簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 嚴聆語
Yen, Ling-Yu
論文名稱: 從永續發展目標探究氣候變遷風險意識與調適行為:以新竹地區為例
A Study of Climate Change Risk Perception and Adaptive Behavior for Sustainable Development Goals in Hsinchu
指導教授: 鄭國泰
Cheng, Kuo-Tai
口試委員: 闕雅文
Chiueh, Ya-Wen
張筵儀
Chang, Yan-Yi
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 竹師教育學院 - 環境與文化資源學系所
Department of Enivonmental and Cultural Resources
論文出版年: 2022
畢業學年度: 110
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 139
中文關鍵詞: 永續發展目標氣候變遷風險意識海平面上升調適行為調適能力
外文關鍵詞: Sustainable Development Goals, Climate change risk perception, Sea level rise, Adaptive behavior, Adaptive capacity
相關次數: 點閱:3下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 近年來,全球暖化的現象日漸嚴重,加速冰山融雪與海水溫度升高,影響全球海平面的上升,導致臺灣沿海地區也受到氣候變遷與海平面上升的威脅,然而,為了研究臺灣沿海地區民眾的氣候風險意識、調適行為意願以及調適能力,本研究以氣候變遷風險意識模型(Climate Change Risk Perception Model)結合學習調適能力的五個教學面向,來建構社區防救災經驗、海平面上升風險意識、調適行為意願、調適行為學習面向以及調適能力之間的關係模式。本研究以新竹地區民眾為問卷調查對象,經由簡單線性迴歸分析與結構方程模型(Structural Equation Modeling)進行模式驗證分析,研究結果發現:一、新竹民眾的社區防救災經驗和海平面上升風險意識會有顯著關係;二、新竹民眾的社區防救災經驗和調適行為意願會有顯著關係;三、新竹民眾的海平面上升風險意識會正向影響調適行為意願;四、新竹民眾的海平面上升風險意識會正向影響調適行為學習面向;五、新竹民眾的調適行為意願不會影響調適行為學習面向;六、新竹民眾透過調適行為學習面向來正向影響自身的調適能力。最後,本研究根據研究結果提出實務建議與未來研究方向。


    The problem of global warming has become more serious in recent years. Glacial melt and rising ocean temperatures are exacerbated, resulting in global sea level rise. Climate change and sea level rise have also posed a threat to Taiwan's coastal areas as a result of global warming. The study uses the climate change risk perception model combined with five pedagogical aspects of learning adaptive capacity to construct a model between experience with community disaster prevention and protection, sea level rise risk perception, willingness of adaptive behavior, learning aspects of adaptive behavior and adaptive capacity of individuals in Taiwan's coastal areas in order to investigate climate risk perception, willingness of adaptive behavior, and adaptive capacity of people in Taiwan's coastal areas.

    The research questionnaire's subjects are inhabitants of the Hsinchu region. The following are the findings of model fitness testing using simple linear regression analysis and structural equation modeling: First, inhabitants of the Hsinchu region's experience with community disaster prevention and protection was substantially connected with their sea level rise risk perception. Second, inhabitants of the Hsinchu region's experience with community disaster prevention and protection was substantially connected with their willingness of adaptive behavior. Third, inhabitants of the Hsinchu region's sea level rise risk perception was significantly and positively correlated with their willingness of adaptive behavior. Fourth, inhabitants of the Hsinchu region's sea level rise risk perception was significantly and positively correlated with their learning aspects of adaptive behavior. Fifth, inhabitants of the Hsinchu region's willingness of adaptive behavior was not substantially associated with their learning aspects of adaptive behavior. Sixth, inhabitants of the Hsinchu region's learning aspects of adaptive behavior was significantly and positively correlated with their adaptive capacity. Finally, the study recommended the establishment for practice and future research based on the findings.

    摘要 I ABSTRACT II 謝辭 III 目錄 IV 圖目錄 VI 表目錄 VII 第壹章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 2 第三節 研究流程 2 第貳章 文獻回顧 4 第一節 永續發展目標 4 第二節 氣候變遷與風險意識 11 第三節 氣候變遷與調適行為 20 第四節 第13項SDGs與調適能力之關聯性 25 第參章 研究方法 28 第一節 研究假設與架構 28 第二節 研究對象 31 第三節 研究設計與工具 36 第四節 問卷資料處理與分析 41 第五節 研究問卷分析方法 69 第肆章 研究結果 71 第一節 描述性統計分析 71 第二節 相關分析 80 第三節 簡單線性迴歸分析 82 第四節 結構模式分析 84 第伍章 結論與討論 93 第一節 研究結論 93 第二節 研究建議 96 第三節 研究限制與未來研究建議 97 參考文獻 99 中文部分 99 英文部分 101 附錄 104 附錄一 聯合國永續發展目標和細項目標 104 附錄二 問卷初稿 117 附錄三 專家效度問卷 120 附錄四 專家審閱意見結果彙整表 126 附錄五 正式問卷 132 附錄六 線上問卷 135 附錄七 研究問卷 138

    中文部分
    吳明隆(民98)。SPSS操作與應用:問卷統計分析實務。臺北市:五南。
    吳明隆(民98)。結構方程式模式:AMOS的操作與應用。臺北市:五南。
    吳統雄(民73)。電話調查:理論與方法。新北市:聯經出版事業公司。
    邱皓政(民94)。結構方程模式:LISREL的理論、技術與應用。臺北市:雙葉書廊。
    涂金堂(民101)。量表編製與SPSS。臺北市:五南。
    陳寬裕、王正華(民106)。論文統計分析實務:SPSS與AMOS的運用。臺北市五南。
    榮泰生(民109)。Amos與研究方法。臺北市:五南。
    鄭燦堂(民109)。風險管理:理論與實務。臺北市:五南。
    顏志龍、鄭中平(民108)。給論文寫作者的統計指南:傻瓜也會跑統計。臺北市:五南。
    NHK特別採訪小組(民107)。311的釜石奇蹟:日本大地震中讓孩子全員生還的特別課程。臺北市:行人。
    天然災害統計(民111年)。內政部消防署。取自https://www.nfa.gov.tw/cht/index.php?code=list&ids=233
    永續發展自願檢視報告(民110年)。行政院國家永續發展委員會。取自https://ncsd.ndc.gov.tw/Fore/Vhome
    各區人口統計(民111年4月)。新竹市政府民政處。取自https://www.hccg.gov.tw/civil/ch/home.jsp?id=55&parentpath=0,4,46
    每月人口統計資料(民111年4月)。新竹縣政府民政處。取自https://civil.hsinchu.gov.tw/News.aspx?n=1331&sms=9528
    災害風險簡介(民109年)。國家災害防救科技中心。取自https://dra.ncdr.nat.gov.tw/Frontend/Disaster/RiskIndex?Category=DisasterRisk
    災害潛勢地圖(民111年)。國家災害防救科技中心。取自https://dmap.ncdr.nat.gov.tw/
    周桂田、趙家緯、梁曉昀、周姵妤、黃慧慈(民110年4月20日)。臺灣氣候風險與機會研究報告。國立臺灣大學社會科學院風險社會與政策研究中心。取自https://rsprc.ntu.edu.tw/zh-tw/m07-3/workingpaper/362-working-paper-climate-change/1563-2021-04-20-08-34-38.html
    新竹市深耕計畫109年期末報告(民109年)。新竹市災害防救資訊平台。取自https://sites.google.com/g.ncu.edu.tw/hcc119/%E7%9B%B8%E9%97%9C%E6%88%90%E6%9E%9C/%E6%88%90%E6%9E%9C%E5%A0%B1%E5%91%8A?authuser=0
    新竹市深耕計畫110年期末報告(民110年)。新竹市災害防救資訊平台。取自https://sites.google.com/g.ncu.edu.tw/hcc119/%E7%9B%B8%E9%97%9C%E6%88%90%E6%9E%9C/%E6%88%90%E6%9E%9C%E5%A0%B1%E5%91%8A?authuser=0
    新竹縣深耕計畫109年期末報告(民109年)。新竹縣防災資訊網。取自https://odm.hsinchu.gov.tw/DeepGlowing/Report
    新竹縣深耕計畫110年期末報告(民110年)。新竹縣防災資訊網。取自https://odm.hsinchu.gov.tw/DeepGlowing/Report
    臺灣永續發展目標(民111年)。行政院國家永續發展委員會。取自https://ncsd.ndc.gov.tw/Fore/SDG13
    Yung-Jen Chen & Jiao Wang (民108年9月17日)。全球暖化下臺灣海平面上升衝擊分析。GREENPEACE綠色和平。取自https://www.greenpeace.org/taiwan/

    英文部分
    Adger, W. N. (2003). Social capital, collective action, and adaptation to climate change. Economic Geography, 79(4), 387-404. Retrieved from <Go to ISI>://WOS:000186599800003
    Adger, W. N., Brown, I., & Surminski, S. (2018). Advances in risk assessment for climate change adaptation policy. In: The Royal Society Publishing.
    Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables (Vol. 210): John Wiley & Sons.
    Boyer-Villemaire, U., Bernatchez, P., Benavente, J., & Cooper, J. A. G. (2014). Quantifying community's functional awareness of coastal changes and hazards from citizen perception analysis in Canada, UK and Spain. Ocean & coastal management, 93, 106-120.
    Didham, R. J., & Ofei-Manu, P. (2020). Adaptive capacity as an educational goal to advance policy for integrating DRR into quality education for sustainable development. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 47, 9. doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101631
    Elrick-Barr, C. E., Smith, T. F., Preston, B. L., Thomsen, D. C., & Baum, S. (2016). How are coastal households responding to climate change? Environmental Science & Policy, 63, 177-186.
    Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological methods, 4(3), 272.
    Floyd, D. L., Prentice‐Dunn, S., & Rogers, R. W. (2000). A meta‐analysis of research on protection motivation theory. Journal of applied social psychology, 30(2), 407-429.
    Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50.
    Grothmann, T., & Patt, A. (2005). Adaptive capacity and human cognition: the process of individual adaptation to climate change. Global environmental change, 15(3), 199-213.
    Hair, J. F. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
    Hampel, J. (2006). Different concepts of risk–A challenge for risk communication. International journal of medical microbiology, 296, 5-10.
    Harries, T., & Penning-Rowsell, E. (2011). Victim pressure, institutional inertia and climate change adaptation: The case of flood risk. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions, 21(1), 188-197. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.09.002
    Hoffmann, R., & Muttarak, R. (2017). Learn from the past, prepare for the future: Impacts of education and experience on disaster preparedness in the Philippines and Thailand. World Development, 96, 32-51.
    Keys, N., Thomsen, D. C., & Smith, T. F. (2016). Adaptive capacity and climate change: the role of community opinion leaders. Local Environment, 21(4), 432-450.
    Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 2nd ed. New York, NY, US: Guilford Press.
    Klinke, A., & Renn, O. (2002). A new approach to risk evaluation and management: Risk‐based, precaution‐based, and discourse‐based strategies 1. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 22(6), 1071-1094.
    Luu, T. A., Nguyen, A. T., Trinh, Q. A., Pham, V., Le, B. B., Nguyen, D. T., . . . Hens, L. (2019). Farmers' Intention to Climate Change Adaptation in Agriculture in the Red River Delta Biosphere Reserve (Vietnam): A Combination of Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) and Protection Motivation Theory (PMT). Sustainability, 11(10), 17. doi:10.3390/su11102993
    Ngo, C. C., Poortvliet, P. M., & Feindt, P. H. (2020). Drivers of flood and climate change risk perceptions and intention to adapt: an explorative survey in coastal and delta Vietnam. Journal of Risk Research, 23(4), 424-446.
    Sachs, J. D. (2012). From Millennium Development Goals to Sustainable Development Goals. Lancet, 379(9832), 2206-2211. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60685-0
    Sachs, J. D., & McArthur, J. W. (2005). The Millennium Project: a plan for meeting the millennium development goals. Lancet, 365(9456), 347-353. Retrieved from <Go to ISI>://WOS:000226449600040
    Sund, B., Svensson, M., & Andersson, H. (2017). Demographic determinants of incident experience and risk perception: Do high-risk groups accurately perceive themselves as high-risk? Journal of Risk Research, 20(1), 99-117.
    Van der Linden, S. (2014). On the relationship between personal experience, affect and risk perception: The case of climate change. European journal of social psychology, 44(5), 430-440.
    Vaughan, E. J., & Vaughan, T. M. (1995). Essentials of insurance: A risk management perspective: Wiley.
    Wachinger, G., Renn, O., Begg, C., & Kuhlicke, C. (2013). The risk perception paradox—implications for governance and communication of natural hazards. Risk analysis, 33(6), 1049-1065.
    Glasgow Climate Pact. (2021, November). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Retrieved from https://unfccc.int/documents/310475
    Millennium Development Goals. (2000). United Nations. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/
    Our common future. (1987, October). World Commission on Environment and Development. Retrieved from https://www.are.admin.ch/are/en/home/media/publications/sustainable-development/brundtland-report.html
    Picturing Our Future. (2021, October). Climate Central. Retrieved from https://www.climatecentral.org/news/picturing-our-future
    SDG Indicators. (2021, February). United Nations. Retrieved from https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/indicators/indicators-list/
    The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. (2015, September). United Nations. Retrieved from https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
    The Global Risks Report 2021. (2021, January). World Economic Forum. Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-global-risks-report-2021
    The Millennium Development Goals Report 2015. (2015). United Nations. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/zh/millenniumgoals/reports.shtml

    QR CODE