近年來，由於全球資訊科技強勁的需求，帶動程式設計教育的浪潮，同時也發展出
許多便於操作使用的視覺化程式設計軟體。這些視覺化程式設計軟體利用圖塊，透過直覺式拖拉建構出程式，大幅降低程式設計學習的門檻。為了讓程式設計的基礎教育向下扎根，讓國小三年級學生在開始接觸資訊課程時，可以在輕鬆快樂的環境探索程式設計，啟發其對電腦科學領域的興趣，本研究先從文獻中探討現有視覺化程式設計相關研究確立研究方向，再從現有視覺化程式設計軟體中，選擇具有中文介面、免費的Code.org 程式設計網站，作為國小三年級學生上線學習程式設計的教學平臺。
本研究以桃園市某國小三年級兩個班共 51 名學生進行 12 節 Code.org 程式設計教學研究。首先由老師對學生進行 Code.org 學習預期心態量表前測，了解學生對學習Code.org 的預期心態，再由老師帶領學生上網學習 Code.org 程式設計。程式設計教學課程結束後，由老師進行學生對 Code.org 學習滿意度量表後測。最後，交叉分析前、後測及 Code.org 教學實驗成果，並呈現研究結果。
本研究發現 Code.org 程式設計教學成功引發學生對程式設計的興趣，大多數學生
很享受學習 Code.org、認同學習 Code.org不困難、操作方便、對程式設計有幫助，而且能加快學習效率，未來也將繼續學習。研究結果證實 Code.org 程式設計教學適合向下延伸至國小三年級，使學生在一開始接觸資訊課程便能學習程式設計。另外，我們也發現男生在完成課程的比例、短完成時間、程式設計技巧及學習態度等各方面的表現均優於女生，顯示性別在 Code.org 程式設計教學結果上存在差異。

In recent years, lots of vasual programming software has been developed. In this study, we firstly surveyed the existing paper about Visual Programming and compaired Visual Programming software. Then we selected Code.org as an experiment platform for 3rd grade primary students to learn Programming.
In order to inspect feasible of code.org, 51 3rd grade primary students in an elementary school in Daxi District of Taoyuan city were invited to participate in 12-hours Code.org programing learning experiment. Students took a pre-test before they learned Code.org programming online 1 hour per week for 12 weeks. Then, students took a post-test after the experiment.
According to the result of the experiment, we found that most participants were highly interested in Code.org programming and they also agreed that it is easy and helpful for them
to learn Code.org. This study confirmed that Code.org is suitable for 3rd grade primary students to learn programming. In addition, we also found the boys' performance are better than and the girls' in programming skills, learning attitude and programming
ccompishment.
Therefor, there is indeed the difference between the boys and the girls in learning Code.org programming.

一、中文部分
王吉源(民 102)。小學六年級學童學習程式設計對邏輯思考推理能力之影響（未出版之
碩士論文）。康寧大學，臺北市。
李俊林(民 102)。運用程式模組輔助國小學童 Scratch 程式設計之研究（未出版之碩士論
文）。國立屏東教育大學，屏東市。
李佳恩(民 104)。合作學習對國中七年級學生學習 Scratch 程式設計的學習態度與成效之
影影響（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺南大學，臺南市。
陳建宏(民 101)。圖形化程式設計的發展與趨勢—國家實驗研究院儀器科技研究中心。
儀科中心簡訊，（110）。
陳俊廷（民 104）。國小高年級學童線上自學程式設計對邏輯推理能力之影響（未出版之
碩士論文）。康寧大學，臺北市。
郭文明（民 104）。問題解決教學策略對國小學童 Scratch 程式設計學習成就、態度與問
題解決歷程之影響（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺北教育大學，臺北市。
楊建民(民 99)。探究式教學法與講述式教學法在國小 Scratch 程式教學學習成效之研究
（未出版之碩士論文）。國立屏東教育大學，屏東市。
劉正吉(民 100)。以 Scratch 同儕程式設計提升學童問題解決能力之探究(未出版之碩士
論文)。國立新竹教育大學，新竹市。
鄭宇珺(民 101)。以 Scratch 結合樂高機器人在合作學習之探究—以國小高年級學生為例
(未出版之碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學，新竹市。
蕭杏純(民 105)。合作學習法於程式積木學習成效及學習態度之研究—以高市某國小為
例(未出版之碩士論文)．樹德科技大學，高雄市。
教育部(民 90)。《中小學資訊教育總藍圖》。
教育部(民 103)。《十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱》。
教育部(民 97)。《國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要總綱》。
教育部(民 97)。《教育部中小學資訊教育白皮書》。
108
二、英文文獻
Ahmad & Love. ( 2013). Factor infulencing students’ acceptance of m-learning : An
investigation in higher education. The International Review of Research in Open and
Distance Learning, 14(5), 83-107.
Corneliussen H. G. & Proitza L. ( 2016). Kids Code in a rural village in Norway: could code
clubs be a new arena for increasing girls’ digital interest and competence? Information,
Communication & Society, 19(1), 95–110.
Chao P. Y. ( 2016). Exploring students' computational practice, design and performance of
problem-solving through a visual programming environment. Computers & Education,
95, 202-215.
Denner J. et al. (2012). Computer games created by middle school girls: Can they be used to
measure understanding of computer science concepts? Computer Education, 58(1),
240-249.
ET2020 (2016). Coding and computational thinking on the curriculum. ET 2020 Working
Group on Digital Skills and Competences.
Fessakis et al. (2013). Problem solving by 5-6 years old kindergarten children in a computer
programming environment: A case study, Computer & Science, 63, 87-97.
Huang T. C. et al. ( 2017). Coding, the New Literacy: Thinking-Oriented Programing
Learning e-Book. Emerging Technologies for Education, 10108, 27–33.
Israel M. et al. (2015). Supporting all learners in school-wide computational thinking:
A cross-case qualitative analysis. Computers & Education, 82, 263-279.
Kalelioglu F. (2015). A new way of teaching programming skills to K-12 students: Code. org.
Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 200-210.
Kobsiripat W. (2015). Effects of the media to promote the scratch programming capabilities
creativity of elementary school students. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 227–232.
Lye S. Y. et al. (2014). Review on teaching and learning of computational thinking through
programming: What is next for K-12? Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 51–61.
Navarrete C. C. (2013). Creative thinking in digital game design and development: A case
study. Computers & Education, 69, 320-331.
Ouahbia I. et al. (2015). Learning Basic Programming Concepts by Creating Games with
Scratch Programming Environment. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191(2), 1479-1482.
Robertson J. (2012). Making games in the classroom: Benefits and gender concerns.
Computers & Education, 59(2), 385-398.
109
Resnick et al. (2009). Scratch: Programming for All, Communications of the ACM, 52(11).
Sáez-López J. M. et al. (2016). Visual programming languages integrated across the
curriculum in elementary school: A two year case study using Scratch in five schools.
Computers & Education, 97, 129-141.
Winslow L. F. (1996). Programming pedagogy: A Psychological Overview. SIGCSE Bulletin
28(3), 17-22.
三、英文網頁
Businessweekly http://www.businessweekly.com.tw/article.aspx?id=7044&type=Blog
Code.org https://code.org/about/2016
Glassdoor https://www.glassdoor.com/Salary/PayScale-Salaries-E158711.htm
PayScale http://www.payscale.com/research/TW/Country=Taiwan/Salary