簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 李子綺
LEE TZU CHI
論文名稱: 學習鷹架運用在GS平台上進行合作知識建構之研究
A study of group scribbles to support collaborative knowledge building by scaffolding
指導教授: 林秋斌
Robin Lin
口試委員:
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱:
論文出版年: 2014
畢業學年度: 102
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 92
中文關鍵詞: 快速合作知識建構鷹架電腦輔助合作學習Group Scribbles
外文關鍵詞: rapid collaborative knowledge building, scaffolding, computer supported collaborative learning, Group Scribbles
相關次數: 點閱:1下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究目的在探討學習鷹架運用在合作知識建構(knowledge building)中,對知識建構內涵的影響,以及電腦輔助合作知識建構活動對學習成效和學習態度的影響。運用Group Scribbles電腦輔助合作學習平台來進行快速合作知識建構學習活動。研究方法採準實驗設計法,研究對象為新竹市某大學二年級學生,分為實驗組24人與對照組25人,共49位學生,實驗組給予學習鷹架協助快速知識建構;對照組則無使用鷹架。討論主題為網路概論課程中資訊安全單元。學習活動以小組進行,分為發問、回答、建議與補充三階段。發問階段運用概念鷹架,回答、建議與補充運用後設認知鷹架。學習活動進行實行前、後測,活動後填寫「學習回饋問卷」作為資料的收集。研究結果發現:(1)此電腦輔助快速合作知識建構的活動有助於學習成效的提升,但鷹架的採用與否在本研究中對於學習成效並無明顯的差異;(2)此電腦輔助快速合作知識建構的活動學習者覺得討論方式很有趣,當面對困難的問題時同學亦會互相幫助;(3)實驗組所提的問題較有架構、分散至主題的細部,蒐集資料較為豐富,並會進一步搜尋資料。對照組所提的問題則會繞著主題、較無結構性,回答較直覺、隨興,易將建議作成評論而無進一步思考或進行資料的補充。


    The purpose of this research was to investigate the effects of contents on collaborative knowledge building activities by scaffording. And computer suppoorted collaborative knowledge building activity effected to learning performance and attitude.We held rapid knowledge building activities for studying information security on Group Scribbles.We adopted the standard method by chosing 49 students on second grade in the university in Hsinchu city.Seperated them into two groups.Experimental group was 24 persons and control group was 25 persons.The experiment group studied by scaffolding but the other did not.The topic was the information security chapter of internet concept course.Studying activities went through by 3 steps: team brainstorming questions, answering questions and suggestion.Rapid knowledge building in braindstorming questions step used conceptual scaffolding. Answering questions and suggestion steps used metacognitive scaffolding.Pretest and posttest were taken,data collection was by filling learning feedback questionnaire after the activities.The findings were as follows:(1)This activity helped to enhance the effectiveness of learning,but the use of scaffolding or not in this study for no apparent differences (2)This activity made students feel more interesting by discussion,and classmates’ help was more important when faced with difficult problems. (3) Experimental group’s questions were structural,data collection was richer,and further information was collected. Issues raised in the control group were around the theme ,less structural answers,instinct and casual.Suggestions they made became to comment without futher consideration or additional complement.

    表目錄 4 圖目錄 5 摘要 6 Abstract 7 第一章 緒論 8 第一節 研究動機 8 第二節 研究目的與待答問題 10 一、研究目的 10 二、待答問題 10 第三節 名詞解釋 11 一、知識建構(knowledge building) 11 二、Group Scribbles 11 三、學習鷹架 11 四、CSCL 11 第四節 研究範圍與限制 13 一、研究範圍 13 二、研究限制 13 第二章 文獻探討 14 第一節 知識建構(knowledge building) 14 第二節 合作學習(Collaborate Learning) 25 第三節 鷹架理論(Scaffolding) 32 第三章 研究方法 35 第一節 研究對象 35 第二節 研究流程 37 第三節 實驗設計 39 第四節 研究工具 41 第五節 活動設計與實驗流程 50 第六節 資料處理 54 第四章 研究結果與發現 56 第一節 研究對象分析 56 第二節 學習成就分析 59 第三節 學習回饋問卷分析 62 第四節 知識建構貼文分析 71 第五章 結論與建議 80 第一節 結論 80 第二節 建議 82 表目錄 4 圖目錄 5 摘要 6 Abstract 7 第一章 緒論 8 第一節 研究動機 8 第二節 研究目的與待答問題 10 一、研究目的 10 二、待答問題 10 第三節 名詞解釋 11 一、知識建構(knowledge building) 11 二、Group Scribbles 11 三、學習鷹架 11 四、CSCL 11 第四節 研究範圍與限制 13 一、研究範圍 13 二、研究限制 13 第二章 文獻探討 14 第一節 知識建構(knowledge building) 14 第二節 合作學習(Collaborate Learning) 25 第三節 鷹架理論(Scaffolding) 32 第三章 研究方法 35 第一節 研究對象 35 第二節 研究流程 37 第三節 實驗設計 39 第四節 研究工具 41 第五節 活動設計與實驗流程 50 第六節 資料處理 54 第四章 研究結果與發現 56 第一節 研究對象分析 56 第二節 學習成就分析 59 第三節 學習回饋問卷分析 62 第四節 知識建構貼文分析 71 第五章 結論與建議 80 第一節 結論 80 第二節 建議 82 參考文獻 84 一、 中文部分 84 二、 英文部分 84 附錄一:資訊安全前後測測驗試題 87 附錄二:學習回饋問卷(實驗組) 89 附錄三:學習回饋問卷(對照組) 91

    一、 中文部分
    李美雯 (2008). "用戶端資訊安全2--個人資訊安全守則." Retrieved 2011/5/20,2011,from http://www.cc.ntu.edu.tw/chinese/epaper/0004/20080320_4010.htm
    李啟龍 (2000). 網路上的合作探究學習, 國立臺灣師範大學. 碩士論文: 89. (未出版)
    林建名 (2002). 網路合作學習成效之探索性研究. 資訊管理, 南華大學. 碩士.林睿康 (2008). "病毒、垃圾郵件猖獗 資策會:資安產品漸受重視
    ". Retrieved 2011/5/20, 2011, from http://www.nownews.com/2008/12/01/11490-2373614.htm.
    柯志昇 (2008).” 資安週開幕儀式暨國際論壇.” Retrieved 2014/6/5,2014,from
    http://www.iii.org.tw/m/News-more.aspx?id=538&AspxAutoDetectCookieSupport=1
    洪蓉宜 (2002). 合作學習策略在國中生物實驗教學之效益研究. 生物學系, 彰化師範大學. 碩士論文: 149. (未出版)
    洪瑋懋 (2008). 同步式電腦輔助合作學習對中文多義字學習成效與學後保留之探究, 國立新竹教育大學. 碩士論文: 86. (未出版)
    通識教育計畫辦公室. "通識教育中綱計畫." Retrieved 2011/5/20, 2011, from http://hss.edu.tw/plan_detail.php?class_plan=163
    黃政傑(民 85):創思與合作的教學法。台北:師大書苑
    劉芳妃(民87)。合作擬題活動融入國一數學科教學之個案研究。國立高雄師範大學數學系碩士班碩士論文(未出版)

    二、 英文部分
    Chen, W. (2006). Supporting teachers’ intervention in collaborative knowledge building. Network and Computer Applications, 29, 200-215.
    Chan, C. K. K. (2008). Pedagogical Transformation and Knowledge-Building for the Chinese Learner."Evaluation and Research in Education, 21, 235-251.
    Chen, W., Looi, C. K., & Ng, F. K. (2009). Students’ Active Learning Leveraged by Interactive Technologies: GroupScribbles (GS) in a Primary Science Classroom. AERA 2009.
    CHEN, F. H., C.-K. LOOI, et al. (2010). Integrating Technology in the Classroom: Favourable Conditions for Teachers' Upward Developmental Trajectories. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Computers in Education. Putrajaya, Malaysia, 583-590.
    DiGiano, C., Tatar, D., & Kireyev, K. (2006). Learning from the Post-It: Building collective intelligence through lightweight, flexible technology. Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work Companion, Banff. http://Group Scribbles. sri. com/publications/index. html.
    Guzdial, M., & Turns, J. (2000). Effective discussion through a computer-mediated anchored forum. The journal of the learning sciences , 9(4): 437-469.
    Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Barrows, H. S. (2008). "Facilitating collaborative knowledge building." Cognition and instruction, 26(1): 48-94.
    Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1990). Cooperative learning and achievement. In S. Sharan (ed.) Cooperative learning: Theory and research (pp.23-37). New York: Paeger.
    Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Holubec, E. J. (1993). Circles of learning:Cooperation in the classroom. Edina, MN:Interaction.
    Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1994). Learning Together and Alone:Cooperative,Competitive and Individualistic Learning.(4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
    Lee, N. Y., TAN, W. C., & Looi, C. K. (2009). GroupScribbles as a Rapid CSCL Tool: Learning Experiences of Pre-service Teachers. ICCE2009.
    Leng, J., M. Lai and N. Law (2008). Characterizing patterns of interaction in knowledge building discourse. ICCE2008: 351-355.
    Looi, C.-K., Chen, W. et al. (2008). Towards Analysis of Group Interaction Processes Mediated by a Rapid Collaborative Learning Environment, 213-220.
    Looi, C.-K., Chen, W., & Patton, C. M. (2010). "Principles and enactment of rapid collaborative knowledge building in classrooms." Educational Technology, 50(5): 26-32.
    O'Malley, C. (1995). Designing computer support for collaborative learning. In C. O'Malley (Ed.), Computer supported collaborative learning. Berlin: Springer.
    Roehler, L. R. and D. J. Cantlon (1997). "Scaffolding: A powerful tool in social constructivist classrooms." Scaffolding student learning: Instructional approaches and issues 1.
    Roschelle, J., Tatar, D., Chaudhury, S. R., Dimitriadis, Y., Patton C., & DiGiano, C. (2007). Ink, improvisation, and interactive engagement: Learning with tablets. IEEE Computer, 40(9): 42-48.
    Salvin, R. E. (1980). Effects of student teams and peer touring on academic achievement and time on-task. Journal of Experimental education, 48, 252-57.
    Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. The journal of the learning sciences, 3(3): 265-283.
    Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith (Eds.), Liberal education in a knowledge society (pp. 76-98). Chicago: Open Court.
    Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2003). Knowledge building. In Encyclopedia of education (pp. 1370-1373). New York: Macmillan Reference.
    Scardamalia, M. (2004). "CSILE/Knowledge forum®." Education and technology: An encyclopedia: 183-192.
    Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge Building: Theory, Pedagogy, and Technology. Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences: 97-118.
    Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2010). A Brief History of Knowledge Building.
    Singh, G., Hawkins, L., & Whymark, G. (2007). An Integrated Model of Collaborative Knowledge Building. Interdisciplinary Journal of Learning Objects, 3, 85-105.
    So, H.-J., L. H. Seah, et al. (2010). Designing collaborative knowledge building environments accessible to all learners: Impacts and design challenges. Computers & Education, 54, 479-490.
    Soller, A. L. (2001). Supporting social interaction in an intelligent collaborative learning system. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12(1), 40–62.
    Stahl, G. (2000). A Model of Collaborative Knowledge-Building. the Learning Sciences. In B. Fishman & S. O'Connor-Divelbiss, 70-77.
    Yellanda, N., B. Copeb, et al. (2008). Learning by Design: creating pedagogical frameworks for knowledge building in the twenty-first century. Teacher Education, 36(3), 197-213.
    Zhang, J., Scardamalia, M., et al. (2007). Socio-cognitive dynamics of knowledge building in the work of 9- and 10-year-olds. Education Tech Research Dev, 55, 117-145.
    Zhang, J., Scardamalia, M., Reeve, R., & Messina, R. (2009). Designs for Collective Cognitive Responsibility in Knowledge-Building Communities. THE LEARNING SCIENCES, 18, 7-44.
    Zurita, G., & M. Nussbaum (2004). A constructivist mobile learning environment supported by a wireless handheld network. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 20(4): 235-243.

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校內網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)

    QR CODE