車用語音系統的顯示介面已成為影響駕駛安全的重要因子；台灣政府也於民國101年頒佈法規，禁止駕駛在車輛行進中操作娛樂性顯示設備。在無顯示畫面的情況之下操作車載語音系統已成為趨勢。本研究的主要目的即是改善現有的中文車載語音系統，設計出一款具有語音引導性的車載語音系統，即便是新手且在缺乏視覺指引的情況下也能操作自如，我們將本研究所開發之系統稱之新手模式車用語音系統。
本研究使用駕駛模擬器進行實驗測試，總計有20位受試者，每位受試都必須在駕駛狀態中操作音樂與廣播兩項功能。實驗中利用數位錄影裝置記錄受試者的駕駛行為、緊急狀況之反應時間、任務完成時間與使用求助之次數等項目，並在實驗完成後，請受試者填寫主觀問卷及心智負荷問卷。實驗總共分三階段進行，第一階段主要是收集原車用語音系統需改善之處，並且觀察使用者在無顯示畫面之情形下之表現；根據所收集到之實驗資料與語音系統設計原則我們設計出新手模式車用語音系統，並在第二及第三階段實驗中，利用新手與有經驗之受試者進行實驗，並根據受試者的任務完成時間、求助次數、剎車反應時間與心智負荷程度等，驗證新手模式車用語音系統的引導性與安全性。
根據第二及第三階段實驗結果表示，受試者在操作新手模式車用語音系統時，反應時間並未有顯著增加且位於安全值之內。在任務完成時間與求助次數方面，可發現系統具有顯著的引導效果。因此我們可以推斷新手模式車用語音系統不但在系統引導性上有良好的表現，也兼顧了駕駛安全考量，讓使用者在操作車用語音系統時亦能專注於周遭之狀況。

This research is aimed to design an auditory-only in-vehicle speech system, named as Talking Car Novice Mode that provides with elicitation for a novice to handle easily. In this study, 20 participants were asked to use radio and music functions in two kinds of in-vehicle speech systems respectively, the original Talking Car and Talking Car Novice Mode, while driving in a simulator. In the experiment, subjects need to complete the tasks we assigned, such as change the radio frequency, while driving. And the data of driving performance, the amount of time spent on tasks and the frequencies of calling help functions were recorded by a camera. The NASA-TLX questionnaire and subjective questionnaire were completed after the test. The result indicated that there was no significant difference between driving with and without tasks on either the reaction time of slamming the brake or the frequencies of calling helps. Besides, the learning curve of Talking Car Novice Mode is steep, and it ensures that Talking Car Novice Mode provides enough elicitation to novices. Hence, Talking Car Novice Mode system is a safe, convenient and friendly in-vehicle speech system for users.

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (1984). A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Street. Washington D.C.: AASHTO
Balentine, B. (1999). Re-engineering the speech menu: A “Device” approach to interactive list-selection. In D. Gardner-Bonneau, ed., Human Factors and voice interface systems, 213-215. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Baron, A. and Green, P. (2006). Safety and Usability of Speech Interfaces for In-Vehicle Task while Driving: A Brief Literature Review. University of Michigan, Transportation Research Institute. Technical Report UMTRI 2006-5.
Benedetto, A., Calvi, A. and D’Amico F. (2012). Effects of mobile telephone tasks on driving performance: a driving simulator study. Advances in Transportation Studies an international Journal, 26, 29-44.
Broadbent, D. E. (1975). The magic number seven after fifteen years. In A. Kennedy and A. Wilkes, eds., Studies in long term memory. London: Wiley
Cameron, H. (2000). Speech at the interface. Voice Operated Telecom Services workshop. Ghent, Belgium.
Carter, C. and Graham, R. (2000). Experimental Comparison of Manual and Voice Controls for the Operation of In-Vehicle Systems. Proc. 14th Triennial Congress Intel Ergonomics Assoc. and 44th Ann. Meeting Human Factors and Ergonomics Soc. (IEA 2000/HFES 2000), Human Factors and Ergonomics Soc., 2000, 286-289.
Chen, F., Jonsson, I. M., Villing, J. and Larsson S. (2010). Speech Technology: Theory and Applications. Retrieved from: http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007
/978-0-387-73819-2_11, DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-73819-2_11
Clark, R. C., Nguyen, F. and Sweller, J.(2006). Efficiency in Learning: Evidence -Based Guidelines to Manage Cognitive Load. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
Cohen, M. H., Giangola, J. P. and Balogh, J. (2004). VOICE USER INTERFACE DESIGN. Boston: Addison-Wesley

Daneman, M. and P.A. Carpenter. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19(4), 450-466.
Forlines, C., Schmidt-Nielsen, B., Raj, B., Wittenburg, P. and Wolf, P. (2005). A Comparison between Spoken Queries and Menu-based interfaces for In-Car Digital Music Selection. TR2005-020, Cambridge, MA: Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories.
Garay-Vega, L., Pradhan, A. K., Weinberg, G., Schmidt-Nielsen, B., Harsham, B., Shen, Y., Divekar, G., Romoser, M., Knodler, M. and Fisher, D. L. (2010). Evaluation of Different Speech and Touch Interfaces to In-Vehicle Music Retrieval Systems. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 42(3), 913-920.
Gardner-Bonneau, D. J. (1992). Human factors in interactive voice response applications: “Common sense” is an uncommon commodity. Journal of the American Voice I/O Society, 12, 1-12
Gazis, D., Herman, R. and Maradudin A. (1960). The Problem of the Amber Signal Light in Traffic Flow. Operations Research January, 8(1), 112-132
Hua, Z and Ng W. L. (2010). Speech Recognition Interface Design for In-Vehicle System. Second International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Automotive UI 2010), 11-12 November, 2010, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Jamson, A. H., Westerman, S. J., Hockey G. R. J. and Carsten O. M. J. (2004). Based E-Mail and Driver Behavior: Effects of an In-Vehicle Message System Interface. Human Factors: The journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 46, DOI: 10.1518/hfes.46.4.625.56814
Jenness, J. W., Lattanzio, R. J., O’Tolle, M. and Taylor, N. (2002). Voice-activated dialing or eating a cheeseburger: Which is more distracting during simulated driving? Human Factors: The journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, USA, 46, 592-596.
Klauer, S. G., Dingus, T. A., Neale, V. L., Sudweeks, J. D. and Ramsey, D. J. (2006). The Impact of Driver Inattention on Near-Crash/Crash Risk: An Analysis Using the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study Data. DOT HS 810549. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

Kobayashi, K., Lee, R. and Sumiya, K. (2010). Lost again on the way? : Measuring Human Map-Reading Ability. DBSJ journal, 8(4).
Larson J. A (2004). Voice User Interface Design for Novice and Experienced Users. Text, Speech and Language Technology, 26, 41-63
Leong, I. C., Hwang, S. L., Wei, M. S., Ku, P. Y., Chang, H. C., Hung, J. Y. and Kuo, C. C. (2012). Safety Oriented Voice-based Interface for Vehicle’s AV System: Talking Car System. Advances in Social and Organizational Factors. The Netherlands, CRC Press.
Leong I. C. (2012). Human-Machine Interface Design of In-Vehicle Speech Interaction System: Talking Car System. Retrieved from National Tsing Hua University Library website: http://www.lib.nthu.edu.tw/
Lin Y. H. (1992). Methods of measuring the mental workload in working environment. Retrieved from Institute of Occupational Safety and Health website: http://www.iosh.gov.tw/Book/Message_Publish.aspx?P=39&U=406.
Maciej, J. and Vollrath, M. (2009). Comparison of manual vs speech-based interaction with in-vehicle information systems. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 41(5), 924-930.
McGehee, D. V., Mazzae, E. N. and Scott Baldwin G. H. (2000). Driver Reaction Time in Crash Avoidance Research: Validation of a Driving Simulator Study on a Test Track. the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 44(3), DOI: 10.1177/154193120004402026
Miller, G. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81-97.
Ministry of Transportation and Communications in Taiwan, Regulation of Road Transportation Safety Rules 89-90 (2011). Retrieved 15 March,2012 from http://www.motc.gov.tw/ch/home.jsp?id=5&parentpath=0
Mitsopoulos-Rubens, P., Trotter, M. and Lenne, M. (2011). Effects on driving performance of interacting with an in-vehicle music player: a comparison of three interface layout concepts for information presentation. Applied Ergonomics, 42, 583-591.
NASA (1986). NASA Task Load Index(TLX) version 1.0. California: NASA-Ames Research Center, Human Performance Research Group.
NASA (2003). NASA Task Load Index (TLX): Computerized Version (Version 2.0). Moffett Field, California: NASA-Ames Research Center, Aerospace Human Factors Research Division.
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (2010). Blueprint for Ending Distracted Driving. Retrieved 25 May, 2013, From National Highway Traffic Safety Administration website: www.nhtsa.gov/staticfiles/nti/distracted_driving/
pdf/811629.pdf
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (2010). Driving Distraction Program. Retrieved 25 May, 2013, From www.nhtsa.gov/staticfiles/nti/distracted_driving/
pdf/811299.pdf
Nishimoto, T., Shioya, M., Takahashi, J. and Daigo, H. (2005). A study of dialogue management principles corresponding to the driver’s workload. Biennial Workshop on Digital Signal Processing for In-Vehicle and mobile systems, Sesimbra, Portugal, Sep 2005.
Schumacher, R. M., Jr., M.L. Hardzinski, and A.L. Schwarz. (1995). Increasing the usability of interactive voice response system: Research and guidelines for phone-based interfaces. Human Factors, 37(2), 251-264.
Shneiderman, B. and Plaisant, C. (1999). Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction fourth edition. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
Strickland, D. L. (2012). Visual-Manual NHTSA Driver Distraction Guidelines for In-Vehicle Electronic Devices. Federal Register, 77(37), 11200-11250.
Tashiro, M., Horikawa, E., Mochizuki, H., Sakurada, Y., Kato, M., Inokuchi, T., Ridout, F., Hindmarch, I. and Yanai, K. (2005). Effects of fexofenadine and hydroxyzine on brake reaction time during car-driving with cellular phone use. Hum Psychopharmacol Clin Exp, 20, 501-509.
van Winsum, W., Martens, M.H., and Herland, L. (1999). “The effects of speech versus tactile driver support messages on workload, driver behavior and user acceptance”. TNO Human Factors, The Netherlands.
Wickelgren, W. A. (1974). Size of rehearsal group and short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68, 413-419.
Wickens, C.D. (1992). Engineering psychology and human performance (2d ed.). New York: Harper Collins
Wright, T.P. (1936). Factors Affecting the Cost of Airplanes. Aeronautical Sciences Journal, 3(4), 122–128.
葉謹睿(2010)。後數位時代的網站、介面、產品及軟體設計的原則(51-57頁)。台北市:藝術家出版社