環境態度是環境教育中重要的一環，如何讓人們自發性的對環境產生積極正面的態度尤為重要。人文地理學家和社會心理學家在研究人與環境互動發展中，特別指出童年經歷的重要性。環境心理學家提出，童年自然環境的接觸經驗，對往後生活有相當程度的影響，日本學者也提出原風景一詞，解釋在童年經歷的風景與環境的互動經驗中由心理產生對該環境偏好的影響。
過去研究多探討兒童的自然經驗對成人或是兒童的環境態度，或者兒童的自然經驗對於成年時的自然經驗與原風景之影響，鮮少檢驗成年的環境態度究竟是受童年時自然經驗的影響，還是成年時的影響。再者，過去研究偏重於簡單探究原風景與環境態度，或者自然經驗與環境態度，並未以整合觀點探討這些變項之間的相互關係。
因此，本研究欲以量化之實證研究及質性訪談方式進行檢視。量化實證部分以立意取樣436名大學生，填寫原風景、自然經驗及環境態度相關題項之問卷，質化訪談部分以滾雪球方式找10名大學生對其童年時期的大自然接觸經驗，以及影響深遠的地景及對於環境態度的看法作訪談研究。研究發現童年的風景經驗要藉由童年的自然經驗及成年自然連結轉換才會對成年後環境態度造成影響。所以，如果只有童年的風景經驗是不足的，須加上自然經驗及長大後持續對自然環境的關注，長大後會有更加愛護環境的意識及態度。

Geographer and social psychologist investigate people and development of sense of place found the importance of childhood experiences. Contact natural environment in childhood has a considerable degree of influence on the future life, and Japanese scholars bring up the term of primal landscape to explain preference of certain environment evoked by childhood landscapes, and the influence from interaction with environment and landscape.
Few studies examine the formation of environmental attitudes is from childhood or adulthood. Furthermore, some studies only emphasis on the simplicity of relationship between primal landscape and environmental attitudes, or natural experience and environmental attitudes, lack of the integrating perspectives to explore the relationship between these variables. In this study, the empirical and quantitative methodology used to test 436 college students’s primal original landscape, natural experience of childhood and their environmental attitudes in present.
The results of structural equation model show that if the primal landscapes of childhood is the natural environment , the primal landscape has a significant impact on children's natural experience, and these childhood natural experience also has significant influence on their sense of nature relatedness, the sense of nature relatedness in adult has significant impact on their environment attitudes, which means the natural experience in childhood and sense of nature relatedness during adulthood are important mediate variables. There is no such relationship among these variables if the subjects’ primal landscape are non- natural environment.

一、 中文部分
圖書部分：
大辭典(1985)，台北：三民書局股份有限公司。
李永展(1995) 環境態度與環保行為-理論與實證,胡式圖書。
國語辭典(1991) ，台北：台灣商務印書館股份有限公司。
張春興(1992 ) ，張氏心理學辭典，台北：東華書局。
莊耀嘉、王重鳴譯(2001) ，社會心理學，台北：桂冠圖書
遠東常用英漢辭典(1981) ，台北：遠東圖書公司。
謝淑芬(1994) ，觀光心理學，台北：五南圖書。
期刊論文部分：
王之婧、胡力輝、李樹華（2010）。原風景對景觀感知影響的量表設計與析，安徽農業科學，38(23)，12729-12730，12756。
王之婧、胡力輝、李樹華（2010）。原風景對景觀感知影響的調查研究，中國園林，7，46-48。
王偉琴(2010)。登山健行者早期戶外經驗、環境態度、活動涉入與環境行為之模式建立。國立嘉義大學管理研究所博士論文。
林新沛、鄭時宜（2002）。環境倫理與環境政策態度相關之研究-以樹德科技大學為例。樹德科技大學學報， 4（1），51-62。
張子超 (1995) 環保教師對新環境典範態度分析。環境教育季刊，26：37-45。
張子超（2002）。九年一貫課程自然與生活科技學習領域環境價值之內容分析。環境教育學刊，1，83-93。
張麗芬（2005）。寫作對國小五年級學童環境價值觀之影響：以新竹縣大肚國小為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學，新竹市。
戚永年、許慧苓(2001) 。新環境典範在環境態度分析上之運用，台灣林業，27(4) ，47-53。
教育部（2001）。國民中小學九年一貫課程暫行綱要。台北：教育部。
許世璋 (2001)。我們真能教育出可解決環境問題公民嗎？論環境教育與環境行動。中等教育，52：2，52-71。
許世璋、張乃千 (2005) 花蓮縣國小現職教師與師院學生環境素養評量與環境行為預測變項之分析。環境教育研究，2(2)：91-123。
陳佩君、歐聖榮、呂博文（2011）。原風景與景觀知覺關係之研究。造園景觀學報，18(1)39-57。
陳俊甫（2001）。自然體驗的理念與思維—返照初心見自然。國立東華大學自然資源管理研究所碩士論文。未出版，花蓮縣。
黃文雄、黃芳銘、游森期、田育芬、吳忠宏(2009)新環境典範量表之驗證與應用，環境教育研究，6(2) ，49-76
黃乾全、王懋雯(1998)師範學院學生環境行為之研究，國立教育資料館。
黃雪惠 (1996)。職前科學教師對環境的世界觀探究。國立彰化師範大學科學教育學系研究所碩士論文，未出版，彰化。
鄒東明 (2002)中山大學學生環境行為之研究以生科系及其企管系為例(未出版之碩士論文)，國立中山大學公共事務管理究所。
劉俊昌、陳曉菁 (2002) 台中師院新生的環境觀。台中師院學報，16：433-450
蔡志宏（2005）。新環境典範量表與新生態典範量表於預測環境行為意向上之比較研究。國立花蓮師範學院生態與環境教育系碩士論文，未出版，花蓮。
蔡孟宜（2000）。大學生環境認知、態度與行為相關研究－以逢甲大學為例。未出版碩士論文，逢甲大學，台中。
蕭涵之(2009)。荒野青年團義工環境知識、環境態度與環境行為之研究。臺北市立教育大學環境教育與資源系學位論文，台北。
簡秀如(1995)大學生對環保態度及實際環保行為之研究(未出版之碩士論文)，國立交通大學管理科學研究所。

二、 西文部分
Ajzen, I. (1985). From intention to action: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckman(Eds.), Action-control: From cognition to behavior,11-39. Heidelberg, Germany, Springer.
Albrecht, D., Bultena, G., Hoiberg, E., & Nowak, P. (1982) The New Environmental Paradigm scale. The Journal of Environmental Education, 13:39–43.
Allen, J. B., & Ferrand, J. L. (1999). Environmental locus of control, sympathy, and proenvironmental behavior: A test of Geller’s actively caring hypothesis. Environment and Behavior, 31: 338-353.
Arcury, T. A. (1990) Environmental attitude and environmental knowledge. Human Organization,49(4):300-304.
Bechtel, R. B., Verdugo, V. C., & Pinheiro, J. de Q. (1999) Environmental belief systems: United States, Brazil, and Mexico. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30(1): 122–128.
Bixler,R.D.,Floyd,M.F.,&Hamitt,W.E.(2002)Environmental socialization quantitative tests of the childhood play hypothesis. Environment and behavior 34 (6), 795-818
Bjerke, T., Thrane, C & Kleiven J.(2006).Outdoor recreation interests and environmental attitudes in Norway. Managing Leisure,11,116-128.
Carver, Alison, Timperio, Anna F. and Crawford, David A. (2012) Young and free? A study of independent mobility among urban and rural dwelling Australian children. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 15( 6) 505-510
Chawla, (2007). Childhood experience associated with care for the natural world: A theoretical framework for empirical results. Children, Youth and Environments, 17, 144-170.
Chawla, L. & Cushing, D. (2007). Education for strategic environment behavior. Environment Education Research, 13, 437-452.
Chawla, L. (1998). Significant life experience revised: A review of research on sources of environmental sensitivity. The Journal of Environmental Education, 29(3), 11-21.
Clayton, S. & Opotow, S. (2003). Introduction: Identity and Natural Environment. The psychological Significance of Nature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Corral-Verdugo, V., & Armendariz, L. I. (2000) The `New Environmental Paradigm' in a Mexican community. The Journal of Environmental Education, 31(3): 25-31.
Edgell, M. C. R., & Nowell, D. E. (1989) The New Environmental Paradigm scale: Wildlife and environmental beliefs in British Columbia. Society and Natural Resources, 2: 285–296.
Geller, J. M., & Lasley, P. (1985) The New Environmental Paradigm scale: A reexamination. The Journal of Environmental Education, 17: 9–12.
Gunter, B., & Gunter, N. (1980). Leisure styles: A conceptual framework for modern leisure. Sociological Quarterly, 2, 361-374.
Hansen-Ketchum, P., Marck, P., & Reutter, L. (2009). Engaging with nature to promote health: new directions for nursing research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 65(7), 1527-1538.
Hines, J. M., Hungerford, H. R., & Tomera, A. N. (1986-1987). Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Education, 18, 1-8.
Holt, D. T., & Lofgren, S. T. (2005) Examination of the New Environmental Paradigm scale in a military sample. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 100(3): 791-794.
Kaplan, R. & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kaplan,S. & Kaplan, R. ((1981) Cognition and Environment: Functioning in an Uncertain World. Ann Arbor,MI: Ulrich’s Bookstore.
Kim, S. S., Scott, D., & Crompton, J. L. (1997). An exploration of the relationships among social psychological involvement, behavior involvement, commitment, and future intentions in the context of birdwatching. Journal of Leisure Research, 29, 320-341.
Korpela, K. M. (1992). Adolescents' favorite places and environmental self-regulation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12(3), 249-258.
Köse, S., Savran Gencer, A., Gezer, K., Erol, G. H., & Bilen, K. (2011). Investigation of undergraduate students’ environmental attitudes. International Electronic Journal of Environmental Education, 1(2).
Larson, L. R., Castleberry, S. B., & Green, G. T. (2010). Effects of an environmental education program on the environmental orientations of children from different gender, age, and ethnic groups. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 28(3), 95-113.
Larson, L. R., Castleberry, S. B., & Green, G. T. (2010). Effects of an environmental education program on the environmental orientations of children from different gender, age, and ethnic groups. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 28(3), 95-113.
Louv, R. (2005). Last child in the woods. Chapel Hill, NC: Algonquin Press.
Mayer, F. S., & Frantz, C. M. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: a measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 503–515.
Measham, T. G. (2007). Primal landscape: Insights for education from empirical research on ways of learning about environments. International Research in Geographical and Environments Education, 16(4), 339-350.
Moore R. & Wong, H. H. (1997). Nature spaces and materials stimulate children’s limitless imaginations. Natural learning: Creating Environments for Rediscovering Nature’s Way of Teaching. Berkeley, CA: MIG Communications.
Nisbet, E. K. L., Zelenski, J. M., & Murphy, S. A. (2009). The Nature Relatedness
Nord, M., Luloff, A. E., & Bridger, J. C. (1998). The association of forest recreation with environmentalism. Environment and Behavior, 30,235-246.
O’Brien, L. (2009). Learning Outdoors: the Forest School Approach. Education, 37(1), 3-13.
Peplau, S. & Taylor( 1991).Social Psychology(7th ed).Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall.
Roth C. E. (1992). Environmental literacy: Its roots, evolution, and directions in the 1990s. Columbus, Ohio: ERIC/CSMEE.Scale: Linking individuals’connection with nature to environmental concern and behaviour.Environment and Behavior, 41, 715-740.
Stapp, W. B. & Polunin, N. (1991). Global environmental education: Toward a way of thinking and acting. Environmental Conservation, 18(1), 13-18.
Stern, P. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior.Journal of Social Issues, 56, 407-424.
Theodori, G.L., Luloff, A.E..&Willits, F.K.(1998).The association of outdoor recreation and environmental concern: Re-examining the unlap-Heffernan thesis. Rural Sociology,63,94-108.
Thompson, C. W, Aspinall, P, & Montarzino, A. (2008). The childhood factor: Adult visits to green places and the significance of childhood experience.Environment and behavior, 40(1), 111-143.
UNESCO (1988). International Strategy for Action in the Field of Environmental Education and Training for the 1990s, International action in the field of environmental education and training since the Tbilisi conference.columbus, Ohio: ERIC/SMEAC. (ED 307144).
Webster’s New World Dictionary(1984)Second Edition, New World Distionaries/Simon &Schuster,Inc.,NewYork.
Wells, N. & Lekies, K. (2006). Nature and the life course: Pathways from childhood nature experience to adult environmentalism. Children, Youth and environments, 16, 1-24.
Wray-Lake, L., Flanagan, C. A., & Osgood, D. W. (2009). Examining trends in adolescent environmental attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors across three decades. Environment and Behavior , 4.

三、 日文部分
上塘禎、景倉洋二（2010）。個人の持つ原風景の形成プロセスと環境教育会全国大会研究発表論文集(22)，67(5):731-736。
仙田滿(1982)。原風景によるあそび空間の特性にと関する研究一大人の記憶しているあそび空間の調查研究。
吉村晶子，（2004）。原風景の生成に関する研究。平成16年度日本造園学
寺本 潔(1994) ，子どもの知覚環境: 遊び・地図・原風景をめぐる研究。 地人書房。
呉 宣児（2000）。語りから見る原風景 : 語りの種類と語りタイプ。九州学大学院人間環境学研究科。11(2), 132-145。
呉 宣児（2002），語りからみる原風景―心理学からのアプローチ。萌文社(2001/6/10) ISBN-13: 978-4894910287。
野中健一(1992) ，大学生の原風景にみる生活環境の中の自然。環境教育3(1)218。