研究生: |
黃天虹 Huang, Tien-Hung |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
具變化連桿長度3-UPU型並聯式機構之誤差模型與敏感度分析 Error Model and Sensitivity Analysis of a 3-UPU type Parallel Kinematic Mechanism with Variable-Length Links |
指導教授: |
宋震國
Sung, Cheng-Kuo |
口試委員: |
蕭德瑛
Shaw, De-In 林士傑 Lin, Shih-Chieh 蔡志成 Tsai, Jhy-Cherng |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
工學院 - 動力機械工程學系 Department of Power Mechanical Engineering |
論文出版年: | 2022 |
畢業學年度: | 110 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 114 |
中文關鍵詞: | 並聯式機構 、UPU 、誤差模型 、敏感度分析 |
外文關鍵詞: | PKM, UPU, Error model, Sensitivity analysis |
相關次數: | 點閱:3 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
並聯式機構在實際的機台設計中,零件多為複雜的幾何形狀,若是加工精度要求不足會導致加工誤差,誤差反應至零件實際尺寸與輪廓上,使得真實機構參數產生變異。此外,零組件間具有嚴謹的幾何約束條件,如連桿兩端萬向關節之兩軸若互相平行,可達到末端效應器之純平移運動,但組裝過程中難免留下組裝誤差,無法達成機台理想約束條件而影響末端效應器之運動行為。因此本論文將針對應用於五軸工具機的3-UPU平移並聯式機構建立誤差模型,並探討各項誤差影響定位精度之敏感度。
本文首先介紹具變化連桿長度之3-UPU型並聯式機構,以及將萬向接頭獨立為兩旋轉軸之3-RRPRR型,並根據機構參數定義以空間向量法與D-H表示法推導順逆向運動學,再利用雅可比矩陣之條件數定義可操控性指標來評估機構之操控性能。接著,以實際工程圖標註之幾何公差作為製造誤差來源對3-UPU型並聯式機構建立誤差模型,分別探討機構參數變異量對組裝可行性與各連桿迴路端點位置之影響。最後,透過敏感度分析瞭解各公差對於端點位置之影響權重,進而調配關鍵公差項之公差等級以改善端點位置偏移情形。
As the parallel kinematic manipulators (PKM) are designed for the machine tools, the complex shapes of machine elements are challenging to produce precisely. The actual sizes and forms of each part may deviate from nominal parameters through the manufacturing tolerances. In addition, the behavior of the end-effector is controlled by the strict geometric condition between parts. However, the assembly errors will be inevitably left to cause the position and orientation errors of the end-effector. Therefore, a translational 3-UPU PKM applied to five-axis machine tool was investigated in this paper. The error model of PKM was built and the sensitivity analysis was conducted to decide the influential parameters on positioning accuracy of the end-effector.
This paper first introduced a 3-UPU parallel kinematic mechanism with variable-length links. Based on the 3-UPU configuration, the universal joints could be separated into two revolute joints, which was corresponding to the 3-RRPRR mechanism. After defining the structural parameters of two mechanisms, the inverse and forward kinematics were derived through vector algebra and Denavit-Hartenberg method. Furthermore, the Jacobian matrix was obtained by the formula of inverse kinematics. The dexterity index was determined by the condition number of Jacobian matrix to evaluate the control characteristic of mechanisms. Then, the error model of a 3-UPU which contained the manufacturing geometric tolerances was established for investigating the influence of the actual design parameters on assembly condition and positioning of links’ endpoints. Finally, the sensitivity analysis was completed to determine the critical tolerances which significantly affected the deviation of positioning. Through modifying the tolerance grade of critical terms, the improvement on the accuracy of links’ endpoints could be evaluated.
[1] 工具機發展基金會,2019全球工具機主要出口國家市場報導,1-3,取自http://www.tami.org.tw/statistics/2019_global_mt.pdf
[2] D. Stewart, “A Platform with Six Degrees of Freedom,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Vol. 180, No. 15, 1965.
[3] V. E. Gough and S. G. Whitehall, “Universal Tyre Test Machine,” Proceedings of 9th International Congress FISITA, May 1962, pp. 117-137.
[4] L. W. Tsai, “Systematic Enumeration of Parallel Manipulators,” Parallel Kinematic Machines: Theoretical Aspects and Industrial Requirements, 1999, pp. 33-49.
[5] Exechon, Retrieved from http://www.exechon.com/xmini/
[6] K. H. Hunt, “Structural Kinematics of In-Parallel-Actuated Robot-Arms,” ASME. Journal of Mechanisms, Transmissions, and Automation in Design, Vol. 105, December 1983, pp. 705-712.
[7] R. Clavel, “DELTA, a fast robot with parallel geometry,” Proc of the 18th International Symposium on Industrial Robots, Lausanne, April 1988, pp. 91-100.
[8] M. Weck and D. Staimer, “Parallel Kinematic Machine Tools – Current State and Future Potentials,” CIRP Annals, Vol. 51, Iss. 2, 2002, pp. 671-683.
[9] Tricept, Retrieved from http://www.pkmtricept.com/index.php?id=en
[10] P. Nauna, K. J. Waldron and V. Murthy, “Direct Kinematic Solution of a Stewart Platform,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, Vol. 6, Iss. 4, June 1990, pp. 438-444.
[11] L. W. Tsai, G. C. Walsh and R. E. Stamper, “Kinematics of a Novel Three DOF Translational Platform,” Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Vol. 4, 1996, pp. 3446-3451.
[12] L. W. Tsai, “Kinematics of A Three-DOF Platform with Three Extensible Limbs,” Recent Advances in Robot Kinematics, Springer, 1996, pp. 401-410.
[13] D. M. Ku, “Direct displacement analysis of a Stewart platform mechanism,” Mechanism and Machine Theory, Vol. 34, Iss. 3, April 1999, pp. 453-465.
[14] P. Ji and H. T. Wu, “Kinematics analysis of an offset 3-UPU translational parallel robotic manipulator,” Robotics and Autonomous Systems, Vol.42, Iss. 2, 2003, pp. 117-123.
[15] B. Hu and Y. Lu, “Analyses of kinematics, statics, and workspace of a 3-RRPRR parallel manipulator and its three isomeric mechanisms,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Vol. 222, Iss. 9, 2008, pp. 1829-1837.
[16] J. K. Salisbury and J. J. Craig, “Articulated Hands: Force Control and Kinematic Issues,” The International Journal of Robotics Research, Vol. 1, Iss. 1, March 1982, pp. 4-17.
[17] T. Yoshikawa, “Manipulability of Robotic Mechanisms,” The International Journal of Robotics Research, Vol. 4, Iss. 2, June 1985, pp. 3-9.
[18] C. A. Klein and B. E. Blaho, “Dexterity Measures for the Design and Control of Kinematically Redundant Manipulators,” The International Journal of Robotics Research, Vol. 6, Iss. 2, June 1987, pp. 72-83.
[19] C. Gosselin, “Dexterity indices for planar and spatial robotic manipulators,” Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Vol. 1, 1990, pp. 650-655.
[20] C. Gosselin and J. Angeles, “A Global Performance Index for the Kinematic optimization of Robotic Manipulators,” ASME. Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 133, Iss. 3, September 1991, pp. 220-226.
[21] L. W. Tsai and S. Joshi, “Kinematics and Optimization of a Spatial 3-UPU Parallel Manipulator,” ASME. Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 122, Iss. 4, December 2000, pp. 439-446.
[22] Y. Li and Q. Xu, “Kinematics and Dexterity Analysis for a Novel 3-DOF Translational Parallel Manipulator,” Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2005, pp. 2944-2949.
[23] G. Cui, H. Zhang, F. Xu and C. Sun, “Kinematics Dexterity Analysis and Optimization of 4-UPS-UPU Parallel Robot Manipulator,” Intelligent Robotics and Applications, Vol. 8918, 2014, pp. 1-11.
[24] C. Wu, “The Kinematic Error Model for the Design of Robot Manipulator,” American Control Conference, 1983, pp. 497-502.
[25] J. Wang and O. Masory, “On the accuracy of a Stewart platform Part Ⅰ The effect of manufacturing tolerance,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Vol. 1, 1993, pp. 114-120.
[26] J. W. Zhao, K. C. Fan, T. H. Chang and Z. Li, “Error Analysis of a Serial-Parallel Type Machine Tool,” International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 19, Iss. 3, February 2002, pp. 174-179.
[27] L. Kong, G. Chen, Z. Zhang and H. Wang, “Kinematic calibration and investigation of the influence of universal joint errors on accuracy improvement for a 3-DOF parallel manipulator,” Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, Vol. 49, 2018, pp. 388-397.
[28] D. E. Whitney, O. L. Gilbert, and M. Jastrzebski, “Representation of geometric variation using matrix transform for statistical tolerance analysis in assemblies,” Research in Engineering design, Vol. 6, December 1994, pp. 191-210.
[29] 侯靖男,「公差分析與公差敏感度分析在產品設計之應用」,國立中興大學機械工程所,碩士論文,中華民國八十五年。
[30] A. Desrochers and A. Rivière, “A matrix approach to the representation of tolerance zones and clearances,” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 13, September 1997, pp. 630-636.
[31] A. Lamikiz, L.N. López de Lacalle, O. Ocerin, D. Díez and E. Maidagan, “The Denavit and Hartenberg approach applied to evaluate the consequences in the tool tip position of geometrical errors in five-axis milling centres,” International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 37, 2008, pp. 122–139.
[32] A. J. Patel and K. F. Ehmann, “Volumetric Error Analysis of a Stewart Platform-Based Machine Tool,” CIRP Annals, Vol. 46, Iss. 1, 1997, pp. 287-290.
[33] C. Han, J. Kim and F. C. Park, “Kinematic sensitivity analysis of the 3-UPU parallel mechanism,” Mechanism and Machine Theory, Vol. 37, Iss. 8, 2002, pp. 787-798.
[34] K. C. Fan, H. Wang, J. W. Zhao and T. H. Chang, “Sensitivity analysis of the 3-PRS parallel kinematic spindle platform of a serial-parallel machine tool,” International Journal of Machine Tool and Manufacture, Vol. 43, Iss. 15, 2003, pp. 1561-1569.
[35] N. Wang, S. Guo, Y. Fang and X. Li, “Error sensibility analysis of 3-UPU parallel manipulator based on probability distribution,” Second International Conference on Machanic Automation and Control Engineering, 2011, pp. 1296-1301.
[36] G. Chen, Y. Liang, Y. Sun, W. Chen and B. Wang, “Volumetric error modeling and sensitivity analysis for designing a five-axis ultra-precision machine tool,“ International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 68, January 2013, pp. 2525–2534.
[37] J. Denavit and R. S. Hartenberg, “A Kinematic Notation for Lower-Pair Mechanisms Based on Matrices,” Journal of Applied Mechanics, Vol. 22, Iss. 2, June 1955, pp. 215-221.
[38] 機械製圖編輯委員會,「CNS機械製圖(上冊)」,高立圖書,中華民國七十九年。