研究生: |
施宗甫 |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
開發具磁性與酸鹼應答性複合高分子液胞作為腫瘤標的藥物傳遞及MR影像顯影之診斷治療奈米平台 Magnetic and pH-Responsive Complex Polymeric Vesicles as a Theranostic Nanoplatform for Tumor-Targeting Drug Delivery and Enhanced MR Imaging |
指導教授: | 邱信程 |
口試委員: |
王麗芳
張建文 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
原子科學院 - 生醫工程與環境科學系 Department of Biomedical Engineering and Environmental Sciences |
論文出版年: | 2012 |
畢業學年度: | 100 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 66 |
中文關鍵詞: | 高分子液胞 、藥物刺激控制釋放 、腫瘤標的 |
外文關鍵詞: | polymersomes, stimuli-triggered drug release, tumor-targeting |
相關次數: | 點閱:3 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
為了在醫學上達到有效診斷與治療的效用,本研究開發出具磁性與酸鹼應答性高分子複合液胞作為攜帶治療藥劑和MR影像顯影劑之傳遞載體。於pH 5.0含有citrate-SPIO的水相中藉由高分子PAAc-co-DSA的自組裝行為形成奈米級SPIO-loaded 高分子液胞(ca. 110 nm)。DOX分子以靜電作用力吸附於液胞表面富含AAc鏈段的區域;其包覆效率約為70 %。為了提高結構的穩定性和具有主動腫瘤標的能力,藉由靜電作用力將高分子chitosan和γ-PGA(OSu)-g-PEG-folate以layer-by-layer的方式吸附於液胞表面,最後形成FA-conjugated SPIO/DOX-loaded高分子複合液胞(ca. 220 nm)。於MR影像顯影方面,SPIO-loaded 複合液胞具有較高的橫向鬆弛率r2 (i.e., 255 Fe mM-1 S-1 vs 183.4 Fe mM-1 S-1 of Resovist)相較於商品化顯影劑Resovist。在藥物釋放行為方面主要和環境的pH值有關;於10小時左右,來自SPIO/DOX-loaded複合液胞之藥物分子DOX的累積釋放量於pH 4.7和pH 7.4分別為70 %和20 %。另一方面,利用CLSM和流式細胞儀的分析結果得知表面修飾葉酸分子之高分子複合液胞有助於細胞(HeLa cells)以folate receptor-mediated的吞噬路徑進行uptake。於細胞(HeLa cells)毒性的結果顯示,FA-conjugated SPIO/DOX-loaded高分子複合液胞對HeLa cells的毒殺效果比folate-free SPIO/DOX-loaded高分子複合液胞來的好。最後,此多功能FA-conjugated SPIO/DOX-loaded高分子複合液胞具腫瘤標的藥物傳遞、藥物控制釋放能力及MR 影像顯影功能,可作為腫瘤標的藥物傳遞及MR影像診斷奈米平台。
In this study, a multifunctional and pH-responsive polymeric complex vesicle as an anticancer drug and MRI contrast agent carrier has been developed for cancer theranostics. The superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO)-loaded polymeric vesicles (ca. 110 nm) were formed by self-assembly of the poly(acrylic acid-co-disterin acrylate) (P(AAc-co-DSA)) in the SPIO aqueous solution (pH 5.0) via sonication technique while the SPIO was simultaneously encapulated into the interior aqueous compartment of the vesicles. The anticancer drug, doxorubicin (DOX), was then loaded within ionized AAc-rich regions of the membrane of polymer vesicle via electrostatic interaction between the ionized AAc units and postively charged DOX molecules. To improve the stability of the resulting polymer vesicles, chitosan and folate-polyethylene glycol-grafted poly(glutamic acid) (PGA-g-PEG(FA)) were sequentially deposited on the outermost surfaces of the DOX/SPIO-loaded polymer vesicles. The loading efficiency of DOX was ca. 70 %. The in vitro drug release behavior of SPIO/DOX-loaded complex vesicles shows a significant increased drug release at pH 4.7 (70%) and a severely retarded drug release at pH 7.4 (20%). This indicates that the loaded DOX molecules can be effectivitly released in the acid environment of tumor (e.g. endosomes or lysosomes). Compared to commercial MRI contrast agent, Resovist, the relaxivity r2 value of SPIO/DOX-loaded polymeric complex vesicles was much higher than Resovist. Results from flow cytometry and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) analysis showed that folate-conjugated vesicles exhibited higher than folat-free vesicles which also led to higher cytotoxicity. Thus, these DOX/SPIO-loaded folate-conjugated polymer complex vesicles can provide pH-controlled drug release, as well as enhanced MRI contrast, thereby mtargeted cancer therapy and diagnosis possible.
1. Langer, R.;Farokhzad, O. C. ACSNANO, 2009, 3, 16-20
2. Broz, P.;Driamov, S.;Ziegler, J.;Ben-Haim, N.;Marsch, S.;Meier, W.;Hunziker, P. Nano Lett, 2006, 6, 2349-2353
3. Loomis, K.;McNeeley, K.;Bellamkonda, R. V. Soft Matter, 2011, 7, 839-856
4. Du, J.;O’Reilly, R. K. Soft Matter, 2009, 5, 3544-3561
5. Meier, W. Chem. Soc. Res., 2000, 29, 295-303
6. Ringsdorf, H.;Schlarb, B.;Venzmer, J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 1988, 27, 113-158
7. Discher, B. M.;Won, Y. Y.;Ege, D. S.;Lee, J. C.;Bates, F. S.;Discher, D. E.;Hammer, D. A. Science, 1999, 284, 1143-1146
8. Li, M. H.;Keller, P. Soft Matter, 2009, 5, 927-937
9. Meng, F.;Zhong, Z.;Feijen, J. Biomacromolecules 2009, 10, 197- 209
10. Kim, K. T.;Meeuwissen, S. A.;Nolte, Roeland J. M.;van Hest, Jan C. M. nanoscale, 2010, 2, 844-858
11. Jianzhong Du, Yiqing Tang, Andrew L. Lewis, and Steven P. Armes. J. AM. CHEM. SOC ., 2005, 127, 17982-17983
12. Chiu, H. C.;Lin, Y. W.;Huang, Y. F.;Chuang, C. K.;Chern, C. S. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.,2008, 47, 1875-1878
13. Sun, Q.;Cheng, D.;Yu, X.;Zhang, Z.;Dai, J.;Li, H.;Liang, B.;Shuai, X. J. Mater. Chem., 2011, 21, 15316-15326
14. Tsai, H. C.;Chang, W. H.;Lo, C. L.;Tsai, C. H.;Chang, C. H.;Ou, T. W.; Yen, T. C.;Hsiue, G. H. Biomaterials, 2010, 31, 2293–2301
15. Nasongkla, N.;Bey, E.;Ren, J.;Ai, H.;Khemtong, C.;Guthi, J. S.;Chin, S. F.;Sherry, A. D.;Boothman, D. A.;Gao, J. Nano Lett, 2006, 6, 2427-2430
16. Yang, X.;Grailer, J. J.;Rowland, I. J.;Javadi, A.;Hurley, S. A.;Matson, V. Z.;Steeber, D. A.;Gong, S., ACSNANO 2010, 6805-6817
17. Mi, F. L.;Wu, Y. Y.;Lin, Y. H.;Sonaje, K.;Ho, Y. C.;Chen, C. T.;Juang, J. H.;Sung, H. W. Bioconjugate Chem., 2008, 19, 1248-1255
18. Hu, Y.;Ding, Y.;Ding, D.;Sun, M.; Zhang, L.;Jiang, X.;Yang, C. Biomacromolecules, 2007, 8, 1069-1076
19. Guo, M.;Que, C.;Wang, C.;Liu, X.;Yan, H.;Liu, K. Biomaterials, 2011, 32, 185-194
20. Kitaeva, M. V.;Melik-Nubarov, N. S.;Menger, F. M.;Yaroslavov, A. A.
Langmuir, 2004, 20, 6575-6579
21. Tian, Y.;Bromberg, L.;Lin, S. N.;Hatton, T. A.;Tam, K. C. Journal of Controlled Release, 2007, 121, 137-145
22. Prabaharan, M.;Grailer, J. J.;Pilla, S.;Steeber, D. A.;Gong, S. Biomaterials 2009, 30, 3009-3019
23. Yoo, H. S.;Park, T. G. Journal of Controlled Release 2004, 96, 273-283
24. Bae, Y.;Jang, W. D.;Nishiyama, N.;Fukushima, S.;Kataoka, K. Mol. BioSyst.,2005,1,242-250
25. Low, P. S.;Henne, W. A.;Doorneweerd, D. D. accounts of chemical research, 2008, 41, 120-129
26. Yan, E.;Ding, Y.;Chen, C.;Li, R.;Hu, Y.;Jiang, X. Chem. Commun., 2009, 2718-2720
27. Yan, E.;Fu, Y.;Wang, X.;Ding, Y;Qian, H.;Wang, C. H.;Hu, Y.;Jiang, X. J. Mater. Chem., 2011, 21, 3147-3155
28. Huang, W. C.;Chiang, W. H.;Huang, Y. F.;Lin, S. C.;Shih, Z. F.;Chern, C. S.;Chiang, C. S.;Chiu, H. C. Journal of Drug Targeting, 2011, 1-10
29. Chiu, Y. L.;Ho, Y. C.;Chen, Y. M.;Peng, S.F.;Ke, C. J.;Chen, K. J.; Mi, F. L.;Sung, H. W. Journal of Controlled Release, 2010, 146, 152-159
30. Wang, N.;Dong, A.;Tang, H.;Van Kirk, E. A.;Johnson, P. A.;Murdoch, W. J.;Radosz, M.;Shen, Y. Macromol. Biosci., 2007, 7, 1187-1198
31. Huang, S. J.;Sun, S. L.;Feng, T. H.;Sung, K. H.;Lui, W. L.;Wang, L. F. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2009, 38, 64-73
32. Sun, C.;Sze, R.;Zhang, M. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 2006, 550-557
33. Khemtong, C.;Kessinger, C. W.;Gao, J. Chem. Commun., 2009, 3497-3510
34. Xiong, J.;Meng, F.;Wang, C.;Cheng, R.;Liu, Z.;Zhong, Z. J. Mater. Chem., 2011, 21, 5786-5794
35. Lee, P. W.;Hsu, S. H.;Wang, J. J.;Tsai, J. S.;Lin, K. J.;Wey, S. P.;Chen, F. R.;Lai, C. H.;Yen, T. C.;Sung, H. W. Biomaterials, 2010, 31, 1316-1324
36. Jain, T. K.;Richey, J.;Strand, M.;Leslie-Pelecky, D. L.;Flask, C. A.;Labhasetwar, V. Biomaterials, 2008, 29, 4012-4021
37. Yang, X.;Pilla, S.;Grailer, J. J.;Steeber, D. A.;Gong, S.;Chen, Y.; Chen, G. J. Mater. Chem., 2009, 19, 5812-5817
38. Lesieur, S.;Gazeau, F.;Luciani, N.;Menager, C.;Wilhelm, C. J. Mater. Chem., 2011, 21, 14387-14393
39. Cheng, D.;Hong, G.;Wang, W.;Yuan, R.;Ai, H.;Shen, J.;Liang, B.; Gao, J.;Shuai, X. J. Mater. Chem., 2011, 21, 4796–4804
40. Sahoo, Y.;Goodarzi, A.;Swihart, M. T.;Ohulchanskyy, T. Y.;Kaur, N.;Furlani, E.P.;Prasad, P. N. J Phys Chem B, 2005, 109, 3879-3885