本研究旨在探討新竹縣國民小學校長服務領導與學校效能的現況，並分析國民小學校長服務領導與學校效能之間的相關性，以及服務領導對學校效能的預測力。本研究採問卷調查法，使用的工具「新竹縣國民小學校長服務領導與學校效能關係之調查問卷」以新竹縣公立國民小學教師為母群體，有效樣本為243位國小教師。根據所蒐集的資料，以t 考驗、單因子變異數分析、Pearson 積差相關、及多元逐步迴歸分析等統計方法進行分析與處理。研究結果分述如下：
一、新竹縣國民小學校長服務領導的現況，整體表現良好，且達高度知覺水準。
二、新竹縣國民小學校效能的現況，整體表現良好，且達高度知覺水準。
三、不同性別、年齡、教育程度、服務年資、職務及學校所在地之新竹縣國小教師對校長服務領導的知覺無顯著差異。
四、新竹縣國小教師對校長服務領導的知覺，規模較大的學校教師知覺高於其他規模學校。
五、不同性別、年齡、教育程度、服務年資、職務、學校規模及學校所在地之新竹縣國小教師對校長服務領導的知覺無顯著差異。
六、新竹縣國小校長服務領導與學校效能具有顯著正相關。
七、新竹縣國小校長服務領導各層面中以「智慧」與「組織服務」對整體學校效能最具預測效果。
本研究根據以上結論，分別針對國民小學校長及後續研究者提出若干建議。

The purpose of this study is to explore the current situation of elementary school principals’ servant leadership and school effectiveness and the relationship between them. The methodology of this research was a questionnaire survey. The questionnaire was “ The relationship between elementary school principals’ servant leadership and school effectiveness questionnaire in Hsinchu County”. Eventually, 302 valid samples were produced by the target teachers from public elementary schools in Hsinchu County, Taiwan. The researcher analyzed the survey data by various statistical methods, such as: t-test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson product-moment correlation, Canonical correlation analysis and Multiple stepwise regression analysis.
The research draws the following conclusions:
1. Overall, principals’ servant leadership in Hsinchu shows positive result, and the elementary school teachers scored high in principals’ servant leadership.
2. Overall, school effectiveness shows positive result, and the elementary school teachers scored high in school effectiveness.
3. The elementary school teachers with different background variables of “Gender”, “Age”, “Academic Background”, “Years of Service”, “Position”, and “School Region” showed no significantly difference in principals’ servant leadership.
4. “School Size” affected teachers’ awareness on principal’s servant leadership. The elementary school teachers in comparatively larger schools scored above average in principals’ servant leadership.
5. The elementary school teachers with different background variables of “Gender”, “Age”, “Academic Background”, “Years of Service”, “Position”, “School Size”, and “School Region” showed no significantly difference in principals’ servant leadership.
6. There is significant positive correlation between principals’ servant leadership and school effectiveness.
7. Among those servant leadership factors, “Wisdom” and “Organizational stewardship” can predict most total school effectiveness.
According to the study outcomes above, several advices were suggested for elementary school principals and future researchers.

壹、中文部分
王文峰（2003）。私立中學學校主管領導形態、組織溝通滿族、激勵制度與學校效能關係之研究-以台南市為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立成功大學，台南市。
何怡欣（2007）。台南縣市國民小學教務主任服務領導與教師工作士氣關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立台南大學，台南市。
余瑞陽（1997）。國民小學校長管理能力與學校效能關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。臺北市立範學院，台北市。
吳宗立（1999）。國民中學行政人員分享決策與學校效能關係之研究。中學教育學報，6,33-67。
吳明隆、涂金堂(2005)。SPSS與統計應用分析。台北市；五南。
吳清山（1992）。學校效能研究。台北市：五南。
吳清山（2006）。服務領導的理念與實踐。輔仁大學第五屆教育領導與發展學術研討會論文集，5-22。台北縣：輔仁大學。
吳清山（2007）。教育行政議題研究。台北市：高等教育。
吳清山、林天祐（2003）。僕人領導。教育研究雙月刊，120，154。
房美玲（2010）。國民小學總務主任服務領導行為與處室成員工作滿意度關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立台北教育大學，台北市。
林思伶（2003）。從服務領導的理念看教育組織的領導與發展。發表與輔仁大學第二屆教育領導與發展學術研討會，台北縣；輔仁大學。
林思伶（2004）。析論僕人式/服務領導(Servant-Leadership)的概念發展與研究。國立高雄師範大學學報，16，41-57。
林純媛（2005）。雲嘉地區國民小學校長教學領導與學校效能關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立政治大學，台北市。
邱茂城（2005）。高中職學校本位決策、轉型領導與學校效能之研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立台灣師範大學，台北市。
侯世昌（2002）。國民小學家長教育期望、參與學校教育與學校效能之研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立台灣師範大學，台北市。
洪宗邦（2006）。我國大學校長服務型領導與全面品質管理關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。淡江大學，台北縣。
洪珮瑀（2007）。台北縣國民小學校長服務領導行為與家長會組織運作關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。輔仁大學，台北縣。
徐進文（2007）。國民小學校長服務領導與教師教學效能之相關研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立屏東教育大學，屏東縣。
張本文(2011)。校長服務領導、組織文化與創新經營效能關係之研究。學校行政雙月刊，74，1-23。
張永欽（2002）。台北市立國小校長領導行為塑造學校組織文化與學校效能之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立台北師範學院，台北市。
張奕華、張敏章（2010）。台北縣國民小學校長科技領導對學校效能影響之研究。學校行政，66，30-50。
張美瑤（2005）。幼稚園園長服務領導語教師組織承諾關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。
梁靜如（2002）。國民小學校長人性取向領導與學校效能之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立台中師範學院，台中市。
許孝麟（2001）。國民小學教師參與決定與學校效能之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立台中師範學院，台中市。
許顏輝（2005）。國民中學學習型組織、學校組織氣氛與學校效能關係之研究–以中部地區為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立彰化師範大學，彰化縣。
陳亭孜（2006）。國民小學校長服務領導特徵與主任行為表徵關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。台北市。
陳信君（2005）。國民小學校長專業領導行為與學校效能關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立中山大學，高雄市。
陳慶瑞（1996）。國民小學校長權力運用、教師參與決定、與學校效能之關聯性之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立屏東師範學院，屏東縣。
彭祥瑀（2005）。國民小學校長轉型領導與學校效能之研究-以新竹縣為例（未出版之碩士論文）。台北市立教育大學，台北市。
湯發安（2008）。桃園縣國民小學校長服務領導與學校效能關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。中原大學，桃園縣。
黃明哲（2003）。國民小學校長知識管理知能與學校效能關係織研究（未出版之碩士論文）。臺北市立師範學院，台北市。
黃哲彬（2003）。國民小學校長知識管理知能與學校效能關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立台北師範學院，台北市。
黃哲彬（2004）。國民小學校長賦權增能行為與學校效能關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立台南師範學院，台南市。
黃登木（2004）。服務領導在學校組織的運用與基本模式初探（未出版之碩士論文）。輔仁大學，台北縣。
黃種斌（2005）。桃源縣國民小學校長轉型領導與學校效能關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立新竹教育大學，新竹市。
楊炳清（2008）。國民小學校長服務領導行為與學校行政效能關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立台北教育大學，台北市。
葉天賞（2001）。國民中學校長行政溝通行為與學校效能之關係研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。
廖世煇（2008）。高雄縣國民小學校長服務領導與學校組織文化關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。輔仁大學，台北縣。
廖美鳳（2004）。學校自主管理與學校效能之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立台北師範學院，台北市。
蔣君儀（2005）。國民小學校長服務領導與學校文化表徵關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。輔仁大學，台北縣。
賴文豪（2005）。僕人領導與員工工作滿意度之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台北大學，台北市。
戴振浩(2001)。國民小學男女校長領導特質與學校效能影響之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立台北師範學院，台北市。
謝小苓（1988）。好學校必備條件。教育資料文摘。126，4-13。
謝文全（2004）。教育行政學。台北市：高等教育。
鍾孟娟（2007）。國民小學校長服務領導行為與教師典範部屬行為關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。輔仁大學，台北縣。
羅慧筠（2005）。公益服務型組織之服務領導、組織文化與成員態度之相關研究（未出版之碩士論文）。南台科技大學，台南縣。
蘇美麗（2006）。服務領導: 領導者即追隨者的領導新視野。慈濟大學教育研究學刊，2，161-190。
貳、英文部分
Alvares, K. M., & Lee, D. M. (1977). Effects of sex on descriptions and evaluations of supervisory behavior in a simulated industral seting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 405-410.
Angus, J. D. (2012). Performance management coaching: Servant leadership and gender implications. Leadership & Organization Development Journal. Retrived from http://www.academia.edu/1286144/Performance_Management_Coaching_Servant_Leadership_and_Gender_Implications.
Avolio, B. J. (1999). Full leadership development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Barbuto, J. E., & Gifford, G. T. (2010). Examining sex differences of the servant leadership dimensions: An analysis of the agentic and communal properties of the servant leadership questionaire. Journal of Leadership Education, 9(2), 4-20.
Barbuto, J. E., & Wheeler, D. W. (2002). Becoming a servant leader: Do you have what it takes? NebGuide G02-1481-A. Lincoln: University of Nebraska, Nebraska Cooperative Extension.
Barbuto, J. E., & Wheeler, D. W. (2006). Scale development and construct clarification of servant leadership. Group & Organization Management, 31(3), 300-26.
Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.
Berryman-Fink, C. (1985). Male and female managers’ views of the communication skills and training needs of women in management. Public Personnel Management, 14, 307-313.
Bierly, P. E., Kessler, E. H., & Christensen, E. W. (2000). Organizational learning, knowlegdge and wisdom. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 13, 595-618.
Blankstein, A. (2009). Failure is not an option: Six principles for making student success the only option. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Bruggink, P. (2001). Principal succession and school improvement: The relationship between the frequency of principal turnover in Florida public schools from 1990-91 and school performance indicators in 1998-99. (unpublished doctoral dessertation), Florida State University.
Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
Coleman, M. (2003). Gender and the orthodoxies of leadership. School Leadership & Management, 23(3), 325-339.
Covey, S. R. (2002). Servant-leadership and community leadership in the twenty-first century. In L. C. Spears & M. Lawrence (Eds.), focus on leadership: Servant- leadership for the twenty-first century , 26-33. New York: Wily.
Dacher, E. S. (1999). Loving openness and the healing relationship. Advances in mind-body medicine, 15, 32-43.
Day, D. R., & Stogdill, R. M. (1972). Leader behavior of male and female supervisors: A comparative study. Personnel Psychology, 25, 353-360.
DiPaola, M., & Hoy, W. (2008). Improving schools: Studies in leadership and culture. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Drury, S. (2004). Employee perceptions of servant leadership: Comparisons by level and with job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Dissertation Abstracts International, UMI NO.3146724.
Eagly, A. H., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., & Engen M. L. (2003). Transformational, ransactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 569-591.
Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex Differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In T. Eckes & H. M. Trautner (Eds.). The Developmental Social Psychology of Gender, 123-174. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Ehrhart, M. G. (2004). Leadership and procedural justice climate as antecedents of unit-levelorganizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology, 57(1), 61-94.
Eisler, R. (1994). From domination to partnership: The hidden subtext for sustainable change. Journal of Organizational Change, 7, 32-46.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Greenleaf, R. K. (1970). The servant as leader. Indianapolis, IN: Greenleaf Center.
Greenleaf, R. K. (1977). Servant leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness. New York: Paulist Press.
Harper, N. L., & Hirokawa, R. Y. (1988). A comparison of persuasive strategies used by female and male managers I: An examination of downward influence. Communication Quarterly, 36, 157-168.
Herbst, J. (2003) Organizational servant leadership and its relationship to secondary school effectiveness(unpublisheddoctoraldissertation), Florida Atlantic University.
Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2001). Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Hyman, B. (1980). Responsive leadership: The woman manager’s asset or liability. Supervisory Management, 25, 40-43.
Kae, R. (2011). Servant-leadership as gender-integrative leadership: Paving a path for more gender-integrative organizations through leadership dducation. Journal of Leadership Education, 10(2), 155-171.
Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.
Kuik, A. (1998). The meaning of servant leadership. Dissertation Abstracts International, UMI NO. NQ32029.
Laub, J. (1999). Assessing the servant organization: Development of the servant organizational leadership assessment (SOLA) instrument. Dissertation Abstracts International, 60(2), 308.
Levine, D. U. ,& Lezotte, L. w. (1990). Unusually effective school: A review and analysis of research and practice.
Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Zhao, H., & Henderson, D. (2008). Servant leadership: Development of a multidimensional measure and multi-level assessment. The Leadership Quarterly, 19 (2), 161-177.
Lynham, S., & Chermack, T. (2006). Responsible leadership for performance: A theoretical model and hypotheses. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 12(4), 73–88.
Mcdonald, A. L. (1993). Comparisions of the perceptions of parents and elementary principals on the components of and effective school. Abstract from: ProQuest File: Dissertation Abstracts Item: 9321800.
Milett, K.ate.T. (1978). Sexual politics. New York: Ballantine Books.
Miner, J. B. (1974). Motivation to manage among women: Studies of college students. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 5, 241-250.
Ming, H. S. (2005). Servant leadership and its effect on church organization. Dissertation Abstracts International, UMI No.3169049.
Nelson, L. (2003). An exploratory study of the application and acceptance of servant-leadership theory among black leaders in South Africa. Dissertations Abstracts International, 64, 944A.
Noddings, N. (2003). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education (2nd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Northouse, P. G. (2004). Leadership: Theory and practice (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
Patterson, K. (2003). Servant leadership: A theoretical model. Dissertation Abstracts International, 64 (2), 570.
Purkey, S., & Smith, M. (1983). Effective schools: A review. The Elementary School Journal, 834(4), 427-452.
Rajek, B. (1997).Designing and implementing value focused effectiveness indicators. Reid, K., HopKins, D., & Holly, P. (1987). Towards the effective school:The problems and somesolutions. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Reynolds, D., Bollen, R., Creemers, B., Hopkins, D., Stoll, L and Lagerweij, N. (1996) Making goodschool, London: Routledge.
Russell, R. R. (2001). The role of values in servant leadership. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 22(1), 76-84.
Russell, R., & Stone, A. (2002). A review of servant leadership attributes: Developoing a practicalmodel. Leadership & Organizational Development Journal, 23,145-157.
Rutter, M. (1983). School effects on pupil progress: Research findings and policy implications. Child Development,54, 1-29.
Sammons, P., Mortimore, P., & Hillman, J. (1996). Key characteristics of effective schools: A response to peddling feel-good fictions. Forum, 38, 88-90.
Sargent, A. G. (1989). Management in the 90s: The androgynous manager. Trainning & Development Journal, 29-35.
Schmoker, M., & Marzano, R. J. (1999). Realizing the promise of standards-based education. Educational Leadership,56, 17-21.
Spears, L. (Eds.) (1998). The power of servant-leadership: Essays. San Francisco.Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.
Taylor, T. (2002). Examination of leadership practices of principals identified as servant leaders(dissertation) . Columbia: University of Missouri-Columbia.
Weymes, E. (2003). Relationships not leadership sustain successful organizations. Journal of Change Management, 3, 319-332.
Wiebe, D. J. (1992). A survey of the relationship between school effectiveness characteristics and student achievement as perceived by elementary school principals. Dissertation Abstracts Internationals, 52(1), 41-81.
Willms, J. D. (1992). Monitoring school performance: A guide for educator. London.
The Palmer Press.