本次研究目的在於探討應用Kahoot App融入偏鄉國小六年級數學課程的課堂教學，對學生數學的學習成就與學習態度之影響為何，並探究學生對此一數位學習模式的接受程度。即時回饋系統可以提升教學者與學習者彼此間的交流互動，並從教學活動中強化學生的專注度、參與度，更可以提高學習動機的作用。
Kahoot為一款結合智慧行動載具的即時回饋App，只要教學場域中具備電腦、平板與投影設備，教師便可以利用投影螢幕呈現Kahoot試題，學生則使用智慧型載具選擇答案。本研究之實驗設計採單組前後測實驗，研究對象為金門縣某國小六年級學生，共16人。整體教學實驗分成四階段，第一階段進行「Kahoot融入分數與小數計算單元」，第二階段進行「傳統評量融入速率單元」，第三階段為「Kahoot融入基準量與比較量單元」，第四階段為「傳統評量融入怎樣解題單元」。實驗工具為「數學學習成就測驗」、「Kahoot課前學習預期態度問卷」、「Kahoot課後學習滿意度問卷」，將以上資料經過統計、分析與歸納後，研究結果如下：
一、 應用Kahoot App融入數學教學明顯提升學童的學習成就
二、 應用Kahoot App融入數學教學，學生學習態度並無明顯差異。
三、 學生對使用Kahoot App的學習情境持滿意態度

The purpose of this research is to explore the application of Kahoot App into the classroom teaching of sixth grade mathematics courses in remote elementary schools, and the impact on students' mathematics learning achievements and learning attitudes, and to explore students' acceptance of this digital learning model. The interactive response system can increase the interaction between the teacher and the learner, and strengthen the concentration and participation of students from the teaching activities, and can improve the role of learning motivation.
Kahoot is a interactive response app that combines smart vehicles. As long as the teaching field has computers, tablets and projection equipment, teachers can use the projection screen to present Kahoot test questions, and students use smart vehicles to select answers. This study adopts a single-group pre- and post-test experimental design, and the research object is a class of sixth grade students in a elementary school in Kinmen County, a total of 16 students. The experiment is divided into four stages, the first stage is "Kahoot integration score and decimal calculation unit", the second stage is "traditional assessment integration rate unit", the third stage is "Kahoot integration benchmark and comparison unit", and the fourth The stage is "How to integrate traditional assessment into problem-solving unit". The experimental tools are "Mathematics Learning Achievement Test", "Kahoot Pre-Class Learning Expectation Attitude Questionnaire", "Kahoot After-Class Learning Satisfaction Questionnaire". After collecting, analyzing and discussing relevant data, the research results are as follows:
1. The integration of Kahoot App into mathematics teaching significantly improves students' learning achievement
2. Using Kahoot App to integrate into mathematics teaching, there is no significant difference in students' learning attitudes.
3. Students are satisfied with the learning situation using Kahoot App

1. 王全世. (2000). 資訊科技融入教學之意義與內涵. 資訊與教育, 80卷, 頁23-31.
2. 王雪如. (2007). 智慧型教學代理人於行動學習之應用探討. 中山女高學報, 7卷, 頁19-33.
3. 李建霖. (2010). 學習滿意度之定義及相關理論研究. 屏東教大體育(13), 101-107.
4. 李慶志. (2020). 行動學習結合數學解題歷程對於 國小三年級學生數學學習成效之影響. (博士). 國立臺南大學, 台南市. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/11296/f3sjda
5. 林大正, & 陳宗禧. (2008). 情境感知行動學習環境下數位教材內容設計之研究.(資訊科技與應用期刊), 2(4), 221-226. doi:10.6302/jita.200803_2(4).0006
6. 林怡采, & 顏晴榮. (2011). 線上Flash測驗應用於國小低年級評量之研究. 臺灣數學教師電子期刊(26), 27-54. doi:10.6610/etjmt.20110601.02
7. 柯燕輝. (2002). 課堂上網路學習情意評量管理機制. (碩士). 國立臺灣師範大學, 臺北市. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/11296/c382wt
8. 孫秉文. (2009). 多媒體教材在不同行動載具上的認知負荷與學習成效之研究－以高一地球科學「太空中的地球」為例. 國立交通大學, Available from Airiti AiritiLibrary database. (2009年)
9. 張國恩, 宋曜廷, 侯惠澤, & 陳裕隆. (2010). 臺灣中小學行動學習實施與運用現況探討. 全球華人計算機教育應用學報, 6(1-2), 92-109.
10. 陳景蔚. (2006). 無所不在的運算環境與進化中的行動學習. 嘉義大學通識學報(4), 17-45. doi:10.7042/jydxtsxb.200609.0017
11. 陳祺祐, & 林弘昌. (2007). 行動學習在教育上的應用與分析. 生活科技教育月刊, 40(5), 31-38.
12. 黃玉湘. (2002). 我國社區大學學員學習動機與學習滿意度之研究. (碩士). 國立中正大學, 嘉義縣. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/11296/y2egga
13. 黃喜美. (2015). 以科技接受模式探討臺南市國小教師對於行動學習之使用意願與現況調查研究. (碩士). 國立臺南大學, 台南市.
Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/11296/95j7z6
14. 網奕資訊. IRS即時反饋系統研習講義.
15. 簡茂發. (1982). 教學評量原理與方法. 師友月刊, 184卷, 頁17-21.
16. 蘇怡如, 彭心儀, 周倩. (2004). 行動學習之定義與要素. 教學科技與媒體, 70卷, 頁4-14.
17. 蘇照雅. (2005). 行動學習－開創學習的新里程碑. 生活科技教育, 38(7), 1-2. doi:10.6232/lte.2005.38(7).1
18. 龔心怡. (2016a). 因應差異化教學的評量方式：多元評量停、看、聽. 臺灣教育評論月刊, 5卷(1期), 頁211-215.
19. 龔心怡. (2016b). 運用紙本IRS即時反饋系統翻轉高等教育統計課程--Plickers教學之反思. 高等教育研究紀要, 5卷, 頁35-48.
英文部分
1. Abu-Al-Aish, A., & Love, S. (2013). Factors influencing students’ acceptance of m-learning: An investigation in higher education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(5). doi:10.19173/irrodl.v14i5.1631
2. Crompton, H. (2013). A historical overview of mobile learning: Toward learner-centered education. In: Berge ZL and Muilenburg LY (eds) Handbook of Mobile Learning. New York:Routledge, (pp. 3-14).
3. Korucu, A. T., & Alkan, A. (2011). Differences between m-learning (mobile learning) and e-learning, basic terminology and usage of m-learning in education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 1925-1930. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.029
4. Lan, Y.-F., & Sie, Y.-S. (2010). Using RSS to support mobile learning based on media richness theory. Computers & Education, 55(2), 723-732. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.03.005
5. Liu, G.-Z., & Hwang, G.-J. (2010). A key step to understanding paradigm shifts in e-learning: towards context-aware ubiquitous learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2), E1-E9. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00976.x
6. Mayer, R. (2003). The promise of multimedia learning: using the same instructional design methods across different media. Learning and Instruction, 13, 125-139.
7. Moon, T. R. (2005). The role of assessment in differentiation. Theory Into Practice, 44(3), 226-233.
8. Paris, S., & Paris, A. (2001). Classroom Applications of Research on Self-Regulated Learning. Educational Psychologist, 36, 101 - 189.
9. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6. doi:10.1108/10748120110424816
10. Ross, P. (1995). Relevant Telecomputing Activities. The Computing Teacher, 22, 28-30.
11. Tomlinson, C. (2005). Grading and Differentiation: Paradox or Good Practice? Theory Into Practice, 44, 262 - 269.
12. Wang, T.-H. (2011). Implementation of Web-based dynamic assessment in facilitating junior high school students to learn mathematics. Comput. Educ., 56, 1062-1071.