研究生: |
繁玉萍 |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
自然選汰影響果蠅基因體演化之研究 Study of genome evolution shaping by natural selection in Drosophila |
指導教授: |
傅化文
Fu, Hua-Wen 丁照棣 Ting, Chau-Ti |
口試委員: |
張大慈
Chang, Dah-Tsyr 王弘毅 Wang, Hurng-Yi 胡哲明 Hu, Jer-Ming |
學位類別: |
博士 Doctor |
系所名稱: |
生命科學暨醫學院 - 分子與細胞生物研究所 Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology |
論文出版年: | 2013 |
畢業學年度: | 101 |
語文別: | 英文 |
論文頁數: | 99 |
中文關鍵詞: | 果蠅 、演化 、自然選汰 |
外文關鍵詞: | Drosophila, evolution, natural selection |
相關次數: | 點閱:2 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
遺傳上的變異如何影響物種演化一直是分子演化想要解答的議題,先前的研究大都著重在少數基因如何造成表型乃至於個體適應性的演化。例如:OdsH的基因研究指出,其因為正向選汰而造成的快速演化,形成擬黃果蠅種群之生殖隔離。本研究探討OdsH是否曾多次地受到正向選汰壓力而造成快速演化,並參與其他物種的種化的過程。過去十年中分子演化和族群遺傳學因為定序技術的發展而顯著進展,許多物種基因體的定序均已完成,分析比較多種果蠅的分子演化,本研究發現OdsH快速演化而造成種化的機制,僅出現在擬黃果蠅種群中。接下來分析基因體中各個基因的親緣關係以驗證擬黃果蠅種群中的不完全譜系分類,再次支持了大部份的基因都是屬於中性或是類中性選汰的說法。最後,藉由黃果蠅鹼基組成的分析,本研究發現黃果蠅的偏好密碼子在近期出現改變,傾向於使用AT組成較多的密碼子。近年來,由於全基因組的遺傳變異分析逐步建立,對於影響基因體結構的各種因素已逐步建立,藉由這些序列資料上的分析,本研究提出之具體貢獻為1)建立OdsH在Drsophila genus的分子演化史;2)全面檢視在遺傳隔離尚未建立的種群中,不完全譜系分枝在基因體中的分布;3)提出黃果蠅偏好密碼子改變的證據。
The goal of molecular evolution is to understand the forces that have an impact on the levels of genetic variation. Previous studies have been dedicated to identify significant genetic variations that attribute to phenotypic change and eventually alter fitness of individuals. For example, the studies on OdsH have shown clear evidence of positive selection and pointed out that OdsH plays a major role in the formation of reproductive isolation. However, it has been questioned whether OdsH undergoes recurrent selection and contributes to the species formation in other Drosophila species clades. In the past decade, the field of molecular evolution and population genetics has made tremendous progress mainly due to recent development of sequencing technology. As several Drosophila genome projects are completed, it is feasible the pattern of molecular evolution in a wide range of Drosophila species, and find that rapid divergence driven by positive selection of OdsH is only present within Drosophila simulans species complex. Besides, the patterns of incomplete lineage sorting among newly diverged species were dissected employing phylogenetic analysis on genome-wide data, and supported the view that most of genetic variations were selected neutral or nearly neutral. Finally, I focus on base composition evolution, which is attributed to weak selection, in D. melanogaster population. and suggested a recent preferred codon shift towards AT-rich codons. By means of studying genome-wide genetic variation, the knowledge of how forces shape the genome structure could be established. Major contributions of this thesis are 1) to reconstruct of history of molecular evolution of OdsH is the genus of Drosophila; 2) to survey the genomic pattern of incomplete lineage sorting among the species which genetic barrier has not been established; 3) to show the evidence of AT-ending codons could currently be favored by natural selection in the D. melanogaster lineage.
Akashi, H. 1994. Synonymous codon usage in Drosophila melanogaster: natural selection and translational accuracy. Genetics 136:927-935.
Akashi, H. 1995. Inferring weak selection from patterns of polymorphism and divergence at "silent" sites in Drosophila DNA. Genetics 139:1067-1076.
Akashi, H. 1996. Molecular evolution between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans: reduced codon bias, faster rates of amino acid substitution, and larger proteins in D. melanogaster. Genetics 144:1297-1307.
Akashi, H. 1997. Distinguishing the effects of mutational biases and natural selection on DNA sequence variation. Genetics 147:1989-1991.
Akashi, H., and A. Eyre-Walker. 1998. Translational selection and molecular evolution. Curr Opin Genet Dev 8:688-693.
Akashi, H., P. Goel, and A. John. 2007. Ancestral inference and the study of codon bias evolution: implications for molecular evolutionary analyses of the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup. PLoS One 2:e1065.
Akashi, H., R. M. Kliman, and A. Eyre-Walker. 1998. Mutation pressure, natural selection, and the evolution of base composition in Drosophila. Genetica 102-103:49-60.
Akashi, H., S. W. Schaeffer. 1997 Natural selection and the frequency distribution of "Silent" DNA polymorphism in Drosophila. Genetics 146: 195-307.
Akashi, H., W. Y. Ko, S. Piao, A. John, P. Goel, C. F. Lin, and A. P. Vitins. 2006. Molecular evolution in the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup: frequent parameter fluctuations on the timescale of molecular divergence. Genetics 172:1711-1726.
Akashi, H, N. Osada, T. Ohta. 2012. Weak selection and protein evolution. Genetics 192:15-31.
Andolfatto, P. 2005. Adaptive evolution of non-coding DNA in Drosophila. Nature 437:1149-1152.
Andolfatto, P. 2007. Hitchhiking effects of recurrent beneficial amino acid substitutions in the Drosophila melanogaster genome. Genome Res 17:1755-1762.
Barton, N. H. 2000. Genetic hitchhiking. Phil Trans Royal Soc B 355:1553–1562.
Bauer DuMont, V., J. C. Fay, P. P. Calabrese, and C. F. Aquadro. 2004. DNA variability and divergence at the notch locus in Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans: a case of accelerated synonymous site divergence. Genetics 167:171-185.
Bauer DuMont, V. L., N. D. Singh, M. H. Wright, and C. F. Aquadro. 2009. Locus-specific decoupling of base composition evolution at synonymous sites and introns along the Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila sechellia lineages. Genome Biol Evol 1:67-74.
Bayes, J. J., and H. S. Malik. 2009. Altered heterochromatin binding by a hybrid sterility protein in Drosophila sibling species. Science 326:1538-1541.
Begun, D. J. 2001. The frequency distribution of nucleotide variation in Drosophila simulans. Mol Biol Evol 18:1343-1352.
Begun, D. J., A. K. Holloway, K. Stevens, L. W. Hillier, Y. P. Poh et al. 2007. Population genomics: whole-genome analysis of polymorphism and divergence in Drosophila simulans. PLoS Biol 5:e310.
Begun, D. J., and P. Whitley. 2002. Molecular population genetics of Xdh and the evolution of base composition in Drosophila. Genetics 162:1725-1735.
Brideau, N. J., H. A. Flores, J. Wang, S. Maheshwari, X. Wang, and D. A. Barbash. 2006. Two Dobzhansky-Muller genes interact to cause hybrid lethality in Drosophila. Science 314:1292-1295.
Bulmer, M. 1991. The selection-mutation-drift theory of synonymous codon usage. Genetics 129:897-907.
Carlini, D. B. 2004. Experimental reduction of codon bias in the Drosophila alcohol dehydrogenase gene results in decreased ethanol tolerance of adult flies. J Evol Biol 17:779-785.
Cheng, Y. -J. 2012. Genetic and Functional Analysis of Odysseus, a hybrid male sterile gene, in Drosophila. Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology. National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Chintapalli, V. R., J. Wang, and J. A. Dow. 2007. Using FlyAtlas to identify better Drosophila melanogaster models of human disease. Nat Genet 39:715-720.
Clark, A. G. and D. L. Hartl. Principles of Population Genetics. Sinaure Associated, Inc, Sunderland, MA.
Clark, A. G., M. B. Eisen D. R. Smith C. M. Bergman B. Oliver et al. 2007. Evolution of genes and genomes on the Drosophila phylogeny. Nature 450:203-218.
Comeron, J. M., M. Kreitman, and M. Aguade. 1999. Natural selection on synonymous sites is correlated with gene length and recombination in Drosophila. Genetics 151:239-249.
Coyne, J. A., H. A. Orr. 2004. Speciation. Sinaure Associated, Inc, Sunderland, MA.
Davis, A. W., J. Roote, T. Morley, K. Sawamura, S. Herrmann, and M. Ashburner. 1996. Rescue of hybrid sterility in crosses between D. melanogaster and D. simulans. Nature 380: 157-159.
Dobzhansky, T. 1936. Studies on Hybrid Sterility. II. Localization of sterility factors in Drosophila pseudoobscura hybrids. Genetics 21:113-135.
Dobzhansky, T. 1937. Genetics and the origin of species. Columbia University Press, New York.
Dong, H., L. Nilsson, and C. G. Kurland. 1996. Co-variation of tRNA abundance and codon usage in Escherichia coli at different growth rates. J Mol Biol 260:649-663.
Drummond, D. A., and C. O. Wilke. 2008. Mistranslation-induced protein misfolding as a dominant constraint on coding-sequence evolution. Cell 134:341-352.
Duret, L. 2002. Evolution of synonymous codon usage in metazoans. Curr Opin Genet Dev 12:640-649.
Duret, L., and D. Mouchiroud. 1999. Expression pattern and, surprisingly, gene length shape codon usage in Caenorhabditis, Drosophila, and Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:4482-4487.
Edwards, A. W. F. 2008. G. H. Hardy (1908) and Hardy–Weinberg Equilibrium. Genetics 179:1143-50.
Edwards, S.V. and P. Beerli. 2000. Perspective: gene divergence, population divergence, and the variance in coalescence time in phylogeographic studies. Evolution Int J Org Evolution 54:1839-1854.
Fisher, R. A. 1930. The genetical theory of natural selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Fiston-Lavier, A. S., N. D. Singh, M. Lipatov, and D. A. Petrov. 2010. Drosophila melanogaster recombination rate calculator. Gene 463:18-20.
Fitch, W.M. and E. Margoliash. 1967. A method for estimating the number of invariant amino acid coding positions in a gene using cytochrome c as a model case. Biochem Genet 1:65-71.
Fu, Y. X., and W. H. Li. 1993. Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations. Genetics 133:693-709.
Galtier, N., E. Bazin, and N. Bierne. 2006. GC-biased segregation of noncoding polymorphisms in Drosophila. Genetics 172:221-228.
Haddrill, P. R., and B. Charlesworth. 2008. Non-neutral processes drive the nucleotide composition of non-coding sequences in Drosophila. Biol Lett 4:438-441.
Hardy, G.H. 1908. Mendelian proportions in a mixed population. Science 28: 49-50.
Hartl D. L. and A. G. Clark 2007. Principles of population genetics. Sinaure Associated, Inc, Sunderland, MA.
Heger, A., and C. P. Ponting. 2007. Variable strength of translational selection among 12 Drosophila species. Genetics 177:1337-1348.
Hense, W., N. Anderson, S. Hutter, W. Stephan, J. Parsch, and D. B. Carlini. 2010. Experimentally increased codon bias in the Drosophila Adh gene leads to an increase in larval, but not adult, alcohol dehydrogenase activity. Genetics 184:547-555.
Hey, J. The neutralist, the fly and the selectionist. Trends Ecol Evol. 14: 35-38.
Hey, J. and R. M. Kliman. 1993. Population genetics and phylogenetics of DNA sequence variation at multiple loci within the Drosophila melanogaster species complex. Mol Biol Evol 10:804-822.
Hey, J., and R. M. Kliman 2002. Interactions between natural selection, recombination and gene density in the genes of Drosophila. Genetics 160:595-608.
Higgins, D. G., A. J. Bleasby, and R. Fuchs. 1992. CLUSTAL V: improved software for multiple sequence alignment. Comput Appl Biosci 8:189-191.
Hill, W. G., and A. Robertson. 1966. The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection. Genet Res 8:269-294.
Holloway, A. K., D. J. Begun, A. Siepel, and K. S. Pollard. 2008. Accelerated sequence divergence of conserved genomic elements in Drosophila melanogaster. Genome Res 18:1592-1601.
Ikemura, T. 1982. Correlation between the abundance of yeast transfer RNAs and the occurrence of the respective codons in protein genes. Differences in synonymous codon choice patterns of yeast and Escherichia coli with reference to the abundance of isoaccepting transfer RNAs. J Mol Biol 158:573-597.
Ikemura, T. 1985. Codon usage and tRNA content in unicellular and multicellular organisms. Mol Biol Evol 2:13-34.
Keightley, P. D., U. Trivedi, M. Thomson, F. Oliver, S. Kumar, and M. L. Blaxter. 2009. Analysis of the genome sequences of three Drosophila melanogaster spontaneous mutation accumulation lines. Genome Res 19:1195-1201.
Kern, A. D., and D. J. Begun. 2005. Patterns of polymorphism and divergence from noncoding sequences of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans: evidence for nonequilibrium processes. Mol Biol Evol 22:51-62.
Kimchi-Sarfaty, C., J. M. Oh, I. W. Kim, Z. E. Sauna, A. M. Calcagno, S. V. Ambudkar, and M. M. Gottesman. 2007. A "silent" polymorphism in the MDR1 gene changes substrate specificity. Science 315:525-528.
Kimura, M. 1983. The neutral theory of molecular evolution. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.
Kliman, R. M., P. Andolfatto, J.A. Coyne, F. Depaulis, M. Kreitman, A.J. Berry, J. McCarter, J. Wakeley, and J. Hey. 2000. The population genetics of the origin and divergence of the Drosophila simulans complex species. Genetics 156:1913-1931.
Kreitman, M. 1983. Nucleotide polymorphism at the alcohol dehydrogenase locus of Drosophila melanogaster. Nature 304:412-417.
Langley, C. H., K. Stevans, C. Cardeno, Y. C. G. Lee, D. Schrider et al. 2012. Genomic variation in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 192:533-598.
Lewin, R. 1985. Hawaiian Drosophila: Young Islands, Old Flies: Molecular evidence on Hawaiian drosophilines indicates that they colonized the 6-million-year-old islands more than 40 million years ago. Science 229:1072-1074.
Librado, P., and J. Rozas. 2009. DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 25:1451-1452.
Lin, Y. S., J. K. Byrnes, J. K. Hwang, and W. H. Li. 2006. Codon-usage bias versus gene conversion in the evolution of yeast duplicate genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:14412-14416.
Lynch, M., and J. S. Conery. 2000. The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicate genes. Science 290:1151-1155.
Lynch, M., and A. Force. 2000. The probability of duplicate gene preservation by subfunctionalization. Genetics 154:459-473.
Malik, H. S. and S. Henikoff. 2005. Positive Selection of Iris, a Retroviral Envelope–Derived Host Gene in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Genet 1:e44.
Marais, G., D. Mouchiroud, and L. Duret. 2003. Neutral effect of recombination on base composition in Drosophila. Genet Res 81:79-87.
Martinez-Cruzado, J.C. 1990. Evolution of the autosomal chorion cluster in Drosophila. IV. The Hawaiian Drosophila: rapid protein evolution and constancy in the rate of DNA divergence. J Mol Evol 31:402-423.
Maynard Smith J., and J. Haigh. 1974. The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene. Genet Res 23:23-35.
McVean, G. A., and J. Vieira. 2001. Inferring parameters of mutation, selection and demography from patterns of synonymous site evolution in Drosophila. Genetics 157:245-257.
McVean, G. A., and J. Vieira. 1999. The evolution of codon preferences in Drosophila: a maximum-likelihood approach to parameter estimation and hypothesis testing. J Mol Evol 49:63-75.
Miller, D. M., M. M. Shen, C. E. Shamu, T. R. Burglin, G. Ruvkun, M. L. Dubois, M. Ghee, and L. Wilson. 1992. C. elegans unc-4 gene encodes a homeodomain protein that determines the pattern of synaptic input to specific motor neurons. Nature 355:841-845.
Moriyama, E. N., and D. L. Hartl. 1993. Codon usage bias and base composition of nuclear genes in Drosophila. Genetics 134:847-858.
Muller, H. J. 1942. Isolating mechanisms, evolution and temperature. Biol. Symp. 6:71-125.
Nei, M., Y. Suzuki, and M. Nozawa 2010. The neutral theory of molecular evolution. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 11:265-89.
Nielsen, R., S. Williamson, Y. Kim, M. J. Hubisz, A. G. Clark et al. 2005. Genomic scans for selective sweeps using SNP data. Genome Res 15: 1566-1575.
Nielsen, R., V. L. Bauer DuMont, M. J. Hubisz, and C. F. Aquadro. 2007. Maximum likelihood estimation of ancestral codon usage bias parameters in Drosophila. Mol Biol Evol 24:228-235.
Nolte, V., and C. Schlotterer. 2008. African Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans populations have similar levels of sequence variability, suggesting comparable effective population sizes. Genetics 178:405-412.
Ohno, S. 1970. Evolution by Gene Duplication. Springer-Verlag, New York.
Ohta, T. 1992. The nearly neutral theory of molecular evolution". Annu Rev Eco Sys 23:263–286.
Ohta, T. 2002. Near-neutrality in evolution of genes and gene regulation". Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:16134–16137.
Ohta, T., and J. H. Gillespie. 1996. Development of Neutral and Nearly Neutral Theories. Theor Popul Biol 49:128-142.
Pollard, D. A., V. N. Iyer, A.M. Moses, and M.B. Eisen. 2006. Widespread discordance of gene trees with species tree in Drosophila: evidence for incomplete lineage sorting. PLoS Genet 2:e173.
Palopoli, M. F., A. W. Davis, and C.I. Wu. 1996. Discord between the phylogenies inferred from molecular versus functional data: uneven rates of functional evolution or low levels of gene flow? Genetics 144:1321-1328.
Pamilo, P. and S. Palsson. 1998. Associative overdominance, heterozygosity and fitness. Heredity 81:381-389.
Pavlidis, P., J. D. Jensen and W. Stephan. 2010. Searching for footprints of positive selection in whole-genome SNP data from nonequilibrium populations. Genetics 185:907-922.
Perez, D. E., and C. -I Wu. 1995. Further characterization of the Odysseus locus of hybrid sterility in Drosophila: one gene is not enough. Genetics 140:201-206.
Pritchard, J. K. and A. Di Rienzo. 2010. Adaptation - not by sweeps alone. Nat Rev Genet 11:665-667.
Rodriguez-Trelles, F., R. Tarrio, and F. J. Ayala. 1999. Switch in codon bias and increased rates of amino acid substitution in the Drosophila saltans species group. Genetics 153:339-350.
Rogers, H. H., C. M. Bergman, and S. Griffiths-Jones. 2010. The evolution of tRNA genes in Drosophila. Genome Biol Evol 2:467-477.
Shah, P., and M. A. Gilchrist. 2010. Effect of correlated tRNA abundances on translation errors and evolution of codon usage bias. PLoS Genet 6:e1001128.
Sharp, P. M., and W. H. Li. 1986. An evolutionary perspective on synonymous codon usage in unicellular organisms. J Mol Evol 24:28-38.
Shapiro, J.A., W. Huang, C. Zhang, M. J. Hubisz, J. Lu, D. A. Turissini, S. Fang, H. Y. Wang, R. R. Hudson, R. Nielsen, Z. Chen, and C. -I Wu. 2007. Adaptive genic evolution in the Drosophila genomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:2271-2276.
Shields, D. C., P. M. Sharp, D. G. Higgins, and F. Wright. 1988. "Silent" sites in Drosophila genes are not neutral: evidence of selection among synonymous codons. Mol Biol Evol 5:704-716.
Singh, N. D., P. F. Arndt, A. G. Clark, and C. F. Aquadro. 2009. Strong evidence for lineage and sequence specificity of substitution rates and patterns in Drosophila. Mol Biol Evol 26:1591-1605.
Singh, N. D., P. F. Arndt, and D. A. Petrov. 2005. Genomic heterogeneity of background substitutional patterns in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 169:709-722.
Singh, N. D., P. F. Arndt, and D. A. Petrov. 2006. Minor shift in background substitutional patterns in the Drosophila saltans and willistoni lineages is insufficient to explain GC content of coding sequences. BMC Biol 4:37.
Singh, N. D., V. L. Bauer DuMont, M. J. Hubisz, R. Nielsen, and C. F. Aquadro. 2007. Patterns of mutation and selection at synonymous sites in Drosophila. Mol Biol Evol 24:2687-2697.
Singh, N. D., J. C. Davis, and D. A. Petrov. 2005. X-linked genes evolve higher codon bias in Drosophila and Caenorhabditis. Genetics 171:145-155.
Stenico, M., A. T. Lloyd, and P. M. Sharp. 1994. Codon usage in Caenorhabditis elegans: delineation of translational selection and mutational biases. Nucleic Acids Res 22:2437-2446.
Stephan, W., T. H. E. Wiehe, and M. W. Lenz 1992. The effect of strongly selected substitutions on neutral polymorphism: Analytical results based on diffusion theory. Theoret Pop Biol 41:237-254.
Stephan, W. 2010. Genetic hitchhiking versus background selection: the controversy and its implications. Phil Trans R Soc B 365:1245-1253.
Stoletzki, N., and A. Eyre-Walker. 2007. Synonymous codon usage in Escherichia coli: selection for translational accuracy. Mol Biol Evol 24:374-381.
Sutton, G. G., O. White, M. D. Adams, and A. R. Kerlavage. 1995. TIGR Assembler: A new tool for assembling large shotgun sequencing projects. Genome Sci Tech 1:9-19.
Sun, S., C. -T. Ting, and C. -I Wu. 2004. The normal function of a speciation gene, Odysseus, and its hybrid sterility effect. Science 305:81-83.
Supek, F., N. Skunca, J. Repar, K. Vlahovicek, and T. Smuc. 2010. Translational selection is ubiquitous in prokaryotes. PLoS Genet 6:e1001004.
Tabuchi, K., S. Yoshikawa, Y. Yuasa, K. Sawamoto, and H. Okano. 1998. A novel Drosophila paired-like homeobox gene related to Caenorhabditis elegans unc-4 is expressed in subsets of postmitotic neurons and epidermal cells. Neurosci Lett 257:49-52.
Ting, C. -T., S. C. Tsaur, M. -L. Wu, and C. -I Wu. 1998. A rapidly evolving homeobox at the site of a hybrid sterility gene. Science 282:1501-1504.
Ting, C. -T., S. C. Tsaur, and C. -I Wu. 2000. The phylogeny of closely related species as revealed by the genealogy of a speciation gene, Odysseus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:5313-5316.
Ting, C. -T., A. Takahashi, and C. -I Wu. 2001. Incipient speciation by sexual isolation in Drosophila: concurrent evolution at multiple loci. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:6709-6713.
Ting, C. -T. and C. -I Wu. 2004. Genes and speciation. Nat Rev Genet 5:114-22.
Ting, C. -T., S. C. Tsaur, S. Sun, W. E. Browne, Y. -C. Chen, N. H. Patel, and C. -I Wu. 2004. Gene duplication and speciation in Drosophila: evidence from the Odysseus locus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:12232-12235.
Tajima, F. 1989. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 123:585-595.
Takano-Shimizu, T. 2001. Local changes in GC/AT substitution biases and in crossover frequencies on Drosophila chromosomes. Mol Biol Evol 18:606-619.
Tamura, K., S. Subramanian, and S. Kumar. 2004. Temporal patterns of fruit fly (Drosophila) evolution revealed by mutation clocks. Mol Biol Evol 21:36-44.
Thompson, J. D., D. G. Higgins, and T. J. Gibson. 1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 22:4673-4680.
Tsaur, S. C., C. -T. Ting, and C. -I Wu. 2001. Sex in Drosophila mauritiana: a very high level of amino acid polymorphism in a male reproductive protein gene, Acp26Aa. Mol Biol Evol 18:22-26.
Tsaur, S. C. and C. -I Wu. 1997. Positive selection and the molecular evolution of a gene of male reproduction, Acp26Aa of Drosophila. Mol Biol Evol 14:544-549.
Watanabe, T. K. and M. Kawanishi. 1979. Mating preference and the direction of evolution in Drosophila. Science 205:906-907.
Wen, S. Y., K. Shimada, K. Kawai, and M. J. Toda. 2006. Strong purifying selection on the Odysseus gene in two clades of sibling species of the Drosophila montium species subgroup. J Mol Evol 62:659-662.
Wu, C. -I The genic view of the process of speciation. J Evol Biol 14:851-865.
Yang, Z. and R. Nielsen. 2000. Estimating synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution rates under realistic evolutionary models. Mol Biol Evol 17:32-43.
Yang, Z. 2007. PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol Biol Evol 24:1586-1591.
Zeng, K., and B. Charlesworth. 2009. Estimating selection intensity on synonymous codon usage in a nonequilibrium population. Genetics 183:651-662.
Zeng, K., and B. Charlesworth. 2010. Studying patterns of recent evolution at synonymous sites and intronic sites in Drosophila melanogaster. J Mol Evol 70:116-128.