研究生: |
吳睿恒 Wu, Jui-Heng |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
2000年後成立的台灣製造業高科技廠商勞動生產力、研發投入與匯率之關係 The Relationship between Labor Productivity, R&D Investment, and Exchange Rates in High-Tech Manufacturing Firms Established after 2000 in Taiwan |
指導教授: |
廖肇寧
Liao, Chao-Ning |
口試委員: |
郭俊宏
Kuo, Chun-Hung 劉文獻 Liu, Wen-Hsien |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
科技管理學院 - 經濟學系 Department of Economics |
論文出版年: | 2024 |
畢業學年度: | 113 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 41 |
中文關鍵詞: | 勞動生產力 、經濟成長 、匯率 、研發投入 |
外文關鍵詞: | Labor Productivity, Economic Growth, Exchange Rate, R&D Investment |
相關次數: | 點閱:71 下載:2 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
2000年後台灣國內生產毛額平均年增率出現衰退、台灣央行執行匯率貶值政策和持續成長的研發投入金額,導致2000年後台灣的經濟環境與結構出現變化。本文採用台灣2000年後成立的製造業廠商的追蹤資料,以探究全體製造業與高科技廠商的勞動生產力變化以及研發投入和匯率對勞動生產力之影響。結果顯示高科技產業與全體製造業的勞動生產力皆在初期快速增長、中期成長停滯、後期增長趨緩,且勞動生產力表現在高科技產業優於全體製造業。百分位數的分析可以發現高科技產業大多數廠商集中在勞動生產力較低的區塊,且勞動生產力百分位數排名較低的廠商之研發密度較高。迴歸結果顯示研發投入對勞動生產力成正向顯著的影響,並且在廠商特性中的原料與上一期的勞動生產力也呈現正向顯著,廠商年數、廠商規模與勞動資本比則呈現負向顯著。在匯率與勞動生產力的關係部分,2000年至2010年匯率與勞動生產力呈負相關、2011年至2019年呈正相關,顯示匯率對勞動生產力的影響具有時期性差異。
The decline in Taiwan's average annual GDP growth rate after 2000, a depreciation policy implemented by the Central Bank of the Republic of China and continuous growth in R&D investment led to changes in Taiwan's economic environment and structure. This study utilizes panel data from manufacturing firms established in Taiwan after 2000 to examine changes in labor productivity across the entire manufacturing sector and high-tech firms, as well as the impact of R&D investment and exchange rates on labor productivity. The findings indicate that labor productivity in both the high-tech sector and the overall manufacturing industry experienced rapid growth in the initial period, stagnation in the middle period, and slower growth in the later period. Additionally, labor productivity in the high-tech industry outperformed that of the entire manufacturing sector. Percentile analysis shows that most firms in the high-tech industry are concentrated in the lower productivity range, and those with lower percentile rankings in labor productivity have a higher R&D intensity. Regression results demonstrate a significantly positive impact of R&D investment on labor productivity. Other firm characteristics, such as raw material inputs and labor productivity from the previous period, also show significant positive effects. In contrast, the number of years a firm has been established, firm size, and the labor-to-capital ratio exhibit significant negative effects. Regarding the relationship between exchange rates and labor productivity, there is a negative correlation from 2000 to 2010, while from 2011 to 2019, the correlation turns positive, indicating that the impact of exchange rates on labor productivity varies over different periods.
Alencar, D. A., Jayme Jr, F. G., & Britto, G. (2018), “Productivity, Real Exchange Rate, and Aggregate Demand: an Empirical Exercise Applied to Brazil from 1960 to 2011,” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 41(3), 455-477.
Chen, J. R., & Yang, C. H. (2005), “Technological Knowledge, Spillover and Productivity: Evidence from Taiwanese Firm Level Panel Data,” Applied Economics, 37(20), 2361-2371.
Choi, B. Y., & Pyun, J. H. (2020), “Does Real Exchange Rate Depreciation Increase Productivity?: Analysis Using Korean Firm-Level Data,” The Effects of Globalisation on Firm and Labour Performance, 134-168, Routledge.
Cuneo, P., & Mairesse, J. (1984), “Productivity And R&D at the Firm Level in French Manufacturing, R&D, Patents, and Productivity,” University of Chicago Press, 393-416.
David, O., Umeh, J. C., & Ameh, A. A. (2010), “The Effect of Exchange Rate Fluctuations on the Nigerian Manufacturing Sector,” African Journal of Business Management, 4(14), 2994.
Fedulova, I., Voronkova, O. Y., Zhuravlev, P., Gerasimova, E., Glyzina, M., Alekhina, N. A. (2019), “Labor Productivity and Its Role in the Sustainable Development of Economy: On the Example of a Region,” Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 7(2), 1059-1073.
Hall, B. H. (1993), “The Stock Market's Valuation of R&D Investment During the 1980's,” The American Economic Review, 83(2), 259-264.
Hecht, J. (2017), “Research and Development and Labour Productivity: Do High-Tech Firms Exhibit Labour- or Capital-Saving Technical Change?” Applied Economics, 50(16), 1790–1811.
Jeanneney, S. G., & Hua, P. (2011), “How Does Real Exchange Rate Influence Labour Productivity in China?” China Economic Review, 22(4), 628-645.
Jorgenson, D. W. (1991), “Productivity and Economic Growth. In Fifty Years of Economic Measurement: The Jubilee of the Conference on Research in Income and Wealth,” University of Chicago Press, 19-118.
Korkmaz, S., & Korkmaz, O. (2017), “The Relationship Between Labor Productivity And Economic Growth in OECD Countries,” International Journal of Economics and Finance, 9(5), 71-76.
Lee, J., & Tang, M. K. (2007), “Does Productivity Growth Appreciate the Real Exchange Rate?” Review of International Economics, 15(1), 164-187.
Liu, J. T., Tsou, M. W., & Wang, P. (2010), “Workforce Composition and Firm Productivity: Evidence from Taiwan,” Economic Inquiry, 48(4), 1032-1047.
Mansfield, E. (1980), “Basic Research and Productivity Increase in Manufacturing,” The American Economic Review, 70(5), 863-873.
Murphy, G., & Siedschlag, I. (2012), “The Effect of Real Exchange Rate Changes on Labour Productivity Growth,” ESRI Working Paper, No. 439.
Ortega‐Argilés, R., Piva, M., Potters, L., & Vivarelli, M. (2010), “Is Corporate R&D Investment in High‐Tech Sectors More Effective?” Contemporary Economic Policy, 28(3), 353-365.
Palangkaraya, A., Stierwald, A., & Yong, J. (2009), “Is Firm Productivity Related to Size and Age? The Case of Large Australian Firms,” Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 9, 167-195.
Yao Tang, (2011), “Does Productivity Respond to Exchange Rate Appreciations? A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation,” Working Papers 1, Bowdoin College, Department of Economics.
Tsai, K. H., & Wang, J. C. (2004), “R&D Productivity and the Spillover Effects of High‐Tech Industry on the Traditional Manufacturing Sector: The Case of Taiwan,” World Economy, 27(10), 1555-1570.
Varum, C. A., Cibrão, B., Morgado, A., & Costa, J. (2009), “R&D, structural change and productivity: the role of high and medium-high technology industries,” Economia Aplicada, 13, 399-424.
Wieser, R. (2005), “Research and Development Productivity and Spillovers: Empirical Evidence at the Firm Level,” Journal of Economic Surveys, 19(4), 587-621.
Griliches, Z. and J. Mairesse, (1981), “Productivity and R&D at the Firm Level,” Nber Working Paper, No. 826.
吳俊毅、林依伶 (2017),「生產力與新台幣匯率關係之探討」,《中央銀行季刊》,第40卷,第2期,33-70。
宋郁潔 (2021),「台灣製造業廠商研發、內部資金和勞動生產力的關係」,國立清華大學經濟學系碩士論文。
李昭芬 (2018),「主要貿易往來國的匯率與貨幣政策對台灣總體經濟之衝擊」,中原大學國際經營與貿易研究所碩士論文。
林依伶、楊子霆 (2018),「經濟成長,薪資停滯?初探台灣實質薪資與勞動生產力成長脫鉤之成因」,《經濟論文》,46(2),263-322。
林慈芳 (2011),「台灣勞動生產力成長估測與因應對策」,《台灣經濟論衡》,9(4),42-71。
馬毓駿 (2022),「製造業因應通膨需留意日後跌價風險」,《經濟前瞻》,(199),23-27。
陳旭昇 (2019),「台灣匯率貶值政策之探討」,《經濟論文叢刊》,47(1),41-74。
陳畊麗 (2016),「全球化、自動化及老齡化下的臺灣經濟轉型與對策」,《台灣經濟論衡》,14(2),111-133。
楊力怡 (2008),「原物料價格上漲後競爭製造商的訂價策略」,國立中央大學工業管理研究所碩士論文。
蔡致遠 (2023a),「台灣製造業產業升級與匯率水準及匯率波動關係探討」,財團法人台北外匯市場發展基金會。
蔡致遠 (2023b),「探究台灣製造業實質勞動生產力與實質薪資脫鉤的關稅與匯率政策因素」,《經濟論文》,51(2),117-154。
蔡蕙安 (2008),「台灣高科技產業之發展與相關實證課題探討」,《經濟論文叢刊》,36(2),183-233。
蕭全政 (2004),「經濟發展與臺灣的政治民主化」,《臺灣民主季刊》,1(1),1-25。
簡廷容 (2014),「研發投入、外國投資與出口對中國製造產業追趕效果之研究」,國立臺灣大學經濟研究所碩士論文。