科技產業的演進，有關於技術策略及技術系統的相關議題，對企業來說愈益重要；技術之創造應用與掌握，關係著以技術為主的企業之生存。配合技術系統所衍生之競爭力將是科技企業發展的主要動力。技術策略在企業中佔有很重要的關鍵因素，包括一開始技術的選擇、核心技術的發展方向、經驗的回饋與修正、以及未來技術的走向。並配合著技術在市場面經歷不同的時點時，發展出適合當時環境的競爭策略。
多功能事務機產業從 hp 於1996年時推出第一台集合列印、掃瞄、傳真、與複印之彩色噴墨多功能機開始，無論國際間或是台灣的影像事業群廠商皆想投入此一市場。台灣在此領域相關的廠商在當時皆以掃瞄器技術為主，列印技術為最缺乏的部份；本研究以個案分析比較的方式，深入探討台灣廠商在面對此一問題時，企業能對技術系統之知識本質與外溢機制有明確之認識，具體運用多樣性創造機制，建立創新組合，以達成產品與市場之預期目標。

With the speedy evolution of technological industry, how to co-evolve and benefit from the industry technological systems are becoming important to technology-based firms. The technical competence derived from the knowledge diffusion and variety creation mechanisms appear to be a major force to drive the competitive advantage of the firms. Technology strategic initiatives play a key factor in the co-evolution process, including the selection of technology, the development orientation of core technology, feedback and correction based on the development experiences, coordinate and align technology and market strategies appropriate for the environment at that time.
The development of the multi-function printer technological system began from the color multi-function inkjet printer that combined printing, scanning, fax and copy introduced by hp in 1996. Many of the imaging system suppliers, international or in Taiwan, try to make an entry in this market. Most of the Taiwanese firms are specialized in scanning technology with the lack of the printing technology. Knowledge diffusion thus plays an important role for those make a successful entry, while the variety creation mechanisms determine the value creation after the entry. This research conducted in-depth interviews and comparative analysis of the case firms to establish a process model for knowledge diffusion and variety creation mechanisms. Technology-based firms could gain insightful understanding on the nature of knowledge spillover and practice variety creation to establish well-aligned combinations of technical innovation to achieve successful product and market entry.

英文部份

Afuah, A., “Innovation Management-Strategies, Implementation, and Profits,” Oxford University Press, 1998
Betz, F., “Managing Technological Innovation: Competitive Advantage from Change,” John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, 1998
Brockhoff, K., “R&D Marketing Linkage and Innovation Strategy-Some West German Experience,” IEEE, vol. 35, pp. 167-174, No. 3, 1988
Brown, L., “Innovation Diffusion,” Methuen, 1981
Burgelman, R. A. and R. S. Rosenbloom, “Technology Strategy: An Evolutionary Process Perspective,” Research on Technological Innovation, Management, and Policy, vol. 4, pp. 1-23, 1989
Burgelman, R. A., “Fading Memories: A Process Theory of Strategy Business Exit in Dynamic Environments,” Administrative Science Quarterly 39, 1994
Burgelman, R. A., C. Christensen, and S. Wheelwright, “Strategic Management of Technology and Innovation,” McGraw Hill, 2004
Carlsson, B., “Technological Systems and Industrial Dynamics,” Kluwer Acadmic Publishers, Boston, 1997
Carlsson, B. and R. Stankiewiez, “On the Nature, Function and Composition of Technological Systems,” Evolutionary Economics, vol. 1, pp. 93-118, 1991
Chiesa, V. and R. Manzini, “Competence-based Diversification,” Long Range Planning, vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 209-217, 1997.
Christensen, C. M., “The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail,” Harvard Business School Press, 1997
Cohen, W. M., and D. A. Levinthal, “Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation,” Administrative Science Quarterly 35, pp. 128-152, 1990
Dietzenbacher, E., “Spillovers of Innovation Effects,” Journal of Policy Modeling, vol. 22, pp. 27-42, 2000
Dosi, G., and B. Kogut, “National Specificities and the Context of Change: The Coevolution of Organization and Technology,” Country Competitiveness, pp. 249-262, 1993
Freeman, C., “Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan,” London and New York, Pinter, 1987.
Hahn, Y. H., P. Yu. , “Towards a New Technology Policy: The Integration of Generation and Diffusion,” Technovation, vol. 19, pp. 177-186, 1999
Hamel, G. and C. K. Prahalad, “Competing for the Future,” Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA, 1994.
Hampson, K. D., “Technology Strategy and Competitive Performance: A Study of Bridge Construction,” Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University, 1993
Industry Analysts, Inc., “OPA Multifunctional Product Reliability Study,” Industry Analysts, Inc., 1999
Leoncini, R., “The Nature of Long-run Technological Change: Innovation, Evolution, and Technological Systems,” Research Policy, vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 75-93, 1998
Lundvall B. Å., B. Johnson, E. S. Andersen, and B. Dalum, “National Systems of Production, Innovation and Competence Building,” Resource Policy, vol. 31, pp. 213-231, 2002.
Lundvall, B. Å., “National System of Innovation-Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning,” London and New York, Pinter, 1988
Mahoney, J.T. and J. R. Pandian, “The Resource-based View within the Conversation of Strategy Management,” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 13, pp. 363-380, 1992
Mansfield E., “International Technology Transfer: Forms, Resource Requirement and Policy,” American Economic Association, vol. 68, No. 2, pp. 372 – 376, 1975
Maxwell, J. A., “Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach,” Saga Publications, 1996
McKelvey, B. and H. E. Aldrich, “Populations, Organizations, and Applied Organizational Science,” Administrative Science Quarterly 28, pp. 101-128
Moore G., “Living on the Fault Line,” McGraw Hill, 2004
Nelson, R. R., “National Innovation System—A Comparative Analysis,” Oxford University Press, Oxford, N.Y., 1993
Nelson, R., K. Nelson, “Technology, Institutions, and Innovation systems,” Resource Policy, vol. 31, pp. 265-272, 2002.
Nelson, R. R. and S. G. Winter, “An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change,” Belknup Press of Harvard University Press, 1982.
OECD, “Osol Manual: The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activity”, OECD, 1997
Park, Y.-T., “Technology Diffusion Policy: A Review and Classification of Policy Practices,” Technology in Society, vol. 21, pp. 275-586, 1999.
Penrose, E.T., “The Theory of the Growth of the Firm,” Wiley, New York, 1959
Porter, M. E., “Competitive Advantage,” New York: Free Press, 1985
Porter, M. E., “The Technological Dimension of Competitive Strategy,” Research on Technological Innovation, Management, and Policy, vol. 1, pp. 1-33, 1983
Prahalad, C. K. and G. Hamel, “The Core Competence of the Corporation,” Harvard Business Review, May-June, pp. 79-91, 1990
Radosevic, S., “Defining Systems of Innovation: a Methodological Discussion,” Technology in Society, vol. 20, pp. 75-86, 1998
Ramdas, K., “Production and Operations Management,” vol. 12, pp. 79-101, 2003
Rogers, E. M., “Diffusion of Preventive Innovations,” Addictive Behaviors, vol. 27, pp. 989-993, 2002.
Selznick, P., “Leadership in Administration,” New York: Harper and Row, 1957
Stalk, G.., P. Evans, and L.E. Shulman, “Competing on Capabilities: The New Rules of Corporate Strategy,” Harvard Business Review, March-April, pp. 57-69, 1992
Ulrich, K. T., “The Role of Product Architecture in the Manufacturing Firm,” Research Policy, vol. 24, pp. 419-440, 1995
Wang, K., Wu, F.-S., Wen, C.-T., Hsu, M.-Y., Hung, S.-C., Chu, Y.-Y., and Luo, Y.-L., “Taiwan’s National Innovation System”, Country Report on Taiwan for the ESF, 2003.
Wheelwright, S. C., and K. B. Clark., “Revolutionizing Product Development,” New York: Free Press, 1992
Yin, R. K., “Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 2nd ed.,” Sage Publications, 1994
Zhao, L. and A. Reisman, “Toward Meta Research on Technology Transfer,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, vol. 39(1), pp. 13-21, 1992

中文部份

元大京華證券研究部，多功能事務機─產業的明日之星，元大京華，2005
左克傑，多功能事務機大廠產品策略分析，資策會(MIC)，2004
左克傑，多功能事務機產品發展現況分析─大廠產品策略觀點，資策會(MIC)，2003
李洋寧，知識可及性對創新的影響─以台灣北部區域電子產業為例，國立交通大學交通運輸研究所碩士論文，2003
邱銘傳，以創新系統之觀點探討台灣硬碟機產業之產品與製程創新，國立清華大學工業工程與工程管理研究所碩士論文，1999
林道燊，多功能事務機發展概況，台灣工業銀行(IBT)-綜研所，2003
拓墣產業研究所 資訊通訊產業研究中心，熱門資通訊產品之發展與關鍵零組件徹底攻略，拓墣產業研究所，2003
林博文，「技術移轉與鑑價」課程教材，清華大學科管所，2002
洪世章，PC Technology System，科技管理學刊，2卷1期：159-178，1997
洪世章，國家系統、技術系統與產業創新，科技管理學刊，4卷2期：125-136，1999
姜水傳，台灣多功能事務機廠商的競爭策略分析，國立交通大學科技管理研究所，2002
建華證券，建華投顧多功能事務機研究報告，建華證券，2004
財團法人工業技術研究院產業經濟與資源服務中心，2004光電工業年鑑，財團法人工業技術研究院，2004
徐作聖，科技政策與企業策略-台灣十大產業發展策略，全華科技圖書，2003
徐作聖、邱奕嘉、許友耕，高科技產業策略與競爭，全華科技圖書，2003
徐作聖、邱奕嘉、鄭志強，產業經營與創新政策，全華科技圖書，2003
殷孟雲，噴墨印表機設計原理，全華科技圖書，2001
徐凰原，以技術系統的觀點來探索平面顯示器產業，國立清華大學科技管理研究所，2003
張宏哲，虹光的策略研究，國立清華大學工業工程與工程管理研究所碩士論文，2001
陳有斌、李和澤，傳真機專題研究報告，工研院光電所，1995
陳朝煌，影像掃瞄器產業因應快速全球化之運籌策略研究：以虹光公司為例，國立交通大學高階主管管理學程碩士班，2003
國際聯合，多功能事務機研究報告，國際聯合，2004
葉世文，技術創新體系之演進-我國影像擷取產業之案例與流程模擬，國立清華大學工業工程與工程管理研究所碩士論文，2001
曾昆銘，台灣影像掃描器產業的技術創新系統發展之研究，國立清華大學工業工程與工程管理研究所碩士論文，2000
游景森，談多功能事務機發展分析，財團法人資訊工業策進會，1999
傑佛瑞莫爾、陳正平譯，斷層線上，臉譜出版，2002
黃瑞龍，印表機產業技術創新之探討：以台灣多功能事務機個案為例，國立清華大學工業工程與工程管理研究所碩士論文，2005
資策會(MIC)，多功能事務機產業發展研究，財團法人資訊工業策進會，2002~2004
廖仁豪，多功能事務機（MFP）綜觀，台灣工業銀行，2002
謝樹崢、黃金龍，雷射印表機(二)，國科會光電小組，1993
謝佩芬、陳文棠，2004年我國多功能事務機產業發展現況分析，資策會(MIC)，2004
鐘俊元、李和澤，印表機專題報告，工研院光電所，1996

網頁資料

Canon公司網站 http://www.canon.com/
EPSON公司網站 http://www.epson.com/
Gartner調查中心 http://www.gartner.com/
hp公司網站 http://welcome.hp.com/country/us/en/welcome.html
ITIS產業資訊服務網 http://www.itis.org.tw/
Lexmark公司網站 http://www.lexmark.com
公開資訊觀測站 http://newmops.tse.com.tw/
光寶科技網站 http://www.liteon.com/liteon/index.jsp
拓璞產業研究所 http://www.topology.com.tw/TRI/default.asp
虹光精密網站 http://www.avision.com.tw/
科技資訊網 http://taiwan.cnet.com/
資策會(MIC) http://mic.iii.org.tw/
電子時報 http://www.digitimes.com.tw/