研究生: |
黃以辰 Huang, Yi-Chen |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
比較晶圓雙雄的策略變化:主題模型方法的應用 Comparing the Strategic Change of TSMC and UMC: The Application of Topic Modeling Approach |
指導教授: |
洪世章
Hung, Shih-Chang |
口試委員: |
陳宗權
Chen, Tzong-Chyuan 曾詠青 Tseng, Yung-Ching |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
科技管理學院 - 科技管理研究所 Institute of Technology Management |
論文出版年: | 2020 |
畢業學年度: | 108 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 42 |
中文關鍵詞: | 台積電 、聯電 、策略變化 、主題模型 、LDA演算法 |
外文關鍵詞: | TSMC, UMC, strategic change, topic modeling, LDA algorithm |
相關次數: | 點閱:2 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本文採用主題模型,探討台積電與聯電在策略變化上的差異。台積電與聯電 是台灣代表性的晶圓代工廠,起初由政府主導集資、從工研院衍生出來,但是可 以發現到兩者隨著環境的變化,所採用的策略產生差異,表現在產能、行銷、研 發與投資等活動。為了具體探究兩者在策略上的差異,本文鎖定聯合知識庫作為 實證資料的來源,蒐集自 1980 年的新聞報導,進行 LDA 演算法的自然語言處理 與分析。本文分別建立 8 個潛藏主題的模型,並觀察兩者在發展過程中每一個主 題的歷年權重變化。我們發現到台積電和聯電都同時強調客戶關係、西進、經營 狀況、公司理念、合作夥伴這 5 個主題,但權重變化有所不同。另外,兩者各自 發展出一些獨特的主題。透過主題模型的比較與後續質性的詮釋,本研究提供一 個結合資料科學與個案研究的實證曲徑,來分析廠商層級的策略變化。
This paper used topic modeling approach to analyze the differences of strategic change between TSMC and UMC. TSMC and UMC are representative wafer foundry in Taiwan. Both of them founded by the government and derived from ITRI(Industrial Technology Research Institute). As the environment changes, the strategies they used make a difference shown in activities such as productivity, marketing, R&D, and investment. To research the differences between TSMC and UMC specifically, this article locked UDN as a source of empirical information and collected the newspapers from 1980 to perform natural language process and analysis by LDA algorithm. This article established 8 latent topics and observed the changes in the weight of each topic over the years. We found that both TSMC and UMC emphasized the five topics of Customer relationship, Westward advancement, business effectiveness, company philosophy, and partners, but the changes of weight are different. In addition, they developed some unique topics respectively. Through the comparison of topic modeling and qualitative interpretation, this study provides an empirical approach that combines data science and case study to analyze strategic change at manufacturer level.
天下編輯,1999,曹興誠:聯電與霸業傳奇,台北:天下雜誌。
天下編輯,2003,「張忠謀的動態領導」,天下雜誌,271:168-170。
文馨瑩、李吉仁,2012,「探究動態能耐的緣起:誘發多樣化的技術創新例規」,
臺大管理論叢,22(2):189-220。
王曉玟,2013,「特稿/打下三星、英特爾!張忠謀的最後一戰」,天下雜誌。
https://www.cw.com.tw/article/articleLogin.action?from=search&id=5050672
伍忠賢,2006,透視台積電,台北:五南。
余宜芳,2007,台積 DNA,台北:天下文化。
吳迎春、王曉玟,2012,「張忠謀公開接班人 3 條件」,天下雜誌。
https://www.cw.com.tw/article/articleLogin.action?from=search&id=5030896
吳思華、沈榮欽,1999,台灣積體電路產業的形成與發展,收錄於管理資本在台
灣:台灣產業發展的邏輯,蔡敦浩(編),58-150,台北:聯經出版社。
吳凱琳,2013,「蘋果攜手台積電,與三星分手仍有難度」,天下雜誌。
https://www.cw.com.tw/article/articleLogin.action?from=search&id=5050077
洪世章、蔡碧鳳,2006,「企業興業與成長:比較個案研究」,中山管理評論,14
(1):79-117。
洪世章、譚丹琪、廖曉青,2007,「企業成長、策略選擇與策略改變」,中山管理
評論,15(1):11-35。
梁郁雯,2003,「曹興誠:聯電漸從打擊中恢復」,天下雜誌,288:218-223。
陳良榕,2005,「半導體爭霸,台日聯手打三星」,天下雜誌,320:36-37。
陳東升,2003,積體網路:台灣高科技產業的社會學分析,台北:群學。
陳雅慧,2002,「員工分紅,凝聚台灣科技的力量」,天下雜誌,256:44-51。
黃靖萱,2019,「做客戶的市場顧問:晶圓代工王自稱服務業」,商業周刊,1676:
102-103。
黃靖萱,2019,「對手高度決定自己的強度:一場 32 年的專注馬拉松」,商業周
刊,1676:106-107。
熊毅晰、王曉玟,2008,「開放創新 打造不敗企業」,天下雜誌,396:74-77。
鄭伯壎,2007,矽龍:台灣半導體產業的傳奇,台北:華泰文化。
盧智芳,1999,「一山要容五隻大老虎」,天下雜誌,221:100-103。
盧智芳,2001,「充滿風險還是高懸機會?」,天下雜誌,236:120-126。
蘇育琪,1999,「台積、宏碁、IBM 為何聯盟」,天下雜誌,218:220-221。
Antons, D., Grünwald, E., Cichy, P., & Salge, T. O. 2020. The application of text
mining methods in innovation research: Current state, evolution patterns, and
development priorities. R&D Management, 50(3): 329-351.
Antons, D., Joshi, A. M., & Salge, T. O. 2018. Content, contribution, and knowledge
consumption: Uncovering hidden topic structure and rhetorical signals in
scientific texts. Journal of Management, 45(7):3035–3076.
Bagheri, A., Saraee, M., & de Jong, F. 2014. ADM-LDA: An aspect detection
model based on topic modelling using the structure of review sentences.
Journal of Information Science, 40(5), 621–636.
Balaguer, A., Luo, Y.-L., Tsai, M.-H., Hung, S.-C., Chu, Y.-Y., Wu, F.-S., Hsu, M.-Y.,
& Wang, K. 2008. The rise and growth of a policy-driven economy: Taiwan. In
C. Edquist & L. Hommen (Eds.), Small country innovation systems:
Globalization, change and policy in Asia and Europe: 31-70. Cheltenham, UK:
Edward Elgar.
Bao, Y., & Datta, A. 2014. Simultaneously discovering and quantifying risk types
from textual risk disclosures. Management Science, 60(6): 1371–1391.
Baumer, E., Mimno, D.,Guha, S., Quan, E., & Gay, G. K. 2017. Comparing Grounded
Theory and Topic Modeling: Extreme Divergence or Unlikely Convergence?
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology.
68(6):1397-1410.
Blei, D. M. 2012. Probabilistic topic models. Communications of the ACM, 55:
77-84.
Blei, D. M. and Ng, A.Y. and Jordan, M. I. 2003. Latent Dirichlet Allocation. the
Journal of machine Learning research, 3: 993–1022.
Chandler, A. D. 1962. Strategy and structure: Chapter in the history of the American
industrial enterprise. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chang, J., Gerrish, S., Wang, C., Boyd-Graber, J. L., Blei, D. M. 2009. Reading tea
leaves: How humans interpret topic models. In Proceedings of the 22
International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS),
288-296.
Chang, M. 2011. Pure play: A dedicated wafer foundry grows in Taiwan. IEEE Solid-
State Circuits Magazine, 3(4): 21-24.
Chen, S.-J., Ko, J.-J. R., & Lawler, J. 2003. Changing patterns of industrial relations
in Taiwan. Industrial Relations, 42(3): 315-340.
Chen, Z.S.; Wong, A.K.Y.; Cheng, T.C.; Koon, A.C.; Chan, H.Y.E. 2019.
FipoQ/FBXO33, a Cullin-1-based ubiquitin ligase complex component
38
modulates ubiquitination and solubility of polyglutamine disease protein.
J.Neurochem, 149:781-798.
Cho, Y. J., Fu, P. W., & Wu, C. C. 2017. Popular research topics in marketing journals,
1995–2014. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 40: 52–72.
Croidieu, G., & Kim, P. H. 2018. Labor of love: Amateurs and lay-expertise
legitimation in the early U.S. radio field. Administrative Science Quarterly,
63(1): 1–42.
Deephouse, D. 1999. To be different or to be the same? It's a question (and theory)
of strategic balance. Strategic Management Journal, 20: 147-166.
Deerwester, S., Dumais, S. T., Furnas, G. W., Landauer, T. K., & Harshman, R.
1990. Indexing by Latent Semantic Analysis. Journal of the American
Society for Information Science, 41(6):391-407.
DiMaggio, P., Nag, M., & Blei, D. 2013. Exploiting affinities between topic
modeling and the sociological perspective on culture: Application to newspaper
coverage of U.S. government arts funding. Poetics, 41(6): 570-606.
Fligstein, N., Stuart Brundage, J., & Schultz, M. 2017. Seeing like the Fed: Culture,
cognition, and framing in the failure to anticipate the Financial Crisis of 2008.
American Sociological Review, 82(5): 879–909.
Geva, H., Oestreicher-Singer, G., & Saar-Tsechansky, M. 2019. Using retweets
when shaping our online persona: Topic modeling approach. MIS Quarterly,
43:501-524.
Gioia, D. A., & Chittipeddi, K. 1991. Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic
change initiation. Strategic Management Journal, 12(6): 433-448.
Giorgi, S., & Weber, K. 2015. Marks of distinction: Framing and audience
appreciation in the context of investment advice. Administrative Science
Quarterly, 60(2): 333-367.
Glaser, B.G., & Strauss, A.L. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for
qualitative research. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
Grove, A. 1996. Only the paranoid survive: How to exploit the crisis points that
challenge every company. New York, NY: Doubleday.
Haans, R. F. J. 2019. What’s the value of being different when everyone is? The
effects of distinctiveness on performance in homogeneous versus heterogeneous
categories. Strategic Management Journal, 40(1): 3–27.
Hannigan, T. R.,
Haans, R. F. J., Vakili, K., Tchalian, H.,
Glaser, V. L.,
Wang, M. S.
Kaplan, S.,
13(2): 586-632.
Jennings, P. D. 2019. Topic modeling in management research:
rendering new theory from textual data. Academy of Management Annals,
Hofmann, T. 1999. Probabilistic Latent Semantic Analysis.
Proceedings of the 15th
39
Conference on Uncertainty in AI: 289-296.
Johnson, G. 1992. Managing strategic change: Strategy, culture and action. Long
Range Planning, 25(1):28-36.
Jonathan K. Pritchard, Matthew Stephens and Peter Donnelly. 2000. Inference of
Population Structure Using Multilocus Genotype Data. Genetics, 155(2): 945-
959.
Kaplan, S., & Vakili, K. 2014. The double-edged sword of recombination in
breakthrough innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 36(10): 1435-1457.
Krippendorff, K. 1980. Validity in Content Analysis. In Mochmann, E. (Ed.).
Computer strategien für die Kom-munikations analyse. Frankfurt: Campus
Verlag.
Li, Q.-H., Chen, Y.-J., & Sun, J.-G. 2003. A new dictionary mechanism for Chinese
word segmentation. Journal of Chinese Information Processing, 17(4): 14-19.
Liu, T.-H., Chu, Y.-Y., Hung, S.-C., & Wu, S.-Y. 2005. Technology entrepreneurial
styles: A comparison of UMC and TSMC. International Journal of Technology
Management, 29(1/2): 92-115.
Mathews, J. A. 1997. A Silicon Valley of the East: Creating Taiwan's semiconductor
industry. California Management Review, 39(4): 26-54.
Mejía, C. and Kajikawa, Y. 2019. Technology news and their linkage to production
of knowledge in robotics re- search. Technological Forecasting and Social
Change, 143:114–124.
Miles, R. E. and Snow, C. C. Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process. New
York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Mohr, J. W., & Bogdanov, P. 2013. Introduction—topic models: What they are and
why they matter. Poetics, 41: 545–569.
Momeni, A., & Rost, K. 2016. Identification and monitoring of possible disruptive
technologies by patent-development paths and topic modeling. Technological
Forecasting and Social Change. 104: 16-29.
Murthy, A. C., T. S. Fristoe, and J. R. Burger. 2016. Homogenizing effects of cities
on North American winter bird diversity. Ecosphere, 7(1):e01216.
10.1002/ecs2.1216.
Nam, H., Joshi, Y. V., & Kannan, P. K. 2017.
Harvesting brand information from
social. tags. Journal of Marketing, 81(4): 88–108.
Natale, F., Hofherr, J., Fiore, G., Virtanen, J., 2012. Interactions between
aquaculture and fisheries. Marine Policy, 38:205-213.
Newman D, Asuncion A, Smyth P, & Welling M. 2007. Distributed Inference for
Latent Dirichlet Allocation. Neural Information Processing Systems. 20:1081-
1088.
40
Newman D, Lau JH, Grieser K, Baldwin T . 2010. Automatic evaluation of topic
coherence. 2010 Annual Conference of the North American.
Newman, D. J., & Block, S. 2006. Probabilistic topic decomposition of an
Eighteenth-century American newspaper. Journal of the American Society for
Information Science and Technology, 57(6): 753-767.
Papadimitriou, C. H., Raghavan, P., Tamaki, H. & Vempala, S. 1998. Latent semantic.
Indexing: a probabilistic analysis. Journal of Computer and System Sciences,
61: 217–235.
Porter, M. E. 1980. Competitive Strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and
competitors. New York, NY: Free Press.
Pritchard, JK., Stephens, M., & Donnelly, P. 2000. Inference of population structure
using multilocus genotype data. Genetics. 155(2):945-959.
Pröllochs, N., & Feuerriegel, S. 2020. Business analytics for strategic
management: Identifying and assessing corporate challenges via topic modeling.
Information & Management, 57(1): 103070.
Puranam, D., Narayan, V., & Kadiyali, V. 2017. The effect of calorie posting
regulation. on consumer opinion: A flexible latent Dirichlet allocation model
with in- formative priors. Marketing Science, 36(5): 726–746.
Rajagopalan, N , & Spreitzer, G. M. 1997. Toward a theory of strategic change: a
multi-lens perspective and integrative framework. Academy of Management
Review, 22(1): 48-79.
Ruckman, K., & McCarthy, I. 2017. Why do some patents get licensed while others
do not? Industrial and Corporate Change, 26(4): 667–688.
Schmiedel, T., Müller, O., & vom Brocke, J. 2019. Topic modeling as a strategy
of inquiry in organizational research: A tutorial with an application example on
organizational culture. Organizational Research Methods, 22(4): 941-968.
Siggelkow N. 2007. Persuasion with case studies. Academy of Management
Journal, 50(1): 20-24.
Simsek, Z, Vaara, E, Paruchuri, S, Nadkarni, S, & Shaw, J. D. 2019. New ways of
seeing big data. Academy of Management, 62(4):971-978.
Strauss, A & Corbin, J. 1990. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory
Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Strauss, A & Corbin, J. 1998.Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and
Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Suominen, A., & Toivanen, H. 2016. Map of science with topic modeling:
Comparison of unsupervised learning and human-assigned subject classification.
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology.
67(10): 2464-2476.
41
Toubia, Olivier, and Oded Netzer. 2017. Idea Generation, Creativity, and
Prototypicality. Marketing Science, 36(1):20.
Turney, P. D., Pantel, P. 2010.From frequency to meaning: Vector space models of
semantics. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 37:141–188.
Wiersema, M. F., & Bantel, K. A. 1992. Top management team demography and
corporate strategic change. Academy of Management Journal, 35(1): 91-121.