研究生: |
周明徹 |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
政商關係對企業價值的影響 |
指導教授: | 吳世英 |
口試委員: | |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
科技管理學院 - 經濟學系 Department of Economics |
論文出版年: | 2005 |
畢業學年度: | 93 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 100 |
中文關鍵詞: | 政商關係 、無形資產 |
相關次數: | 點閱:1 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
摘 要
本文利用在台灣上市公司中,擔任重要職務關係人的政商關係為出發點,以此來代表整個企業的政商關係,並採用市價淨值比法及無形價值定價法來實證研究政商關係對企業價值的影響。
實證結果主要發現(1)不論以市價淨值比法或資產超額報酬法衡量政商關係對企業價值的影響時,在區分產業的情況下,其結果大致顯現了執政黨關係大致上是對企業有正面助益的,而在野黨關係則較不確定。若將企業的經營階層區分為經營階層(董事長、副董事長、總經理)及非經營階層(董事、監事、大股東)後,企業經營階層所建立的執政黨關係對企業的影響更是顯著。(2)由於不同執政黨之因(兩千年第十屆總統大選,執政半個多世紀的中國國民黨敗選,改由民進黨執政,為台灣戒嚴之後的第一次政黨輪替)因而區分年份之下,1999年的國民黨執政之時可能因樣本數較小而大致顯示為不顯著的結果。2000-03年民進黨執政之時,執政黨關係的影響,不論有無細分經營階層及非經營階層的情況下,都有顯著的正向影響,顯示出在民進黨執政之時企業執政黨關係的建立應是較有利的。而在野黨關係則大致為顯著的負向影響,呈現出與在野黨的政商關係較不利於企業的營運。
但因為政商關係的界定仍有許多不完整之處,因此可能導致迴歸結果的偏誤,本文也討論了可能的改進方向。
參考文獻
中文部份
1.宋偉航譯(1998),Thomas A. Stewart著, “智慧資本-資訊 時 代的企業利基”,初版,台北:智庫股份有限公司。
2.李坤致(2000), “智慧資本與價值動因對企業價值影響之研究”,國立中正大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
3.何玉玲(2004), “無形資產價值影響因素之研究-以台灣IC設計業為例”,國立交通大學管理科學碩士班碩士論文。
4.林大容(1999)譯, “智慧資本-如何衡量資訊時代無形資產的價值”,臺北市:麥田出版,城邦文化發行。
5.林佑聰(2003), “政商關係與股東財富”,國立台灣科技大學企業管理學系碩士班碩士論文。
6.林洋鑫(2002), “電子產業無形資產之關聯性研究”, 國立交通大學管理科學碩士班碩士論文。
7.徐瑞希(1991), “政商關係解讀”,臺北市:遠流出版。
8.陳柔縉(1999), “總統的親戚-臺灣權貴家族”,臺北市:時報文化。
9.黃德舜(1998), “企業財務分析-企業價值的創造及評估”,台北:華泰文化事業。
10.楊川毅(2005), “影響無形資產價值驅動因子之國內外比較-以台灣、美國IC設計業為例”,國立交通大學管理科學碩士班碩士論文。
11.劉阿榮(2003), “跨世紀的台灣政商關係-一九九O迄今”,中大社會學報第16期,頁97-126。
12.劉昭志(2003), “智慧資產評價、融資彈性與降低銀行放款風險之研究-以中小企業為例”,國立中正大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
13.鄭丁旺(2001), “中級會計學(上冊)”,第七版,台北:宜增文具印刷品行。
14.簡志豪(2000), “影響智慧資本因子之研究-以我國上市資訊電子股為例”,逢甲大學會計所論文。
15.瞿宛文、洪嘉瑜(2002), “自由化與企業集團化的趨勢”,載:《台灣社會研究季刊》第四十七期, 頁45-86。
16.蘇子琴(1994), “權與錢-透視台灣政商關係”,台北:新新聞文化公司。
外文部份
1.Becker , G. (1983), “A Theory of Competition among Pressure Groups for Political Influence,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol.98, iss. 3, pp.371-400.
2.Bhagwati, JN.(1980), “Lobbying and Welfare,” Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 14, iss. 3 ,pp. 355-63
3.Bhagwati, JN. , Brecher , R.A. and Srinivasan, T.N.(1984), “DUP Activities and Economic Theory,” European Economic Review, Vol. 24, iss. 3, pp. 17-32.
4.Carroll, A. and J. Hall(1987), “Strategic Management Processes for Corporate Social Policy,” In W.King and W. Clelands(eds), Strategic Planning and Management Handbook. Reinhold, New York.
5.Chauvin, K.W., and H. Mark(1993), “Advertising, R&D Expenditures and the Market Value of the Firm,” Financial Management, Vol. 22, iss. 4, pp. 128-40.
6.Edvinsson, L.and M. S. Malone(1997), “Intellectual Capital,” New York: HarperCollins Publishers, Inc.
7.Fisman, R.(2001), “Estimating the Value of Political Connections,” American Economic Review, Vol. 91, iss. 4, pp. 1095-1102.
8.Getz, K.(1993), “Selecting Corporate Political Tactics,” In B.Mitnick(ed.), Corporate Political Agency, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
9.Hillman, A. J., A. Zardkoohi, and L. Bierman(1999), “Corporate Political Strategies and Firm Performance: Indications of Firm-Specific Benefits from Personal Service in the U.S. Government,” Strategic Management Journal,
Vol. 20, iss. 1, pp.67-81.
10.Hirschey, M., and J. Weygandt, (1985) , “ Amortization Policy for Advertising And Research and Development Expenditures,” Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 23, iss. 1, pp.326-335.
11.Hurwitz, J, S. Lines, B. Montgomery and J. Schmidt(2002), “The Linkage between Management Practices, Intangible Performance and Stock Returns,” Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 3, iss 1, pp.51-61.
12.Johnson, S. and T. Mitton(2003), “Cronyism and Capital Controls: Evidence from Malaysia,”Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 67, iss. 2, pp. 351-382.
13.Khan, M. H. and K.S.Jomo (2000), “Rents, Rent-seeking and Economic Development: Theory and the Asian Evidence,” New York :Cambridge University Press.
14.Kothari, S., and J. Zimmerman.(1995), “Price and Return Models,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 20, iss. 2, pp. 155-192.
15.Krueger , A.O. (1974) , “The Political Economy of
Rent-seeking Society,”Journal of Political Economy,
Vol. 83, pp. 291-303.
16.Mathur , L. Knowles, and I. Mathur (1995), “The Effect of Advertising Slogan Changes on the Market Values of Firms,” Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 35, iss 1, pp.59-65.
17.McCormick, R.E. and R.D. Tollison (1981), “Politicians, Legislation, and the Economy: An Inquiry into the Interest-Group Theory of Government,” Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishing.
18.Peltzman, S. (1976), “Toward a More General Theory of Regulation,” Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 19, iss.2, pp 211-240.
19.Peltzman, S. (1984), “Constituent Interest and Congressional Voting,” Journal of Law and Economics,
Vol. 27, iss. 1, pp181-210.
20.Posner, R.A. (1975), “The Social Costs of Monopoly and Regulation,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 83, iss.4, pp 807-827.
21.Rowley, K.Charles, R.D.Tollison, and G.Tullock (1988), “The Political Economy of Rent-seeking,” Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
22.Smith, G. V. and R. L. Parr(2000), “Valuation of Intellectual Property and Intangible Assets,”New York:John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
23.Stewart, T. (1994), “Your Company’s Most Valuable Asset: Intellectual Capital,” Fortune.
24.Stratmann , T. (1993), “How Reelection Constituencies Matter: Evidence From Political Action Committees’ Contributions and Congressional Voting,” Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 39, iss. 2, pp 603-635.
25.Tullock, G. (1967), “The Welfare Costs of Tariffs, Monopolies and Theft,” Western Economic Journal,
Vol. 3, pp 224-232.
26.Tullock, G. (1971), “The Cost of Transfers,” Kyklos, Vol. 24, iss. 4, pp. 629-643.
27.Tullock, G. (1989), “The Economics of Special Privilege and Rent Seeking,” Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
28.Tullock, G. (1993), “Rent seeking,” Aldershot, Hants, England; E. Elgar. Brookfield, Vt, USA.
29.Zardkoohi, A.(1985), “On the Political Participation of the Firm in the Electoral Process,” Southern Economics Journal, Vol. 51, iss. 3, pp.804-817.