與兩位分析者進行團體歷程資料之分析，資料分析為團體過程分析，針對成員在團體中對於過去經驗、當下生活事件與問題的言說之口語內容逐字稿進行文本分析。採用「基底重複之不適應情緒結構分析量表」（FRAMES），針對其二至九次團體單元中的文本進行分析，並對諮商團體中成員存在的客體關係衝突類別與團體現象進行歸納與整理。
　　團體成員於團體過程的言說中，呈現出過去自己面對重要他人經驗關係時的客體關係衝突，每位成員在團體過程中的客體關係衝突類別消長有其獨特性存在，但共構出團體前期與團體後期的分野；團體前期正向與負向客體關係衝突類別的出現百分比大致相當，團體後期負向客體關係衝突類別的出現百分比大於正向客體關係衝突類別，而在團體中獲益的成員正向客體關係衝突類別出現百分比在團體結尾時大於負向客體關係衝突類別；其中一位成員之客體關係衝突展現在與團體成員的互動上，對當次的團體互動歷程與團體氣氛有所影響。

The current study was to explore the change process of members’ object relation conflict in a counseling group focus on the romantic love issues.The research adopt quasi experiment process research to analysis a unstructured conseling group focus on the romantic love issues lead by two leaders.Researcher using FRAMES to analysis every members’ verbatim in the group with two coders.
Eight members’ object relation cateragry arise percentage is idiographic, but build the group stage(initial and later phase);at the initial stage(sessions 2 to 5), positive and negative object relation cateragrys’ arise percentage was even, at the later stage(sessions 6 to 9), negative object relation cateragrys’ arise percentage is more than positive, the member got profit in group show more positive object relation cateragrys arise percentage at the end of the group; A member reappear the object relation conflict in group.

中文文獻：
王美華（2007）。大學生活壓力與適應因應策略之研究。元智大學資訊社會學研究所碩士論文。
王郁茗、王慶福（2007）。大學生知覺其人際依附風格對愛情關係適應之影響。教育心理學報，38(4)，397-415。
王麗斐、林淑君（2010）。國內諮商與心理治療質性研究之研究方法與研究題材之初步性整合分析。教育心理學報，41(4)，799-821。
白嘉玲（2009）。不同背景變項的單身成人依附風格、宗教認同態度和人際親密能力之關係研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系在職進修碩士論文。
吳秀碧（2005）。諮商團體領導原理的建構：螺旋式領導方法。中華輔導學報，17，1-32。
吳秀碧、洪雅鳳、羅家玲（2003）。團體諮商歷程中領導者意圖與聚焦之分析研究。中華輔導學報，13，117-150。
吳秀碧、許育光、李俊良（2003）。諮商團體歷程中成員自我揭露頻率與深度之初探。彰化師大輔導學報，25，1-24。
吳秀碧、許育光、洪雅鳳、羅家玲（2004）。非結構諮商團體過程中領導者技術運用之研究。中華心理衛生學刊，17(3)，23-56。
李文瑄（2004a）。個別心理治療（三十二）—客體的源頭與客體關係的本質（上）。諮商與輔導，224，50。
李文瑄（2004b）。個別心理治療（三十三）－客體的源頭與客體關係的本質（下）。 諮商與輔導，225， 48。
李靜如（2007）。大學生的成人依附、社交能力、社會支持、寂寞與憂鬱之關係。 國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文。
卓紋君、張淑芬、高琇玲（2004）。完形治療團體中主角成員個人工作之歷程研究。諮商輔導學報：高師輔導所刊，(10)，111-142。
林佳玲（2000）。夫妻依附風格、衝突因應策略與婚姻滿意度之相關研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
邱美華（2012）。團體諮商領導者效能研究初探。輔導季刊，48(3)，31-37。
邱美華、謝麗紅（2009）。焦點解決團體諮商領導者意圖與成員知覺一致性分析。中華輔導與諮商學報，25，1-38。
姜智惠（2003）。國小攻擊傾向兒童在阿德勒取向團體遊戲治療之轉變歷程研究。 國立新竹師範學院輔導教學碩士班碩士論文，未出版，新竹市。
施建彬（2004）。大學新生心理健康及其相關因素探討。大葉學報，13(2)，109-117。
柳杰欣、吳麗娟、林世華（2009）。適婚男女知覺父母婚姻關係、依附關係與其婚姻態度之相關研究，教育心理學報，40(4)，641-662。
夏林淸（2002）。大團體動力 : 理念、結構與現象。臺北市：五南。
孫頌賢、修慧蘭(2007)。成人依附的測量：成人世界中不同依附對象的測量差異和關連，中華心理衛生學刊，20(1)，31-51。
張芳榮、李娟娟、謝宏林、王梅麗、張達人（2005）。家庭暴力加害人非自願性團體治療之團體歷程探討。中華團體心理治療，11(2)，1-13。
康斐文（2009）。兒童成長團體對國小高年級學生之輔導歷程研究。國立臺南大學教育學系輔導教學碩士班碩士論文。
張景然（2001）。準團體諮商員的迷思與衍生的問題。諮商與輔導，185，2-7。
許育光（2005）。團體諮商轉換階段之人際歷程與領導者介入策略分析研究。國立彰化師範大學輔導與諮商學系研究所博士論文。
許育光（2009）。碩士層級受訓團體諮商師參與“螺旋式領導取向”培訓之成效與介入能力學習經驗分析。教育心理學報，41(S)，321-344。
許育光（2011）。諮商團體成員自我揭露因素之歷程變化分析。教育心理學報， 42(4)，655-676。
許育光（2013）。團體諮商與心理治療：多元場域應用實務。台北市：五南。
許育光、吳秀碧（2010）。諮商團體領導者於情緒處理段落之介入策略研究。中華輔導與諮商學報，27，245-284。
陳均姝、陳登義、施欣欣（2006）。一位門診病人參與團體心理治療之療效因子與改變過程研究－以人際與心理動力取向團體心理治療爲例。輔導與諮商學報，28(1)，1-27。
陳秉華（1996）。諮商中大學生的心理分離－個體化沖突改變歷程研究。教育心理學報，(28)，145-175。
陳思帆（2008）。大學生依附關係、拒絕敏感度與曖昧訊息處理之關係研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
陳慧苓（2012）。新手領導者帶領低結構團體之技巧問題探討。諮商與輔導，314，25-28。
曾正奇、謝秋雯、陳信昭（2011）。團體發展歷程分析工具之介紹與應用－以一個團體段落為例。中華團體心理治療， 17(2)，9-27。
賀孝銘、吳秀碧、張德榮（2001）。不同層級準諮商員「個案概念化」能力之差異比較研究。彰化師大輔導學報，22，1-31。
馮喬琳（2006）。大學生依附風格、人際衝突類型與因應策略之相關研究。中國文化大學心理輔導研究所碩士論文。
黃惠貞、姜逸群（2005）。大專院校學生靈性健康、知覺壓力與憂鬱之相關研究。 衛生教育學報，23，121-143。
黃慧森、廖鳳池（2008）。高中生共許生涯願景的故事：敘事取向生涯探索團體之研究。諮商輔導學報：高師輔導所刊，18，55-88。
楊文貴（2001）。人際基模的發展與內涵。國立台北師範學院學報，14，209-232。
楊晴如（2008）。大學生生活壓力、解釋風格與情緒幸福感之關係研究。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
詹杏如（2007）。當我們只在夢中相見─夢工作團體對成人經歷哀傷歷程之療效因子。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
潘正德（1998）。團體歷程中口語互動行為與相關變項之研究。中原學報(人文及社會科學系列)，26(4)，73-97。
潘正德（1999）。不同理論取向團體的口語互動行為分析與團體效果研究。中原學報(人文及社會科學系列)，27(2)，95-122。
潘正德、林繼偉、王裕仁（2003）。團體口語行為量表信效度之研究。中華輔導學報，13，89-116。
謝麗紅（1995）。成長團體過程與團體效果之分析研究。國立彰化師範大學輔導與諮商學系研究所博士論文。
謝麗紅（2000）。團體過程中工作同盟的變化及其與團體結果之關係研究。彰化師大輔導學報，21，63-92。
蘇完女、吳秀碧（2003）。團體成員解決其未完成事件的內涵及其歷程之分析研究。中華輔導學報，14，31-62。
英文文獻：
Ainsworth, M. S., & Bowlby, J. (1991). An ethological approach to personality development. American Psychologist, 46(4), 333-341. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.46.4.333
Albani, C., Pokorny, D., Blaser, G., Gruninger, S., Konig, S., Marschke, F., . . . Kachele, H. (2002). Reformulation of the Core Conflictual Relationship Theme (CCRT) categories: The CCRT-LU Category System. Psychotherapy Research, 12(3), 319-338. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ptr/12.3.319
Andersen, S. M., & Chen, S. (2002). The relational self: An interpersonal social-cognitive theory. Psychological Review, 109(4), 619-645. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.109.4.619
Andersen, S. M., & Thorpe, J. S. (2009). An IF-THEN theory of personality: Significant others and the relational self. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(2), 163-170. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.12.040
Anthony, B., & Jeremy, H. (2004). 當代精神分析導論：理論與實務 (林玉華、樊雪梅, Trans.). 台北市: 五南.
Ashbach, C., & Schermer, V. L. (1987). Object relations, the self and the group: A conceptual paradigm. New York, NY: Routledge; US.
Baldwin, M. W. (1992). Relational schemas and the processing of social information. Psychological Bulletin, 112(3), 461-484. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.3.461
Baldwin, M. W. (1997). Relational schemas as a source of if-then self-inference procedures. Review of General Psychology, 1(4), 326-335. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.1.4.326
Baldwin, M. W., Granzberg, A., Pippus, L., & Pritchard, E. T. (2003). Cued activation of relational schemas: Self-evaluation and gender effects. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 35(2), 153-163. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0087197
Baldwin, M. W., Keelan, J. P. R., Fehr, B., Enns, V., & Koh-Rangarajoo, E. (1996). Social-cognitive conceptualization of attachment working models: Availability and accessibility effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(1), 94-109. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.1.94
Bales, R. F. (1988). A new overview of the SYMLOG system: Measuring and changing behavior in groups The SYMLOG practitioner: Applications of small group research (pp. 319-344). New York, NY, England: Praeger Publishers; England.
Barber, J. P., & Crits-Christoph, P. (1993). Advances in measures of psychodynamic formulations. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61(4), 574-585. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.61.4.574
Barlow, S. H., Burlingame, G. M., & Fuhriman, A. (2000). Therapeutic Application of Groups: From Pratt's "Thought Control Classes" to Modern Group Psychotherapy. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, & Practice March, 4(1), 115-134.
Bednar, R. L., & Kaul, T. J. (1994). Experiential group research: Can the canon fire? Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (4th ed ) (pp. 631-663). Oxford, England: John Wiley & Sons; England.
Bell, L. (2001). Patterns of interaction in multidisciplinary child protection teams in New Jersey. Child Abuse & Neglect, 25(1), 65-80. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134%2800%2900224-6
Bilican, F. (2010). Change in interpersonal schemas during the psychotherapy process. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 71(3-B), 2039.
Bourke, M. E., & Grenyer, B. F. (2010). Psychotherapists' response to borderline personality disorder: A core conflictual relationship theme analysis. Psychotherapy Research, 20(6), 680-691. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2010.504242
Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss. Separation: Anger and anxiety (Vol. 2).London: Hogarth.
Bowlby, J. (1983). Attachment and loss: Retrospect and prospect. Annual Progress in Child Psychiatry & Child Development, 29-47.
Burlingame, G. M., Fuhriman, A. J., & Johnson, J. (2004). Process and Outcome in Group Counseling and Psychotherapy: A Perspective Handbook of group counseling and psychotherapy (pp. 49-61). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd.
Collins, N. L. (1996). Working models of attachment: Implications for explanation, emotion, and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(4), 810-832. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.4.810
Corey, M. S., Corey, G., & Corey, C. (2010)。團體諮商：歷程與實務（第八版）（陳慶福，翁樹澍，許淑穗，劉志如，吳淑禎，王沂釗譯）。臺北市：洪葉文化（原出版於2008）。
Dahl, H. (1995). An information feedback theory of emotions and defenses Ego defenses: Theory and measurement (pp. 98-119). Oxford, England: John Wiley & Sons; England.
Dahl, H., & Stengel, B. (1978). A classification of emotion words: A modification and partial test of De Rivera's decision theory of emotions. Psychoanalysis & Contemporary Thought, 1(2), 269-312.
Dahl, H., & Teller, V. (1994). The characteristics, identification, and applications of FRAMES. Psychotherapy Research, 4(3-4), 253-276. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10503309412331334082
De Grada, E., Kruglanski, A. W., Mannetti, L., & Pierro, A. (1999). Motivated cognition and group interaction: Need for closure affects the contents and processes of collective negotiations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35(4), 346-365. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1999.1376
DeLucia-Waack, J. L., & Bridbord, K. H. (2004). Measures of Group Process, Dynamics, Climate, Leadership Behaviors, and Therapeutic Factors: A Review Handbook of group counseling and psychotherapy (pp. 120-135). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd.
Demorest, A. P., & Alexander, I. E. (1992). Affective scripts as organizers of personal experience. Journal of Personality, 60(3), 645-663. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00924.x
Dinero, R. E, Conger, R. D., Shaver, P. R., Keith F., Widaman, K. F.& La r s en-Ri f e, D. (2008).Influence of family of origin and adult romantic partners on romantic attachment security. Journal of Family Psychology, 22(3), 622-632.
Drapeau, M., Perry, J., & Korner, A. (2012). Interpersonal patterns in borderline personality disorder. Journal of Personality Disorders, 26(4), 583-592. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2012.26.4.583
Forsyth, D. R. (2000). One hundred years of group research: Introduction to the special issue. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 4(1), 3-6. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.4.1.3
Greenberg, L. S., & Pinsof, W. M. (1986). The psychotherapeutic process: A research handbook The psychotherapeutic process: A research handbook (pp. xvii, 741). New York, NY: Guilford Press; US.
Greene, L. R. (2000). Process analysis of group interaction in therapeutic groups The process of group psychotherapy: Systems for analyzing change (pp. 23-47). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; US.
Hill, C. R., & Safran, J. D. (1994). Assessing interpersonal schemas: Anticipated responses of significant others. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 13(4), 366-379.
Hill, W. (1971). The Hill Interaction Matrix. Personnel & Guidance Journal, 49(8), 619-623.
Holmes, S. E., & Kivlighan, D. M., Jr. (2000). Comparison of therapeutic factors in group and individual treatment processes. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47(4), 478-484. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.47.4.478
Holzer, M., & Dahl, H. (1996). How to find FRAMES. Psychotherapy Research, 6(3), 177-197.
Holzer, M., Dahl, H., & Kachele, H. (1998). Identification of repetitive emotional structures via the Frames Method. Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie, 48(8), 298-307.
Horowitz, L. M., & Rosenberg, S. E. (1994). The consensual response psychodynamic formulation: I. Method and research results. Psychotherapy Research, 4(3-4), 222-233. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10503309412331334052
Jacobs, E. E., Harvill, R. L., & Masson, R. L. (2006)。團體諮商：策略與技巧（程小蘋、黃慧涵、劉安真、梁淑娟譯）。台北：五南（原著出版於2006）。
Kiesler, D. J. (1973). The process of psychotherapy: Empirical foundations and systems of analysis. 464.
Kivlighan, D. M. (1985). Feedback in group psychotherapy: Review and implications. Small Group Behavior, 16(3), 373-385. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0090552685163007
Kivlighan, D. M., & Angelone, E. O. (1992). Interpersonal problems: Variables influencing participants' perception of group climate. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 39(4), 468-472. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.39.4.468
Kivlighan, D. M., & Goldfine, D. C. (1991). Endorsement of therapeutic factors as a function of stage of group development and participant interpersonal attitudes. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38(2), 150-158. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.38.2.150
Kivlighan, D. M., Jr., & Lilly, R. L. (1997). Developmental changes in group climate as they relate to therapeutic gain. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 1(3), 208-221. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.1.3.208
Kivlighan, D. M., Jr., Markin, R. D., Stahl, J. V., & Salahuddin, N. M. (2007). Changes in the ways that group trainees structure their knowledge of group members with training. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 11(3), 176-186. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.11.3.176
Kivlighan, D. M., Jr., & Miles, J. R. (2007). Content themes in Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 1997-2002. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 11(3), 129-139. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.11.3.129
Kivlighan, D. M., Jr., Multon, K. D., & Brossart, D. F. (1996). Helpful impacts in group counseling: Development of a multidimensional rating system. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43(3), 347-355. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.43.3.347
Kivlighan, D. M., Marsh-Angelone, M., & Angelone, E. O. (1994). Projection in group counseling: The relationship between members' interpersonal problems and their perception of the group leader. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 41(1), 99-104. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.41.1.99
Kivlighan, D. M., & Mullison, D. (1988). Participants' perception of therapeutic factors in group counseling: The role of interpersonal style and stage of group development. Small Group Behavior, 19(4), 452-468. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/104649648801900403
Luborsky, L., Barber, J. P., Binder, J., Curtis, J., Dahl, H., Horowitz, L. M., . . . et al. (1993). Transference-related measures: A new class based on psychotherapy sessions Psychodynamic treatment research: A handbook for clinical practice (pp. 326-341). New York, NY: Basic Books; US.
Luborsky, L., & Crits-Christoph, P. (1989). A relationship pattern measure: The core conflictual relationship theme. Psychiatry: Interpersonal and Biological Processes, 52(3), 250-259.
MacKenzie, K. R. (1997). Clinical Application of Group Development Ideas. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, & Practice, 1(4), 275-287.
Mayfield, W. A., Kardash, C. M., & Kivlighan, D. M., Jr. (1999). Differences in experienced and novice counselors' knowledge structures about clients: Implications for case conceptualization. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 46(4), 504-514. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.46.4.504
McLeod, J. (2006)。認識諮商研究(連廷誥、連廷嘉、連秀鸞譯)。台北市：心理（原出版於2003）。
Pietromonaco, P. R., & Barrett, L. F. (1997). Working Models of Attachment and Daily Social Interactions. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 73(6), 1409-1423.
Rae, D. S., Vathally, S. T., Manderscheid, R. W., & Silbergeld, S. (1976). Hill Interaction Matrix (HIM) scoring and analysis programs. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 8(6), 520-521.
Romano, J. L., & Sullivan, B. A. (2000). Simulated group counseling for group work training: A four-year research study of group development. Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 25(4), 366-375. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01933920008411680
Sammons, M., Siegel, P., & Nieto, C. (1998). A comparison of FRAMES with core conflictual relationship theme and computerized referential activity. Revista Argentina de Clinica Psicologica, 7(2), 131-145.
Shechtman, Z., & Dvir, V. (2006). Attachment Style as a Predictor of Behavior in Group Counseling With Preadolescents. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, & Practice March, 10(1), 29-42.
Shechtman, Z., & Rybko, J. (2004). Attachment Style and Observed Initial Self-Disclosure as Explanatory Variables of Group Functioning. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, & Practice September, 8(3), 207-220.
Siegel, P., & Demorest, A. (2010). Affective scripts: A systematic case study of change in psychotherapy Psychotherapy Research, 20(4), 369-387. doi: 10.1080/10503300903544240
Siegel, P. F., Sammons, M., & Dahl, H. (2002). FRAMES: The method in action and the assessment of its reliability. Psychotherapy Research, 12(1), 59-77. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ptr/12.1.59
Slavin, R. L. (1993). The significance of here-and-now disclosure in promoting cohesion in group psychotherapy. Group, 17(3), 143-150. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01419673
Slonim, D. A., Shefler, G., Gvirsman, S. D., & Tishby, O. (2011). Changes in rigidity and symptoms among adolescents in psychodynamic psychotherapy. Psychotherapy Research, 21(6), 685-697. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2011.602753
Soldz, S., Budman, S., Davis, M., & Demby, A. (1993). Beyond the interpersonal circumplex in group psychotherapy: The structure and relationship to outcome of the Individual Group Member Interpersonal Process Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 49(4), 551-563. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679%28199307%2949:4%3C551::AID-JCLP2270490413%3E3.0.CO;2-5
Sullivan, H. S. (1953). The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. 393.
Tomkins, S. S. (1987). Script theory The emergence of personality (pp. 147-216). New York, NY: Springer Publishing Co; US.
Toren, Z., & Shechtman, Z. (2010). Association of personal, process, and outcome variables in group counseling: Testing an exploratory model. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 14(4), 292-303. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0018872
Tschuschke, V., & Dies, R. R. (1997). The contribution of feedback to outcome in long-term group psychotherapy. Group, 21(1), 3-15. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02872750
Waldinger, R. J. (2003). Attachment and Core Relationship Themes: Wishes for Autonomy and Closeness in the Narratives of Securely and Insecurely Attached Adults. Psychotherapy Research, 13(1), 77-98. doi: 10.1093/ptr/kpg008
Waldinger, R. J., Diguer, L., Guastella, F., Lefebvre, R., Allen, J. P., Luborsky, L., & Hauser, S. T. (2002). The same old song?--Stability and change in relationship schemas from adolescence to young adulthood. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31(1), 17-29. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1014080915602
Whittingham, M. (2007). How do power, affiliation and status satisfaction impact the dynamics of conflict within small groups? an analysis of the perceptions of group members. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 68(2-B), 1325.
Yalom, I. D. (2001)。團體心理治療的理論與實務(方紫薇、馬宗潔譯)。臺北市：桂冠（原著出版於1995）。