研究生: |
裴國豪 Kora Alain Simplice Charlemagne BENON |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
Bridging Service Science and Systems Development Methodologies 橋接服務科學與系統開發之方法論 |
指導教授: |
雷松亞
Ray, Soumya |
口試委員: |
王俊程
Wang, Jyun-Cheng 林福仁 Lin, Fu-Ren |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
科技管理學院 - 國際專業管理碩士班 International Master of Business Administration(IMBA) |
論文出版年: | 2013 |
畢業學年度: | 101 |
語文別: | 英文 |
論文頁數: | 63 |
中文關鍵詞: | 系統開發方法 、服務科學方法 、庫存的工具和方法 、專業服務的方法 |
外文關鍵詞: | systems development methodologies, service science methodologies, inventory of tools and methodologies, service professionals’ methodologies |
相關次數: | 點閱:2 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
Just like systems development makes use of innumerable tools, techniques and methodologies, so does service science. The training of service professionals requires however a mastery of these tools methodologies and techniques in a relatively short period of time. The cumulative amount of the tools, methodologies and techniques of these two fields of study requires a focus on some more straightforward, difficult to bypass and practical methodologies for more effectiveness and efficiency of their training. This paper is a case study of SOA and ISS classes bridging the methodologies of service science and systems development by first, going through the tools, methodologies and techniques used in the classes of service oriented architecture and of introduction to service science, second makes a directory of the tools, methodologies and techniques students kept in mind after training, third, an inventory of those they actually used during the field projects and the order in which they used them and finally makes suggestions about how to train service professionals using a sorted list of the tools, methodologies and techniques with a sequence of usage.
1. Avison, D.E. and Fitzgerald, G. (2003) Where Now for Development Methodologies? Communications of the ACM, January 2003, Vol. 46, No. 1, 79-82.
2. Bellizzi, D., Byers, J. et al. 2013. Foundations of System Development, Available at: http://comp325wikibook.wikispaces.com/Chapter+6+-+Foundations+of+System+Development.
3. Dorst, K. 2003a. The Problem of Design Problems. Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/versions?doi=10.1.1.105.6547.
4. Fitzgerald, B. (1997) The Use of Systems Development Methodologies in Practice: A Field Study, The Information Systems Journal, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 201-212.
5. Fitzgerald, B. (1998) An Empirical Investigation into the Adoption of Systems Development Methodologies, Information & Management, Vol. 34, pp. 317-328.
6. Goldstein S. M., Johnston R., Duffy J. A., Rao J., 2002. The service concept: the missing link in service design research?, Journal of Operations Management 20 (2) 121–134.
7. Iivari, J.; Hirschheim, R.; and Klein, H.K. A dynamic framework for classifying information systems development methodologies and approaches. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17, 3 (Winter 2000-2001), 179-218.
8. James C. Spohrer and Paul P. Maglio, 2010. Toward a Science of Service Systems: Value and Symbols, Handbook of Service Science, pp. 157–196.
9. Lin, F.R. and Hsieh, P.S. 2011. A SAT View on New Service Development. Service Science 3(2), pp. 141-157.
10. Ordanini, A. and Pasini, P. 2008. Service co-production and value co-creation: The case for a service-oriented architecture (SOA). European Management Journal Vol. 26 (5) pp. 289–297.
11. Papazoglou M. P. and Yang J. 2002. Design Methodology for Web Services and Business Processes, Procs. of the 3rd VLDB-TES Workshop, August, Hong Kong, Lecture Notes in Computer Science Vol. 2444, 54-64, Springer, 2002.
12. Rabiee F., 2004. Focus-group interview and data analysis, Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 63 (4), 655–660.
13. Ronsairo, M.S. and Lunar, B.C. March 2012. Assessment of Service Learning in Ecology Class Using the Orid Model, IAMURE, Vol.2 (1). Pp. 107-122.
14. Stanfield, B. 2012. The Art of Focused Conversation: 100 Ways to Access Group Wisdom in the Workplace. ICA Series. New Society Publishers.
15. The Office of Quality Improvement, University of Wisconsin-Madison. 2007. Facilitator Tool Kit: A guide For Helping Groups Get Results, pp 36-41. Available at http://oqi.wisc.edu/resourcelibrary/uploads/resources/Facilitator%20Tool%20Kit.pdf.
16. Vargo S.L., Maglio P.P., Akaka M.A. 2008. On value and value co-creation: A service systems and service logic perspective, European Management Journal. 26 (3), 145-152
17. Vargo, S. L. and Lusch, R. F., 2008. “Service-Dominant Logic: Continuing the Evolution,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 36, 1-10.
18. Wee L.C., 2008. The ORID in IS Classes. Information Systems Education Journal, 6 (34). Available at http://isedj.org/6/34/.