中文摘要

本篇論文主要在討論動相(Aspect)與複動性標記(Pluractional markers) 之間的相互關係。在Lenci (1999)的學說中,副詞量化(Adverbial quantification) 和動相系統有密切的關係。本文從漢語的角度出發，將複動性標記分為完整體(Perfective)以及非完整體(Imperfective)。由於非完整體在語意內涵中非受限的關係(Unbounded)，它是屬於內延性質的(Intensional)；相對的,完整體其受限(Bounded)的性質屬於外延性(Extensional)。
就非完整體而言，討論集中在習慣句(habitual sentences)，而其內延性展現在可能世界(possible world)上。漢語習慣句有三種，簡單泛稱句(simple generic sentences)，量化性副詞泛稱句(quantificational adverb generic sentences)，和老標記泛稱句(lau-marker generic sentences)。由這三種句型，我們可得知老標記泛稱句和另外兩類擁有不同的運符(operator) Gn 和HAB. 這兩類運符操作的範域(scope)不同，而老標記泛稱句的預設性解讀(presuppositional reading)也說明HAB的語意特質為歸納性(inductive)，選擇的是預設性的情態基礎(presuppositional modal base)。Gn 代表另外兩類習慣句。 Gn 單獨出現時，代表簡單泛稱句；然而Gn可以和其他量化副詞同時出現， Gn 與量化副詞同時出現時，代表量化性副詞泛稱句。這兩類習慣句均可採預設性解讀或非預設性解讀。
就完整體而言，討論集中在單動性(Singulactional markers)以及複動性標記(Pluractional markers)的重複性動作(Repeated actions)以及反覆性動作(repetitive actions)的語意內涵。漢語中的單動性標記又和再預設了過往事件(Prior events)的存在；而又修飾重複性動作，因此又修飾的事件和過往事件的關係沒有累積延續的意涵，只能說兩個事件的事件類型(event type)一致。相反的再修飾反覆性動作，因此再修飾的事件和過往事件有累積延續的關係。而複動性標記一再、再三、一直、一天到晚、不時大多修飾重複性事件，但是受到複動性標性本身修飾事件間隔時間，以及修飾事件的事件類型的影響，一直修飾單動作動詞(semelfactive verb)時，句子中包含的為反覆性事件。
本篇論文從完整體和非完整體的角度探討漢語中的複動性標記，並且對兩陣營中複動性標記的不同行為做出分析。

Bonomi, A., 1995. Aspect and quantification, In Pier Marco Bertinetto, Valentina Bianchi, James Higginbotham, and Mario Squartini (eds.) Temporal reference, aspect and actionality, volume I. Semantic and Syntactic Perspectives, 93-110. Torino: Rosenberg and Sellier.
Carlson, Gregory N., 1977. Reference to Kinds in English. Ph.D. thesis. University of Massachusetts. Amherst.
Carlson, Gregory N., 1989. On the semantic composition of English generic sentences. In G. Chierchia, B. Partee & R. Turner (eds.) Properties, types and meaning. Volume 2: semantic issues 167-192. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Carlson, Gregory N., 1995. Truth-conditions of generic sentences. In G. Carlson & F. J. Pelletier (eds.) The Generic Book: 224-37. Chicago: University of Chicago Press,
Chierchia, G., 1992. Anaphora and dynamic binding. Linguistics and Philosophy, 15:111-183.
Chierchia, G., 1995b. Individual-level predicates as inherent generics. In G. Carlson & F. J. Pelletier (eds.) The Generic Book: 176-223. Chicago: University of Chicago Press,
Chierchia,G., 1998. Reference to kinds across languages, Natural Language Semantics 6, 339-405.
Cohen, Ariel, 1999. Generics, frequency adverbs, and probability. Linguistics and Philosophy 22:221-253.
Comrie, Bernard, 1976. Aspect: an introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge University Press, New York.
Dahl, □., 1975. On generics. In E. L. Keenan (ed.) Formal Semantics of Natural Language, 99-111. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Davidson, D., 1969. The individuation of events. In N. Rescher (ed.), Essays in Honor of Carl G. Hempel, 216-34. Dordrecht: Reidel..
Diesing, M., 1992. Indefinites, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen, 2001. Adverbs of Quantification and Genericity. Ms. Universit□ Paris 7.
Fortescue, M., 1984. West Greenlandic. London: Croom Helm.
Van Geenhoven, V., 2005. Atelicity, pluractionality, and adverbial quantification. In In H. Verkuyl, H. de Swart and A. van Hout (eds) Perspectives on Aspect 1. Dordrecht: Springer.
Heim, Irene, 1982. The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases. Ph.D. thesis. University of Massachusetts. Amherst.
Higginbotham, James, 2000. On events in linguistics Semantics. In James Higginbotham, Fabio Pianesi, and Achille C. Varzi. (eds.) Speaking of Events, 49 - 79. Oxford University Press, New York.
Hoepelman, J. and C. Rohrer. 1980 On the mass-count distinction and the French
Imparfait and Pass□ Simple. In C. Rohrer (ed.) Time, tense and quantifiers, 85-112. T□bingen: Niemeyer.
Hsieh, Fang-Yi, 2007. Exploration of V yi-xia Construction in Chines: A construction-based Account. MA Thesis, National Tsing Hua University.
Hsieh, I-Ta Chris, 2004. Genericity and Adverbial Quantification: From a Chinese Perspective. National Tsing Hua University, Taiwan.
Klimek, Dorota, 2006. Aspect in episodic, adverbially quantified and habitual dynamic contexts in Polish, Czech and Russian. Netherlands: Utrecht University.
Kratzer, Angelike. 1981. The notional category of modality. In H.-J. Heikmeyer & H. Rieser (eds.), Words, Worlds and Contexts. New Approaches in Word Semantics 38-74. Berlin: De Gruyter:
Kratzer, Angelike. 1995. Stage-level and individual-level predicates. In Gregory N. Carlson and Francis Jeffry Pelletier (eds.) The Generic Book. 125-175. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
Krifka, Manfred, Francis Jeffry Pelletier, Gregory N. Carlson, Alice Ter Meulen, Gennaro Chierchia & Godehard Link, 1995. Genericity: An Introduction. In Gregory N. Carlson and Francis Jeffry Pelletier (eds.) The Generic Book. 1-124. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lasersohn, P., 1995. Plurality, Conjunction and Events, Dordrecht, Kluwer.
Lenci, A. und Bertinetto, P. M., 1999. Aspect, adverbs, and events: habituality vs. perfectivity. In F. Pianesi, J. Higginbotham and A. C. Varzi (eds), Speaking of Events. 245-287. Oxford: Oxford University Press,
Lewis, David, 1975. Adverbs of quantification. In Edward Keenan (ed.) Formal Semantics of Natural Languages, 3-15. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lin, J. and L. Liu, 2006. ‘Again’ and ‘again’: a grammatical analysis of you and zai in Mandarin Chinese. In Proceedings of the European Association of Chinese Linguistics.
L□, Shu- Xiang, 1980. Xiandai Hanyu Ba-bai Ci (Eight Hundred Words in Modern Chinese). Hong Kong: Shangwu Yinshuguan.
Parsons, Terence, 1990. Events in the Semantics of English: a study in subatomic semantics. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Rimell, Laura, 2004. Habitual sentences and generic quantification. In V. Chand, A. Kelleher, A. Rodriguez and B. Schmeiser (eds). Proceedings of WCCFL 23.
Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press
Rooth, M., 1995. Indefinites, adverbs of quantification, and focus semantics, In G. N.
Carlson /F.J. Pelletier (eds.) The Generic Book: 265-299. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rothstein, M., 1995. Adverbial quantification over events, Natural Language Semantics 3:1-31.
Rothstein, Susan, 2004. Structuring Events. Oxford: Blackwell
Shen, Li, 2004. Aspect agreement and light verb in Chinese: a comparison with Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 13: 309-336.
De Swart, Henri□tte, 1993. Adverbs of Quantification: A Generalized quantifiers Approach. PhD. Dissertations, Rijksuniversiteit Gr□ningen.
Tang, Ting-Chi, 1988. Hanyu Cifa Jufa Lunji (Essays on word formation and syntax of Mandarin Chinese). Taipei: Student Books.
Vendler, Z., 1957. Verbs and times. Philosophical Review, 66, 143-160.
Xrakovskij ,Viktor S., 1997. Semantic types of the plurality of situations. In Viktor S. Xrahoviskij. (ed.) Typology of Iterative Constructions. 1-64. Munchen : Lincom Europa.