銲接製程對309L沃斯田鐵系不鏽鋼銲道之疲勞裂縫成長影響

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

回結果列表

研究生：	陳香如 Chen, Hsiang-Ju
論文名稱：	銲接製程對309L沃斯田鐵系不鏽鋼銲道之疲勞裂縫成長影響 Effect of Welding Process on the Fatigue Crack Growth Rate of 309L Austenitic Stainless Steel Weldments
指導教授：	喻冀平 Yu, Ge-Ping 黃嘉宏 Huang, Jia-Hong
口試委員:	蔡履文黃俊源
學位類別：	碩士 Master
系所名稱：	原子科學院 - 工程與系統科學系 Department of Engineering and System Science
論文出版年：	2012
畢業學年度：	100
語文別：	英文
論文頁數：	115
中文關鍵詞：	309L不鏽鋼、惰性氣體鎢極電弧銲、遮蔽金屬電弧銲、疲勞裂縫成長
外文關鍵詞：	309L austenite stainless steels, Gas Tungsten Arc Welding, Shield Metal Arc Welding, fatigue crack growth rate
相關次數：	點閱：3 下載：0
分享至:	分享至facebook 分享至twitter

查詢本校圖書館目錄查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統勘誤回報

本研究以工業常用的銲接方式，惰性氣體鎢極電弧銲及遮蔽金屬電弧銲進行309L不鏽鋼銲道之同質金屬銲接，針對室溫與高溫環境之疲勞裂縫成長進行研究，以探討銲件的顯微組織、殘留應力與疲勞裂縫成長速率之關係，並評估顯微結構對疲勞裂縫成長的差異。本實驗希望模擬核電廠現場銲接條件，由取得核能級銲接人員進行銲接。結果顯示，309L固化模式屬於肥粒鐵-沃斯田鐵模式，氬電銲銲接微結構主要為樹枝狀結構，但因熱輸入量及冷卻速率不同而造成不同的微結構形貌。肥粒鐵含量會隨銲接次數變多而下降。因肥粒鐵較硬，硬度隨著肥粒鐵含量上升而上升。後層銲接會使前層硬度下降，使前層有回火作用。為了解殘留應力對疲勞裂縫成長的影響，所以本實驗使用X光與中子繞射法量測殘留應力。X光量測表層殘留應力，氬銲殘留壓應力較小且應力範圍較平均，電銲殘留壓應力較大且波動大，可能是熱輸入量造成冷卻速率快慢，因此對表層殘留應力影響大。中子量測內部殘留應力，氬銲殘留壓應力大於電銲。銲件分別在25°C與288°C下進行疲勞裂縫成長試驗。結果顯示，所有試片為穿晶破裂。在25°C，銲道的疲勞裂縫成長低於316L母材，可能為為結構的影響導致疲勞裂縫成長速率降低。因其銲接微結構為不均勻的，破斷面較粗糙，而阻礙疲勞裂縫成長。在288°C，所有試片結果相似。氬電銲試片分別發生動態回復以及平面滑移現象。氬銲具有較高的疊差能，造成動態回復而使疲勞裂縫成長增快。電銲有較低疊差能，發生平面滑移而延長疲勞壽命。微結構及硬度主要對疲勞裂縫成長有較大影響，殘留應力對疲勞裂縫成長無太大影響。

The purpose of the study is to understand the effect of welding process on the fatigue crack growth rate of 309L austenitic stainless steel weldments. Two welding processes, the GTAW (Gas Tungsten Arc Welding) and SMAW (Shield Metal Arc Welding) were adopted to weld 309L austenite stainless steels and test them in 25°C and 288°C.
The results show that the solidification mode of 309L austenitic stainless steel weldments is ferrite-austenitic mode and the primary microstructure is dendritic structure. The ferrite content decreases with increasing welding times. The hardness increases with the increasing ferrite content and the latter welding layer shows the lower hardness, resulting from the tempering effect. The residual stress is related to the heat input by the different welding procedures. In order to realize the effect of the residual stress on fatigue crack growth rate, this study measured the residual stress by XRD and neutron diffraction. The measurement by XRD was conducted to detect the surface residual stress. By GTAW, the compressive residual stress is small and average stress. By SMAW, the compressive residual stress is relatively large with more fluctuation. The heat input due to different process may result in different cooling rates, which play an important role on the distribution of surface residual stress. The inner residual stress is determined by neutron diffraction. The residual stress of the weldments by GTAW is higher than that by SMAW.
The weldments of fatigue crack growth was tested at 25°C and 288°C. All the specimens were transgranular fracture. The results reveal that the base metal and weld display different trends at 25°C. The fatigue crack growth of both weldment are lower than base metal due to microstructure. The inhomogeneous structure has rough fracture surface which retards the fatigue crack growth rate. At 288°C, all the specimens shows similar crack growth rate. The weldments by GTAW and SMAW have the dynamic recovery and planar slip phenomenon, respectively. The weldments by GTAW have high stacking fault energy which results in dynamic recovery and increases the fatigue crack growth rate. In contrast, the weldments by SMAW have low stacking fault energy meaning that the planar slip could occur difficultly. As a result, the weldments by SMAW have longer the fatigue life. The experimental results indicate that the residual stress has no significant effect on the fatigue crack growth rate. The microstructure and hardness have a more prominent effect on fatigue crack growth rate and the residual stress has no significant effect on fatigue crack growth rate.

摘要    I
Abstract    II
誌謝    IV
Content    VI
List of Figures    IX
List of Tables    XIII
Chapter 1  Introduction    1
Chapter 2  Literature Review    3
2.1 Austenitic stainless steel    3
2.1.1 316L    4
2.1.2 309L    4
2.2 Welding    7
2.2.1 Gas Tungsten Arc Welding (GTAW)    7
2.2.2 Shielded Metal Arc Welding (SMAW)    7
2.3 Solidification mode    10
2.4 Delta-ferrite    13
2.5 Residual stress    15
2.6 Fatigue crack growth rate    16
Chapter 3  Experimental Details    18
3.1 Preparation    18
3.2Characterization Methods    23
3.2.1 Inductively Coupled plasma-mass Spectrometer (ICP-MS) and Carbon/Sulfur analyze    23
3.2.2 Metallograph    23
3.2.3 Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)    23
3.2.4 Ferrite number (FN) prediction    24
3.3 Properties Measurement    25
3.3.1 Vickers hardness test (HV)    25
3.3.2. Residual stress    25
3.3.2.1 XRD Sin2ψ method    25
3.3.2.2 Neutron diffraction    26
3.3.3 Tensile test     27
3.3.4 Fatigue crack growth rate    27
Chapter 4  Results    33
4.1 Microstructure observation (OM)    33
4.2 Ferrite number content characterization    40
4.3 Microhardness characterization    42
4.4 Tensile test    45
4.5 Residual stress    47
4.5.1 X-ray diffraction    47
4.5.2 Neutron diffraction    47
4.6 Fatigue crack growth rate    51
Chapter 5  Discussion    66
5.1 The relationship between heat input and microstructure    66
5.2 The relationship between welding times and ferrite number    66
5.3 Hardness    67
5.4 Tensile test    69
5.5 Residual stress    70
5.6 Fatigue crack growth rate    71
Chpater 6  Conclusions    73
References    74
Appendix.A    76
Appendix.B    77
Appendix C    94
Appendix D    113


                                

[1] ASM Handbook Vol.1 Properties and Selection Irons Steels and High Performance Alloys, 1993.
[2] W.F. Smith, Structure and Properties of Engineering Alloys, 2nd Edition, McGraw-Hill. Inc., New York, USA, 1993.
[3] J.C. Lippold, D.J. Kotecki, Welding Metallurgy and Weldability of Stainless Steel, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, 2005.
[4] F.C. Hull, EFFECT OF DELTA FERRITE ON HOT CRACKING OF STAINLESS STEEL, Weld. J., 46 (1967) S399-&.
[5] ASM Handbook Vol.6 Welding, Brazing, and Soldering, 1993.
[6] S. Kou, Welding Metallurgy, 2nd Edition John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey., 1987.
[7] N. Suutala, T. Takalo, T. Moisio, FERRITIC-AUSTENITIC SOLIDIFICATION MODE IN AUSTENITIC STAINLESS-STEEL WELDS, Metallurgical Transactions a-Physical Metallurgy and Materials Science, 11 (1980) 717-725.
[8] J.A. Brooks, A.W. Thompson, MICROSTRUCTURAL DEVELOPMENT AND SOLIDIFICATION CRACKING SUSCEPTIBILITY OF AUSTENITIC STAINLESS-STEEL WELDS, Int. Mater. Rev., 36 (1991) 16-44.
[9] J.M. Vitek, S.A. David, D.J. Alexander, Keiser, Jr., R.K. Nanstad, LOW-TEMPERATURE AGING BEHAVIOR OF TYPE-308 STAINLESS-STEEL WELD METAL, Acta Metall. Mater., 39 (1991) 503-516.
[10] K.V. P., S. N., T. T., Correlation between solidification cracking and microstructure in austenitic and austenitic-ferritic stainless steel welds, Welding Research International, 9 (1979) 55-75.
[11] J.C. Lippold, W.F. Savage, SOLIDIFICATION OF AUSTENITIC STAINLESS-STEEL WELDMENTS .3. THE EFFECT OF SOLIDIFICATION BEHAVIOR ON HOT CRACKING SUSCEPTIBILITY, Weld. J., 61 (1982) S388-S396.
[12] D.J. Kotecki, T.A. Siewert, WRC-1992 CONSTITUTION DIAGRAM FOR STAINLESS-STEEL WELD METALS - A MODIFICATION OF THE WRC-1988 DIAGRAM, Weld. J., 71 (1992) S171-S178.
[13] J.M. Vitek, S.A. David, THE SIGMA-PHASE TRANSFORMATION IN AUSTENITIC STAINLESS-STEELS, Weld. J., 65 (1986) S106-S111.
[14] H.J. Stone, P.J. Withers, T.M. Holden, S.M. Roberts, R.C. Reed, Comparison of three different techniques for measuring the residual stresses in an electron beam-welded plate of WASPALOY, Metall. Mater. Trans. A-Phys. Metall. Mater. Sci., 30 (1999) 1797-1808.
[15] G. Albertini, G. Bruno, B.D. Dunn, F. Fiori, W. Reimers, J.S. Wright, Comparative neutron and X-ray residual stress measurements on A1-2219 welded plate, Materials Science and Engineering: A, 224 (1996) 157 - 165.
[16] ASM Handbook Vol.19 Fatigue and Fracture, (1993).
[17] ASTM, Standard Test Method for Vickers hardness of Metallic Materials, American Society for Testing Materials, Philadelphia, 2003.
[18] B.D.Cullity, S.R.Stock, Element of X-Ray Diffraction, Prentice Hall, 2001.
[19] ASTM, Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials, American Society for Testing Materials, Philadelphia, 2004.
[20] ASTM, Standard Test Method for Measurement of Fatigure Crack Growth Rates, American Society for Testing Materials, Philadelphia, 2008.
[21] R.C. Bates, W.G. Clark, Fractography and fracture mechanics, Asm Transactions Quarterly, 1969.

全文公開日期本全文未授權公開 (校內網路)
全文公開日期本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

相關論文