本篇論文討論了使用交友軟體尋找約會對象可能帶來的潛在危險。其中一個特別關注的問題是在這些交友軟體上分享個人照片時所可能涉及的個人資訊洩露。為了解決這個問題，本研究採用了展望理論和社會從眾理論的概念，嘗試使用訊息「輕推」設計來鼓勵使用者暫緩在交友軟體上分享個人照片的行為。

研究採用了2x2的設計架構，考慮了展望理論中的情感價值和不確定性類型，以及社會從眾理論中的情感價值和社會規劃類型等因素，進行輕推訊息的設計。為了驗證所提出的假設，我們分析了來自400名問卷填答的資料。研究結果指出，訊息組合為負向不確定性以及正向敘述性的訊息設計，能有效地促使使用者暫緩分享個人照片的意願。此外，研究還強調了性別、先前使用交友軟體的經驗，以及感情關係狀態在決策過程中的重要性。總體而言，本研究為在交友軟體情境之下使用訊息輕推設計之領域做出貢獻。

This paper addresses potential dangers associated with the increased usage of dating apps for meeting romantic partners. One particular concern is the disclosure of personal information when sharing personal photos on these apps. To address this concern, the paper examines the impact of using nudges based on prospect theory and social conformity theory to encourage individuals to postpone sharing personal photos on dating apps.
The survey follows a 2x2 design, considering the factors of valence and types of uncertainty for prospect theory nudges and valence and types of norms for social conformity theory nudges. To evaluate the proposed hypotheses, data from 400 respondents was analyzed. The findings show that the combination of negative uncertainty and positive descriptive nudges is effective in prompting individuals to postpone their intentions of sharing personal photos. Furthermore, the findings emphasize the importance of gender, prior dating app experience, and relationship status in the decision-making process. Overall, this study contributes by implementing nudges in the setting of dating applications.
 

Adrianson, L. (2001). Gender and computer-mediated communication: Group processes in
problem solving. Computers in Human Behavior, 17(1), 71-94.
Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a
unanimous majority. Psychological monographs: General and applied, 70(9), 1.
Bauer, R. A. (1967). Consumer behavior as risk taking. Marketing: Critical perspectives on
business and management, 13-21.
Beck, U. (2009). World at risk. Polity.
Blackhart, G. C., Fitzpatrick, J., & Williamson, J. (2014). Dispositional factors predicting use
of online dating sites and behaviors related to online dating. Computers in human behavior, 33, 113-118.
Blackwell, C., Birnholtz, J., & Abbott, C. (2015). Seeing and being seen: Co-situation and
impression formation using Grindr, a location-aware gay dating app. New media & society, 17(7), 1117-1136.
Bonan, J., Cattaneo, C., d’Adda, G., & Tavoni, M. (2020). The interaction of descriptive and
injunctive social norms in promoting energy conservation. Nature Energy, 5(11), 900-909.
Borsari, B., & Carey, K. B. (2003). Descriptive and injunctive norms in college drinking: a
meta-analytic integration. Journal of studies on alcohol, 64(3), 331-341.
Bosone, L., & Martinez, F. (2017). When, how and why is loss-framing more effective than
gain-and non-gain-framing in the promotion of detection behaviors?. International Review of Social Psychology, 1(30), 184-192.
Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods. Oxford university press.
Brown, J. D. (2002). The Cronbach alpha reliability estimate. JALT Testing & Evaluation
SIG Newsletter, 6(1).
Burga, S. (2023, February 17). If You're Looking for Love Online, Here's What to Know
About Dating App Safety. Time. Retrieved July 2023 from https://time.com/6256395/dating-app-safety-tips/
Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity.
Annu. Rev. Psychol., 55, 591-621.
Couch, D., Liamputtong, P., & Pitts, M. (2012). What are the real and perceived risks and
dangers of online dating? Perspectives from online daters: Health risks in the media. Health, Risk & Society, 14(7-8), 697-714.
Cunningham, S. (1967). The major dimensions of perceived risk. In: D. Cox (Ed.), Risk
Taking and Information Handling in Consumer Behavior. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Detweiler, J. B., Bedell, B. T., Salovey, P., Pronin, E., & Rothman, A. J. (1999). Message
framing and sunscreen use: gain-framed messages motivate beach-goers. Health psychology, 18(2), 189.
Duguay, S., Dietzel, C., & Myles, D. (2022). The year of the “virtual date”: Reimagining
dating app affordances during the COVID-19 pandemic. new media & society, 14614448211072257.
Ellison, N., Heino, R., & Gibbs, J. (2006). Managing impressions online: Self-presentation
processes in the online dating environment. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 11(2), 415-441.
Featherman, M. S., & Pavlou, P. A. (2003). Predicting e-services adoption: a perceived risk
facets perspective. International journal of human-computer studies, 59(4), 451-474.
Flores, A. R., Herman, J., Gates, G. J., & Brown, T. N. (2016). How many adults identify as
transgender in the United States? (Vol. 13). Los Angeles, CA: Williams Institute.
Gatter, K., & Hodkinson, K. (2016). On the differences between Tinder™ versus online
dating agencies: Questioning a myth. An exploratory study. Cogent psychology, 3(1), 1162414.
Gibbs, J. L., Ellison, N. B., & Heino, R. D. (2006). Self-presentation in online personals: The
role of anticipated future interaction, self-disclosure, and perceived success in Internet dating. Communication research, 33(2), 152-177.
Giddens, A. (1999). Risk and responsibility. Mod. L. Rev., 62, 1.
Gong, J., Zhang, Y., Yang, Z., Huang, Y., Feng, J., & Zhang, W. (2013). The framing effect
in medical decision-making: a review of the literature. Psychology, health & medicine, 18(6), 645-653.
Hadji-Vasilev, A. (2023, March 16). 25 Online Dating Statistics & Trends in 2023.
Cloudwards. Retrieved July 2023 from https://www.cloudwards.net/online-dating-statistics/
Hansen, P. G., & Jespersen, A. M. (2013). Nudge and the manipulation of choice: A
framework for the responsible use of the nudge approach to behavior change in public policy. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 4(1), 3-28.
Hayes, A. F., & Preacher, K. J. (2014). Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical
independent variable. British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology, 67(3), 451-470.
Higgs, S. (2015). Social norms and their influence on eating behaviors. Appetite, 86, 38-44.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture and organizations. International studies of management & organization, 10(4), 15-41.
Horton, R. L. (1976). The structure of perceived risk: Some further progress. Journal of the
Academy of Marketing Science, 4, 694-706.
Johnson, E. J., Shu, S. B., Dellaert, B. G., Fox, C., Goldstein, D. G., Häubl, G., ... & Weber,
E. U. (2012). Beyond nudges: Tools of a choice architecture. Marketing letters, 23, 487-504.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (2013). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. In
Handbook of the fundamentals of financial decision making: Part I (pp. 99-127).
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1991). Anomalies: The endowment effect,
loss aversion, and status quo bias. Journal of Economic perspectives, 5(1), 193-206.
Kaakinen, M., Koivula, A., Savolainen, I., Sirola, A., Mikkola, M., Zych, I., ... & Oksanen,
A. (2021). Online dating applications and risk of youth victimization: A lifestyle exposure perspective. Aggressive behavior, 47(5), 530-543.
Kane, M. J., Hambrick, D. Z., Tuholski, S. W., Wilhelm, O., Payne, T. W., & Engle, R. W.
(2004). The generality of working memory capacity: a latent-variable approach to verbal and visuospatial memory span and reasoning. Journal of experimental psychology: General, 133(2), 189.
Lopes, M., & Vogel, C. (2019). Gender differences in online dating experiences. Em: A.
Hetsroni e M. Tuncez (eds.), It happened on tinder. Reflections and studies on internet-infused dating, 31-47.
Leonard, T. C. (2008). Richard H. Thaler, Cass R. Sunstein, Nudge: Improving decisions
about health, wealth, and happiness: Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, 2008, 293 pp, $26.00.
Levy, J. S. (1992). An introduction to prospect theory. Political psychology, 171-186.
Loewenstein, G., & Elster, J. (Eds.). (1992). Choice over time. Russell Sage Foundation.
Malkin, N., Mathur, A., Harbach, M., & Egelman, S. (2017, April). Personalized security
messaging: Nudges for compliance with browser warnings. In 2nd european workshop on usable security. internet society.
Moscovici, S., & Zavalloni, M. (1969). The group as a polarizer of attitudes. Journal of
personality and social psychology, 12(2), 125.
Moscovici, S., & Zavalloni, M. (1969). The group as a polarizer of attitudes. Journal of
personality and social psychology, 12(2), 125.
Phan, A., Seigfried-Spellar, K., & Choo, K. K. R. (2021). Threaten me softly: A review of
potential dating app risks. Computers in human behavior reports, 3, 100055.
Quinn, A., & Schlenker, B. R. (2002). Can accountability produce independence? Goals as
determinants of the impact of accountability on conformity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(4), 472-483.
Rosa, E. A. (2003). The logical structure of the social amplification of risk framework
(SARF): Metatheoretical foundations and policy implications. The social amplification of risk, 47, 47-49.
Schneider, T. R., Salovey, P., Pallonen, U., Mundorf, N., Smith, N. F., & Steward, W. T.
(2001). Visual and auditory message framing effects on tobacco smoking 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31(4), 667-682.
Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science, 236(4799), 280-285.
Sunstein CR, Thaler RH. Libertarian paternalism is not an oxymoron. The University of
Chicago Law Review 2003;70(4): 1159–202.
Sugden, R. (2009). On nudging: A review of nudge: Improving decisions about health,
wealth and happiness by Richard H. Thaler and Cass R. Sunstein.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of
choice. science, 211(4481), 453-458.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative
representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and uncertainty, 5, 297-323.
Villacis, A. H., Alwang, J. R., & Barrera, V. (2021). Linking risk preferences and risk
perceptions of climate change: A prospect theory approach. Agricultural Economics, 52(5), 863-877.
Voorhees, C. M., Brady, M. K., Calantone, R., & Ramirez, E. (2016). Discriminant validity
testing in marketing: an analysis, causes for concern, and proposed remedies. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 44, 119-134.
Wakker, P. P. (2010). Prospect theory: For risk and ambiguity. Cambridge university press.
Wijenayake, S., van Berkel, N., Kostakos, V., & Goncalves, J. (2020). Impact of contextual
and personal determinants on online social conformity. Computers in Human Behavior, 108, 106302.