供應鏈合作廠商篩選與環保程度評估隨著環保意識抬頭與消費者日漸重視綠色產品的同時，其重要性也相對提升。供應鏈綠化可行之政策辦法也逐漸多元發展。本研究第一階段旨在發展出一套供應鏈廠商篩選機制，以因子評比法與層級分析法來帄衡並降低決策者進行判斷行為時，團體客觀與個人主觀對於篩選條件之權重設定所產生影響。透過兩種不同手法之結合，各取其特性，可依決策者需求，調整兩種方法之權重。並可透過層級分析法之兩兩比較來確認因子評比法權重擬定的適合性。並以此來檢視四種供應鏈體系概況。根據產業特性、體系規模、能源使用量、節能率等因子來分析與建議現階段各體系內合宜推廣對象。其次，第二階段則透過資料蒐集與分析之方式來探討供應鏈推行相關綠色政策之動機誘因，並透過實際案例說明;以整理出對應各誘因之相關政策與辦法。

The importance of green supplier assessment and filtering in supply chain raise progressively, while the environmental consciousness and consumer’s awareness to eco-friendly concept is getting more and more important nowadays. Policies and measures related to green supply chains develop in many areas. First, this research aims to formulate a filtering mechanism in picking the appropriate supply chain members for implementing the green policies, through the combination of two methods, Factor Rating System and Analytic Hierarchy Process. This methodology is proposed to balance the effect caused between individual and group, finding a way to set the weighting of factors in filtering mechanism. The decision maker can adjust the importance on two methods to meet the requirements. Factors considering contain the scale of supply chain, characteristics, energy consuming, etc. Second, this research summarizes the incentives for implementing the green policies and measures through the data collection and analysis. Keywords:

[1] 吳彥輝(1999)，運用模糊層級分析法與管理才能評鑑模式之研究，碩士論文， 中山大學人力資源管理所。
[2] 余鑑、于俊傑、余采芳(2012)，科技基礎自我服務模型應用於綠色供應鏈知識網之研究-以奇美電子為例，中華管理評論國際學報，2012年2月第十五卷一期。 [3] 黃敬惠(2013)，應用模糊AHP和模糊DEA評選IC測詴廠客戶，碩士論文，國立逢甲大學工業工程與系統管理學系。
[4] 張祐輔(2010)，結合網路程序分析法、多目標資料包絡分析法與多目標粒子群演算法於供應商評選問題，TOPCO崇越論文大賞。
[5] 葉清江、賴明政(2000)，物流與供應鏈管理4th Ed，全華。
[6] Chopra, S., Meindl, P. (2004). Supply Chain Management: Strategy, Planning and Operation. Prentice Hall, New Jersey [7] Chen, J. C., Cheng, C. H., & Huang, P. B. (2013). Supply chain management with lean production and RFID application: A case study. Expert systems with applications, 40(9), 3389-3397.
[8] Dekker, R., Bloemhof, J., & Mallidis, I. (2012). Operations Research for green logistics–An overview of aspects, issues, contributions and challenges. European Journal of Operational Research, 219(3), 671-679.
[9] Dou, Y., Zhu, Q., & Sarkis, J. (2014). Evaluating green supplier development programs with a grey-analytical network process-based methodology. European Journal of Operational Research, 233(2), 420-431.
[10] Kannan, D., Jabbour, A. B. L. D. S., & Jabbour, C. J. C. (2014). Selecting green suppliers based on GSCM practices: Using fuzzy TOPSIS applied to a Brazilian electronics company. European Journal of Operational Research, 233(2),432-447.
[11] Kuo, T. C., Hsu, C. W., Huang, S. H., & Gong, D. C. (2014). Data sharing: a collaborative model for a green textile/clothing supply chain. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 27(3), 266-280.
[12] Mirzapour Al-e-hashem, S. M. J., Baboli, A., & Sazvar, Z. (2013). A stochastic aggregate production planning model in a green supply chain: Considering flexible lead times, nonlinear purchase and shortage cost functions. European Journal of Operational Research, 230(1), 26-41.
[13] Narasimhan, R., & Carter, J. R. (1998). Environmental supply chain management. The Center for Advanced Purchasing Studies, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
[14] Quariguasi Frota Neto, J., Walther, G., Bloemhof, J., Van Nunen, J. A. E. E., & Spengler, T. (2009). A methodology for assessing eco-efficiency in logistics networks. European Journal of Operational Research, 193(3), 670-682.
[15] Rao, P., & Holt, D. (2005). Do green supply chains lead to competitiveness and economic performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25(9), 898-916.
[16] Saaty, T. L., (1996). The analytic network process: Decision making with dependence and feedback, RWS.
[17] Vachon, S., & Klassen, R. D. (2008). Environmental management and manufacturing performance: the role of collaboration in the supply chain. International journal of production economics, 111(2), 299-315.