車用語音互動系統之語音介面設計｜國立清華大學博碩士論文庫

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

回結果列表

研究生：	胡惠寧 Hu, Hui-Ning
論文名稱：	車用語音互動系統之語音介面設計 Redesign Auditory Interface of In-Vehicle Speech Interaction System
指導教授：	黃雪玲 Hwang, Sheue-Ling
口試委員:	姚怡然李英聯
學位類別：	碩士 Master
系所名稱：	工學院 - 工業工程與工程管理學系 Department of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management
論文出版年：	2014
畢業學年度：	102
語文別：	英文
論文頁數：	60
中文關鍵詞：	語音介面、人因工程、引導語句、按鍵設計
外文關鍵詞：	system dialogues
相關次數：	點閱：2 下載：0
分享至:	分享至facebook 分享至twitter

查詢本校圖書館目錄查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統勘誤回報

由工研院所研發的車用語音系統(Talking Car)是目前較完整的中文介面車用系統，然而根據研究發現Talking Car系統仍有許多缺陷，而其中位於方向盤上的控制按鍵以及系統之引導語句，都被指出必須立即改善否則將影響使用者的駕駛安全，為了使Talking Car系統更安全，更容易使初學者上手，本研究將針對這些問題進行一系列之實驗與改善，最後再透過實驗驗證改善成果。
首先，為了解引導語句之問題，我們將進行語句實驗，透過此實驗了解受測者對各引導語句的了解度、煩躁度和語句的引導程度，並使用問卷了解受測者的需求與建議，隨後針對有問題之引導語句進行改善，而控制按鍵的部分，我們將控制按鍵的個數縮減為四個並且增加主功能鍵，以此增加系統使用的直覺性，最後參照銷售量最佳的五大車款設計各控制按鍵之圖示，如此能讓使用者更容易記憶控制按鍵之位置並使用，在完成改善後會進行駕駛模擬實驗驗證改善之成果，在實驗當中，受測者將駕駛模擬器並使用Talking Car系統依照指示完成任務，在駕駛過程中，剎車反應時間會被記錄以了解受測者的反應時間，實驗最後受測者須回答主觀以及NASA-TLX問卷，以此了解受測者對Talking Car的滿意度和建議以及心智負荷程度。
根據實驗的結果，其中受測者之整體任務完成時間、任務失敗率以及心智負荷皆有顯著地下降，而煞車反應時間也與未使用Talking Car時無顯著差異，這些結果皆證實進行改善後之Talking Car系統更便於使用，使用者不會被轉移注意力因此提升了駕駛之安全性，並且在主觀問卷中更可看出使用者對Talking Car系統有更高的滿意度，並且更認同其引導性，因此使用者們將更樂於使用Talking Car系統。

This research aimed to conduct a series of user interface improvement against an in-vehicle full voice-based interface named Talking Car and to verify the result of improvement by conducting driving simulation experiments.
According to a previous study, current Talking Car system has some defects on control button and system dialogues with elicitation. For the first part, control button data from 5 brands which are the most popular cars in the market were gathered and analyzed. Then, cooperated with expert advices the control button was redesigned. In the system dialogues part, an experiment was conducted to realize the misunderstood and annoying degree of current guiding sentences. When conducting the experiment, subjects listened and rated degree of understanding and annoying for each system dialogues while driving. After all improvement, another driving simulation experiment was conducted. In this experiment, subjects need to complete the tasks assigned by controlling Talking Car while driving, and task finished time and number of error were collected to verify the effect of improvements.
Under objective statistic data, the final result indicated that task finished time has decreased significantly. The shorter task finished time proved the system is more convenient and easy to use. With regard to evaluation of safety, reacting time of emergency brake were decreased. In consequence, the system is more suitable using in driving. And in the subjective part, subjects are more satisfied with system dialogues of novices and control button. After improvement, Talking Car is easier to use and more fit to the novices. Talking Car provides with consummate functions and intuitive interface.

摘  要    ii
Abstract    iii
致謝    iv
Chapter 1 Introduction    1
1.1 Background and motivation    1
1.2 Objectives    2
Chapter 2 Literature Review    3
2.1 Driving Distraction and In-Vehicle System    3
2.2 Development of Talking Car System    4
2.3 System Sentences with Elicitation    5
2.3.1 Inter-Item Gap    5
2.3.2 Short-term Memory    6
2.3.3 Consistency    6
2.4 Control Button on Steering Wheel    7
Chapter 3 Research Method    9
3.1 Experiment Ⅰ: System dialogues evaluation    10
3.1.1 Dialogue evaluation of Talking Car system    10
3.1.2 Apparatus and experimental environment setting    13
3.1.3 Experiment Design    15
3.1.4 Results of the Experiment I    16
3.2 Redesign Talking Car system    19
3.2.1 System dialogue guidelines    19
3.2.2 Function of Control Buttons    21
3.2.3 Redesign control button interface    23
3.3 Experiment II: Driving simulation experiment    26
3.3.1 Apparatus and experimental environment setting    26
3.3.2 Experimental design and hypothesis    26
3.3.3 Experimental procedure    28
Chapter4 Experimental Results    29
4.1 Tasks Completion Time    29
4.2 Task Failure Rate    29
4.3 Subjective Questionnaire    31
4.4 NASA-TLX    34
4.4 Break Reaction Time    37
Chapter 5 Discussion    40
5.1 The effect of Talking Car system on performance    40
5.1.1 Novice elicitation and efficiency in learning    40
5.1.2 Brake reaction time, mental workload and driving safety    41
5.1.3 Subjective satisfaction and acceptation    43
5.2 Suggestions    43
5.3 Study limitations    44
Chapter 6 Conclusion    46
6.1 Main conclusions    46
6.2 Future works    47
References    48
Appendix I: Data of tasks completion time    51
Appendix II: Data of Break reaction time    52
Appendix III: Data of NASA-TLX    53
Appendix IV: Data of NASA-TLX    54
Appendix V: Data of subject questionnaire    55
Appendix VI: NASA-TLX    57
Appendix VII: Talking Car operation flow chart    60

                                

American Honda Motor Co. (2013). Inc. Gauges and Displays. 2013 CR-V Online Reference Owner's Manual, 84-86.

Baryerische Motoren Werke aktiengesellschaft. (2013). Voice activation system. Owner's Manual for Vehicle, 13, 22-24.

Barón, A., & Green, P. (2006). Safety and usability of speech interfaces for in-vehicle tasks while driving: A brief literature review. University of Michigan, Transportation Research Institute.

Benedetto, A., Calvi, A. and D’Amico F. (2012). Effects of mobile telephone tasks on driving performance: a driving simulator study. Advances in Transportation Studies an international Journal, 26, 29-44.

Chen, H. C. (2014). A Modified Failure Mode and Effects Analysis for In-Vehicle Speech Interaction Systems. Retrieved from National Tsing Hua University Library website: http://www.lib.nthu.edu.tw/

Chung, C., & Rantanen, E. (2010). Gestural interaction with in-vehicle audio and climate controls. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 54(19), 1406-1410.

Clark, R. C., Nguyen, F. and Sweller, J.(2006). Efficiency in Learning: Evidence -Based Guidelines to Manage Cognitive Load. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.

Daneman, M. and P.A. Carpenter. (1980), “Individual differences in working memory and reading”, in Handbook of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19(4), 450-466.

Dicke, C., Jakus, G., & Sodnik, J. (2013). Auditory and Head-Up Displays in Vehicles. In Human-Computer Interaction. Applications and Services, 551-560. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Eiriksdottir, E., Nees, M., Lindsay, J., & Stanley, R. (2006). User preferences for auditory device-driven menu navigation. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 50(17), 2076-2078.
Garay-Vega, L., Pradhan, A. K., Weinberg, G., Schmidt-Nielsen, B., Harsham, B., Shen, Y., Divekar, G., Romoser, M., Knodler, M. and Fisher, D. L. (2010). Evaluation of Different Speech and Touch Interfaces to In-Vehicle Music Retrieval Systems. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 42(3), 913-920.

Jamson, A. H., Westerman, S. J., Hockey G. R. J. and Carsten O. M. J. (2004). Based E-Mail and Driver Behavior: Effects of an In-Vehicle Message System Interface. Human Factors: The journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

Jenness, J. W., Lattanzio, R. J., O'Toole, M., & Taylor, N. (2002). Voice-activated dialing or eating a cheeseburger: which is more distracting during simulated driving?. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 46(4), 592-596.

Tashiro, M., Horikawa, E., Mochizuki, H., Sakurada, Y., Kato, M., Inokuchi, T., Ridout, F., Hindmarch, I. and Yanai, K. (2005). Effects of fexofenadine and hydroxyzine on brake reaction time during car-driving with cellular phone use. Hum Psychopharmacol Clin Exp, 20, 501-509.

Leong, I. C. (2012). Human-Machine Interface Design of In-vehicle Speech Interaction System: Talking Car System. Retrieved from National Tsing Hua University Library website: http://www.lib.nthu.edu.tw/

Lexus. (2013). VOICE COMMAND SYSTEM OPERATION. Owner’s Manual.

Maciej, J. and Vollrath, M. (2009). Comparison of manual vs speech-based interaction with in-vehicle information systems. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 41(5), 924-930.

Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC. (2013). Controls in detail. Online Reference Owner's Manual, 122-155.

Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological review, 63(2), 81.

Kajastila, R., & Lokki, T. (2013). Eyes-free interaction with free-hand gestures and auditory menus. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 71(5), 627-640.

Sodnik, J., Dicke, C., Tomažič, S., & Billinghurst, M. (2008). A user study of auditory versus visual interfaces for use while driving. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66(5), 318-332.

Toyota Motor Corporation. (2013). Instrument cluster. Main Owner’s Manual, 168-169.

Wei, M. S. (2013). Designing an Auditory In-Vehicle Speech System with Novice Elicitation Function. Retrieved from National Tsing Hua University Library website: http://www.lib.nthu.edu.tw/

Wickens, C. D. (1992). Engineering psychology and human performance. HarperCollins Publishers.

Young, K. L., Rudin-Brown, C. M., Lenne, M. G., & Williamson, A. R. (2012). The implications of cross-regional differences for the design of In-vehicle Information Systems: A comparison of Australian and Chinese drivers. Applied ergonomics, 43(3), 564-573.

全文公開日期本全文未授權公開 (校內網路)
全文公開日期本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

相關論文