簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 范鎮富
論文名稱: 噪音特性對生理與心理影響之探討以半導體廠無塵室作業區環境為例
指導教授: 王茂駿
口試委員:
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 工學院 - 工業工程與工程管理學系碩士在職專班
Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management
論文出版年: 2007
畢業學年度: 95
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 66
中文關鍵詞: 噪音暴露噪音特性血壓煩擾半導體廠
外文關鍵詞: noise exposure, noise characteristic, blood pressure, annoyance, semiconductor factory
相關次數: 點閱:3下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究主要目的是在探討低於法定規定85 dB(A)之半導體廠無塵室作業區噪音對於作業員生理及心理之影響。在研究方法上將噪音依聲壓位準分成80 dB(A)與65 dB(A),頻率分為相對的高、低頻率等四種噪音特性組合,以實驗室模擬噪音方式,對10位男性與10位女性受試者進行噪音暴露1小時,瞭解不同噪音特性對於人們生理上血壓、脈搏的反應及主觀心理上煩擾、疲勞的感受,並評估個人噪音敏感度與心理感受的相關性。其結果顯示血壓反應在暴露於80 dB(A)噪音之收縮壓大於65 dB(A)之收縮壓 (p<0.001)。在主觀煩擾度上暴露於80 dB(A)大於65 dB(A) (p<0.001)。在主觀疲勞度上暴露於80 dB(A)大於65 dB(A) (p<0.001),且噪音對疲勞度影響以集中精神困難為主。主觀心理感受與客觀收縮壓反應,都隨著聲壓位準愈大其平均變化量也相對愈大。噪音頻率對於生理反應與主觀感受均無顯著關係。因此推論半導體廠無塵室作業區內噪音由於聲壓位準之差異會對作業人員造成不同生理反應與主觀心理感受影響。個人噪音敏感度與心理感受的相關性上呈現顯著的正相關,顯示個人自覺噪音敏度愈高對於噪音暴露下所產生之主觀煩擾度及自覺疲勞感受均會增加。由研究結果建議改善半導體廠無塵室噪音以降低噪音對作業人員生理與心理的影響, 進而提升半導體廠無塵室作業環境品質。


    This main purpose of this research is to study the physiological and psychological responses of noise exposure which are lower than the permitted range of regulation, 85 dB(A) in the working area of clean room in a semiconductor factory. Noises are simulated in laboratory and are divided into 4 groups, i.e. 80 dB(A) and 65 dB(A) with high and low frequency. Twenty subjects (10 males and 10 females) were exposed to the noise conditions for one hour to evaluate the physiological responses including blood pressure and pulse. These subjects’ psychological responses in annoyance and physiological fatigue were investigated by questionnaires, then to evaluate the relevance of individual noise sensitivity and subjective feeling. The results indicate that the systolic pressure under exposing 80 dB(A) noise is higher than under exposing 65 dB(A) noise (P<0.001), psychological annoyance under exposing 80 dB(A) noise is greater than under exposing 65 dB(A) noise (P <0.001) and subjective fatigue under exposing 80 dB(A) noise is greater than under exposing 65 dB(A) noise (P <0.001). Also, the effect of noise to human’s fatigue is primarily on difficulty of concentration. The subjective feeling and the systolic pressure is greater with the increase of noise intensity. There is no obvious relationship between the noise frequency and physiological responses and subjective feeling. Thus, in the clean room of a semiconductor factory, only the difference of noise intensity will cause different physiological responses and subjective feeling. The significant correlation between individual noise sensitivity and psychological feeling, indicates that person with higher individual noise sensitivity tend to have greater response in physiological fatigue and psychological annoyance. To improve the quality of working, this research suggests to level down the noise in the clean room of a semiconductor factory to reduce the physiological and psychological noise effect on operators.

    摘 要 I ABSTRACT II 誌 謝 III 目 錄 IV 圖目錄 VI 表目錄 VIII 第一章 緒論 1 1-1 研究動機 1 1-2 研究目的 2 1-3 研究流程 3 1-4 研究限制 4 第二章 文獻探討 5 2-1 噪音 5 2-1-1 聲音 5 2-1-2 噪音量測 6 2-1-3 噪音定義 8 2-2 噪音的危害 9 2-3 噪音對非聽覺系統的影響 12 2-3-1 職業噪音對心臟血管功能的影響 12 2-3-2 主觀噪音感受 13 2-4 主觀噪音感受評估工具文獻探討 15 2-4-1 噪音對煩擾評估方式 15 2-4-2 噪音對疲勞評估方式 16 2-4-3 個人噪音敏感度評估方式 16 2-5 半導體廠噪音特性 17 第三章 研究方法 19 3-1 研究對象 19 3-2 實驗設計 19 3-3 研究步驟 20 3-4 資料建檔與統計分析 23 3-5 實驗材料與設備 24 第四章 研究結果與討論 27 4-1 噪音量測 27 4-1-1 半導體無塵室噪音量測結果分析 27 4-1-2 噪音特性樣本選取 28 4-1-3 噪音特性採樣與錄音 29 4-1-4 噪音特性樣本實驗室模擬 30 4-2 受試者資料 32 4-3 受試者血壓與聽力常模 32 4-4 客觀生理評量分析 34 4-4-1 性別差異對生理評量分析 35 4-4-2 聲壓位準對生理評量分析 36 4-5 主觀心理評量分析 40 4-5-1 煩擾度評量分析 41 4-5-2 自覺疲勞評量分析 44 4-6 皮爾森相關分析(Pearson Correlation) 48 4-7 討論 49 4-7-1 噪音頻率 49 4-7-2 噪音聲壓位準 49 4-7-3 噪音自覺煩擾度 51 4-7-4 個人噪音敏感度 51 第五章 結論與建議 53 5-1 結論 53 5-2 建議 54 參考文獻 55 附 錄 61

    1. 三浦豐彥、池田正之、小山內博,(1993);現代勞動衛生,第二版,日本勞動科學研究所:1109-1201。
    2. 于台珊、張淑如、徐儆暉、盧士一,(2002);勞工聽力保護計畫指引,第三版,行政院勞工委員會勞工安全衛生研究所,IOSH91-T-020。
    3. 石東生、陳秋蓉、張振平,(2004);93年受僱者工作環境安全衛生狀況認知調查,行政院勞工委員會勞工安全衛生研究所,IOSH93-H302。
    4. 行政院環境保護署,(2006);噪音管制標準,第三條,行政院環境保護署環署空字第0950087606號令修正發布。
    5. 行政院勞工委員會勞工安全衛生研究所,(1999);勞工聽力危害預防手冊。
    6. 吳聰能,(1988);噪音對人體影響之流行病學性研究,聽覺性與非聽覺性健康效應,高雄醫學院醫學研究所博士論文。
    7. 吳聰能、張博雅,(1990);噪音曝露與血壓關係之研究,行政院衛生署。
    8. 高慧娟,(1992);噪音組成成分對工作表現與心臟血管功能之影響,中國醫藥學院環境醫學研究所碩士論文。
    9. 許勝雄、彭游、吳水丕,(2005);人因工程,第三版,滄海書局:466-490。
    10. 陳順勝、吳聰能、江宏哲、陳贊如、倪威光、顏嘉賢,(1992);高頻率噪音心臟血管功能之影響及偵測方法之研究,行政院衛生署八十一年度委託研究計畫。
    11. 陳秋蓉、潘致弘、吳雨圭、楊怡和,(1997);勞工健檢聽力檢查常指引之建立,勞工安全衛生研究季刊,第五卷第一期:73-88。
    12. 陳玟伶,(2003);牙科相關工作人員噪音暴露研究,台北醫學大學公共衛生學研究所碩士論文。
    13. 黃乾全、董貞吟,(1992);在校園環境保護與管理,師大書苑。
    14. 黃乾全、董貞吟,(2004);噪音振動,財團法人中興工程研究發展基金會。
    15. 葉文裕、林守香、盧士一,(2001);半導體工業噪音狀況之調查,勞工安全衛生研究季刊,第九卷第二期:167-177。
    16. 戴基福、楊瑞鍾、葉文裕,(2001);受僱者工作環境安全衛生狀況認知調查中華民國九十年九月台灣地區,行政院勞工委員會勞工安全衛生研究所,IOSH90-H304。
    17. 潘致弘,(1999);半導體勞工健檢與職業傷病資料分析,行政院勞工委員會勞工安全衛生研究所,IOSH88-M322。
    18. 簡瑞滿,(2001);汽車製造業作業環境風險評估,國立台灣大學職業醫學與工業衛生研究所碩士學位論文。
    19. 羅正忠、張鼎張,(2004);半導體製程技術導論,台灣培生教育出版,學銘圖書。
    20. Belojevic, G., Jakovljevic, B. and Aleksic, O., (1997), Subjective reactions to traffic noise with regard to some personality traits, Environment International, 23 (2): 221-226.
    21. Cantrell, R. W., (1979), Physiological effects of noise, The Oto-laryngologic Clinics of North America, 12 (3): 537-549.
    22. Di Cantogno, L. V., Dallerba, R., Teagno, P. S. and Cocola, L., (1976), Urban traffic noise, Cardiocirculatory activity and coronary risk factors, Acta Oto-Laryngologica (Supplement), 339: 55-63.
    23. Dijk, F. V., (1986), Non-auditory effects of noise in industry, International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 58: 325-332.
    24. Ellermeier, W., Eigenstetter, M. and Zimmer, K., (2001), Psychoacoustic correlates of individual noise sensitivity, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109 (4): 1464-1473.
    25. Enmarker, I. and Boman, E., (2004), Noise annoyance responses of middle school pupils and teachers, Journal of Environmental Psychology: 527-536.
    26. Gawron, V. J., (1982), Performance effects of noise intensity: Psychological set and task type and complexity, Human Factors, 24: 225-243.
    27. Gupta, D. and Vishwakarma, S. K., (1989), Toy weapons and firecrackers: A source of hearing loss, Laryngoscope, 99: 330-334.
    28. Haines, M. M., Stansfeld, S. A., Brentnall, S., Head, J., Berry, B., Jiggins, M. and Hygge, S., (2001), The west London schools study: The effects of chronic aircraft noise exposure on child health, Psychological Medicine, 31 (8): 1385-
    1396.
    29. Job, R. F. S., (1988), Community response to noise: A review of factors influencing the relationship between noise exposure and reaction, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 83: 991-1001.
    30. Job, R. F. S., (1999), Noise sensitivity as a factor influencing human reactions to noise, Noise and Health, 3: 57-68.
    31. Kavoussi, N., (1973), The relationship between the length of exposure to noise and incidence of hypertension at a silo in Tehran, Medicina del Lavoro, 64: 292-295.
    32. Kjellberg, A., Landstroem, U., Tesarz, M. and Soederberg, L., (1996), The effects of non-physical noise characteristics, ongoing task and noise sensitivity on annoyance and distraction due to noise at work, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16 (2): 123-136.
    33. Kjellberg, A., Tesarz, M., Holmberg, K. and Landström, U., (1997), Evaluation of frequency-weighted sound level measurements for prediction of low- frequency noise annoyance, Environment International, 23 (4): 519-527.
    34. Kryter, K. D. and Poza, F., (1980), Effect of noise on some autonomic system activities, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 67 (6): 2036-2044.
    35. Landström, U., Åkerlund, E., Kjellberg, A. and Tesarz, M., (1995), Exposure levels, tonal components and noise annoyance in working environments, Environment International, 21 (3): 221-226.
    36. Leikin, J. B., Davis, A., Klodd, D. A., Thunder, T., Kelafant, G. A., Paquette, D. L., Rothe, M. J. and Rubin R., (2000), Selected topics related to occupational exposures, Disease-a-Month, 46 (4): 240-322.
    37. Lercher, P., Hortnagl, J. and Kofler, W. W., (1993), Work noise annoyance and blood pressure combined effects with stressful working-conditions, International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 65 (1): 23-28.
    38. May, J. J., (2000), Occupational hearing loss, American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 37 (1): 112-120.
    39. Miedema, H. M. and Vos, H., (1998), Exposure-response relationships for transportation noise, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 104 (6): 3432-3445.
    40. Mosskov, J. I. and Ettema, J. H., (1977), IV. Extra-auditory effects in long-term exposure to aircraft and traffic noise, International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 40: 177-184
    41. Newby, H. A. and Popelka, G. R., (1985), Audiology (5th ed.), New Jersey, Prentice-Hall, Inc.
    42. Passchier, V. W. and Passchier, W. F., (2000), Noise exposure and public health, Environmental Health Perspectives (Supplement.1), 108: 123-131.
    43. Pugh, J. E., Milton, B. H. and David, J. A., (1974), Cochlear electrical activity in noise induced hearing loss, Arch Oto-laryngol, 100: 36-40.
    44. Ray, R. L., Brady, J. V. and Emurian, H. H., (1984), Cardiovascular effects of noise during complex task performance, International Journal of Psychophysiology, 1: 335-340.
    45. Schultz, T. J., (1978), Synthesis of social surveys on noise annoyance, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 64 (2): 377-405.
    46. Simpson, T., Lee, E. R. and Cameron, C., (1996), Relationships among sleep dimensions and factors that impair sleep after cardiac surgery, Research in Nursing and Health, 19 (3): 213-223.
    47. Talbott, E., Helmkamp, J., Mathews, K., Kuller, L., Cottington, E. and Redmond, G., (1985), Occupational noise exposure, noise-induced hearing loss and the epidemiology of high blood pressure, American Journal of Epidemiology, 121: 501-504.
    48. Taylor, S. M., (1984), A path model of aircraft noise annoyance, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 96: 243-260.
    49. Tetsuro, S., Takeo, F., Shizuma, Y. and Syuji, H., (2004), Effects of acoustical noise on annoyance, performance and fatigue during mental memory task, Applied Acoustics, 65: 913-921.
    50. Topf, M. and Thompson, S., (2001), Interactive relationships between hospital patients’ noise-induced stress and other stress with sleep, Heart and Lung - The Journal of Acute and Critical Care, 30 (4): 237-243.
    51. Ward, W. D., (1991), The role of intermittence in PTS, Journal of the Acoustical
    Society of America, 90: 164-169.
    52. Waye, K. P., Bengtsson, J., Rylander, R., Hucklebridge, F., Evans, P. and Clow, A., (2002), Low frequency noise enhances cortisol among noise sensitive subjects during work performance, Life Sciences, 70 (7): 745-758.
    53. Weinstein, N. D., (1978), Individual differences in reactions to noise: A longitudinal study in a college dormitory, Journal of Applied Psychology, 63:
    458-466.
    54. William, N. R., (1992), Environmental and Occupational Medicine (2nd ed.), Boston, Littlle, Brown and Company: 1121-1131.
    55. Wright, R. A., Shaw, L. L. and Jones, C. R., (1990), Task demand and cardiovascular response magnitude: Further evidence of the mediating role of success importance, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59 (6): 1250-1260.
    56. Zimmer, K. and Ellermeier, W., (1999), Psychometric properties of four measures of noise sensitivity: A comparison, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19: 295-302.

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校內網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)

    QR CODE