摘要
自18世紀工業革命以來，全球化迅速蓬勃發展帶動了工業與醫療進步，醫療延長人類壽命，人口老化也隨之而來，亦因工業化帶來的廢水、汙染物、食品加工，嚴重影響人類健康，文明病接踵而至。血液透析自是其中一種文明病，為造福人群讓病患不在是一種終身須做血液透析維持生命，創新的透析技術轉變成另一種形式變成血液及血管清潔，讓血液透析轉換成在定期健檢提早發現血液及血管與身體器官病變問題，提前做血液及血管清潔，解決血液太油或血管阻塞導致器官病變或衰竭，引發各種疾病上身，讓全身的器官可以更正常化運作與進行各式各樣的排毒，減少各國人民因健康問題導致各國政府，因此透析病患日益增加問題，造成龐大的財政負擔。血液透析技術創新也可用在疫苗的接種，未來可以直接透過血液透析的方式直接進入人體進行，進行更直接的治療，讓患者們能重新恢復健康獲得重生，讓血液透析變成協助人類對抗病毒的一大利器，血液透析醫療成為能造福人群的偉大醫療產業。
關鍵詞：全球化、血液透析、造福人群

ABSTRACT
Since the industrial revolution in the 18th century, the rapid development of globalization has led to the advancement of industry and medical care. Medical treatment has extended human life and population aging has also followed. Wastewater, pollutants, and food processing caused by industrialization have seriously affected human health. The disease of civilization came one after another. Hemodialysis is one of the diseases of civilization. In order to benefit the people, it is a life-long hemodialysis necessary for patients to stay alive. Innovative hemodialysis is transformed into another form of blood and blood vessel cleaning, so that hemodialysis can be converted into regular health checkups. Early detection of blood, blood vessels, and body organ diseases, clean blood and blood vessels in advance, to solve the problem of organ disease or failure caused by too oily blood or blood vessel blockage, causing various diseases of the upper body, so that the organs of the whole body can be more normalized and performed in various ways This kind of detoxification reduces the health problems of the people of all countries and the governments of all countries. Therefore, the problem of dialysis patients is increasing, which causes a huge financial burden. Innovations in hemodialysis technology can also be used for vaccination. In the future, hemodialysis can directly enter the human body for more direct treatment, so that patients can regain their health and rebirth, and hemodialysis can become a part of helping humans fight the virus. A great weapon, hemodialysis and dialysis medicine has become a great medical industry that can benefit the population.
Keywords: globalization, hemodialysis, benefiting the crowd

一、中文部分
王振寰，2010，追趕的極限：台灣的經濟轉型與創新。台北：巨流圖書。
帕米爾編輯部（譯），1973。Peter Kropotkin著。《互助論》（Mutual aid）。台北：帕米爾書店。
林侑毅（譯），2014。金成鎬著。《能解決問題，才是大才》。台北：高寶。
洪世章，1999，「國家系統、技術系統與產業創新」，科技管理學刊，4（2）：125-136。
洪世章，2001，「社會結構與國家競爭力」，收錄於張維安編，台灣企業組織結構與競爭力：頁93-118。台北：聯經。
洪世章，2016，創新六策：寫給創新者的關鍵思維。台北：聯經。
洪世章，2021，打造創新路徑：改變世界的台灣科技產業。台北：聯經。
洪世章、曾詠青，2014，「師出有名：如何做好政策行銷」，產業與管理論壇，16（2）：26-42。
洪懿妍，2003，創新引擎：工研院：臺灣產業成功的推手。台北：天下出版社。
陳昇瑋、溫怡玲，2019，人工智慧在台灣：產業轉型的契機與挑戰。台北：天下雜誌。
傅大為，2009，回答科學是什麼的三個答案：STS、性別與科學哲學。台北：群學。
葉啟政，2004，進出「結構-行動」的困境。台北：三民。

二、英文部分
Abdelnour, S., Hasselbladh, H., & Kallinikos, J. 2017. Agency and institutions in organization studies. Organization Studies, 38(12): 1775-1792.
Abrahamson, E., &Fombrun, C.J. 1992. Forging the iron cage: Interorganizational networks and the production of macro-culture. Journal of Management studies, 29(2): 175-194.
Aldrich, H.E., &Fiol, C. M. 1994. Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review, 19(4): 645-670.
Badosevic, S. 1998. Defining systems of innovation: A methodological discussion. Technology in Society, 20(1): 75-86.
Berger, P.L., & Luckmann, T.1966. The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. 1979. Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis: Elements of the sociology of corporate life. London, UK: Heinemann.
Child, J. 1972. Organ structure, environment and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociology, 6(1): 1-22.
Diesing, P. 1966. Objectivism vs. subjectivism in the social sciences. Philosophy of Science, 33(1/2): 124-133.
Hu, M. C., & Hung, S.-C. 2014. Taiwan’ s pharmaceuticals: A failure of the sectoral system of innovation? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 88: 162-176.
Hung, S.-C. 2000. Social construction of industrial advantage. Technovation, 20(4):197-203.
Luthans, F., & Davis, T.R.V. 1982. An idiographic approach to organizational behavior research: The use of single case experimental designs and direct measures. Academy of Management Review, 7(3): 380-391.
Mani, S. 2009. Why is the Indian pharmaceutical industry more innovative than its telecommunications equipment industry? Contrasts between the sectoral systems of innovation of the Indian pharmaceutical and telecommunications industries. In F. Malerba & S. Mani (Eds.), Sectoral systems of innovation and production in developing countries:27-56. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Porter, M.E. 1979. How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2): 137-145.
Williamson, O.E. 1985.The economic institution of capitalism: Firms, markets, relational contracting. New York, NY: Free Press.