現今全球暖化與氣候變遷加劇，在資源有限的壓力之下，各國莫不積極發展綠色經濟，紛紛思考如何利用替代能源或新興能源來取代人類對於傳統能源的依賴，以因應能源需求的高度成長與日趨嚴重的環保議題。台灣自2008年頒布「永續能源政策綱領」以來，實施一連串的新能源政策與各項產業發展計畫，致力打造綠能低碳環境，逐步邁向非核家園。
為了進一步了解目前台灣新興能源產業的整體發展狀況，本研究以創新系統中產業創新系統之產業創新技術觀點為起點，並參考我國能源科技中心近二年之能源計畫報告，運用其所建構的四個主要面向 ( 技術與生產、需求市場、政府政策、社會環境與福利 )來作為本研究問卷之架構，而問卷內容設計上則參考歐盟科技指標、各項創新調查與台灣永續能源發展指標，以「新興能源產業發展之利害關係人」為研究對象，研究範圍包括台北、新竹、台中與高雄等地，共發出440份問卷，有效問卷383份，有效回收率87.05%，以SPSS 18.0統計軟體進行資料分析與假說驗證。
藉由初步迴歸分析，研究結果顯示台灣新興能源產業結構中 ( 生產面、需求面、政策面、社會環境面 ) 各有若干因素具有相互顯著影響，再透過二次迴歸分析後發現，具有相互顯著影響且影響程度較高因素有：生產面之創新與研發資源及合作關係、需求面之消費者與最終產品市場、政策面之產業與環境政策、社會環境面之生產環境與社會福利等，換言之，台灣的新興能源產業發展目前在上述層面較能明顯看出相互連結與牽動發展之影響效益。

Today, with global warming and climate change, governments make a big effort to develop the green economic. To deal with the raising energy demand and serious environmental problems, people consider using green energy to replace traditional energy. Taiwan’s government declared “Sustainable Energy Policy” in 2008. Since then, the authorities implement a series of projects in developing green energy industry and try to make green environment to nuclear-free nation.
To further understand the overall development of the green energy industry in Taiwan, this study took the industrial innovation technology point of view of sectoral innovation system as a starting point. Refering to 2011 and 2012’s energy project reports of Taiwan’s energy technology center, this study constructed four dimensions (Technology and production, Market demand, Government policies, and Environment and welfare) as the framework of the research questionnaire. For the questionnaire contents, it referred to the European Union on science and technology indicators, the innovation survey and the Sustainable Energy development Indicators in Taiwan. The stakeholders in Taiwan’s green industry are used as examples for this study. 440 questionnaires were distributed, including Taipei, Hsinchu, Taichung and Kaohsiung, and 383 valid questionnaires were retured with effective rate of 87.05%. The study used SPSS 18.0 statistical software for data analysis and hypothesis verification.
Through innitial regression analysis, the results show that there are several factors with mutual significant impact in every dimension (Supply, Demand, Policy, and Environment dimension) of Taiwan’s green energy industry. After second regression analysis, the results show the mutual significant influence and higher impact factors are : innovation and R&D resources and cooperative relations in supply dimension, consumer values and end product market in demand dimension, the industry and environmental policy in policy dimension, the production environment and social welfare in environment dimension. In conclusion, the study shows that the above factors are much apparent and interconnected determinants of developing in
Taiwan's green energy industry.

中文
1. 徐作聖(1999)。國家創新系統與競爭力。台北市：聯經出版社
2. 洪世章、林于婷（2003）。國家創新系統：概念、成因與效果。研考雙月刊，27(4)，24-33。
3. 張元杰、陳明惠( 2004 )。以知識系統觀點探討創新系統學派。Technology in Socity, vol. 26 : 17-37.
4. 黃進華、陳幸雄 (2004)。我國創新系統相關指標架構之比較評估。台北市：行政院研究發展考核委員會。
5. 吳萬益 (2008)。企業研究方法。第三版。華泰書局。
6. 李德治、童惠玲 (2010)。多變量分析。第二版。雙葉書廊。
7. 史欽泰、胡美智 (2011)。建立能源科技創新系統衡量指標：發光二極體（LED）創新指標系統。行政院能源產業科技策略研究中心計畫報告。
8. 史欽泰、胡美智 (2012)。能源科技政策與產業經濟模型：建立能源科技創新衡量指標系統。行政院能源產業科技策略研究中心計畫報告。
9. 經濟部能源局 (2012)。能源產業技術白皮書。台北市：行政院經濟部。
10. 王怡臻 (2012)。台灣工業部門節能政策現況。產業情報研究所。上網日期：2012年12月13日，取自: http://mic.iii.org.tw/aisp/reports/reportdetail_register.asp?docid=2992&rtype=freereport

英文
1. Amsden, A. and Chu, W.W. (2003) Beyond Late Development: Taiwan’s Upgrading Policies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Breschi, S and Malerba, F. (1997), Sectoral Innovation Systems : Technological Regimes, Schumpeterian Dynamics, and Spatial Boundaries.
3. Breschi, Stefano, Franco Malerba, and Luigi Orsenigo. (2000), Technological Regimes and Schumpeterian Patterns of Innovation, Economic Journal, Vol. 110, No. 463 : 388-410.
4. Carlsson, B (1995), Technological System and Economic Performance: A Case of Factory Automation, Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer.
5. Carlsson, B. and Stankiewicz, R. (1991), On the Nature, Function and Composition of Technological Systems, Journal od Evolutionary Economics, vol. 1:93-118.
6. Chang-Wook Kim and Keun Lee. (2003), Innovation, Technological Regimes and Organizational Selection in Industry Evolution: A History Friendly Model of the DRAM industry, Industrial and Corporate Change, vol. 12, no. 6: 1195.
7. Choung, Jae-Young and Hwang, Hye-Ran. (2000), National systems of innovation – institutional linkages and performance in the case of Korea and Taiwan, Scientometrics, Vol. 48, No.3.
8. Cooke, P., Uranga, M. and Etexbarria, G. (1997), Regional Innovation Systems: Institutional and Organizational Dimension, Research Policy. Vol. 26: 475-491.
9. De la Mothe, J. and Paquet, G. (1998), Local and Regional Systems of Innovation, Boston/MA: Kluwer Academic.
10. Dosi, G, (1988), Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation, Journal of Economic Literature, 26: 1120-1171.
11. Dosi, G. (1982), Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories, Research Policy, 11: 147-162.
12. Dosi, G., Pavitt, K. and Soete, L. (1990), The Economics of Technical Change and International Trade, Harvester Wheatsheaf, London.
13. Edquist, C. (1997) Systems of Innovation : Technologies, Organizations, and Institutions, London: Pinter.
14. Edquist, C. (1997). System of Innovation : Technologies, Institutions and Organizations, London : Pinter.
15. European Commission (2011), Innovation Union Scoreboard : Enterprise and Industry, EU, Belgium.
16. Fagerberg, J. and Verspagen, B. (2007) Innovation, growth and economic development: Have the conditions for catch-up changed? International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development, 1 (1): 13-33.
17. Franco Malerba. (2005), Sectoral Systems of Innovation : A Framework for Linking Innovation to the Knowledge Base, Structure and Dynamics of Sectors, Journal Economics of Innovation and New Technology. Vol. 14 : 63-82.
18. Freeman, C. (1987), Technology Policy and Economic Performance Lesson from Japan, London: Frances Pinter.
19. Freeman, C. and L. Soete. (1997), Development and the diffusion of technology in The Economics of Industrial Innovation, Pinter Publishers, London.
20. Fthenakis, V., Mason, J.E., and Zweibel, K. (2009) The technical, economic and geographic feasibility for solar energy to supply the energy needs of the US, Energy Policy, 37(2), pp 387-399.
21. Gerschenkron, A. (1962) Economic backwardness in historical perspective, a book of essays, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
22. Hirshman, W. P. (2008) Welcome to Solar Street: Taiwan’s IC market downturn is PV’s gain, Photon International, September, pp. 60-74.
23. Hsu, J.-Y., Poon, J.P. and Yeung, H.W.-C. (2008) External leveraging and technological upgrading among East Asian firms in the US, European Planning Studies, 16 (1): 99-118.
24. Hu, M. C. and Mathews, J. A. (2005) National innovative capacity in East Asia. Research Policy, 34(9), pp.1322-1349.
25. Hu, M. C. and Mathews, J. A. (2008) China’s innovative capacity. Research Policy, 37(9), pp.1465-1479.
26. Lall, S. (1992) Technological capabilities and industrialization, World Development, 20 (2): 165-186.
27. Lee, K. and Lim, C. (2001) Technological regimes, catching-up and leapfrogging: Findings from the Korean industries, Research Policy, 30: 459-483.
28. Lee, O., Lester, B. T., Ma, L., Lambert, J., &Jean-Baptiste., M. (2007), Conception of the greenhouse effect and global warming among elementary students fromdiverse languages and cultures. Journal of Geoscience Education, 55(2), 117-125.
29. Lubell, M., Zahran, S., & Veditz, A. (2007), Colletive action and citizen responses to global warming. Polit Behav, 29, 391-413.
30. Lundvall, B. (1992), National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theorem of Innovation and Interactive Learning, London: Pinter Publications.
31. Mahmood, Ishtiaq P and Jasjit Singh. (2003), Technological dynamism in Asia, Research Policy 32
32. Malerba, F. (2002), Sectoral systems of innovation and production, Research Policy 31: 247-264.
33. Malerba, Franco and Luigi Orsenigo. (1996), Schumpeterian patterns of innovation are technology-specific, Research Policy, Volume 25 : 451-478.
34. Mathews, J.A. (2006) Catch-up strategies and the latecomer effect in industrial development, New Political Economy, 11 (3): 313-336.
35. Mathews, J.A. (2008) Energizing industrial development, Transnational Corporations, 17 (3), pp. 59-83.
36. Metcalfem J.S. (1995), The Economic Foundations of Technology Policy: Equilbrim and Evolutionary Perspectives, In P. Stoneman (ed.) Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change, Oxford: Blackwell.
37. MIC (Market Intelligence Center). (2009) The Trend of Global Photovoltaic Industry Development (Chinese version). Presentation by Sean Kuo on 23rd April 2009, Taipei, Taiwan.
38. Mudambi, R. (2008) Location, control and innovation in knowledge-intensive industries, Journal of Economic Geography, 8: 699-725.
39. Nelson, R. (2007) The changing institutional requirements for technological and economic catch up, International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development, 1 (1): 4-12
40. Nelson, R. and Rosenberg, N. (1993), Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis, New York: Oxford University Press.
41. Nelson, R. and S. Winter. (1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA
42. OECD (2010), Oslo Manual : Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data, OECD.
43. OECD. (1997), National Innovation Systems, Paris : Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
44. Patel, P. and K, Pavitti. (1994), The Nature and Economic Importance of National Innovation Systems, Paris : STI Review, OECD.
45. Pavitt, K. (1984), Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change. Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory, Research Policy, vol. 13:343-373.
46. Perez, C. and Soete, L. (1988) Catching-up in technology: Entry barriers and windows of opportunity. In G. Dosi (ed), Technical Change and Economic Theory, Pinter Publishers, London.
47. PIDA (Photonics Industry & Development Association). (2008). Taiwan’s photovoltaic industry. Taipei, Taiwan.
48. Ren21 (2009). Renewables: Global Status Report 2009 Update. Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21st Century. Available at: http://www.ren21.net/pdf/RE_GSR_2009_Update.pdf
49. Rodrik, D. (2006) Goodbye Washington Consensus, hello Washington confusion? A review of the World Bank’s Economic Growth in the 1990s: Learning from a Decade of reform, Journal of Economic Literature, 44 (Dec 2006): 973-987.
50. Schnaars, S. (1994) Managing Imitation Strategies: How Later Entrants Seize Markets from Pioneers. New York: The Free Press.
51. Shum, K.L. and Watanabe, C. (2009) An innovation management approach for renewable energy deployment: The case of solar photovoltaic (PV) technology, Energy Policy, 37: 3535-3544.
52. Suarez, F.F. and Utterback, J.M. (1995) Dominant designs and the survival of firms, Strategic Management Journal, 16 (6): 415-430.
53. Sutton, J. (2002) Rich trades, scarce capabilities: Industrial development revisited, The Economic and Social Review, 33 (1): 1-22.
54. Swann, P., and J. Gill. (1993). Corporate Vision and Rapid Technological Change: The Evolution of Market Structure. Routledge, London.
55. Tan, H. and Mathews, J. A. (2010) Identification and analysis of industry cycles, Journal of Business Research 63 (5): 454-462.