簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 謝麗雯
Hsieh, Li-wen
論文名稱: 設計改善推薦意願之推薦活動
Designing a Referral Reward Program: How to Improve the Willingness to Recommend
指導教授: 王俊程
Wang, Jyun-Cheng
口試委員: 林福仁
Lin, Fu-ren
嚴秀茹
Yen, Hsiuju Rebecca
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 科技管理學院 - 服務科學研究所
Institute of Service Science
論文出版年: 2013
畢業學年度: 101
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 40
中文關鍵詞: 推薦活動推薦意願產品風險互惠性資訊不對稱性連結強度
外文關鍵詞: referral reward program, recommendation intention, product-related risk, reciprocity, information asymmetry, tie strength
相關次數: 點閱:4下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 現今市面上有愈來愈多的公司推出推薦活動,這些公司藉由推薦活動來刺激顧客對產品的興趣、增加產品銷售量,並提高顧客的參與度,因此推薦活動的重要性愈來愈高。本研究藉由探討推薦活動所涉及的產品風險、互惠性、資訊不對稱性以及推薦發送者和接受者之間的連結強度,對發送者推薦意願所造成的影響,以提供有興趣推出推薦活動的公司在設計推薦活動時的參考依據。經由設計16種版本的情境式問卷,並對480份有效樣本進行假說檢定,本研究發現產品風險、資訊不對稱性以及推薦發送者和接受者之間的連結強度都對發送者的推薦意願產生影響,而互惠性在產品風險、資訊不對稱性這兩個變數與發送者的推薦意願之間的關係中,扮演了調節變數的角色。當產品風險愈低時,發送者的推薦意願愈高,而當推薦活動存在資訊對稱性時,發送者的推薦意願愈高。另外,當推薦發送者和接受者之間的連結強度愈高時,發送者的推薦意願也愈高。除此之外,當推薦活動存在互惠性時,能夠強化產品風險、資訊不對稱性這兩個變數與發送者的推薦意願之間的關係。因此,本研究建議公司在設計推薦活動時,如果想要提高人們的推薦意願,則必須讓推薦活動中包含低風險產品、存在資訊對稱性以及互惠性,並鼓勵人們推薦給和自己的關係屬於強連結的人。


    There are more and more firms engaging in referral reward programs to increase customer participation and customers’ interests in products, so the importance of referral reward program is increasing. This paper aims to provide the guidelines for companies to design the referral reward programs that improve the recommendation giver’s willingness to recommend. We conducted a questionnaire survey to examine the effects of product-related risk, reciprocity, information asymmetry, and tie strength on the recommendation giver’s recommendation intention. We found that product-related risk, reciprocity, information asymmetry, and tie strength all have influence on recommendation intention. The recommendation intention is negatively affected by product-related risk, positively affected by information asymmetry and the tie strength between the recommendation giver and receiver. Besides, the relationship between product-related risk and recommendation intention is moderated by reciprocity, and reciprocity is also the moderator of the relationship between tie strength and recommendation intention. To increase the recommendation giver’s willingness to recommend, this paper suggests the firms designing referral reward programs that involve low risk product, reciprocity, information symmetry, and strong tie.

    Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Background and Motivation 1 1.2 Objectives and Questions 2 1.3 Contributions 3 Chapter 2 Literature Review 5 2.1 Referral Reward Program 5 2.2 Product-related Risk 6 2.3 Information Symmetry 7 2.4 Tie Strength 8 2.5 Reciprocity 9 Chapter3 Research Method 10 3.1 Research Model and Hypotheses 10 3.1.1 Product-related Risk and Recommendation Intention 11 3.1.2 Information Symmetry and Recommendation Intention 11 3.1.3 Tie Strength and Recommendation Intention 12 3.1.4 Reciprocity and Recommendation Intention 13 3.2 Experimental Design 14 3.2.1 Questionnaire 16 3.2.2 Measurement of Variables 24 Chapter4 Data Analysis 27 4.1Manipulation Checks 27 4.2 Validity and Reliability 28 4.3 Descriptive Statistics 28 4.4 Hypothesis Testing and Results 29 4.5 Moderating Effects 32 Chapter 5 Conclusion and Discussion 35 5.1 Conclusion 35 5.2 Discussion and Future Work 37 Reference 38

    Afzal, W., Roland, D., & Al-Squri, M. N. (2009). Information asymmetry and product valuation: an exploratory study. Journal of Information Science, 35(2), 192-203.
    Arndt, J. (1967). Word of mouth advertising: A review of the literature: Advertising Research Foundation.
    Beatty, S. E., & Smith, S. M. (1987). External search effort: An investigation across several product categories. Journal of Consumer Research, 83-95.
    Birukov, A., Blanzieri, E., & Giorgini, P. (2005). Implicit: An agent-based recommendation system for web search. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the fourth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems.
    Biyalogorsky, E., Gerstner, E., & Libai, B. (2001). Customer referral management: Optimal reward programs. Marketing Science, 20(1), 82-95.
    Blackwell, R. D., Miniard, P. W., & Engel, J. F. (2001). Consumer behavior 9th. South-Western Thomas Learning. Mason, OH.
    Buttle, F. A. (1998). Word of mouth: understanding and managing referral marketing. Journal of strategic marketing, 6(3), 241-254.
    Chew, P., Tambyah, S. K., & Wirtz, J. (2005). Consumer Responses To Recommend-A-Friend Programs.
    Chew, P., & Wirtz, J. (2001). The effects of incentives, deal proneness, satisfaction and tie strength on word-of-mouth behavior: Research Paper Series, NUS Business School, National University of Singapore.
    Duhan, D. F., Johnson, S. D., Wilcox, J. B., & Harrell, G. D. (1997). Influences on consumer use of word-of-mouth recommendation sources. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25(4), 283-295.
    Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American journal of sociology, 1360-1380.
    Grewal, D., Gotlieb, J., & Marmorstein, H. (1994). The moderating effects of message framing and source credibility on the price-perceived risk relationship. Journal of Consumer Research, 145-153.
    Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & William, C. (1998). Black (1998), Multivariate data analysis: Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Hennig-Thurau, T., & Paul, M. (2007). Can economic bonus programs jeopardize service relationships? Service Business, 1(2), 159-175.
    Kaplan, L. B., Szybillo, G. J., & Jacoby, J. (1974). Components of perceived risk in product purchase: A cross-validation. Journal of applied Psychology, 59(3), 287.
    Kornish, L. J., & Li, Q. (2010). Optimal referral bonuses with asymmetric information: Firm-offered and interpersonal incentives. Marketing Science, 29(1), 108-121.
    Leonard, N. H., Scholl, R. W., & Kowalski, K. B. (1999). Information processing style and decision making. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(3), 407-420.
    Molm, L. D. (2010). The structure of reciprocity. Social Psychology Quarterly, 73(2), 119-131.
    Nayyar, P. R. (1990). Information asymmetries: A source of competitive advantage for diversified service firms. Strategic Management Journal, 11(7), 513-519.
    Panovich, K., Miller, R., & Karger, D. (2012). Tie strength in question & answer on social network sites. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work.
    Rodriguez, S. P., Peñalvert, A. J. B., & García, J. L. (2011). The pedagogical importance of evacuation drills in schools as a means of increasing the preventive culture in Spain. Paper presented at the XV Congreso de Ingeniería de Organizacion: Cartagena, 7 a 9 de septiembre de 2011.
    Schmitt, P., Skiera, B., & Van den Bulte, C. (2011). Referral programs and customer value. Journal of Marketing, 75(1), 46-59.
    Silverman, G. (1997). How to harness the awesome power of word of mouth. DIRECT MARKETING-GARDEN CITY-, 60, 32-37.
    Smith, M. D., & Brynjolfsson, E. (2001). Consumer decision‐making at an Internet shopbot: Brand still matters. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 49(4), 541-558.
    Soukhanov, A. H., Ellis, K., & Severynse, M. (1992). The american heritage dictionary of the english language; The american heritage dictionary of the english language: Houghton Mifflin.
    Verlegh, P. W., Ryu, G., Tuk, M. A., & Feick, L. (2013). Receiver responses to rewarded referrals: the motive inferences framework. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 1-14.
    Wathieu, L., & Bertini, M. (2007). Price as a stimulus to think: The case for willful overpricing. Marketing Science, 26(1), 118-129.
    Wirtz, J., Orsingher, C., Chew, P., & Tambyah, S. K. (2013). The Role of Metaperception on the Effectiveness of Referral Reward Programs. Journal of Service Research, 16(1), 82-98.
    Xiao, P., Tang, C. S., & Wirtz, J. (2011). Optimizing referral reward programs under impression management considerations. European Journal of Operational Research, 215(3), 730-739.

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校內網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)

    QR CODE