簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 黃詠舜
論文名稱: 太陽能供應鏈上下游相對比例之決策
Decision for relative weightings of the upstream-downstream layers of solar supply chain
指導教授: 簡禎富
口試委員: 洪錦輝
胡均立
翁晶晶
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 工學院 - 工業工程與工程管理學系
Department of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management
論文出版年: 2012
畢業學年度: 100
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 108
中文關鍵詞: 太陽能分析網路程序法供應鏈管理決策分析
外文關鍵詞: Solar Industry, Analytical Network Process, Supply Chain Management, Decision Analysis
相關次數: 點閱:3下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 由於能源危機與環保意識的抬頭,無污染且取之不盡的再生能源受到重視而蓬勃發展。在各種再生能源之中,太陽能由於具有最高發電量的潛力,以及其安裝地點彈性的特性,成為各國積極投入發展的目標。然而,由於進入障礙相對較低所以競爭者眾多,以及高度依賴政府補助政策來刺激需求的特性,使得太陽能產業的供需變動極大。在2005年,由於石油價格屢創新高所帶來的大量需求導致上游多晶矽供不應求及報價高漲,讓太陽能廠商尋求長期合約或轉投資上游原料廠以確保原料來源及成本控制;然而,隨著2008年金融風暴及景氣低迷,政府減少甚至取消補助造成的供過於求及削價競爭,又讓矽原料跌至將近成本價,當初的合約及投資反而成為負擔。在這樣高度變化的經營環境下,如何決定上下游自製外包的比例以確保競爭力,成為太陽能廠商的重要課題。然而回顧過去的文獻中,較少有包含完整因子的自製外包決策架構,且較少考慮同時自製且外包這種在太陽能產業常見的經營模式。
    本研究應用分析網路程序法(Analytic Network Process, ANP)發展一自製外包決策模型,協助決策者決定上下游自製外包的相對比例。首先由文獻回顧整理垂直整合的關鍵因子,考慮因子間的相互影響關係來建立網路架構,並透過問卷進行成對比較蒐集各項因子及供應鏈上下游間的相對權重,以求得適切的上下游相對比例。本研究以三家台灣太陽能製造商為實證進行案例分析,並進行敏感度分析以驗證研究效度。


    To survive in the highly competitive and volatile solar business environment, the ability to decide what layers along the supply chain to invest in and develop internally and which to leave others to develop is a critical problem for players in solar industry. For example, the supply shortage of polysilicon in 2005 severely tested the manufacturers in the industry. Long-term contract and vertical integration was the strategy to acquire raw material. However, when the financial crisis in 2008 made governments cut off the subsidies, the demand dropped dramatically. The price of raw material fell down rapidly and the contract and integration become a huge burden. We can observe that both make and buy is a strategy for solar manufacturers to maintain the competitiveness. However, only few researches propose comprehensive make or buy methodology, and concurrently make and buy was not an option.
    This research aims to build relative weightings of upstream-downstream layers decision framework for solar industry based on analytical network process (ANP), to help decision maker to decide an appropriate management structure in a supply chain. The tasks involved in this research includes: (1) Reviewing and sorting out critical factors for integration in economics theories and empirical studies. (2) Taking dependences and feedback in criterion and alternatives into the decision framework. (3) Derived the relative weightings between layers through ANP pairwise comparison, taking into account decision maker’s preferences and judgments. (4) Empirical study included face to face surveys with three solar companies in Taiwan, and the results were analyzed and discussed, including a sensitivity analysis.

    Contents i List of tables iii List of figures iv Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1. Background, significance and motivation 1 1.2. Research aims 4 1.3. Overview of this thesis 4 Chapter 2 Literature review 5 2.1. Solar photovoltaic industry 5 2.1.1. Development and technologies 5 2.1.2. PV Industry overview 7 2.2. Related theories of vertical integration 8 2.2.1. Supply chain management 8 2.2.2. Neoclassical economics 10 2.2.3. Agency theory 12 2.2.4. Transaction cost economics 16 2.2.5. Evolutional economics 22 2.3. Analytical network process. 23 2.3.1. The theory and characteristics of ANP 23 2.3.2. Applications of ANP 24 Chapter 3 Method 26 3.1 Structure problems and clarify decision elements 27 3.2 Define objective and network structure 27 3.3 Generate alternatives and network structure 27 3.4 Build relative weights by attribute pairwise comparison 28 3.5 Alternative pairwise comparison 30 3.6 Limited supermatrix calculation 31 3.7 Overall alternative rank 32 Chapter 4 Empirical study 34 4.1 Structure problems and clarify decision elements 35 4.2 Define objective and network structure 35 4.3 Generate alternatives and network structure 40 4.4 Build relative weights by attribute pairwise comparison 40 4.5 Alternative pairwise comparison 42 4.6 Limited supermatrix calculation 45 4.7 Overall alternative rank 54 4.8 Sensitivity analysis 57 Chapter 5 Conclusion and further research 63 References 65 Appendix 69

    Agarwal, A., Shankar, R. and Tiwari, M. K. (2006), “Modeling the Metrics of Lean, Agile and Leagile Supply Chain: An ANP-Based Approach,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.173, pp. 211-225
    Asan, U. and Soyer, A. (2009), “Identifying Strategic Management Concepts: An Analytic Network Process Approach,” Design and Management of Production Systems, Vol. 56, No. 2, pp. 600–615.
    Bayazita, O. and Karpak, B. (2007), “An Analytical Network Process-based Framework for Successful Total Quality Management (TQM): An Assessment of Turkish Manufacturing Industry Readiness,” International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 105, No. 1, pp. 79–96.
    Burt, D.N., Petcavage, S.D., and Pinkerton, R.L. (2010), Supply Management, McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New York.
    Canez, L. E., Platts, K. W. and Probert, D. R. (2000) “Developing a Framework for Make-or-Buy Decisions,” International Journal of Operations & Production Management, vol. 20, no. 11, pp. 1313-1330.
    Chandler, A. D. (1990), Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism, Belknap Press, Cambridge.
    Chien, C.-F. (2005), Decision Analysis and Management, Yeh Yeh Book Gallery, Taipei.
    Chung and, S.-H., Amy H.I. Lee, W.L. Pearn (2005), “Analytic Network Process (ANP) Approach For Product Mixplanning in Semiconductor Fabricator,” International Journal of Production Economics, Vol.96, No. 1, pp.15–36.
    Coase, R. H. (1937), “The Nature of the Firm,” Economica, Vol. 4, No. 16, pp. 386-405.
    EPIA (May, 2012), Global Market Outlook: For Photovoltaics until 2016. 15 June, 2012. http://files.epia.org/files/Global-Market-Outlook-2016.pdf
    Fine, C. H. and Whitney, D.E. (1996), “Is the Make-buy Decision Process a Core Competence?” MIT IMVP Sponsors' Meeting, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
    Geyskens, I., Steenkamp, J. and Kumar, N. (2006) “Make, Buy, or Ally: A Transaction Cost Theory Meta-Analysis,” Academy of Management Journal, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 519-543.
    Gulbrandsen, B., Sandvik, K. and Haugland, S. A. (2009) “Antecedents of Vertical Integration: Transaction Cost Economics and Resource-Based Explanations,” Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 89-102.
    Huang, R. Y. (July, 2011), Suntech terminate the contract with MECE. Access date: 15 June, 2012. http://www.digitimes.com.tw/tw/dt/n/shwnws.asp?CnlID=10&Cat=35&Cat1=&id=240590
    Huang, R. Y. (May, 2012), Motech reinvestment poly plant, AEP, suspend the production, and consider to dispose its assets. Access date: 15 June, 2012. http://www.digitimes.com.tw/tw/dt/n/shwnws.asp?CnlID=1&Cat=90&Cat1=&id=0000285499_HF53B6Z3L42JQC8704483&query=%ADZ%AD%7D
    Jensen, M. C. and Meckling, W. H. (1976), “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 305-360.
    Lafontaine, F. and Slade, M. (2007), “Vertical integration and firm boundaries: The evidence,” Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 45, No. 3, pp. 629-685.
    Marshall, A. (1920), Principles of Economics, 8th ed., Macmillan and Co., Ltd., London.
    McIvor, R. T., Humphreys, P. K. and McAleer, W. E. (1997) “A Strategic Model for the Formulation of an Effective Make or Buy Decision,” Management Decision, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 169-178.
    Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. G. (1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Economic change, Belknap press.
    Padillo, J.M. and Diaby, M. (1999), “A Multiple-Criteria Decision Methodology for the Make-or-Buy Problem,” International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 37, No. 14, PP. 3203-3229.
    O’Brien, D. P. (1984), “The Evolution of the Theory of the Firm,” In Frank H. Stephen (ed.), Firms, Organization and Labour, Macmillan Press, London.
    Qiu, X.F. (2011), “Basic Data of the Solar Photovoltaic Manufacturing,” Taiwan Industry Economics Services.
    Rindfleisch, A. and Heide, J. B. (1997), “Transaction Cost Analysis: Past, Present, and Future Applications,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 61, No. 4, pp. 30-54.
    Saaty, T. L. (1980), Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation, McGraw-Hill, New York.
    Saaty, T. L. (1986), “Axiomatic Foundation of Analytic Hierarchy Process,” Management Science, Vol. 32, No. 7, pp. 841-855.
    Saaty, T. L. (1996), Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, PA.
    Scherer, F. M. (1984), Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, 2nd ed., Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
    Schumpeter, J. A. (1983), The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle, Transaction Books, New Brunswick.
    Simchi-levi, D., Kaminsky, P., and Simchi-levi, E. ( 2011), Designing and Managing the Supply Chain: Concepts, Strategies, and Case Studies, Gau Lih Book co, Taipei.
    Simon, H. A. (1977), The New Science of Management Decision, Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs.
    Sipahi, S. and Timor, M. (2010), “The Analytic Hierarchy Process and Analytic Network Process: An Overview of Applications,” Management Decision, Vol. 48, No. 5, pp. 775-808.
    UNEP (2008), Solar PV: A Reliable, Cost-Effective Climate Solution. Access date: June 15, 2012. http://www.unep.org/pdf/factsheet-Poznan.pdf
    Williamson, O. E. (1975), Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implication, Free Press, New York.
    Williamson, O. E. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting, Free Press, New York.
    Yuksel, I. and Dagdeviren, M. (2007), “Using the analytic network process (ANP) in a SWOT analysis – A case study for a textile firm,” Information Sciences, Vol. 177, No. 16, pp. 3364-3382.

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校內網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (國家圖書館:臺灣博碩士論文系統)
    QR CODE