簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 張瑜真
Chang, Yu-Chen
論文名稱: 以功能性磁振造影探索雙語人士類比推理之心智歷程
Analogical Reasoning in Bilingual Minds:An fMRI study of English Simile Comprehension in Mandarin-English Bilinguals
指導教授: 楊梵孛
口試委員: 蘇怡如
謝豐舟
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 人文社會學院 - 外國語文學系
Foreign Languages and Literature
論文出版年: 2013
畢業學年度: 102
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 79
中文關鍵詞: 功能性磁振造影類比推理比喻句雙語人士
外文關鍵詞: Functional magnetic resonance imaging, Analogical reasoning, Simile, Bilingual
相關次數: 點閱:2下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究採用事件相關功能性磁振造影實驗,主要探討雙語人士如何理解明喻句,比較受試者在處理以第二語言呈現的明喻句時,左右半腦涉入程度之差異,藉以鑑定一般類比推理網路的認知歷程;而過去對於明喻句相關實驗研究,僅專注於單語人士對明喻句的處理,提出內側前額葉一區有活化反應,並假設人類在不同類型的概念關係之間,皆運用非常相似的認知子程序進行處理。本實驗受試者為15名健康雙語人士(9名女性,6名男性,平均年齡25.1歲,年齡標準偏差為 2.5)。實驗刺激項共有125句簡短的英文句。共可分為五大類分別做為實驗控制變項,其中包含直述句(例如,他是一個捐助者);三大類比喻句,如:定語比喻(例如,牛奶像絲綢),關係比喻(例如,蚊子像吸血鬼),雙明喻(例如,脊椎就像是樹幹),和語意異常(例如,一所學校就像一個三明治)。
    成像結果顯示,整體而言相對於直述句,三大類比喻句的類比映射和推理決策在大腦的運作處理涉及內側前額葉。此外,由於額葉外側主要負責副語言線索回憶和檢索的腦區,故該部位亦參與比喻理解時的運作。而對於語意異常的句子,由於其語意內涵並非我們對於一般外在概念或經驗的認識,故在處理過程中,並未反應出腦中有特別認知努力的處理
    實驗數據顯示,雙語使用者對於在比喻句進行理解時,會激活內側前額葉,此結果與過去針對單語人士所作的實驗研究成果相同。前額葉皮層的次區域和其它腦區,則會因處理比喻類型的不同,而呈現不同的結果反應。此外,調查結果顯示,當人類理解明喻句時,會同時牽涉左右腦半球的運作。因此,本研究對於過去雙側大腦半球同時處理形象化的語言之之理論提供支持。本研究進一步支持了認為對於形象化語言的處理為雙側大腦半球同時運作的假說。


    Previous research on similes has only reported involvement of the medial frontal gyrus, focused on monolingual processing, and assumed different conceptual relations all engage similar cognitive subprocesses. Using event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), the present study investigated simile comprehension for Mandarin-English bilinguals in order to characterize the general analogical reasoning network as well as hemisphere involvement of second language simile processing. Fifteen healthy Mandarin-English bilinguals (9 females, 6 males; mean age=25.1, SD=2.5) participated in the fMRI experiment. Stimuli consisted of 125 short English sentences created for five conditions: literal sentences (e.g., he is a donor), attributive similes (e.g., Milk is like silk), relational similes (e.g., Mosquitoes are like vampires), double similes (e.g., A spine is like a tree trunk), and anomalous sentences (e.g., a school is like a sandwich). Imaging results revealed that similes, relative to literal sentences, involve the medial frontal gyrus in analogical mapping. Regions outside frontal cortices responsible for recollection and retrieval of paralinguistic cues were also engaged in simile comprehension. Anomalies, on the other hand, do not reflect further cognitive efforts spent in retrieving known knowledge and social cues helpful to understand the sentence meaning. Data indicated that simile comprehension in bilinguals activated the medial frontal gyrus as monolinguals reported in previous studies. The degree to which subregions in the prefrontal cortex and other brain areas are involved in simile comprehension is differentially modulated by subtypes of simile. The results also revealed that simile comprehension engaged both hemispheres, and thus provided support of bilateral hemisphere processing for figurative language.

    Abstract (Chinese) 1 Abstract (English) 2 Chapter 1 Introduction 3 1.1 Research background and motivation 3 1.2 Goals of the current study 6 1.3 Organization of the thesis 7 Chapter 2 Literature review 8 2.1 Analogical reasoning 8 2.2 Structure mapping theory 8 2.3 Neural substrates of analogy and simile comprehension 11 2.4 Research questions 15 2.5 Research hypothesis 15 Chapter 3 Methodology 17 3.1 Participants 17 3.2 Experimental stimuli 17 3.3 General procedure 21 3.4 Image acquisition 23 3.5 Data analysis 24 Chapter 4 Results and discussion for novel similes 26 4.1 Behavioral data inside scanner 26 4.2 fMRI Results for novel similes and anomalies 28 4.3 Discussion for Similes 30 4.3.1 Comprehension of similes 30 4.3.2 Anomaly and simile comprehension 35 4.3.3 Similes in the monolingual and bilingual brains 39 4.3.4 Task and novelty effects 41 Chapter 5 Results and discussion for subtypes of similes 44 5.1 Behavioral data inside scanner 44 5.2 fMRI results 46 5.2.1 Attributive similes 46 5.2.2. Relational similes 47 5.2.3. Double similis 48 5.3 Discussion for subtypes of simile 48 5.3.1 Regions shared by three subtypes of simile 48 5.3.2 Different activations among three subtypes of similes 52 5.3.3 Eastern versus western reasoning patterns 63 Chapter 6 Conclusion 69 References 72 Appendix A 77 Appendix B 78 Appendix C 79

    Aminoff, E., Gronau, N., Bar, M. (2007) The parahippocampal cortex mediates spatial and nonspatial associations. Cereb Cortex, 17:1493-503.
    Arzouan, Y., Solomon, S., Faust, M., Goldstein, A. (2011) Big words, halved brains and small worlds: complex brain networks of figurative language comprehension. PLoS One, 6:e19345.
    Baldo, J.V., Bunge, S.A., Wilson, S.M., Dronkers, N.F. (2010) Is relational reasoning dependent on language? A voxel-based lesion symptom mapping study. Brain Lang, 113:59-64.
    Bassok, M., Dunbar, K.N., Holyoak, K.J. (2012) Introduction to the special section on the neural substrate of analogical reasoning and metaphor comprehension. Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 38:261-3.
    Bowdle, B.F., Gentner, D. (2005) The career of metaphor. Psychological review, 112:193-216.
    Brown, J.I., Fishco, V.V., Hanna, G. (1993) Nelson-Denny reading test : manual for scoring and interpretation, forms G & H.
    Bunge, S.A., Wendelken, C., Badre, D., Wagner, A.D. (2005) Analogical reasoning and prefrontal cortex: evidence for separable retrieval and integration mechanisms. Cereb Cortex, 15:239-49.
    Cho, S., Moody, T.D., Fernandino, L., Mumford, J.A., Poldrack, R.A., Cannon, T.D., Knowlton, B.J., Holyoak, K.J. (2010) Common and dissociable prefrontal loci associated with component mechanisms of analogical reasoning. Cereb Cortex, 20:524-33.
    Coltheart, M. (1981) The MRC psycholinguistic database. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 33:497-505.
    Diana, R.A., Yonelinas, A.P., Ranganath, C. (2007) Imaging recollection and familiarity in the medial temporal lobe: a three-component model. Trends in cognitive sciences, 11:379-86.
    Diaz, M.T., Barrett, K.T., Hogstrom, L.J. (2011) The influence of sentence novelty and figurativeness on brain activity. Neuropsychologia, 49:320-30.
    Ebisch, S.J., Mantini, D., Romanelli, R., Tommasi, M., Perrucci, M.G., Romani, G.L., Colom, R., Saggino, A. (2013) Long-range functional interactions of anterior insula and medial frontal cortex are differently modulated by visuospatial and inductive reasoning tasks. Neuroimage, 78:426-38.
    Fass, D. (1991) met*: a method for discriminating metonymy and metaphor by computer. Comput. Linguist., 17:49-90.
    Gentner, D., Anggoro, F.K., Klibanoff, R.S. (2011) Structure mapping and relational language support children's learning of relational categories. Child development, 82:1173-88.
    Gentner, D., Colhoun, J. (2010) Analogical Processes in Human Thinking and Learning. In: Glatzeder, B., Goel, V., Müller, A., editors. Towards a Theory of Thinking: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. p 35-48.
    Gentner, D., Holyoak, K., Kokinov, B. (2001) The Analogical Mind: Perspectives from Cognitive Science. The MIT Press.
    Gentner, D., Namy, L.L. (2006) Analogical Processes in Language Learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15:297-301.
    Gentner, D., Smith, L. (2012) Analogical Reasoning. In: Editor-in-Chief, V.S.R., editor. Encyclopedia of Human Behavior (Second Edition). San Diego: Academic Press. p 130-136.
    Green, A.E., Kraemer, D.J., Fugelsang, J.A., Gray, J.R., Dunbar, K.N. (2010) Connecting long distance: semantic distance in analogical reasoning modulates frontopolar cortex activity. Cereb Cortex, 20:70-6.
    Imai, M., Gentner, D. (1997) A cross-linguistic study of early word meaning: universal ontology and linguistic influence. Cognition, 62:169-200.
    Ji, L.J., Peng, K., Nisbett, R.E. (2000) Culture, control, and perception of relationships in the environment. Journal of personality and social psychology, 78:943-55.
    Ji, L.J., Zhang, Z., Nisbett, R.E. (2004) Is it culture or is it language? Examination of language effects in cross-cultural research on categorization. Journal of personality and social psychology, 87:57-65.
    Kirchhoff, B.A., Anderson, B.A., Barch, D.M., Jacoby, L.L. (2012) Cognitive and neural effects of semantic encoding strategy training in older adults. Cereb Cortex, 22:788-99.
    Krawczyk, D.C. (2012) The cognition and neuroscience of relational reasoning. Brain Res, 1428:13-23.
    Krawczyk, D.C., McClelland, M.M., Donovan, C.M., Tillman, G.D., Maguire, M.J. (2010) An fMRI investigation of cognitive stages in reasoning by analogy. Brain research, 1342:63-73.
    Leroy, S., Parisse, C., Maillart, C. (2012) Analogical reasoning in children with specific language impairment. Clinical linguistics & phonetics, 26:380-95.
    Lieberman, M.D., Cunningham, W.A. (2009) Type I and Type II error concerns in fMRI research: re-balancing the scale. Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 4:423-8.
    Markman, A.B., Gentner, D. (2000) Structure mapping in the comparison process. The American journal of psychology, 113:501-38.
    Monti, M.M., Parsons, L.M., Osherson, D.N. (2009) The boundaries of language and thought in deductive inference. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106:12554-9.
    Morrison, R.G., Krawczyk, D.C., Holyoak, K.J., Hummel, J.E., Chow, T.W., Miller, B.L., Knowlton, B.J. (2004) A neurocomputational model of analogical reasoning and its breakdown in frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 16:260-71.
    Namy, L.L., Gentner, D. (2002) Making a silk purse out of two sow's ears: young children's use of comparison in category learning. Journal of experimental psychology. General, 131:5-15.
    Naylor, L., Van Herwegen, J. (2012) The production of figurative language in typically developing children and Williams Syndrome. Research in developmental disabilities, 33:711-6.
    Nisbett, R.E., Peng, K., Choi, I., Norenzayan, A. (2001) Culture and systems of thought: holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychol Rev, 108:291-310.
    Peng, K., Nisbett, R.E. (2000) Dialectical responses to questions about dialectical thinking. The American psychologist, 55:1067-8.
    Pihlajamaki, M., Tanila, H., Hanninen, T., Kononen, M., Laakso, M., Partanen, K., Soininen, H., Aronen, H.J. (2000) Verbal fluency activates the left medial temporal lobe: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Ann Neurol, 47:470-6.
    Prat, C.S., Mason, R.A., Just, M.A. (2012a) An fMRI investigation of analogical mapping in metaphor comprehension: the influence of context and individual cognitive capacities on processing demands. Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 38:282-94.
    Prat, C.S., Mason, R.A., Just, M.A. (2012b) An fMRI investigation of analogical mapping in metaphor comprehension: The influence of context and individual cognitive capacities on processing demands. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38:282-294.
    Ranganath, C., Yonelinas, A.P., Cohen, M.X., Dy, C.J., Tom, S.M., D'Esposito, M. (2004) Dissociable correlates of recollection and familiarity within the medial temporal lobes. Neuropsychologia, 42:2-13.
    Rankin, K.P., Salazar, A., Gorno-Tempini, M.L., Sollberger, M., Wilson, S.M., Pavlic, D., Stanley, C.M., Glenn, S., Weiner, M.W., Miller, B.L. (2009) Detecting sarcasm from paralinguistic cues: anatomic and cognitive correlates in neurodegenerative disease. NeuroImage, 47:2005-15.
    Rapp, A.M., Leube, D.T., Erb, M., Grodd, W., Kircher, T.T. (2007) Laterality in metaphor processing: lack of evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging for the right hemisphere theory. Brain and language, 100:142-9.
    Raven, J., Raven, J.C., Court, J.H. (2000) Manual for Raven's progressive matrices and vocabulary scales. (including the parallel and plus versions) Section 3, Standard progressive matrices. Oxford. Oxford Psychologists Press.
    Robin, N., Holyoak, K.J. (1995) Relational complexity and the functions of the prefrontal cortex
    The cognitive neurosciences. In: Gazzaniga, M.S., editor: MIT Press. p 987-997.
    Sabsevitz, D.S., Medler, D.A., Seidenberg, M., Binder, J.R. (2005) Modulation of the semantic system by word imageability. Neuroimage, 27:188-200.
    Schmidt, G.L., Cardillo, E.R., Kranjec, A., Lehet, M., Widick, P., Chatterjee, A. (2012) Not all analogies are created equal: Associative and categorical analogy processing following brain damage. Neuropsychologia, 50:1372-9.
    Shibata, M., Abe, J., Terao, A., Miyamoto, T. (2007) Neural mechanisms involved in the comprehension of metaphoric and literal sentences: an fMRI study. Brain Res, 1166:92-102.
    Shibata, M., Toyomura, A., Motoyama, H., Itoh, H., Kawabata, Y., Abe, J. (2012) Does simile comprehension differ from metaphor comprehension? A functional MRI study. Brain and language, 121:254-60.
    Shokri-Kojori, E., Motes, M.A., Rypma, B., Krawczyk, D.C. (2012) The network architecture of cortical processing in visuo-spatial reasoning. Scientific reports, 2:411.
    Strange, B.A., Otten, L.J., Josephs, O., Rugg, M.D., Dolan, R.J. (2002) Dissociable human perirhinal, hippocampal, and parahippocampal roles during verbal encoding. J Neurosci, 22:523-8.
    Subramaniam, K., Faust, M., Beeman, M., Mashal, N. (2012) The repetition paradigm: enhancement of novel metaphors and suppression of conventional metaphors in the left inferior parietal lobe. Neuropsychologia, 50:2705-19.
    Thoma, P., Daum, I. (2006) Neurocognitive mechanisms of figurative language processing--evidence from clinical dysfunctions. Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 30:1182-205.
    Volle, E., Gilbert, S.J., Benoit, R.G., Burgess, P.W. (2010) Specialization of the rostral prefrontal cortex for distinct analogy processes. Cereb Cortex, 20:2647-59.
    Wolff, P., Gentner, D. (2011) Structure-mapping in metaphor comprehension. Cognitive science, 35:1456-88.
    Yang, F.G., Edens, J., Simpson, C., Krawczyk, D.C. (2009a) Differences in task demands influence the hemispheric lateralization and neural correlates of metaphor. Brain and language, 111:114-24.
    Yang, F.G., Edens, J., Simpson, C., Krawczyk, D.C. (2009b) Differences in task demands influence the hemispheric lateralization and neural correlates of metaphor. Brain and Language, 111:114-124.
    Yang, F.G., Fuller, J., Khodaparast, N., Krawczyk, D.C. (2010) Figurative language processing after traumatic brain injury in adults: A preliminary study. Neuropsychologia, 48:1923-1929.

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校內網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)

    QR CODE