本研究參考歐盟與美國實施不對稱管制之規範，研究其體系設計之原理原則與實施不對稱管制之經驗及成效，希望能藉由比較分析方法辨明不對稱管制之理念、釐清其本質意義與規範原則，目的在於據以檢討我國電信事業實施不對稱管之現狀及法規發展方向，最終對電信事業不對稱管制架構之調整提出建議。

本研究發現不對稱管制應為電信市場自由化開放進程中，基於對市場競爭所帶來之利益妥協而不得不使用的過渡性政策工具。其本於投資階梯理論所建立之法規環境，固然有助於服務型競爭之促進，卻不必然具有促進設施型競爭的功能。因此，為確保實施不對稱管制之正當性與適當性，不對稱管制應恆以有效促進競爭為目的發動，管制措施應以達成政策目標而有必要為原則訂定，且包含明確的退場機制設計。

基於上述發現，本研究建議不對稱管制之法規架構應包含以下要素：1.依競爭法原則施為之相關市場界定、2.以具前瞻性觀點之市場分析認定市場主導者、3.定期檢討機制、4.明確的成本核算與價格計算方式、5.法規影響評估程序、6.階段性解除管制之時程規劃。

The purpose of this study is to review the asymmetric regulation in telecommunications in Taiwan by a comparative analysis of U.S. and EU regulatory framework and experience. The study found that asymmetric regulation should solely be a necessary transitional tool during the telecommunications liberalization process, for the purpose of promoting competition. The necessity of such regulation comes from the compromise for competition interests. A regulatory framework established from the “ladder of investment” theory is unlikely to be effective in promoting facilities-based competition, although it can effectively promote service-based competition. Therefore, the implementation of regulatory remedies shall be based on the competition barriers identified, and be proportionated and justified according to its purpose, that is, to promote competition effectively.

Based on the study findings described above, the author suggests that the following elements should be included in a proper asymmetric regulatory framework: 1. To define relevant markets based on principles of competition law, 2. To identify dominant suppliers through a forward-looking market analysis, 3. To periodically review, 4. An explicit cost accounting and pricing methodology, 5. A regulatory impact assessment, 6. and a process planning of over time segmental deregulation.

一、中文
1、專書與專書論文
王郁琦（2000）。「龜兔賽跑」－美國1996通訊法對電信市場既有業者的非對稱性管制，固網 v. 法律：傳播與法律系列研討會（六），頁31-46，台北：政治大學傳播學院研究暨發展中心。
莊春發（1994）。市場的迷思：論市場定義在公平交易法應用的困境，瞿宛文主編，產業結構與公平交易法，頁。台北：中央研究院中山人文社會研究所專書。
彭心儀（2005）。論WTO多邊架構下以特定服務部門為基礎之競爭規範：以GATS電信參考文件為核心，WTO服務貿易與通訊科技法律，頁73-129。台北：元照出版社。
劉孔中（2010）。通訊傳播法—數位匯流、管制革新與法治國家。台北：台灣本土法學雜誌有限公司。
2、期刊論文
石世豪（2010）。適用於少數特定對象的法規命令－俱樂部式管制行政下的電信資費調整上限，台灣法學雜誌，151期，頁177-181。
林永勝（2013）。我國推動號碼可攜服務之歷程及其影響，NCC NEWS，102年5月號，頁18-23。
莊懿妃，劉崇堅（2000）。電信產業之不對稱管制，經社法制論叢，26期，頁63-90。
許奎璧，劉崇堅（1994）。電信自由化政策之檢討，經社法制論叢，14期，頁231-249。
陳人傑，石世豪（2011）。電信獨占事業接取網路垂直分離規範之探討，科技法學評論，8卷2期，頁1-73。
劉孔中（2010）。通訊傳播法專題研究系列之－批發價格管制，月旦法學雜誌，184期，頁157-176。
劉崇堅，莊懿妃（1997）。論電信費率管制，經社法制論叢，第19期，頁1-35。
戴豪君（2009）。歐盟電子通訊法中顯著市場力量之探討，科技法律透析，21卷12期，頁9-32。
3、研究報告
廖義男，何之邁，范建得，黃銘傑，石世豪，劉華美等（2003）。公平交易法之註釋研究系列（一），行政院公平交易委員會合作研究報告。
劉孔中，劉崇堅，周韻采，簡維克，胡志男，蔡明德（2008）。電信產業跨平臺結合之競爭規範，公平交易委員會97年度委託研究報告。
4、學位論文
王國維（2010）。從分離到合作_論電信事業設備競爭之防弊與興利，國立臺灣大學法律學系碩士論文。
李萬明（2008）。論電信事業「相關市場」之界定問題，國立清華大學科技法律研究所碩士論文。
邱懷祖（2009）。從用戶迴路租用到基礎設施競爭—論細分化接取之管制必要性，國立清華大學科技法律研究所碩士論文。
5、網路資源
行政院公平交易委員會。公平交易委員會對於電信事業之規範說明，載於行政院公平交易委員會網站http://www.ftc.gov.tw/internet/main/doc/docDetail.aspx?uid=211&docid=275（最後瀏覽日：2013年6月30日）。
二、英文
1、期刊論文
Bauer, G. N. (2011). Why Internet-Based Monopolies Have an Inherent "Get-Out-of-Jail-Free Card". Brooklyn Law Review, 76, 731-773.
Cave, M. (2006). Encouraging Infrastructure Competition Via the Ladder of Investment. Telecommunications Policy, 30, 223-237.
Grajek, M. & Röller, L-H (2012). Regulation and Investment in Network Industries: Evidence from European Telecoms. Journal of Law and Economics, 55(1), 189-216.
Pitofsky, R., Patterson, D. & Hooks, J. (2002). The Essential Facilities Doctrine Under U.S. Antitrust Law, Antitrust Law Journal, 70, 443-460.
Sidak, G., Crandall, R. W. & Singer, H. J. (2002). The Empirical Case Against Asymmetric Regulation Of Broadband Internet Access. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 17(3), 953-987.
Stylianou, K. (2011). An Innovation-Centric Approach Of Telecommunications Infrastructure Regulation. Virginia Journal of Law and Technology, 16(2), 221-252.
Yoo, C. S. (2011). Deregulation vs. Reregulation of Telecommunications: A Clash of Regulatory Paradigms. Journal of Corporation Law, 36, 847-867.
2、官方文獻
Commission Notice on the Definition of Relevant Market for the Purposes of Community Competition Law. 1997 O.J. C 372/03.
Commission Recommendation of 17 December 2007 on Relevant Product and Service Markets Within the Electronic Communications Sector Susceptible to Ex Ante Regulation in Accordance with Directive 2002/21/EC of The European Parliament and Of The Council on a Common Regulatory Framework for Electronic Communications Networks and Services. 2007 O.J. L 344.
Commission Recommendation on Relevant Product and Service Markets Within the Electronic Communications Sector Susceptible to Ex Ante Regulation In Accordance With Directive 2002/21/EC of The European Parliament and of The Council on A Common Regulatory Framework for Electronic Communication Networks And Services. 2003 O.J. L 114.
Directive 2002/19/EC of the European Parliament And of The Council of 7 March 2002 on Access to, And Interconnection of, Electronic Communications Networks And Associated Facilities (Access Directive). 2002 O.J. L 108.
Directive 2002/21/EC of The European Parliament and of the Council on a Common Regulatory Framework for Electronic Communications Networks and Services (Framework Directive). 2002 O.J. L 108.
Directive 2002/22/EC of The European Parliament And of The Council of 7 March 2002 on Universal Service And Users' Rights Relating To Electronic Communications Networks And Services (Universal Service Directive). 2002 O.J. L 108.
Directive 2009/140/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of Amending Directives 2002/21/EC on A Common Regulatory Framework for Electronic Communications Networks and Services, 2002/19/EC on Access to, and Interconnection of, Electronic Communications Networks and Associated Facilities, and 2002/20/EC on The Authorisation of Electronic Communications Networks and Services. 2009 O.J. L 337.
Directive 97/33/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 June 1997 on Interconnection in Telecommunications with Regard to Ensuring Universal Service and Interoperability Through Application of The Principles of Open Network Provision. 1997 O.J. L 199.
European Commission. (2007). Commission acts to reduce telecoms regulation by 50% to focus on broadband competition. IP/07/1678.
European Commission. (2012). Questionnaire for The Public Consultation On The Revision Of The Recommendation on Relevant Markets, Consultation.
Federal Trade Commission & U.S. Department of Justice. (2010). Horizontal Merger Guidelines.
Federal Communications Commission. (2013). In The Matter of Petition of UStelecom For Forbearance Under 47 U.S.C. § 160(C) From Enforcement of Certain Legacy Telecommunications Regulations, Memorandum Opinion and Order and Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. 2013 WL 2177932 (F.C.C.).
Federal Communications Commission. (1983). In the Matter of Policy and Rules Concerning Rater for Competitive Common Carrier Services and Facilities Authorizations Therefor, Fourth Report and Order. 95 F.C.C.2d 554.
Federal Communications Commission. (1999). In The Matter of Regulatory Treatment of Lec Provision of Interexchange Services Originating in the Lec's Local Exchange Area. 14 FCC Rcd. 10771.
Federal Communications Commission. (2012). In The Matter Of Special Access For Price Cap Local Exchange Carriers, Report and Order. 27 FCC Rcd. 10557.
Federal Communications Commission. (2005). In The Matter of Unbundled Access to Network Elements, Review of The Section 251 Unbundling Obligations of Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers, Order on Remand. 20 F.C.C.R. 2533.
Federal Communications Commission. (2005). In The Matters of Appropriate Framework for Broadband Access to The Internet over Wireline Facilities, Report and Order and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. 20 F.C.C.R. 14853.
Federal Communications Commission. (2004). In The Matters of Petition For Forbearance of The Verizon Telephone Companies Pursuant To 47 U.S.C. § 160(C), Memorandum Opinion and Order. 19 F.C.C.R. 21496.
Federal Communications Commission. (2003). In The Review of the Section 251 Unbundling Obligations of Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers, Report and Order and Order on Remand and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. 18 F.C.C.R. 16978.
3、網路資源
1982 Merger Guidelines. Retrieved from http://www.justice.gov/atr/hmerger/11248.htm
1992 Merger Guidelines. Retrieved from http://www.justice.gov/atr/hmerger/11250.htm
Results of the Public consultation on the revision of the Recommendation on relevant markets. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/en/news/results-public-consultation-revision-recommendation-relevant-markets
Rickman, N. & Levine, P. (2002). Price Regulation, Investment And The Commitment Problem. CEPR Discussion Paper, 3200. Retrieved from http://ideas.repec.org/p/sur/surrec/0603.html
USTelecom Petition for Ruling that ILECs Are Non-Dominant in Switched Voice Services. Retrieved from http://www.ustelecom.org/news/filings/ustelecom-petition-ruling-ilecs-are-non-dominant-switched-voice-services