本研究旨在探討國民小學教師專業學習社群評鑑指標建構，採用德懷術問巻調查法進行研究。首先以文獻探討分析建構「國民小學教師專業學習社群評鑑指標」初稿，選取學者專家及實務工作者共15名，進行三回德懷術問巻調查研究。三回合德懷術調查樣本回收率分別為93%、100%、100%。調查所得資料利用SPSS17.0統計軟體，進行描述性統計，採用平均數、標準差確立指標系統。
研究結果發現，國民小學教師專業學習社群評鑑指標包含：具備共同願景與目標、行政支持情境、展現人際互動、共享專業實務、持續精進與檢視成果等5大評鑑指標層面，並細分出25個指評鑑指標細目。

The purpose of this study is to investigate the evaluation indicators construction The purpose of this study is to investigate the evaluation indicators construction The purpose of this study is to investigate the evaluation indicators construction The purpose of this study is to investigate the evaluation indicators construction The purpose of this study is to investigate the evaluation indicators construction The purpose of this study is to investigate the evaluation indicators construction The purpose of this study is to investigate the evaluation indicators construction The purpose of this study is to investigate the evaluation indicators construction The purpose of this study is to investigate the evaluation indicators construction The purpose of this study is to investigate the evaluation indicators construction The purpose of this study is to investigate the evaluation indicators construction The purpose of this study is to investigate the evaluation indicators construction The purpose of this study is to investigate the evaluation indicators construction The purpose of this study is to investigate the evaluation indicators construction The purpose of this study is to investigate the evaluation indicators construction The purpose of this study is to investigate the evaluation indicators construction The purpose of this study is to investigate the evaluation indicators construction The purpose of this study is to investigate the evaluation indicators construction The purpose of this study is to investigate the evaluation indicators construction The purpose of this study is to investigate the evaluation indicators construction The purpose of this study is to investigate the evaluation indicators construction The purpose of this study is to investigate the evaluation indicators construction The purpose of this study is to investigate the evaluation indicators construction of eleme of elemeof eleme of elementary school teachers’ professional learning communit ntary school teachers’ professional learning communit ntary school teachers’ professional learning communit ntary school teachers’ professional learning communit ntary school teachers’ professional learning communit ntary school teachers’ professional learning communit ntary school teachers’ professional learning communit ntary school teachers’ professional learning communit ntary school teachers’ professional learning communit ntary school teachers’ professional learning communit ntary school teachers’ professional learning communit ntary school teachers’ professional learning communit ntary school teachers’ professional learning communit ntary school teachers’ professional learning communit ies . The Delphi . The Delphi . The Delphi . The Delphi . The Delphi technique questionnaire was adopted to conduct the research. This study first used technique questionnaire was adopted to conduct the research. This study first used technique questionnaire was adopted to conduct the research. This study first used technique questionnaire was adopted to conduct the research. This study first used technique questionnaire was adopted to conduct the research. This study first used technique questionnaire was adopted to conduct the research. This study first used technique questionnaire was adopted to conduct the research. This study first used technique questionnaire was adopted to conduct the research. This study first used technique questionnaire was adopted to conduct the research. This study first used technique questionnaire was adopted to conduct the research. This study first used technique questionnaire was adopted to conduct the research. This study first used technique questionnaire was adopted to conduct the research. This study first used technique questionnaire was adopted to conduct the research. This study first used technique questionnaire was adopted to conduct the research. This study first used technique questionnaire was adopted to conduct the research. This study first used technique questionnaire was adopted to conduct the research. This study first used technique questionnaire was adopted to conduct the research. This study first used technique questionnaire was adopted to conduct the research. This study first used technique questionnaire was adopted to conduct the research. This study first used technique questionnaire was adopted to conduct the research. This study first used technique questionnaire was adopted to conduct the research. This study first used technique questionnaire was adopted to conduct the research. This study first used technique questionnaire was adopted to conduct the research. This study first used literature review to analyze and construct the draft of “evaluation ind literature review to analyze and construct the draft of “evaluation ind literature review to analyze and construct the draft of “evaluation ind literature review to analyze and construct the draft of “evaluation ind literature review to analyze and construct the draft of “evaluation ind literature review to analyze and construct the draft of “evaluation ind literature review to analyze and construct the draft of “evaluation ind literature review to analyze and construct the draft of “evaluation ind literature review to analyze and construct the draft of “evaluation ind literature review to analyze and construct the draft of “evaluation ind literature review to analyze and construct the draft of “evaluation ind literature review to analyze and construct the draft of “evaluation ind literature review to analyze and construct the draft of “evaluation ind literature review to analyze and construct the draft of “evaluation ind literature review to analyze and construct the draft of “evaluation ind literature review to analyze and construct the draft of “evaluation ind literature review to analyze and construct the draft of “evaluation ind literature review to analyze and construct the draft of “evaluation ind literature review to analyze and construct the draft of “evaluation ind literature review to analyze and construct the draft of “evaluation ind icators of elementary school teac elementary school teacelementary school teac elementary school teacelementary school teacelementary school teac elementary school teac elementary school teac elementary school teachers’ professional learning communit hers’ professional learning communit hers’ professional learning communit hers’ professional learning communit hers’ professional learning communit hers’ professional learning communit hers’ professional learning communit hers’ professional learning communit hers’ professional learning communit ies ”, with totally 15 of ”, with totally 15 of ”, with totally 15 of ”, with totally 15 of ”, with totally 15 of ”, with totally 15 of ”, with totally 15 of ”, with totally 15 of ”, with totally 15 of scholars, experts, and practical workers selected to carry out three rounds of Delphi scholars, experts, and practical workers selected to carry out three rounds of Delphi scholars, experts, and practical workers selected to carry out three rounds of Delphi scholars, experts, and practical workers selected to carry out three rounds of Delphi scholars, experts, and practical workers selected to carry out three rounds of Delphi scholars, experts, and practical workers selected to carry out three rounds of Delphi scholars, experts, and practical workers selected to carry out three rounds of Delphi scholars, experts, and practical workers selected to carry out three rounds of Delphi scholars, experts, and practical workers selected to carry out three rounds of Delphi scholars, experts, and practical workers selected to carry out three rounds of Delphi scholars, experts, and practical workers selected to carry out three rounds of Delphi scholars, experts, and practical workers selected to carry out three rounds of Delphi scholars, experts, and practical workers selected to carry out three rounds of Delphi scholars, experts, and practical workers selected to carry out three rounds of Delphi scholars, experts, and practical workers selected to carry out three rounds of Delphi scholars, experts, and practical workers selected to carry out three rounds of Delphi scholars, experts, and practical workers selected to carry out three rounds of Delphi scholars, experts, and practical workers selected to carry out three rounds of Delphi scholars, experts, and practical workers selected to carry out three rounds of Delphi scholars, experts, and practical workers selected to carry out three rounds of Delphi scholars, experts, and practical workers selected to carry out three rounds of Delphi technique questionnaires. These three rounds of Delphi questionnaires had technique questionnaires. These three rounds of Delphi questionnaires had technique questionnaires. These three rounds of Delphi questionnaires had technique questionnaires. These three rounds of Delphi questionnaires had technique questionnaires. These three rounds of Delphi questionnaires had technique questionnaires. These three rounds of Delphi questionnaires had technique questionnaires. These three rounds of Delphi questionnaires had technique questionnaires. These three rounds of Delphi questionnaires had technique questionnaires. These three rounds of Delphi questionnaires had technique questionnaires. These three rounds of Delphi questionnaires had technique questionnaires. These three rounds of Delphi questionnaires had technique questionnaires. These three rounds of Delphi questionnaires had technique questionnaires. These three rounds of Delphi questionnaires had technique questionnaires. These three rounds of Delphi questionnaires had technique questionnaires. These three rounds of Delphi questionnaires had technique questionnaires. These three rounds of Delphi questionnaires had technique questionnaires. These three rounds of Delphi questionnaires had technique questionnaires. These three rounds of Delphi questionnaires had technique questionnaires. These three rounds of Delphi questionnaires had technique questionnaires. These three rounds of Delphi questionnaires had technique questionnaires. These three rounds of Delphi questionnaires had technique questionnaires. These three rounds of Delphi questionnaires had technique questionnaires. These three rounds of Delphi questionnaires had respectively response rat respectively response ratrespectively response ratrespectively response rat respectively response rat respectively response ratrespectively response rat es of 93%, 100%, and 100%. The collected data were es of 93%, 100%, and 100%. The collected data were es of 93%, 100%, and 100%. The collected data were es of 93%, 100%, and 100%. The collected data were es of 93%, 100%, and 100%. The collected data were es of 93%, 100%, and 100%. The collected data were es of 93%, 100%, and 100%. The collected data were es of 93%, 100%, and 100%. The collected data were es of 93%, 100%, and 100%. The collected data were es of 93%, 100%, and 100%. The collected data were es of 93%, 100%, and 100%. The collected data were es of 93%, 100%, and 100%. The collected data were es of 93%, 100%, and 100%. The collected data were analyzed by SPSS 17.0 the statistical software to conduct descriptive statistics, and analyzed by SPSS 17.0 the statistical software to conduct descriptive statistics, and analyzed by SPSS 17.0 the statistical software to conduct descriptive statistics, and analyzed by SPSS 17.0 the statistical software to conduct descriptive statistics, and analyzed by SPSS 17.0 the statistical software to conduct descriptive statistics, and analyzed by SPSS 17.0 the statistical software to conduct descriptive statistics, and analyzed by SPSS 17.0 the statistical software to conduct descriptive statistics, and analyzed by SPSS 17.0 the statistical software to conduct descriptive statistics, and analyzed by SPSS 17.0 the statistical software to conduct descriptive statistics, and analyzed by SPSS 17.0 the statistical software to conduct descriptive statistics, and analyzed by SPSS 17.0 the statistical software to conduct descriptive statistics, and analyzed by SPSS 17.0 the statistical software to conduct descriptive statistics, and analyzed by SPSS 17.0 the statistical software to conduct descriptive statistics, and analyzed by SPSS 17.0 the statistical software to conduct descriptive statistics, and analyzed by SPSS 17.0 the statistical software to conduct descriptive statistics, and analyzed by SPSS 17.0 the statistical software to conduct descriptive statistics, and analyzed by SPSS 17.0 the statistical software to conduct descriptive statistics, and analyzed by SPSS 17.0 the statistical software to conduct descriptive statistics, and analyzed by SPSS 17.0 the statistical software to conduct descriptive statistics, and analyzed by SPSS 17.0 the statistical software to conduct descriptive statistics, and analyzed by SPSS 17.0 the statistical software to conduct descriptive statistics, and analyzed by SPSS 17.0 the statistical software to conduct descriptive statistics, and analyzed by SPSS 17.0 the statistical software to conduct descriptive statistics, and analyzed by SPSS 17.0 the statistical software to conduct descriptive statistics, and analyzed by SPSS 17.0 the statistical software to conduct descriptive statistics, and analyzed by SPSS 17.0 the statistical software to conduct descriptive statistics, and means as well standard deviations were used to determine the means as well standard deviations were used to determine the means as well standard deviations were used to determine the means as well standard deviations were used to determine the means as well standard deviations were used to determine the means as well standard deviations were used to determine the means as well standard deviations were used to determine the means as well standard deviations were used to determine the means as well standard deviations were used to determine the means as well standard deviations were used to determine the indicatorindicator indicator system.system.system. system.
The research results showed that research results showed that research results showed that research results showed that research results showed that research results showed that the evaluation ind evaluation ind evaluation ind evaluation ind icators of elementary school of elementary school of elementary school of elementary school of elementary school of elementary school of elementary school of elementary school of elementary school teachers’ professional learning communit teachers’ professional learning communit teachers’ professional learning communit teachers’ professional learning communit teachers’ professional learning communit teachers’ professional learning communit teachers’ professional learning communit teachers’ professional learning communit teachers’ professional learning communit teachers’ professional learning communit ies included the following five major ies included the following five major ies included the following five major ies included the following five major ies included the following five major ies included the following five major ies included the following five major ies included the following five major ies included the following five major ies included the following five major ies included the following five major evaluation evaluation ind icators aspects: shared vision and goal, administrative support icators aspects: shared vision and goal, administrative support icators aspects: shared vision and goal, administrative support icators aspects: shared vision and goal, administrative support icators aspects: shared vision and goal, administrative support icators aspects: shared vision and goal, administrative support icators aspects: shared vision and goal, administrative support icators aspects: shared vision and goal, administrative support icators aspects: shared vision and goal, administrative support icators aspects: shared vision and goal, administrative support icators aspects: shared vision and goal, administrative support icators aspects: shared vision and goal, administrative support icators aspects: shared vision and goal, administrative support icators aspects: shared vision and goal, administrative support icators aspects: shared vision and goal, administrative support icators aspects: shared vision and goal, administrative support icators aspects: shared vision and goal, administrative support icators aspects: shared vision and goal, administrative support scenario , showing personal showing personal showing personal interaction interaction , demonstrating demonstratingdemonstrating demonstrating professional practice, and professional practice, and professional practice, and professional practice, and professional practice, and continuous continuous improvement as well review of results. These five aspects can be divided into 25 improvement as well review of results. These five aspects can be divided into 25 improvement as well review of results. These five aspects can be divided into 25 improvement as well review of results. These five aspects can be divided into 25 improvement as well review of results. These five aspects can be divided into 25 improvement as well review of results. These five aspects can be divided into 25 improvement as well review of results. These five aspects can be divided into 25 improvement as well review of results. These five aspects can be divided into 25 improvement as well review of results. These five aspects can be divided into 25 improvement as well review of results. These five aspects can be divided into 25 improvement as well review of results. These five aspects can be divided into 25 improvement as well review of results. These five aspects can be divided into 25 improvement as well review of results. These five aspects can be divided into 25 improvement as well review of results. These five aspects can be divided into 25 improvement as well review of results. These five aspects can be divided into 25 improvement as well review of results. These five aspects can be divided into 25 improvement as well review of results. These five aspects can be divided into 25 improvement as well review of results. These five aspects can be divided into 25 improvement as well review of results. These five aspects can be divided into 25 improvement as well review of results. These five aspects can be divided into 25 improvement as well review of results. These five aspects can be divided into 25 improvement as well review of results. These five aspects can be divided into 25 improvement as well review of results. These five aspects can be divided into 25 improvement as well review of results. These five aspects can be divided into 25 improvement as well review of results. These five aspects can be divided into 25 evaluation sub evaluation sub evaluation sub - ind icator items. icator items. icator items.icator items.
Keyw ords : teachers teachers’ professional learning communities, professional learning communities, professional learning communities, professional learning communities, professional learning communities, professional learning communities, evaluation indicators evaluation indicators evaluation indicators evaluation indicators , elementary school elementary schoolelementary school elementary schoolelementary school elementary school

壹、中文部分
丁一顧（2011）。會談技巧：教師專業學習社群運作成功的關鍵。教育研究月刊，201，28-38。
丁一顧（2012）。教師專業學習社群運作的核心：以學生學習為本。教育研究月刊，215，5-16。
丁文祺（2007）。國民中學校長教學領導、教師社群互動、教師專業實踐與學校效能關係之研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。
丁琴芳（2008）。國民小學教師專業學習社群發展之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺北教育大學，臺北市。
大前研一（2006）。專業-你的唯一生存之道。臺北市：天下文化。
王保進（1993）。高等教育表現指之研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。
王秀玲、康瀚文（2012）。國民中學教師專業學習社群發展之況與展望。教育研究月刊，215，17-29。
王秀玲等人（2011）。國民中學校長教學領導與教師專業學習社群發展模式之建構（Ⅰ）。行政院國家科學委員會專業研究計畫成果報告（NSC992410-H-003030）。臺北市：國立臺灣師範大學教育學系。
王淑怡（2002）。國民小學教師教學效能指標之建構（未出版之碩士論文）。臺北市立師範學院，臺北市。
甘育萍（2006）。國民小學校長營造教師社群行為與教師專業社群表現關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。輔仁大學，新北市。
江芳盛譯（2004）。Gary Sykes原著。對教育「新專業主義」之評估。張
鈿富主編，教育行政研究手冊，363-401。臺北市：心理。
江彥廷（2007）。Etienne Wenger的實踐社群理論及其對教師專業社群之
啟示。國立臺北教育大學（未出版之碩士論文），臺北市。
何文純（2006）。國民小學社會資本與學習社群關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺北教育大學，臺北市。

何建霖（2009）。國民小學學校分佈式領導、教師同僚專業互享與學生學習表現之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立中正大學，嘉義縣。
吳清山（1997）。學習型組織理論及其對教育革新的啟示。圖書館教育月刊，4，1-7。
吳清山、林天祐（1999）。教育指標。教育資料與研究，29，66。
吳俊憲（2010）。教師專業學習社群：意涵、理論與推動策略。靜宜大學師資培育中心實習輔導通訊，11，3-7。
吳貞慧（2011）。國民小學教師專業學習社群運作過程與成效之個案研究─以星星國小為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立新竹教育大學，新竹市。
李美葺（2010）。國民小學教師專業學習社群之推動與成效分析（未出版之碩士論文）。逢甲大學，臺中市。
李佩玲（2002）。教師分級制對教師專業發展的影響─專業學習社群教師的觀點（未出版之碩士論文）。國立花蓮師範學院，花蓮市。
沈靜濤（2009）。教師專業發展評鑑與專業學習社群之個案研究。國立臺灣師範大學（未出版之碩士論文），臺北市。
辛俊德（2009）。國民小學社群特徵與教師教育信念及專業表現關係之研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立臺北教育大學，臺北市。
周宏欣（2010）。臺中市國民小學教師學習社群發展之研究（未出版之碩士論文。國立嘉義大學），嘉義縣。
林子葉（2009）。「4-P模式」運作數學教學專業社群以促進教師專業成長之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立屏東教育大學，屏東縣。
林劭仁（2006）。專業學習社群運用於師資培育自我評鑑之探究。中正教育研究，5（2），79-111。
林松柏（2005）。台灣地區國民中小學教師專業發展評鑑指標建構之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立暨南大學，南投縣。
林思伶、蔡進雄（2005）。論凝聚教師學習社群的有效途徑。教育研究月刊，132，99-109。
林瑞昌（2006）。以專業社群概念內涵為核心的教師專業發展策略。載於95年度地方教育輔導叢書─熱情卓越新典範。國立臺北教育大學，臺北市。
107
林志成（2002）。國民中小學校務評鑑問題與改進策略。國教世紀，201，13-18。
施心梅（2010）。臺北縣國民中學教師專業學習社群與教師專業發展關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。輔仁大學，新北市。
侯蘊玹（2010）。國民小學藝術與人文領域教科書選用指標建構及影響因素之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣藝術大學，臺北市。
柳雅梅譯（2006）。Sylvia M.Roberts & Eunice Z.Pruitt原著。學校是專業的學習社群。臺北市：心理。
徐慧真（2003）。桃竹苗四縣市國民小學教師文化之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立新竹教育大學，新竹市。
高博銓（2008）。學校學習社群的發展與挑戰。中等教育，59（4），9-20。
高博銓（2009）。學校教師學習社群發展的個案研究。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊，2（1），61-74。
高傳晃（2009）。臺北市國民小學校長領導行為與教師專業學習社群關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。臺北市立教育大學，臺北市。
高麗鳳（2009）。國民中小學教育評鑑人員專業化指標建構之研究（未出版之博士論文）。臺北市立教育大學，臺北市。
孫志麟（1998）。國民教育指標體系的建立及應用（未出版之博士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。
倪惠軒（2011）。國民小學教師專業學習社群個案研究─以彩虹國小為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立新竹教育大學，新竹市。
曾德明（2012）。攜手計畫課後扶助方案評鑑指標建構之訮究（未出版之碩士論文。國立新竹教育大學），新竹市。
張鈿富（2001）。教育指標建立與運用之探討。教育改革的未來，183-217。臺北：師大教研中心。
張國強（2010）。臺中縣國民小學校長教學領導與教師專業學習社群互動之相關研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺中教育大學，臺中市。
張新仁（主編）（2009a）。中小學教師專業學習社群手冊。臺北市：教育部。
張新仁（主編）（2009b）。教師專業學習社群-領頭羊葵花寶典。臺北市：教育部。

張新仁、王瓊珠、馮莉雅編（2009）。中小學教師專業學習社群手冊。臺北市：教育部。
張新仁、王瓊珠、馮莉雅、潘道仁（2011）。臺灣教師專業學習社群的啓動。教育研究月刊，201，5-25。
張德銳、王淑珍（2010）。教師專業學習社群在教學輔導教師制度中的發展與實踐。臺北市立教育大學學報，41，61-90。
莊蕙瑛（2011）。教師專業學習社群組成型態與運作方式之個案研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立東華大學，花蓮縣。
郭木山（2002）。國民小學學校本位教師專業發展之個案研究－以一個教師社群協同反省的行動研究為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺中教育大學，臺中市。
郭昭佑（2001）。教育評鑑指標建構方法探究。國教學報，13，257-285。
陳木金、林忠仁（2009）。從教育政治學看同儕灰猩猩效應對教師專業學習社群的啟示。教育行政論壇學術研討會：教育組織的權力與政治之論文，臺北。
陳如意（2009）。臺北縣國民小學教師學習社群之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺北教育大學，臺北市。
陳佩英（2009）。一起學習、一起領導：專業學習社群的建構與實踐。中等教育，60（3），68-88。
陳淑君（2010）。臺北市國民中學學習領域召集人教師領導之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。
馮鈺娟（2009）。臺中市國民小學校長知識領導與教師專業學習社群態度關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺中教育大學，臺中市。
曾淑惠（2002）。教育方案評鑑。台北：師大書苑。
黃旭鈞（2012）。教室走察方安實踐策略建構之研究。臺北市：高等教育。
黃秋鑾（2009）。臺灣地區國民中學校長知識領導、學習社群與學校創新經營效能關係之研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立臺北教育大學，臺北市。
黃政傑（1996）。技術教育概論。臺北：師大書苑。
楊淙富（2012）。國民小學教師領導、教師專業學習社群與學校效能之研究。國立臺中教育大學（未出版之博士論文），臺中市。

楊玲珠（2010）。臺北市中小學教務主任教學領導行為與教師專業學習社群關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺北市立教育大學，臺北市。
楊智先（2007）。教師社群互動、工作希望感受與創造性轉化之關係：量化模式建構與典範案例分析（未出版之博士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。
葉又慈（2006）。高雄市國民小學教師自我評鑑與教學效能關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。
廖美芬（2010）。國民小學教師學習社群與教師教學效能關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺北教育大學，臺北市。
劉慶生（2010）。建構「國文科教師專業社群」之行動研究（未出版之碩士論文）。輔仁大學，新北市。
劉興欽（2012）。國民小學優質學校指標建構之研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立臺北教育大學，臺北市。
劉雲傑（2012）。國民小學永續學校指標建構與實證分析之研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立新竹教育大學，新竹市。
劉仲瑛（2012）。國中校長正向領導、學校文化與教師專業學習社群關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立新竹教育大學，新竹市。
劉咨廷（2012）。衣帶漸寬終不悔〜「快樂總鋪師」教師專業學習社群創新教學之敘事研究（未出版之碩士論文）。臺北市立教育大學，臺北市。
廖淑霞（2012）。一個「自主性」教師專業學習社群發展之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。臺北市立教育大學，臺北市。
歐用生（1996）。教師專業成長。臺北市：師大書苑。
潘文福、莊蕙瑛（2012）。教師專業學習社群組成型態與運作方式之個案研究。教育研究月刊，215，91-104。
潘慧玲（2008，12月）。以「專業學習社群」推動評鑑後之教師專業發展－學校行政如何提供協助與支持（潘慧玲教授主持）。教育部主辦2008教師專業發展國際學術研討會成果手冊，72，高雄。
蔡進雄（2003）。學校領導的新思維：建立教師學習社群。技術與職業教育雙月刊，78，42-46。

蔡進雄（2005）。中小學教師領導理論之探討。教育研究月刊，139，92-101。
蔡進雄（2006）。從學習社群的觀點論校長專業發展。研習資訊，23（4），129-135。
蔡淑婷（2006）。國小教師協同教學評鑑指標建構之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。臺北市立教育大學，臺北市。
蔣偉民（2011）。我國地方政府國民教育績效評鑑指標建構之研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立新竹教育大學，新竹市。
鄭欣怡（2009）。臺灣地區社區大學行政人員專業能力指標建構之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立新竹教育大學，新竹市。
謝文全（1978）。德懷術在教育研究上的應用。今日教育，34，45-38。
顏國樑（2009）。臺灣教師專業發展評鑑執行的問題與推動策略—政策執行的觀點。研習資訊專論，26，35-46。
顏國樑、倪惠軒（2010）。教師專業學習社群－教師專業成長新取向。臺灣教育發展論壇期刊，1，1-30。

貳、外文部分
Ailwood, J., & Capeness, R. Ailwood, J., & Capeness, R. Ailwood, J., & Capeness, R. Ailwood, J., & Capeness, R. (2001). (2001). Teacher professional learning Teacher professional learning Teacher professional learning Teacher professional learning Teacher professional learning communities: Two queensland case studies communities: Two queensland case studies communities: Two queensland case studies communities: Two queensland case studies communities: Two queensland case studiescommunities: Two queensland case studies communities: Two queensland case studies communities: Two queensland case studies communities: Two queensland case studies’. In R. Capeness, A. Kolatsis, . In R. Capeness, A. Kolatsis, . In R. Capeness, A. Kolatsis, . In R. Capeness, A. Kolatsis, . In R. Capeness, A. Kolatsis, . In R. Capeness, A. Kolatsis, & A. Woods (Eds.), & A. Woods (Eds.), & A. Woods (Eds.), & A. Woods (Eds.), & A. Woods (Eds.), Creating new dialogues: PolicyCreating new dialogues: PolicyCreating new dialogues: Policy Creating new dialogues: Policy Creating new dialogues: Policy Creating new dialogues: Policy , pedagogy and , pedagogy and , pedagogy and reformreform , (pp. (pp.67 -72 ). Brisbane, Queensland: Post Press. . Brisbane, Queensland: Post Press. . Brisbane, Queensland: Post Press. . Brisbane, Queensland: Post Press. . Brisbane, Queensland: Post Press.
Day, C., Jacobson, S. L., & Johansson, O. Day, C., Jacobson, S. L., & Johansson, O. Day, C., Jacobson, S. L., & Johansson, O. Day, C., Jacobson, S. L., & Johansson, O. Day, C., Jacobson, S. L., & Johansson, O. Day, C., Jacobson, S. L., & Johansson, O. Day, C., Jacobson, S. L., & Johansson, O. Day, C., Jacobson, S. L., & Johansson, O. Day, C., Jacobson, S. L., & Johansson, O. Day, C., Jacobson, S. L., & Johansson, O. Day, C., Jacobson, S. L., & Johansson, O. Day, C., Jacobson, S. L., & Johansson, O. Day, C., Jacobson, S. L., & Johansson, O. Day, C., Jacobson, S. L., & Johansson, O. Day, C., Jacobson, S. L., & Johansson, O. Day, C., Jacobson, S. L., & Johansson, O. Day, C., Jacobson, S. L., & Johansson, O. Day, C., Jacobson, S. L., & Johansson, O. (20 11). Leading 11). Leading 11). Leading 11). Leading 11). Leading 11). Leading organizational rganizational rganizational rganizational learning and capacity building. In R. M. learning and capacity building. In R. M. learning and capacity building. In R. M. learning and capacity building. In R. M. learning and capacity building. In R. M. learning and capacity building. In R. M. learning and capacity building. In R. M. learning and capacity building. In R. M. learning and capacity building. In R. M. learning and capacity building. In R. M. learning and capacity building. In R. M. learning and capacity building. In R. M. learning and capacity building. In R. M. Ylimaki & S. L. Jacobson (Eds.). Ylimaki & S. L. Jacobson (Eds.). Ylimaki & S. L. Jacobson (Eds.). Ylimaki & S. L. Jacobson (Eds.). Ylimaki & S. L. Jacobson (Eds.). Ylimaki & S. L. Jacobson (Eds.). Ylimaki & S. L. Jacobson (Eds.). Ylimaki & S. L. Jacobson (Eds.).Ylimaki & S. L. Jacobson (Eds.). US AND US AND US AND Cross CrossCross -national policies, practice national policies, practice national policies, practice national policies, practice national policies, practice national policies, practice national policies, practice s, and preparation. s, and preparation.s, and preparation.s, and preparation. s, and preparation. s, and preparation. s, and preparation. (pp. 29 (pp. 29(pp. 29 -49). AK Houten, Netherlands: Springer. AK Houten, Netherlands: Springer. AK Houten, Netherlands: Springer. AK Houten, Netherlands: Springer. AK Houten, Netherlands: Springer. AK Houten, Netherlands: Springer.
Dufour, R. (2004). What is "professional learning community "? Dufour, R. (2004). What is "professional learning community "? Dufour, R. (2004). What is "professional learning community "? Dufour, R. (2004). What is "professional learning community "? Dufour, R. (2004). What is "professional learning community "? Dufour, R. (2004). What is "professional learning community "? Dufour, R. (2004). What is "professional learning community "? Dufour, R. (2004). What is "professional learning community "? Dufour, R. (2004). What is "professional learning community "? Dufour, R. (2004). What is "professional learning community "? Dufour, R. (2004). What is "professional learning community "? Dufour, R. (2004). What is "professional learning community "? Dufour, R. (2004). What is "professional learning community "? Dufour, R. (2004). What is "professional learning community "?Dufour, R. (2004). What is "professional learning community "?Dufour, R. (2004). What is "professional learning community "? Educational Educational Educational Leadership, 61 Leadership, 61 (8), 6 (8), 6 -11.11.
DuFour, R., & Eaker, R. (1998). DuFour, R., & Eaker, R. (1998). DuFour, R., & Eaker, R. (1998). DuFour, R., & Eaker, R. (1998). DuFour, R., & Eaker, R. (1998). DuFour, R., & Eaker, R. (1998). DuFour, R., & Eaker, R. (1998). DuFour, R., & Eaker, R. (1998). DuFour, R., & Eaker, R. (1998). DuFour, R., & Eaker, R. (1998). DuFour, R., & Eaker, R. (1998). Professional learning communities at work: Professional learning communities at work: Professional learning communities at work: Professional learning communities at work: Professional learning communities at work: Professional learning communities at work: Professional learning communities at work: Professional learning communities at work: Professional learning communities at work: Professional learning communities at work: Professional learning communities at work: Professional learning communities at work: Best practice s for enhancing student achievement. s for enhancing student achievement. s for enhancing student achievement. s for enhancing student achievement. s for enhancing student achievement. s for enhancing student achievement. s for enhancing student achievement. s for enhancing student achievement. Bloomington, IN: Bloomington, IN: Bloomington, IN: Bloomington, IN: National Educational Service. National Educational Service. National Educational Service. National Educational Service.
Dufour, R Dufour, R Dufour, R Dufour, R. (2003 ). Building professional learning community. Building professional learning community. Building professional learning community. Building professional learning community. Building professional learning community. Building professional learning community. Building professional learning community. Building professional learning community. Building professional learning community. Building professional learning community. The school The school The school The school Administrator, 60 Administrator, 60 Administrator, 60 (5), 13 (5), 13-18 .
Gordin, L. (2010). Gordin, L. (2010). Gordin, L. (2010). Gordin, L. (2010). Gordin, L. (2010). Conceptualization and support of the role teacherConceptualization and support of the role teacher Conceptualization and support of the role teacher Conceptualization and support of the role teacher Conceptualization and support of the role teacher Conceptualization and support of the role teacherConceptualization and support of the role teacher Conceptualization and support of the role teacher Conceptualization and support of the role teacherConceptualization and support of the role teacherConceptualization and support of the role teacher Conceptualization and support of the role teacherConceptualization and support of the role teacher Conceptualization and support of the role teacher s serving as team leaders in a professional learning community serving as team leaders in a professional learning communityserving as team leaders in a professional learning community serving as team leaders in a professional learning community serving as team leaders in a professional learning communityserving as team leaders in a professional learning community serving as team leaders in a professional learning communityserving as team leaders in a professional learning community serving as team leaders in a professional learning community serving as team leaders in a professional learning community serving as team leaders in a professional learning community serving as team leaders in a professional learning community serving as team leaders in a professional learning community serving as team leaders in a professional learning community serving as team leaders in a professional learning community serving as team leaders in a professional learning community serving as team leaders in a professional learning community . (Doctoral . (Doctoral . (Doctoral dissertation). Azusa Pacific University, Los Angeles, CA dissertation). Azusa Pacific University, Los Angeles, CA dissertation). Azusa Pacific University, Los Angeles, CA dissertation). Azusa Pacific University, Los Angeles, CA dissertation). Azusa Pacific University, Los Angeles, CA dissertation). Azusa Pacific University, Los Angeles, CA dissertation). Azusa Pacific University, Los Angeles, CAdissertation). Azusa Pacific University, Los Angeles, CA dissertation). Azusa Pacific University, Los Angeles, CA dissertation). Azusa Pacific University, Los Angeles, CAdissertation). Azusa Pacific University, Los Angeles, CA
Hargraves, A. Hargraves, A. Hargraves, A. Hargraves, A. (200 7). Sustainable professional learning communities. In L. . Sustainable professional learning communities. In L. . Sustainable professional learning communities. In L. . Sustainable professional learning communities. In L. . Sustainable professional learning communities. In L. . Sustainable professional learning communities. In L. . Sustainable professional learning communities. In L. . Sustainable professional learning communities. In L. . Sustainable professional learning communities. In L. . Sustainable professional learning communities. In L. . Sustainable professional learning communities. In L. . Sustainable professional learning communities. In L. . Sustainable professional learning communities. In L. . Sustainable professional learning communities. In L. Stoll & K. S. Louis Stoll & K. S. Louis Stoll & K. S. Louis Stoll & K. S. Louis Stoll & K. S. Louis Stoll & K. S. Louis Stoll & K. S. Louis (Eds.), Professional learning communities: Divergence, depth and dilemmas (pp. 181-195). Maidenhead, Berkshire: Open University Press.
Hord, S. M. (1997). Professional learning communities： Communities of
112
continuous inquiry and improvement. Austin, Texas： Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
Hord, S. M. (2004). Professional learning communities： An overview. In Hord, S. M. (Eds.), Learning together, leading together: Changing schools through professional learning communities (pp.5-14). New York: Teachers College Press and Oxford, Ohio: National Staff Development Council.
Hipp, K. K., Huffman, J. B., Pankake, A. M.,& Olivier, D. F. (2009). Sustaining professional learning communities: Case studies. Journal of Educational Change, 9(2), 173-195.
Jennifer, J., & Yendol-Hoppey, D. (2010). Supervisor transformation within a professional learning community. Teacher Education Quarterly, spring, 97-114.
Kruse, S. D., Louis, K. S., & Bryk, A. (1995). An emerging framework for analyzing school-based professional community. In K. S. Louis & S. D. Kruse (Eds.), Professionalism and community: Perspectives on reforming urban schools (23-42). Thousand Oaks, CA : Corwin
PressSnow Snow-Gerono, J. L. (2005). Professional development in a culture of Gerono, J. L. (2005). Professional development in a culture of Gerono, J. L. (2005). Professional development in a culture of Gerono, J. L. (2005). Professional development in a culture of Gerono, J. L. (2005). Professional development in a culture of Gerono, J. L. (2005). Professional development in a culture of Gerono, J. L. (2005). Professional development in a culture of Gerono, J. L. (2005). Professional development in a culture of Gerono, J. L. (2005). Professional development in a culture of Gerono, J. L. (2005). Professional development in a culture of Gerono, J. L. (2005). Professional development in a culture of Gerono, J. L. (2005). Professional development in a culture of Gerono, J. L. (2005). Professional development in a culture of Gerono, J. L. (2005). Professional development in a culture of Gerono, J. L. (2005). Professional development in a culture of Gerono, J. L. (2005). Professional development in a culture of inquiry: PDS teachers identify the benefits of profes inquiry: PDS teachers identify the benefits of profesinquiry: PDS teachers identify the benefits of profes inquiry: PDS teachers identify the benefits of profes inquiry: PDS teachers identify the benefits of profes inquiry: PDS teachers identify the benefits of profes inquiry: PDS teachers identify the benefits of profes inquiry: PDS teachers identify the benefits of profes inquiry: PDS teachers identify the benefits of profesinquiry: PDS teachers identify the benefits of profesinquiry: PDS teachers identify the benefits of profes inquiry: PDS teachers identify the benefits of profes inquiry: PDS teachers identify the benefits of profes inquiry: PDS teachers identify the benefits of profes inquiry: PDS teachers identify the benefits of profesinquiry: PDS teachers identify the benefits of profes inquiry: PDS teachers identify the benefits of profesinquiry: PDS teachers identify the benefits of profes sional learning sional learning sional learning communities. communities. communities. communities. Teaching and Teacher EducationTeaching and Teacher Education Teaching and Teacher Education Teaching and Teacher Education Teaching and Teacher EducationTeaching and Teacher Education Teaching and Teacher Education Teaching and Teacher Education Teaching and Teacher Education, 21 (3), 241 (3), 241 -256 .
Roberts, S. M., & Pruitt, E.Z. (2009). School as professional learning Roberts, S. M., & Pruitt, E.Z. (2009). School as professional learning Roberts, S. M., & Pruitt, E.Z. (2009). School as professional learning Roberts, S. M., & Pruitt, E.Z. (2009). School as professional learning Roberts, S. M., & Pruitt, E.Z. (2009). School as professional learning Roberts, S. M., & Pruitt, E.Z. (2009). School as professional learning Roberts, S. M., & Pruitt, E.Z. (2009). School as professional learning Roberts, S. M., & Pruitt, E.Z. (2009). School as professional learning Roberts, S. M., & Pruitt, E.Z. (2009). School as professional learning Roberts, S. M., & Pruitt, E.Z. (2009). School as professional learning Roberts, S. M., & Pruitt, E.Z. (2009). School as professional learning Roberts, S. M., & Pruitt, E.Z. (2009). School as professional learning Roberts, S. M., & Pruitt, E.Z. (2009). School as professional learning Roberts, S. M., & Pruitt, E.Z. (2009). School as professional learning Roberts, S. M., & Pruitt, E.Z. (2009). School as professional learning communities: communities: communities: communities: Collaborative activities and strategies for professional Collaborative activities and strategies for professional Collaborative activities and strategies for professional Collaborative activities and strategies for professional Collaborative activities and strategies for professional Collaborative activities and strategies for professional Collaborative activities and strategies for professional Collaborative activities and strategies for professional Collaborative activities and strategies for professional Collaborative activities and strategies for professional Collaborative activities and strategies for professional Collaborative activities and strategies for professional Collaborative activities and strategies for professional Collaborative activities and strategies for professional Collaborative activities and strategies for professional Collaborative activities and strategies for professional development. development. (2nd.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin press.
Stoll, L., & Louis, K.S. (2007). Professional learning communities: Divergence, Professional learning communities: Divergence, Professional learning communities: Divergence, Professional learning communities: Divergence, Professional learning communities: Divergence, Professional learning communities: Divergence, Professional learning communities: Divergence, Professional learning communities: Divergence, Professional learning communities: Divergence, Professional learning communities: Divergence, Professional learning communities: Divergence, Professional learning communities: Divergence, depth and dilemmas. depth and dilemmas. depth and dilemmas. Maidenhead, Berkshire: Open University Press.Maidenhead, Berkshire: Open University Press. Maidenhead, Berkshire: Open University Press. Maidenhead, Berkshire: Open University Press. Maidenhead, Berkshire: Open University Press. Maidenhead, Berkshire: Open University Press. Maidenhead, Berkshire: Open University Press.Maidenhead, Berkshire: Open University Press. Maidenhead, Berkshire: Open University Press.
113
Stufflebeam, D. L. (2001). Evaluation checklists: Practical tools for guiding and judging evaluations. American Journal of Evaluation, 22(1), 71-79.
Tichy, N. (1997). Tichy, N. (1997). Tichy, N. (1997). Tichy, N. (1997). Tichy, N. (1997). Tichy, N. (1997). Tichy, N. (1997). Tichy, N. (1997). The leadership engine: How winning companies build The leadership engine: How winning companies build The leadership engine: How winning companies build The leadership engine: How winning companies build The leadership engine: How winning companies build The leadership engine: How winning companies build The leadership engine: How winning companies build The leadership engine: How winning companies build The leadership engine: How winning companies build The leadership engine: How winning companies build The leadership engine: How winning companies build The leadership engine: How winning companies build The leadership engine: How winning companies build The leadership engine: How winning companies build The leadership engine: How winning companies build leaders at every level leaders at every level leaders at every level . New York, NY: Harper Business. . New York, NY: Harper Business. . New York, NY: Harper Business.. New York, NY: Harper Business. . New York, NY: Harper Business. . New York, NY: Harper Business. . New York, NY: Harper Business. . New York, NY: Harper Business.
Uhl, N. P. (1990). Educational model and approaches- Delphi technique. In H. J. W alberg, &G. D. Haertal(Eds). The international encyclopedia of educational evaluation. Oxford:Pergamon.