近年來由於3D列印及掃描逐漸走入家庭，個人化製造業已對著作權法造成威脅。是以，本文將從3D列印及掃描之應用出發，回頭重新檢視個人應用此科技過程當中所涉及之標的物：3D數位設計圖、3D列印產出物，以及3D掃描標的物三者在現行著作權法討論當中具有之客體地位。以過去我國對於空間轉換及工業美術是否應給予保護二大主題做為討論之主軸，並以3D列印及掃描之觀點加入思考。本文以為，3D列印數位設計圖倘若依其色彩、線條及構圖等特質，易被認為係美術著作。惟因其為3D列印必備之媒介，故此實用性於廣義解釋下可能會落入應用美術的範疇。我國實務及學說對於兼具實用性與藝術性之標的物是否應與給予著作權及專利權重疊保護之問題，目前仍存有疑問。因此，不論將3D列印數位設計圖解釋為美術著作或圖形著作，皆有可能因為解釋方法不同而使其脫逸著作權法的保護。是以，建議與建築設計為相類似之立法設計，將3D列印數位設計圖特別定義，使其成為獨立的著作類型之一，並將3D列印及掃描空間轉換需受規範之態樣於著作權法重製或改作之定義當中做調整。以避免按圖施工即為實施之操作使原應受著作權法保障之類型最終無法獲得應有的保護。此外，為因應3D列印走入家庭做為個人藝術創作媒介之潮流，本文承認3D列印物亦有可能成為著作權法所保護之客體。惟因3D列印及掃描可能易使著作物與不受不著作權法保障之工業產品間的界限更為模糊，故基於著作權法與專利法立法目的並不相同之理，應該肯認給予3D列印產出物著作權及專利權等多重保護。

Because domestic and low-cost 3D printers and 3D scanners have gradually increased in recent years, the purpose of using these machines has transferred from previous "industrial production" to current "personal-use creation", as do-it-yourself recently. This trend may make an influence on our Copyright Act. Therefore, base on the traditional concept of reproduction, adaptation and exploitation, we aim to discuss this issue with the appearance of domestic 3D printer and 3D scanner, attempting to figure out the obstacles to the use of Taiwan's Copyright Act. In our discussion, we try to see if a "CAD design" could be regarded as "artistic works", or should be deemed as "pictorial and graphical works" just as IPO used to stand in its opinion with regard to the 2D-3D conversion issue. In which the conversion was also be considered as an conduct out of the scope of Copyright Act just because the conversion was conducted through a "machine". Accordingly, due to the complicated opinions on this kind of works as well as the trait of CAD design, which is indispensable to 3D printing so as to be explained as an "applied art", we suggest that we add new provisions to our current Copyright Act. That is, adding "CAD Design"or "3D Printing Works" as an individual just as "architectural works" did. Besides, giving the conduct of 3D printing and 3D scanning a more specific definition separately, no matter it should be seemed as reproduction or adaptation. Especially in the situation of 3D printing, we should take the "art creation" purpose into consideration in order to protect the works through 3D printing. On the other hand, we try to discuss another issue regarding 3D printing and 3D scanning in the other part. That is, due to the trend of using 3D printer and 3D scanner as a " personal-use art creation " method, the traditional classification on "pure arts", "works of artistic craftsmanship" and "products which are not protected by Copyright Act" has to be revised. As above mentioned, the key point of "machine made" might deprive the 3D works of the protection of Copyright Act. For this reason, we will view this issue from another point of view, trying to see if the creator's subject manner could be taken into account. In addition, for there is no denying that the line between "artistic works" and "industrial products" will be blurred with the domestic use of 3D printer and scanner, we reaffirm to give a subject matter copyright and patent right at the same time.

一、中文文獻

01.張桂芳，《美術著作與圖形著作之立體化於著作權法規範地位之研究－－從我國實務現象之評析出發》，國立台灣大學法律學研究所，碩士論文，2001年。
02.古松展，《論建築設計圖在我國著作權法上之定位》，中原大學財經法律學系，碩士論文，2012年。
03.林大為，《建築著作之研究》，國立政治大學法律學研究所，碩士論文，1996年。
04.古詩苹，《時裝設計產業智慧財產保護之研究》，國立政治大學碩士論文， 2011年7月。
05.陳初梅，《國際智慧財產權法保護工業設計的制度及爭議》，東吳大學法學院法律專業碩士班，碩士論文，2005年1月。
06.張佩娟，《造型設計之概念與法律保護》，中原大學財經法律研究所，碩士論文，95年7月。
07.李文隆，《論工業設計與應用美術之概念與保護──專利法與著作權法之構成與交錯》，輔大法研所，碩士論文，1996年7月。
08.李怡貞，《衍生著作及其相關議題之研究》，國立台北大學法律學系，碩士論文，2014年1月。
09.王賢令，《消費性電子產品的外觀抄襲問題研究－以行動電話為例》，國立清華大學科技法律研究所，碩士論文，2010年1月。
10.謝銘洋、張桂芳，著作權案例彙編—美術著作篇，二版，經濟部智慧財產局著作權組，2006年8月。
11.楊崇森，著作權之保護，初版，中正書局，1977年。
12.羅明通，著作權法論Ｉ，第七版，自版，2009年。
13.張懿云，著作權案例彙編—圖形著作篇，經濟部智慧財產局著作權組，2006年8月。
14.蔡瑞森，著作權侵權應考量實質類似及接觸兩個要件，理律雙月刊，3月號，理律法律事務所，2008年。
15.楊裕富，空間設計：概念與設計方法，初版，田園城市文化事業公司，1998年。
16.陳耀光，「建築著作」著作權相關問題之研究，內政部委託研究，1994年。
17.陳智超，專利法－理論與實務，台北五南，增訂二版，2011年12月。
18.丁靜玟，平面美術或圖形著作轉至為立體物之爭議，理律法律雜誌雙月刊，2006年11月。
19.丁靜玟，衣服之著作權爭議，理律雙月刊，5月號，2008年。
20.謝銘洋，美術工藝品與新式樣之區別－評台灣高等法院八十七年上易字第二Ｏ五六號判決，月旦法學雜誌，第51期，1999年8月，頁188-194。
21.謝銘洋，智慧財產權之概念與法律體系，台大法學論叢，第24卷第1期，頁435。
22.張靜，商標專用權、新式樣專利與著作權競合之解析，律師通訊，第138期，1991年3月。
23.陳櫻琴，美術著作之研究──兼論應用美術著作是否為美術著作，法學叢刊，第144期，頁84。
24.楊崇森，著作權法上若干問題之探討，軍法專刊，第32卷12期，1986年12月，頁12。
25.童沈源，我國新式樣專利權應有範圍之研究，智慧財產季刊，第55期，頁67-71。
26.姚信安，雙魚羅生門：論美術著作之抄襲──從智慧財產法院一○○年度刑智上訴字第三九號刑事判決談起，月旦法學雜誌，第217期，2013年6月，頁160-178。
27.王明德、張陸滿、蔡奇成，建築資訊模型之法律議題初探，台灣建築學會｢建築學報｣，第84期，2013年6月，頁185-203。
28.中華人民共和國國家知識產權局，中華人民共和國專利審查指南(2010版)， 2010年。
29.經濟部智慧財產局，設計實體審查基準公告(2013年版)，2013年。

二、英文文獻

01.Michael Weinberg, It Will Be Awesome if They Don't Screw it Up: 3D Printing, Intellectual Property, and the Fight Over the Next Great Disruptive Technology, Public Knowledge Blog, November 10, 2010. [Kindle Edition]
02.Lien Verbauwhede, TAKING PHOTOS OF COPYRIGHT MATERIAL, TRADESMARKS AND PEOPLE, WIPO, 2007.
03.Edenborough, M., Intellectual Property Law, Cavendish Publishing Limited, 1995.
04.WIPO, LOOKING GOOD-An Introduction to Industrial Designs for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises, Intellectual Property for Business Series, Number:2.
05.WIPO, Background Reading Material on Intellectual Property, page11, WIPO publication, Number659(E), 1988.
06.Mr. Riichi Ushiki, Legal Protection of Industrial Designs, Japan Patent Office, 2001.
07.Michael Weinberg, What's the Deal with Copyright and 3D printing？, IEI Public Knowledge, January 2013.
08.DLA PIPER, Clone Wars: 3D printing and Intellectual Property, April 11, 2011.
09.Dr. Matthew Rimmer, Copyright and The Digital Economy: 3D Printing, The Australian National University College of Law (A submission to the Australian Law Reform Commission)
10.Simon Bradshaw, Adrian Bowyer and Patrick Haufe, The Intelletcual Property Implications of Low-Cost 3D Printing, Scripted, Volume 7, Issue 1, April 2010.
11.Davis Doherty, DOWNLOADING INFRINGEMENT: PATENT LAW AS A ROADBLOCK TO THE 3D PRINTING REVOLUTION, Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, Fall 2012.
12.A BRIEF HISTORY OF 3D PRINTING [Kindle Edition] (http://individual.troweprice.com/staticFiles/Retail/Shared/PDFs/3D_Printing_Infographic_FINAL.pdf)
13.Peter Hanna, The next Napster? Copyright questions as 3D printing comes of age, April , 2011. (http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2011/04/the-next-napster-copyright-questions-as-3d-printing-comes-of-age/)
14.Oliver Herzfeld, Protecting 3D Printing Designs and Objects, May 5 2013. ( http://www.forbes.com/sites/oliverherzfeld/2013/05/29/protecting-3d-printing-designs-and-objects/)
15.MMLC Group, Chinese Intellectual Property Aspects of 3D Printing, May 26, 2013 (http://www.hg.org/article.asp?id=30501)
16.Cathleen Stadeckler, 3D Printing: How Will IP Law Handle The "Next Revolution" in Manufacturing?, April 3, 2013. (http://theipstone.com/2013/04/03/3d-printing-how-will-ip-law-handle-the-next-revolution-in-manufacturing/)
17.Teresa Scassa, 3-D printing: New Dimensions for Canadian IP Law, July 17, 2013. (http://www.teresascassa.ca/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&id=134:3-d-printing-new-dimensions-for-canadian-ip-law)
18.Michael Weinberg, Recognizing Creativity and Innovation in 3D Printing, Public Knowledge Blog, February 22, 2011.
19.Michael Weinberg, 3D Printing Expands How You Should Think About Copyright: The Super 8 Cube Edition, Public Knowledge Policy Blog, June 28, 2011.

三、網站資源

01.經濟部智慧財產局：http://www.tipo.gov.tw/
02.章忠信著作權筆記：http://www.copyrightnote.org/
03.Public Knowkedge：http://www.publicknowledge.org/
04.3D Printing Industry：http://3dprintingindustry.com/