簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 張瀞云
論文名稱: 消費者對綠色產品之購買決策影響因素探討
An Investigation on the Influential Factors of Consumer Purchasing Decision for Green Products
指導教授: 王明揚
口試委員: 黃雪玲
林樹強
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 工學院 - 工業工程與工程管理學系
Department of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management
論文出版年: 2013
畢業學年度: 102
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 99
中文關鍵詞: 綠色產品消費者購買影響因素
外文關鍵詞: green product, consumer, purchasing influential factors
相關次數: 點閱:2下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 二氧化碳排放量與年均溫兩項指標,顯示全球暖化的現象漸趨嚴重,台灣亦是如此。為了延緩環境的惡化,環保署積極推動環保標章申請制度,以促進廠商製造綠色產品與鼓勵民眾進行綠色消費,達成永續經營的任務。本研究主要目的為探討消費者選購綠色產品時,其背後影響買/不買綠色產品的因素,並調查消費者對綠色產品的了解概況與購買節能家電補助政策之看法。
    本研究運用模擬購物情境的概念架設情境系統,並搭配半結構式訪談,分析消費者在情境系統購買綠色產品的影響因素,接著透過訪談與結構式問卷,調查消費者對綠色產品的了解狀況、現實生活購買綠色產品經驗之影響因素、消費者主觀排序吸引買綠色產品的因素,以及對節能補助政策的看法與相關建議。
    研究結果顯示,促使買綠色產品的原因有產品價格可接受、省水電油費、政府獎勵金與折扣優惠,故推論金錢為首要購買綠色產品的考量,次要主因是考量對人體與環境生態有正面影響而買之;促使不買的首要因素是綠色產品價格較貴,其他次因有:不清楚此產品有綠色產品存在、感受不出綠色產品對環境的益處、品牌口碑以及消費者本身的特性。在補助政策方面,有八成表示支持政策,其主因是受補助金的吸引,有一成是中立態度,另一成為不支持,其主因是懷疑補助金的來源;在相關建議方面,政商應互相配合,如補助生產製造與技術指導,有助於增加綠色產品市場的供量,進而藉由市場供需機制,逐漸提升綠色產品的市佔率,或由政府配合廠商導入綠色產品,有助於推廣綠色市場與宣導綠色產品知識,以達到雙贏的效果。
    本文雖屬消費者行為之研究,但研究基礎乃運用人因工程之概念。透過了解消費者選購綠色產品過程所考慮的影響因素,可供政府擬定政策和企業市場行銷之參考。唯有消除不買因素與維持強化會買的影響因素,才能提高消費者購買綠色產品的可能性。


    From two indicators of Carbon dioxide emissions and the annual average temperature, it seems that global warming becomes much worse than before, even in Taiwan. In order to slow down the speed of environmental deterioration, the government promotes eco-labeling application system to producing green goods in manufacturing and encouraging the green consumption in public. The purpose of this study is to identify the factors that could affect consumers purchasing or non-purchasing green products. Moreover, it surveys consumers’ knowledge of green products and collects opinions of subsidy policy for buying energy-saving household.
    The primary methods of this study include the scenario shopping system, semi-structured interview and questionnaire survey. To analyze what kind of factors which affect in consumer purchasing decision for green products by using scenario shopping system. Furthermore, interview is developed in order to obtain participants’ real-life experience in purchasing green products and their opinions of subsidy policy. The questionnaire is developed for surveying consumers’ concept of green product and find out the priority of influential factors for attracting consumers.
    The result shows that the acceptable price, reducing utility fee, government subsidy, and discount could attract consumer in purchasing green products. Therefore, the inferences of the top two influential factors are cost and benefits. Using green products will have some advantages to human health and environment is the secondary purchasing factor. High price is the primary cause of non-purchasing green goods. Other concerned non-purchasing factors including not familiar with existing choice of green product, unawareness of benefit from green product, brand, word of mouth and consumers’ characteristic. There are 80% supporters of energy-saving household policy because of providing the subsidy. The 10% is neutral and the other 10% blackball doubt the source of subsidy. In conclusion, the government and companies should cooperate. The government could provide subsidy or technological cooperation, so that would increase the supply of green products and phase out ordinary products. In addition, introduced green products under the collaboration between the government and producer could broaden green marketing and popularize the green knowledge.
    Although this research belongs to consumer behavior, it’s based on the concept of human factors. According to the result, understanding the influential factors of purchasing green product could be applied to formulate policy-making and plan products marketing. There is one way to increasing the possibility of consumers purchase green products which is by eliminating uninfluential factors and making influential purchasing-factors stronger.

    目錄 摘要 i Abstract ii 誌謝 iii 目錄 iv 圖目錄 vi 表目錄 viii 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究背景與動機 1 1.2 研究目的 4 1.3 研究架構 5 第二章 文獻回顧 7 2.1 綠色產品 7 2.1.1 綠色產品定義 7 2.1.2 環保產品標章 9 2.1.3 國內相關環保政策推行 13 2.1.4 小結 14 2.2 消費者行為 15 2.2.1 消費者行為定義 15 2.2.2 綠色消費 18 2.2.3 小結 20 2.3 相關議題的研究方法 21 2.3.1 量化方法之問卷 21 2.3.2 質化方法之訪談 22 2.3.3 小結 23 第三章 研究方法 24 3.1 研究流程 24 3.2 情境購物系統 26 3.2.1 情境系統 26 3.2.2 架設系統之目的 26 3.2.3 系統之建立 27 3.3 訪談法 29 3.3.1 訪談之目的 29 3.3.2 訪談型式 30 3.3.3 訪談內容大綱與設計 31 3.4 專家評定 33 3.4.1 信度 33 3.4.2 效度 34 3.5 實驗前測 35 3.5.1 前測目的 35 3.5.2 實驗設備與場景 35 3.5.3 前測流程 36 3.5.4 前測結果之修正 37 3.6 正式實驗細節介紹 38 3.6.1 受測者對象與蒐集地點 38 3.6.2 實驗設備與工具 39 3.6.3 正式實驗流程 39 3.7 研究範圍與限制 39 3.8 實驗結果分析方法 40 第四章 研究結果與討論 42 4.1受測者基本資料 42 4.2 情境購物系統結果分析 44 4.2.1 基本資料與系統結果的關係 44 4.2.2 訪談結果-選購綠色產品影響因素 46 4.2.2.1 買綠色產品的影響構面與因素 47 4.2.2.2 不買綠色產品的影響構面與因素 49 4.3 訪談調查問卷結果分析 52 4.3.1 對綠色產品了解程度 52 4.3.2 選購綠色產品影響因素 54 4.3.2.1 買過綠色產品的族群 54 4.3.2.2 沒買過與不清楚的族群 59 4.3.3 主觀排序與購買意願 61 4.3.4 政策知曉與相關建議 63 第五章 結論與未來研究方向 68 5.1 結論 68 5.2 研究檢討與未來研究方向 69 中文參考文獻 71 英文參考文獻 73 附件一 正式實驗訪談大綱 79 附件二 訪談-回顧情境購物系統 80 附件三 訪談問卷-消費者對綠色產品之購買決策影響因素探討 81 附件四 情境購物系統紙本內容 87 附件五 能源效率標示紙本-範例 94 附件六 受測基本資料與綠色知行合一值-檢定詳細資料 95

    中文參考文獻
    行政院環境保護署綠色生活資訊網(2012)。環保標章產品統計數。線上檢索日
    期:2012年12月19日。網址:
    http://greenliving.epa.gov.tw/GreenLife/report/statistics.aspx

    行政院環境保護署綠色生活資訊網(2012)。環境保護產品分類。線上檢索日期:
    2012年12月19日。網址:
    http://greenliving.epa.gov.tw/GreenLife/info/mark/mark-4.aspx

    何子健、蔡宏達、黃裕婷、孫立堅、葉珍羽(2012)。100年度服務業環保標章
    規格標準制訂專案工作計畫(行政院環境保護署委託研究報告,
    EPA-100-K102-02-210)。台北市:財團法人台灣產業服務基金會。

    林建宏、陳靖源、陳君豪、康昭瑋、張耀天、曾偉綸、李明璇、郭于瑄(2012)。
    101年資訊產品環保標章驗證作業專案工作計畫(行政院環境保護署委託研
    究報告,EPA-101-K102-02-201)。新竹縣:財團法人環境與發展基金會。

    交通部中央氣象局(2012)。監測紀要統計資料。線上檢索日期:
    2013年9月27日。網址:
    http://www.cwb.gov.tw/V7/climate/climate_info/monitoring/monitoring_7.html

    經濟部能源局(2012)。節能家電補助。線上檢索日期:2013年3月19日。
    網址:http://www.moea.gov.tw/Mns/populace/news/News.aspx?kind=1&menu_id=40&news_id=25694

    經濟部能源局(2010)。能源效率等級標示。線上檢索日期:2012年12月19日。
    網址:https://ranking.energylabel.org.tw

    經濟部能源局(2011)。中華民國100年能源統計手冊。

    余德章、林文綺、王介丘(2001)。劇本導引Scenario-oriented Design-資訊時
    代產品服務設計新法。台北: 田園城市出版社。

    林金定、嚴嘉楓、陳美花(2005)。質性研究方法:訪談模式與實施步驟分析。
    身心障礙研究,,3(2),122-135。

    林穎謙(2010)。情境故事法對跨領域合作設計的影響 -以使用者導向創新設計
    課程為例. (碩士論文,國立臺灣科技大學)。全國博碩士論文資訊網,
    098NTUS5619004。

    邱皓政(2012)。量化研究法(三):測量原理與量表發展技術。台北:雙葉書廊有限公司。

    宣瑋華(2001)。影響學校採購人員採購綠色產品之因素探討。
    (碩士論文,國立中山大學)。全國博碩士論文資訊網,090NSYS5636002。

    相元翰(2008)。綠色行銷下消費者之綠色消費行為分析。
    (碩士論文,國立交通大學)。全國博碩士論文資訊網,096NCTU5118007。

    張子超 (2003)。永續發展研究中融入九年一貫課程之新環境典範的內涵概念。
    全球變遷通訊雜誌,38,11-16。

    陳向明(2002)。社會科學質的研究。台北: 五南出版。

    楊孝嶸(1981)。社會及行為科學研究法(下冊)。台北: 東華。

    廖家新(2003)。台灣地區消費者對綠色產品的認知與購買行為之調查研究。
    (碩士論文,國立高雄師範大學)。全國博碩士論文資訊,091NKNU0587004。

    戴晧栢(2010)。綠色工作價值觀對工作選擇之影響。
    (碩士論文,國立中央大學)。全國博碩士論文資訊網,098NCU05007028。

    韓婷婷(1999)。民眾參與環境影響評估的行為意向模式之研究。
    (碩士論文,國立中山大學)。全國博碩士論文資訊網,087NSYSU636011。

    簡吟華(2012)。消費者綠色產品購買意願之探討
    (碩士論文,長庚大學)。全國博碩士論文資訊網,100CGU05457019。

    蘇朝墩(2009)。六標準差,前程文化事業有限公司。


    英文參考文獻
    Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 179-211.

    American Marketing Association, AMA. (1995). The definition of consumer behavior. Retrieved December 12, 2012, World Wide Web: http://www.marketingpower.com/_layouts/dictionary.aspx?dLetter=C

    Besterfield, D.H. (2009). Quality control (8th ed.). Prentice Hall.

    Chan, R. Y. K., & Lau, L. B. Y. (2001). Explaining Green Purchasing Behavior- A Cross-Cultural Study on American and Chinese Consumers. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 14(2/3), 9-40.

    Chen, C. (2001). Design for the environment: a quality-based model for green product development. Management Science, 47 (2), 250-263.

    Clark, C. F., Kotchen, M. J., & Moore, M. R. (2003). Internal and external influences on pro-environmental behavior: Participation in a green electricity program. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(3), 237-246.

    Coad, A., Haan, P., & Woersdorfer, J. S. (2009). Consumer support for environmental policies: An application to purchases of green cars. Ecological Economics, 68(7), 2078-2086.

    Dangelico, R. M., & Pontrandolfo, P. (2010). From green product definitions and classifications to the Green Option Matrix. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(16-17), 1608-1628.

    Diamantopoulos, A., Schlegelmilch, B. B., Sinkovics, R. R., & Bohlen, G. M. (2003). Can socio-demographics still play a role in profiling green consumers? A review of the evidence and an empirical investigation. Journal of Business Research, 56(6), 465-480.

    Dunlap, R. E., & Van Liere, K. D. (1978). The "new environmental paradigm": A proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results. Journal of Environmental Education, 9(1), 10-19.
    Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., & Mertig, A. G. (2000). Measuring Endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A Revised NEP Scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 425-442.

    Durif, F., Boivin, C., & Julien, C. (2010). In search of a green product definition. Innovative Marketing, 6(1), 25-33.

    Engel, J. F., Blackwell, R. D., & Miniard, P. W. (2001). Consumer behaviour. USA: Harcourt College.

    European Commission. (2012). EU Flower Mark. Retrieved December 7, 2012, from the World Wide Web: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/ecolabel/

    Francis, J. J., Johnston, M., Robertson, C., Glidewell, L., Entwistle, V., Eccles, M. P.,
    & Grimshaw, J. M. (2010). What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising
    data saturation for theory-based interview studies. Psychology and Health,
    25(10), 1229-1245.

    Green Seal Organizations. (2012). Green Seal Mark. Retrieved December 7, 2012,
    from the World Wide Web: http://www.greenseal.org/

    Hartmann, P., & Apaolaza-Ibáñez, V. (2011). Consumer attitude and purchase intention toward green energy brands: The roles of psychological benefits and environmental concern. Journal of Business Research, 65(9), 1254-1263.

    Hoffman, H.G., Garcia-Palacios, A., Carlin, A., Furness, T. A. III., Botella-Arbona, C. (2003). Interfaces that Heal: Coupling real and virtual objects to cure spider phobia. International journal of human-computer interaction, 15, 469-486.

    Holsti, O. R. (1969). Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

    Hori, S., Kondo, K., Nogata, D., & Ben, H. (2013). The determinants of household energy-saving behavior: Survey and comparison in five major Asian cities. Energy Policy, 52, 354-362.

    International Energy Agency, IEA. (2012). Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis. Retrieved December 3, 2012, from the World Wide Web: http://www.iea.org/stats/index.asp

    International Organization for Standardization, ISO. (1999). ISO 14000 Series of Environmental Standards. Retrieved December 7, 2012, from the World Wide Web: http://www.iisd.org/business/markets/eco_label_iso14020.aspx

    Iravani, M. R., Zadeh, M. S., Forozia, A., Shafaruddin, N., & Mahroeian, H. (2012). Study of Factors Affecting Young Consumers to Choose Green Products. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research,2(6), 5534-5544.

    Jackson, T. (2005). Motivating Sustainable Consumption- a Review of Evidence on Consumer Behaviour and Behavioural Change.

    Japan Environment Association, JEA (2012), Eco-Mark. Retrieved December 7, 2012, from the World Wide Web: http://www.ecomark.jp/english/

    Kassarjian, H. H. (1977). Content analysis in consumer research. The Journal of Consumer Research, 4(1), 8-18.

    Kaufmann, H. R., Panni, M. F. A. K., & Orphanidou, Y. (2012). Factors Affecting Consumers' Green Purchasing Behavior: An Integrated Conceptual Framework. Amfiteatru Economic, 14(31), 50-69.

    Laroche, M., Bergeron, J., & Barbaro-Forleo, G. (2001). Targeting consumers who are willing to pay more for environmentally friendly products. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18 (6), 503 - 520.

    Lee, K. (2009). Gender differences in Hong Kong adolescent consumers' green purchasing behavior. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 26(2), 87-96.

    Ljungberg, L.Y. (2007). Materials selection and design for development of sustainable products. Materials and Design, 28, 466-479.

    Mainieri, T., Barnett, E. G., Valdero, T. R., Unipan, J. B., & Oskamp, S. (1997). Green Buying: The Influence of Environmental Concern on Consumer Behavior. The Journal of Social Psychology, 137(2), 189-204.
    Miao, L., & Wei, W. (2012). Consumers’ pro-environmental behavior and the underlying motivations: A comparison between household and hotel settings. International Journal of Hospitality Management.

    Moisander, J. (2007). Motivational complexity of green consumerism. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 31(4), 404-409.

    National Aeronautics and Space Administration, NASA. (2012). Global Land-Ocean
    Annual Mean Temperature Trend. Retrieved December 3, 2012, from the
    World Wide Web: http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/

    Nair, S. R. (2009). Consumer Behaviour and Marketing Research : Text and Cases. Mumbai, IND: Himalaya Publishing House.

    Nardi, B. A. (1992). The use of scenarios in design. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin, 24(4), 13-14.

    Nijhuis, J., & Burg, S. (2007). Consumer-oriented strategies in new car purchasing. Workshop of the Sustainable Consumption Research Exchange Network,, 241-257.

    Ottman, J. (1992). Sometimes,consumers will pay more to go green. Marketing News, 26(14), 16.

    Ottman, J. A., Stafford, E. R., & Hartman, C. L. (2006). Avoiding green marketing myopia: ways to improve consumer appeal for environmentally preferable products. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 48(5), 22-36.

    Ozaki, R., & Sevastyanova, K. (2011). Going hybrid: An analysis of consumer purchase motivations. Energy Policy, 39(5), 2217-2227.

    Peattie, K., & Crane, A. (2005). Green marketing: legend, myth, farce or prophesy? An International Journal, 8(4), 357 - 370.

    Peter, J. P., & Olson, J. C. (2001). Consumer behavior and marketing strategy: McGraw-Hill Inc.

    Pickett-Baker, J., & Ozaki, R. (2008). Pro-environmental products-marketing influence on consumer purchase decision. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 25(5), 281-293.

    Reinhardt, F. L. (1998). Environmental product differentiation: implications for corporate strategy. California Management Review, 40(4), 43-73.

    Sammer, K., & Wüstenhagen, R. (2006). The influence of eco-labelling on consumer behaviour – results of a discrete choice analysis for washing machines. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15(3), 185-199.

    Schwartz, J., & Miller, T. (1991). The Earth's Best Friends. American Demographics, 13(2), 26-26.

    Shen, J., & Saijo, T. (2009). Does an energy efficiency label alter consumers' purchasing decisions? A latent class approach based on a stated choice experiment in Shanghai. J Environ Manage, 90(11), 3561-3573.

    Shneiderman, B. & Plaisant, C. (2010). Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction (5th ed.). Addison-Wesley.

    Smith, S., & Paladino, A. (2010). Eating clean and green? Investigating consumer motivations towards the purchase of organic food. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ), 18(2), 93-104.

    Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(3), 309-317.

    Stone, D., Jarrett, C., Woodroffe, M. & Minocha, S. (2005). User Interface Design and Evaluation. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA.

    Tadajewski, M., & Wagner-Tsukamoto, S. (2006). Anthropology and consumer research: qualitative insights into green consumer behavior. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 9(1), 8-25.

    Tan, B.C., & Lau, T.C. (2011). Green Purchase Behavior: Examining the Influence of Green Environmental Attitude, Perceived Consumer Effectiveness and Specific Green Purchase Attitude. Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5(8), 559-567.

    Tang, E., Fryxell, G. E., & Chow, C. S. F. (2004). Visual and Verbal Communication in the Design of Eco-Lable for Green Consumer Products. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 16(4), 85-105.

    Teo, T. S.H., & Yeong, Y. D. (2003). Assessing the consumer decision process in the digital marketplace. Omega, 31(5), 349-363.

    Thomas, D. R. (2006). A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27, 237-246.

    The Blue Angel. (2012). Blue Angel Mark. Retrieved December 7, 2012, from the World Wide Web: http://www.blauer-engel.de/en/blauer_engel/

    Tsai, C. C. (2012). A research on selecting criteria for new green product development project: taking Taiwan consumer electronics products as an example. Journal of Cleaner Production, 25, 106-115.

    Veluri, K. K. (2012). Green Marketing Indian Consumer Awareness and Marketing influence on Buying. International Journal of Research in Commerce and Management 3(2), 60-65.

    Young, W., Hwang, K., McDonald, S., & Oates, C. J. (2009). Sustainable consumption: green consumer behaviour when purchasing products. Sustainable Development, 18(1), 20-31.

    Zhu, Q., Li, Y., Geng, Y., & Qi, Y. (2013). Green food consumption intention, behaviors and influencing factors among Chinese consumers. Food Quality and Preference, 28(1), 279-286.

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校內網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (國家圖書館:臺灣博碩士論文系統)
    QR CODE