中文摘要
在萃智工具之中，傳統76標準解使用時常遇到以下問題：(1) 推導理論過多，缺少標準化解題流程，各有繁複或者無結構化或者太少等缺點。(2) 76標準解自身也有重複敘述。(3) 76標準解常為繁雜純文字敘述，無圖示化的結構，不易使用。
本論文針對以上問題，圖示化和流程化物場分析，發展出一套結構化的問題模型和解題模型。在建立初始物場模型(Initial Su-field Model)結構後，藉由解題限制篩選，由操作模式(Operations)和操作元(Operands)，將初始模型結構對應到解答模型結構(Desired Su-field Model)，然後藉由九個場(fields)發想和答案特徵值(Solution Characteristics)協助，去找出觸發解及特定解。
本研究貢獻包括：1) 以圖形結構和新手法的操作模式和操作元來建立物場分析及求解；2) 本論文提出總共43主類和87子類結構，現有的76標準解只佔有本論文提出的結構中的35主類和41子類，獨家提出了8主類和46子類結構新的解題結構；3) 從76標準解萃取屬性特徵為答案特徵值，可以協助解答發想。4) 結合本研究提出結構化流程化解題方式。
關鍵詞：76標準解、圖示化、流程化、結構化、答案特徵值、萃智

Abstract
In TRIZ tools, the usage of traditional 76 standard solutions has the following deficiencies making it difficult to use and comprehend: (1) organization of the solutions is very complex and lack of standard solution process; (2) Many similar repetitions in the 76 standard solutions and the classification is not well structured; (3) 76 standard solutions only have textual descriptions without graphical structures.
This research focused on the above problems by structuring the problem and solution models with systematic solution process. The research developed a structured problem model and solutions model. After building structure of Initial Su-field Model (ISM) and filter it by solution constraint, we can convert the ISM to its corresponding Desired Su-field Model (DSM) by using operations and operands on structured locations, the solution structures can be obtained. By using the 9-field tests, and the solution characteristics the solution models and specific solutions can be obtained.
Contributions of this research include: 1) established a new way of identifying solution standards with visualized structured Su-field models and systematic operation-operand method; 2) The new approach generated 43 categories of solution structures (87 subcategories) of which original 76 standard solutions cover only 35 of them (in which 41 subcategories), and this paper come up with 8 brandnew main category structures and 46 subcategory structures; 3) Extracting characteristic attributes from the 76 standard solutions to help generate specific solutions; 4) Systematic solution process in the combination of special methods from this research.
Key words: 76 Standard Solution、Visualization、Process、Structure、Solution Characteristic、TRIZ

I 英文參考文獻
[1] Altshuller, G. & Shulyak, L. (1996). And suddenly the inventor appeared: TRIZ, the theory of inventive problem solving. Technical Innovation Center, Inc.
[2] Mann, D. (2007). Hands-On Systematic Innovation. UK: IFR Press
[3] Fey, V., & Rivin, E. I. (2005). Innovation on Demand. UK: Cambridge University Press
[4] Iouri Belski (2007).Improving your thinking. Melbourne Australia: TRIZ4U
[5] Livotov, P. (2004). The undervalued innovation potential. The TRIZ Journal .
[6] Pentti Soderlin (2003).Thoughts on field Is the Concept of Field indisputable?.The Triz Journal
[7] Pentti Soderlin (2003).Thoughts on Substance-Field Models and 76 Standards Do we need all of the Standards?.The Triz Journal
[8] Peter Lewis(2005,September).A Perpetual Crisis Machine.Fortune.
[9] Savransky, S. D. (2000). Engineering of Creativity-Introduction to TRIZ Methodology of Inventive Problem Solving. New York: CRC Press
[10] Mao,X. R.,& Zhang,X. E.,& Rizk, S. A. (2007).Generalized Solutions for Su-Field Analysis.The Triz Journal
II中文參考文獻
[1] Stan Kaplan (2008)。TRIZ發明問題解決理論(姜台林編譯)。台北市: 宇河出版社
[2] 李子平(2008)。電腦輔助物場分析解題助手。國立清華大學工業工程與工程管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，新竹
[3] 張祥唐(2008)，物場分析與發明標準解-2008TRIZ系列課程講義。亞卓國際顧問股份有限公司
[4] 楊嶽崙(2011)。電腦輔助萃智創新工具建立。國立清華大學工業工程與工程管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，新竹
[5] 許棟樑(2013)。萃智創新工具精通 中冊。亞卓國際顧問股份有限公司
[6] 林文杉(2015)。基於萃智的化學機械研磨機調節器之創新設計。國立清華大學工業工程與工程管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，新竹