本研究主要目的在於瞭解高中運動校隊教練其家長式領導行為與選手依附型態之間的關係，以教練的家長式領導行為與依附型態類型作探討。以新竹縣市高中職運動代表隊為施測對象，共279位為研究對象，使用測量工具為「家長式教練領導量表」與「選手依附型態量表」。所得資料以描述性統計、皮爾遜積差相關及多元回歸進行分析。研究結果顯示，教練家長式領導行為的「威權領導」與安全、焦慮及畏避型依附有正相關存在；「仁慈領導」與安全型依附有正相關存在，與畏避型依附為有負相關存在；「才德領導」與安全型依附有正相關存在，與畏避型、排拒型依附有負相關存在。仁慈、才德領導對選手依附型態的中安全型依附的預測為正向預測效果；威權領導對焦慮型依附為正向預測效果；威權領導對畏避型依附為正向預測效果，才德領導為負向預測效果。仁慈、才德領導對排拒型依附為負向預測效果。根據研究結果，發現研究假設大都獲得支持，顯示運動員知覺教練的家長式領導行為與運動員對教練的依附之密切關係。

The purpose of this thesis was to study the relationship between coaches’ paternalistic leading style and senior high athletes’ attachment with 279 school team students in Hsinchu as the research subjects. Data collected through the use of “Paternalistic Leadership Scale (PLS)” and “Athlete Attachment Scale”, this thesis takes advantage of descriptive statistics, Pearson product-moment correlation, and Multi factor line regression method as analysis tools. The result shows different correlations between paternalistic leadership and attachments. There are positive correlations between “authoritarianism leadership” and secure, insecure, avoidant attachments. Correlation with “benevolence leadership” is positive for secure attachment but negative for avoidant attachment. Finally, “moral leadership” is positively correlated with secure attachment but negatively correlated with avoidant and dismissing attachments. These correlations correspond with and supports most of my assumptions and predictions. Based on the result, it is concluded that there’s a strong connection between coaches’ paternalistic leadership and athletes’ attachment.

王慶福（1995）。大學生愛情關係徑路模式之分析研究（博士倫文）。國立彰化師範大學，彰化縣。
林桂鳳（2003）。性侵害加害者依附經驗之個案研究（博士倫文）。中央警察大學，桃園市。
周麗芳、鄭伯壎、樊景立、任金剛（2004）。家長式領導：回顧與展望。「華人組織行為研究的方向與策略研討會宣讀論文」。台北：國立台灣大學心理學研究所。
柯慧貞（2001）。行為抑制、控制性親子關係以及依附在婦女焦慮與憂鬱症之致病機轉中的角色。行政院國家科學委員會補助專題研究計畫成果報告（編號：NSC90-2413-H-006-014）。臺南市：國立成功大學。
高三福（2001）。團隊文化與教練領導：質化與量化兩種研究途徑（博士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。
高三福（2005）。華人運動團隊信任：教練與運動員互動之探究。大專體育學刊，7，115-126。
高三福、陳鈺芳（2006）。運動教練的教誨領導：高中運動團隊的個案研究。大專體育學刊，8，97-111。
高三福、顏肇廷、曾冠堯（2008）。運動團隊家長式領導研究之探討。中華體育季刊，22，96-102
高三福、張俊一（2015）。家長式領導在運動團隊的研究：期刊論文的回顧與分析。臺灣運動心理學報，15，75-106。
樊景立、鄭伯壎（2000）。華人組織的家長式領導：一項文化觀點的分析。本土心理學研究，13，127-180。
鄭伯壎、周麗芳、樊景立（2000）。家長式領導量表：三元模式的建構與測量。本土心理學研究，14，3-64。
鄭伯壎、林姿葶、鄭弘岳、周麗芳、任金剛、樊景立（2010）。家長式領導與部屬效能：多層次分析觀點。中華心理學刊，52，1-23。
謝金青（2002）。家長式領導風格之檢驗－兩所國民小學之觀察研究。行政院國家科學委員會補助專題研究計畫成果報告（編號：NSC91-2413-H-134-003）。
張洪斌（2015）。高中棒球教練家長式領導與選手依附的關係（碩士倫文）。國立體育大學。桃園市。
Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns ofattachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Oxford, England:Lawrence Erlbaum.
Armsden, G. C., & Greenberg, M. T. (1987). The inventory of parent and peer attachment: Individual differences and their relationship to psychological well-being in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 16, 427-454.
Ainsworth, M. (1989). Attachments beyond infancy. American Psychologist, 44, 709–716.
Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss. Vol 1. Attachment . New York: Basic Books.
Bowlby,J (1980). Attachment and loss: Vol.3. Loss. New York: Basic Books. as cited in Mikulincer, M. & Shaver, P. R. (2007). Attachment in adulthood: structure, dynamics, and change. New York: Guilford Press.
Bowlby, J. (1988). Developmental psychiatry comes of age. American Journal of Psychiatry, 145, 53-62.
Bartholomew, K., & Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 226-244.
Baker, E., Beech, A., & Tyson, M. (2006). Attachment Disorganization and Its Relevanceto Sexual Offending. Journal of Family Violence, 21, 221-231.
Cheng, B. S., Chou, L. F., Wu, T. Y., Huang, M. P., & Farh, J. L. (2004). Paternalistic leadership and subordinate responses: Establishing a leadership model in Chinese organizations. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 7, 89-117.
Feeney, J.A. & Noller, P. (1990). Attachment style as a predictor of adult romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 281-291.
Feeney, B. C., & VanVleet, M. (2010). Growing through attachment: the Interplay of attachment and exploration in adulthood. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27, 226-234.
Griffin, D., & Bartholomew, K. (1994). Models of the self and others: Fundamental Dimensions underlying measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 430-445.
Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an Attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511-524.
Hazan, C. & Shaver, P. R. (1994). Attachment as an organizational framework for research on close relationships. Psychological Inquiry, 5, 1-22.
Jowett, S., & Cockerill, I. M. (2003). Olympic medallists’ perspective of the athlete-coach relationship. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 4, 313-331.
Kobak, R. R., & Sceery, A. (1988). Attachment in late adolescence: Work in gmodels,affect regulation, and representations of self and others. Child Development, 59, 135-146.
Kobak, R. R., Cole, H. E., Gillies, R. F., & Fleming, W. S. (1993). Attachment and emotion regulation during mother-teen problem solving: a control theory analysis. Child development, 64, 231-245.
Main, M., Kaplan, N., & Cassidy, J. (1985). Security in infancy, childhood, and adulthood: a move to the level of representation. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 50, 66-104.
Mikulincer, M. & Shaver, P. R. (2007). Attachment in adulthood: structure, dynamics, and change. New York : Guilford Press.
Meier, A., &Allen, G. (2009). Romantic relationships from adolescence to young adulthood: evidence from the national longitudinal study of adolescent health. Sociological Quarterly, 50, 308-336.
Poczwardowski, A., Barott, J. E., & Henschen, K. P. (2003). The athlete and coach: Their relationship and its meaning. Results of an interpretive study. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 33, 116-140.
Shaver, P. R., & Brennen, K. A. (1992). Attachment styles and the "Big Five Personality Traits: Their connections with each other and with romantic relationship outcomes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 536-545.