簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 何敬群
Jing-Chiun Ho
論文名稱: 任務複雜度與系統功能性對知識管理系統績效的影響
The Effect of Task Complexity and System Functionality on Knowledge Management System Performance
指導教授: 陳鴻基
Houn-Gee Chen
口試委員:
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 科技管理學院 - 科技管理研究所
Institute of Technology Management
論文出版年: 2004
畢業學年度: 92
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 58
中文關鍵詞: 知識管理系統群聚演算法任務複雜度科技-任務適配度
外文關鍵詞: Knowledge management system, clustering algorithm, task complexity, Technology-task fit model
相關次數: 點閱:2下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究提出一個以群聚演算法為基礎的知識(文件)管理系統,除了用客觀的績效評估指標,如正確率、喚回率及系統處理時間來比較不同演算法間的效率及效果外,並以實驗室實驗法來比較傳統分類搜尋機制與本研究所提出之分類搜尋機制作一使用者認知的比較分析。
    在客觀的績效評估指標上,本研究提出之文件分類系統(中文)不論在正確率、喚回率及系統總處理時間上取得很大的進步。
    本研究並提出一個以使用者認知角度為出發點的績效評估模式來做為我們的研究架構,其中任務複雜度與系統功能性為兩個自變數,而使用者認知的易用性、有用性及使用者資訊滿意度為應變數,代表一個搜尋過程中,使用者感受到的系統績效。所以本研究目的為1)了解任務複雜度對於系統績效的影響;2)了解系統功能性對於系統績效的影響; 3)任務複雜度與系統功能性之間的交互作用是否對系統績效有影響。
    在本研究實證資料分析結果,只有系統功能性(即比較傳統與本研究所提出的分類搜尋機制)對於使用者認知的系統績效有顯著的影響。雖然任務複雜度在本研究中沒有顯著的影響,在研究限制與未來研究建議中,我們仍就實驗設計與任務難易認定上提供一些意見予往後有興趣於相關課題的研究者。


    In this study, a proposed document (knowledge) management system based on a text-mining technique will be tested in an experiment manner. Two independent variables, task complexity and system functionality, are chosen in this experiment.
    Thus, the main goal of this study will be: 1) to understand how different level of task complexity would affect the system performance; 2) to understand how different system functionality would affect the system performance; 3) to understand how the interaction effect of task complexity and system functionality on the system performance.
    The physical configuration of proposed system will be measured in comparing with another classification algorithm in efficiency and effectiveness manners.
    Experimental and analytical results show that system functionality significantly influence system performance perceived by users. Although another effect of task complexity on system performance is not significant, we still discuss the research limitations and provide some suggestions to overcome them for future experiments and researchers.

    Abstract in Chinese…………………………………A Abstract…………………………………………………B 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Research Background and Motivation 1 1.2 Research Purpose 3 1.3 Research Scope 5 2 Literature Review 6 2.1 Knowledge 6 2.1.1 The definition of knowledge 7 2.1.2 The categories of knowledge 9 2.2 Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management system 10 2.2.1 The challenge of knowledge management system 11 2.3 Task complexity 13 2.4 Task-Technology Fit 16 3 Cluster-based Document Management System (Prototype) 18 3.1 Introduction to document classification 18 3.2 Proposed document clustering algorithm 20 3.2.1 Algorithm description 20 3.2.2 Similarity computation 24 3.3 Document collections 25 3.4 Evaluation of clustering algorithm 25 4 Research Methodology 27 4.1 Experimental Methodology 27 4.2 Research framework 28 4.2.1 Independent variable 29 4.2.2 Dependent variable 32 4.3 Research Hypotheses 33 4.4 Experimental Procedure 33 4.4.1 Pilot experiment 33 4.4.2 Content introduction 34 4.4.3 Pretest questionnaire 35 4.4.4 Formal experiment 35 4.4.5 Posttest questionnaire 36 4.4.6 Sample selection 36 5 Data Analysis 37 5.1 Data collection 37 5.2 Sample descriptive statistics analysis 38 5.3 Reliability and Validity 39 5.3.1 Reliability test 39 5.3.2 Content validity 40 5.4 Factor Analysis 40 5.5 Hypotheses test 41 5.5.1 Hypotheses test of main effect and interaction effect 41 6 Conclusion and future work 43 6.1 Conclusion 43 6.2 Research Limitations 44 6.3 Future work 45 References 47 Appendix 51

    Chinese:
    1. Papows, J., “eNetprise.com”, 1998, “十六定位”, 大塊文化, 1999.
    2. CEPD, 行政院經濟建設委員會, “知識經濟發展方案”, 2003.
    3. 戴榮賦, “知識回饋機制與取得方式的結合對知識管理服務品質之影響”,國立中正大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文, 2000.
    4. 呂丰君, “非同步網路學習下任務型態與困難度對合作學習績效與滿意度之研究”, 國立中正大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文, 2002.
    5. 陳泳成, “以修正後的科技接受模式 探討影響「使用者自建系統接受」之因素”, 國立中山大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文, 2003.
    6. 賴宏仁,”電子報個人化新聞推薦方法之研究”, 國立中山大學資訊管理研究所博士論文,2000.
    English:
    7. Anton Leuski, ”Evaluating Document Clustering for Interactive Information Retrieval”, Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Proceedings of the tenth international conference on Information and knowledge management, 2001.
    8. Applehans, Globe, Laugero, “Managing Knowledge—A Practical Web-Based Approach”, Addison-Wesley Pub Co, 1st ed, 1998.
    9. Bair, J., “Knowledge Management Technology: Beyond Document Management”, http://www.strategy-partner.com, 2002.
    10. Bandura, A., “Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory”, Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall, 1986.
    11. Bandura, A., “Self-efficacy mechanism in physiological activation and health-promoting behavior”, Neurobiology of learning, emotion and affect, 1991, pp. 229- 270.
    12. Baystrom, K. and Jarvelin K., “Task complexity affects information seeking and use”, Information Orocessing and Management, 31, 1995, pp. 191-213.
    13. Blattberg, R. C., and Hoch, S. J., “Database Models and Managerial Intuition: 50% Model and 50% Manager”, Management Science, 36(8), 1990, pp. 887-899.
    14. Brooking, A., “Intellectual Capital”, London: Thompson Press, 1996.
    15. Brooking, A., “The Management of Intellectual Captital”, Journal of Long Range Plannig, 30(3), 1997. pp. 364-365.
    16. Castells M., “The Rise of The Network Society”,1996.
    17. Botkin, J., “Smart Business: How Knowledge Communities Can Revolutionize Your Compnany”, New York: Free Press, 1999.
    18. Campbell, J. P., Gasser, M. B., and Oswlad, F.I., “The Substantive Nature of Job Performance Variability”, Individual Differences and Behavior in Organization, 1996.
    19. Davenport, T. H.,Prusak, L., “Working knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know”, Harvard Business School Press, 2000.
    20. Delone, W.H. and McLean, E, R., “Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable”, Information Systems Research, 3(1), 1992, pp. 60-95.
    21. Due, Rechard T., “The Knowledge Economy”, Information Systems Management, 12(3), 1995, pp.76-78.
    22. Dybkjær, L., Bernsen, N.O. and Dybkjær, H., “Different Spoken Language Dialogues for Different Tasks. A Task-Oriented Dialogue Theory”. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction. Human Comfort and Security, Springer Research Reports, 1995, pp.46-61.
    23. Doll, W.J. and Torkzadeh, G., “The Measurement of End-User computing Satisfation”, MIS Quarterly, 12, 1998, pp.259-274.
    24. Elias M. Awad, and Hassan M. Ghaziri, Knowledge Management, Pearson Pirntice Hall,2002.
    25. Feasly, F. G. and Stuart, E. W., ”Magazine Advertising Layout and Design: 1932-1982”, Journal of Advertising, 16(2), 1987.
    26. Glasser, P., “The Knowledge Factor”, CIO Magazine, 1999, pp. 1-9.
    27. Gallupe, R.B., The Impact of Task Difficulty on the Use of a Group Decision Support System, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Minnesota, 1985.
    28. Hibbard, J. “Knowing What We Know”, Information Week. October 20, 1997, pp. 46.
    29. Hideki Tanaka, Tadashi Kumano, Noriyoshi Uratani, Terumasa Ehara, 1999,” An Efficient Document Clustering algorithm and its application to a document browser”, Information Processing and Management,35,pp. 541-557.
    30. Hersey, Ian., “Need: Net-Speed Knowledge Tools”, Electronic Engineering Times, 2000, pp. 90.
    31. Huang, Kaun-Tase, Lee, Yang W., Wang R., “Quality Information and Knowledge”, Prentice Hall PTR, 1999.
    32. Hoch, S. J. and Schkade, D. A., “A Psychological Approach to Decision Support Systems”, Management Science, 42(1), 1996, pp. 51-64.
    33. Hoch, S. J., “Models and Experts in Combination”, the Marketing Information Revolution”, Harvard University Press, 1993.
    34. Hofe A. V., Almeida V., Guibernao, and Legroux, D. , “Actual Use and Judgment of the Usability of a Search Motor on the Web”. Proceedings of the Human Centered Processes Conference, Brest, France, 1999, pp. 463-468.
    35. James B. Q., Jordan J. B. and Karen A. Z., “Innovation Explosion: Using Intellect and Software to Revolutionize Growth Strategies”, 1997.
    36. Jiang J. J., Gary K. and Christopher L. C., “Measuring Information System Service Quality: SERVQUAL From The Other Side”, MIS Quarterly, 26(2), 2002, pp. 146-166.
    37. John H. and Peter S., “A Primer on the Knowledge Economy”, Centre for The Strategic Economic Studies at Victoria University, 2000.
    38. Kerlinger, F.D.,”Human Memory: Structure and Process”, W.H. Freeman and Company, 1975.
    39. Kaufman,L., and Rousseeuw P. J., 1990, “Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Cluster Analysis”, New York: John Wiley.
    40. Kim, G., Nute, D., Rauscher, H.M., and Lofits, D.L., “appBuilder for DSSTools: an Application Development Environment of Developing Decision Support Systems in Prolog”, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 27, pp. 107-125.
    41. Kidd,J.B., “Knowledge Creation in Japanese Manufacturing Companies in Italy”, Management Learning, 29(2),1998, pp. 131–146.
    42. Koch, T., “Internet Search Service”, http://www.lub.lu.se/tk/demos/DO9603-meng.html, 1996
    43. Kraund, M., “Education-Implement Knowledge”, http://www.uis.edu/haund/ntempr.htm, 2000.
    44. Kwan M. M. and Balasubramanian P., “KnowledgeScope: managing knowledge in context”, Decision Support System, 35, 2003, pp. 467-486.
    45. Liao, Shu-hsien, “Knowledge management technologies and applications — Literature review form 1995 to 2002”, Expert Systems with Applications, 25, 2003, pp. 155-164.
    46. McGrath, J.E., Groups: Interaction and Performance, Prentice_Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1984.
    47. McAdam, R. and McCreedy S., “a Critical Review of Knowledge Management models”, The Learning Organization, 6(3), 1999, pp. 91-107.
    48. Miles, I. ,KASTRINOS, N. ,FLANAGAN, K. ,BILDEBEEK, R. ,DEN HERTOG, P. ,HUNTINK, W. ,BOUMAN, M.: "Knowledge Intensive Business Services:Their Roles as Users, Carriers and Sources of Innovation". PREST, Manchester, 1994.
    49. Muller, E., "Innovation Interactions Between Knowledge-Intensive Business Services and Small and Medium-sized Enterprises – Analysis in Terms of Evolution, Knowledge and Territories". Ph.D. dissertation, Faculté des Sciences Économiques et de Gestion, Université Louis Pasteur, Strasbourg, 1999.
    50. Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H., “The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation”, New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.
    51. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., and Berry, L. L., “A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research”, Journal of Marketing, 49, 1985, pp. 41-50.
    52. Polanyi, M., “Knowledge and Being”, The University of Chicago Press, 1974.
    53. Polanyi, M., “The Tacit Dimension”, Doubleday & Company, Inc., 1983.
    54. Qin H., “A Review of Clustering Algorithms as Applied in IR”, University of Illinois at Urbana – Champaign, 1996.
    55. Ramesh, B. and Tiwana, A., “Supporting collaborative process knowledge management in new product development teams”, Decision Support Systems, 27, 1999, pp. 213-235.
    56. Reid, J., “A task-oriented non-interactive evaluation methodology for information retrieval systems”. Information Retrieval, 2, 2000, pp. 115-129.
    57. Roy Lachman, “ AI, Decision Science, and Psychological Theory in Decisions about people ~A case study in jury selection” AI Magazine, 19(1), 1998.
    58. Sia Choon-Ling, Bernard C.Y. Tan, Wei Kwok-Kee, “Exploring the effects of some display and task factors on GSS user groups”, Information And Management, (30:1), pp. 35-41, 1996.
    59. Shaw, M. E., “A comparison of individuals and small groups in the rational solution of complex problems”, American Journal of Psychology, 44, pp. 491-504, 1932.
    60. Shifflett, S.C., “Group performance as a function of task difficulty and organiztional independence”, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 7, pp. 442-456, 1972.
    61. Sveiby, Karl-Erik, “The New Organizational Warlth: Managing and Measuring Knowledge-Based Assets”, New York:Berrett-Kohler, 1997.
    62. Taft, D., “Stopping Knowledge Overflow — Knowledge Management Tools Still in Developmental Phase”, Computer Reseller News, 2000, pp.14.
    63. Tiwana, A., “The Knowledge Management Toolkit”, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2000, pp. 55-98.
    64. Turban E., King D., Lee J., Warkentin M. and Chung H. M., “Electronic Commerce ~ A Managerial Perspective”, Prentice Hall, 2002.
    65. Vicki L. Sauter, ”Decision Support Systems : An Applied Managerial Approach” ,Wiley Text Books, 1996.
    66. White, R.W., Jose, J. M., Ruthven, Ian, “A task-oriented study on the influencing effects of query-biased summarization in web searching”, Information Processing and Management, 39, 2003, pp. 703-733

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校內網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)

    QR CODE