研究生: |
鄭伊斯 Cheng, Yi Ssu |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
台灣企業服務創新類型之關鍵驅動能力與績效分析 Service Innovation Types in Taiwan:Analysis of Driving Forces and Performance |
指導教授: |
許裴舫
Hsu, Pei Fang |
口試委員: |
嚴秀茹
Yen, Hsiu Ju 王貞雅 Wang, Chen Ya |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
科技管理學院 - 服務科學研究所 Institute of Service Science |
論文出版年: | 2015 |
畢業學年度: | 104 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 60 |
中文關鍵詞: | 服務創新績效、漸進式創新、激進式創新、雙元性創新 |
外文關鍵詞: | service innovation performance, incremental innovation, radical innovation, ambidextrous innovation |
相關次數: | 點閱:3 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
服務創新為近年來企業所關注之議題,可能可以為企業帶來競爭優勢,給予顧客新的服務價值。然而,在這發展迅速與競爭激烈的環境中,服務創新之開發過程常受到阻礙。企業該如何運用組織能力,達到最大化的服務創新成效,是當今企業急需關切的議題。本研究以問卷調查台灣企業之服務創新發展概況,依企業投入服務創新活動的程度,將服務創新分為低度創新、漸近式創新、激進式創新與雙元性創新,探討不同服務創新類型的驅動能力因素與服務績效分析。根據文獻探討,本研究提出影響企業服務創新發展的關鍵驅動能力為:(1)組織領導風格 (2)組織策略 (3)管理機制。研究結果顯示不同類型服務創新型態,會有不同的服務績效,雙元性創新類型企業認為其競爭優勢自我感知績效程度最高,但依實際財務指標發現資產報酬率與淨利率逐年降低。不同類型的服務創新型態,會有不同的關鍵驅動能力,漸進式創新類型的企業具有低積極性與低賦權性,其組織策略具有競爭者導向,雖人力資源創新導向低,但會透過教育訓練來加強員工的創新能力;激進式創新的企業具有低風險承受性,在組織策略方面其與漸進式創新、低度創新類型無顯著差異,但特別的是管理機制方面,採用專業資訊系統程度較漸進式創新類型低;雙元性創新類型的企業具有高風險承受性、高積極性與高賦權性,員工較能自行決定所該追求的商機,在組織策略方面有高競爭者導向與高人力創新導向,且內外部人員參與程度最高,並有高度的知識整合管理機制與資訊科技基礎資源。
Recent years have seen increased attention being given to service innovation in enterprises. Service innovation may provide a competitive advantage and give customers the new value of service. However, the new service development process is often hampered during the environment of the rapid development and fierce competition. How enterprises use organization driving forces to maximize the effectiveness of service innovation is an important issue. The method to carry out this study was using a questionnaire survey in Taiwan enterprises. Depending on the degree of innovation in service enterprises, service innovation can be divided into low innovation, incremental innovation, radical innovation and ambidextrous innovation. Then explore the driving forces and performance of the service innovation types. According to the literature, this study presents the three driving forces which affect the development of service innovation: (1) organizational entrepreneurship, (2) organizational strategy, (3) management mechanism. Our analysis finds that different service innovation types have different service performance. Ambidextrous innovation has highest degree of self-perceived competitive advantage and service performance, but the actual financial indicators suggest that its’ return on assets and net profit margin is decreased year by year. Other findings are that different service innovation types have different driving forces. Incremental innovation has low proactiveness, low empowerment, high competitor orientation and low innovative human resource, but it will be to strengthen the innovation capacity of staff through education and training. Radical innovation has low risk taking. Specifically, the usage of professional information systems on radical innovation is lower than incremental innovation. Ambidextrous innovation has high risk taking, high proactiveness and high empowerment, so their employees can decide to pursuit business opportunities. Otherwise, ambidextrous innovation has high competitor orientation, high innovative human resource, high involvement, high knowledge integrator and IT management mechanisms.
Alam, I. (2002). An Exploratory Investigation of User Involvement in New Service Development. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30(3), 250-261.
Badawy, A. M. (2009). Technology management simply defined: A tweet plus two characters. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 26(4), 219-224.
Bennett, R. C., & Cooper, R. G. (1981). The misuse of marketing: An American tragedy. Business Horizons, 24(6), 51-61.
Bharadwaj, S. G., Varadarajan, P. R., & Fahy, J. (1993). Sustainable Competitive Advantage in Service Industries: A Conceptual Model and Research Propositions. Journal of Marketing, 57(4), 83-99.
Bierly, P. E., & Daly, P. S. (2007). Alternative knowledge strategies, competitive environment, and organizational performance in small manufacturing firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(4), 493-516.
Birkinshaw, J., Bessant, J., & Delbridge, R. (2007). Finding, forming, and performing: Creating networks for discontinuous innovation. California Management Review, 49(3), 67-84.
Blazevica, V., & Lievensb, A. (2004). Learning during the new financial service innovation process: Antecedents and performance effects. Journal of Business Research, 57, 374-391.
Bodwell, W., & Chermack, T. J. (2010). Organizational ambidexterity: Integrating deliberate and emergent strategy with scenario planning. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(2), 193-202.
Camisón-Zornoza, C., Lapiedra-Alcamí, R., Segarra-Ciprés, M., & Boronat-Navarro, M. (2004). A Meta-analysis of Innovation and Organizational Size. Organization Studies, 25(3), 331-361.
Carbonell, P., Rodiguez-Escudero, & AI & Pujari, D. (2009). Customer Involvement in New Service Development:An Examination of Antecedents and Outcomes. (26), 536-550.
Chen, J. S., Hung Tai, T., & Huang, A. Y. H. (2009). Service Delivery Innovation: Antecedents and Impact on Firm Performance. Journal of Service Research, 12(1), 36-55.
Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open Innovation:tThe New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA.
Chiesa, V., & Frattini, F. (2011). Commercializing Technological Innovation: Learning from Failures in High-Tech Markets*. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(4), 437-454.
Datta, A. (2011). An Integrative Model to Explain the Ability to Commercialize Innovations: Linking Networks, Absorptive Capacity, Ambidexterity and Environmental Factors. Journal of Management and Strategy, 2(2), 2-22.
De Luca, L. M., & Atuahene-Gima, K. (2007). Market knowledge dimensions and cross-functional collaboration: Examining the different routes to product innovation performance. Journal of Marketing, 71(1), 95-112.
Delaney, J. T., & Huselid, M. A. (1996). The impact of human resource management practices on perceptions of organizational performance. The Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 949-969.
Dewar, R. D., & Dutton, J. E. (1986). The Adoption of Radical and Incremental Innovations - an Empirical-Analysis. Management Science, 32(11), 1422-1433.
Ebben, J. J., & Johnson, A. C. (2005). Efficiency, flexibility, or both? Evidence linking strategy to performance in small firms. Strategic Management Journal, 26(13), 1249-1259.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-55.
Gilson, L. L., Mathieu, J. E., Shalley, C. E., & Ruddy, T. M. (2005). Creativity and standardization: Complementary or conflicting drivers of team effectiveness? Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 521-531.
Govindarajan, V., & Kopalle, P. K. (2006). Disruptiveness of innovations: measurement and an assessment of reliability and validity. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 189-199.
Gray, B. J., Matear, S., Deans, K. R., & Garrett, T. (2007). Assessing Sources of Competitive Advantage in a Service-Dominant World. Australasian Marketing Journal, 15(1), 69-75.
Gupta, A. K., Smith, K. G., & Shalley, C. E. (2006). The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 693-706.
He, Z.-L., & Wong, P.-K. (2004). Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis. Organization Science, 15(4), 481-494.
Henderson, R. M., & Clark, K. B. (1990). Architectural Innovation - the Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established Firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 9-30.
Hildebrand, H. D. D., & Forcada, M. A. H. (2009). Innovation in services: present findings, and future pathways. Journal of Service Management, 20(2), 131-155.
Holahan, P. J., Sullivan, Z. Z., & Markham, S. K. (2014). Product Development as Core Competence: How Formal Product Development Practices Differ for Radical, More Innovative, and Incremental Product Innovations. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(2), 329-345.
Iyer, G. R., LaPlaca, P. J., & Sharma, A. (2006). Innovation and new product introductions in emerging markets: Strategic recommendations for the Indian market. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(3), 373-382.
Jansen, J. J. P., Van den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science, 52(11), 1661-1674.
Johne, A., & Storey, C. (1998). New service development: a review of the literature and annotated bibliography. European Journal of Marketing, 32(3/4), 184-251.
Kyriakopoulos, K., & Moorman, C. (2004). Tradeoffs in marketing exploitation and exploration strategies: The overlooked role of market orientation. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21(3), 219-240.
Lavie, D., Kang, J., & Rosenkopf, L. (2011). Balance Within and Across Domains: The Performance Implications of Exploration and Exploitation in Alliances. Organization Science, 22(6), 1517-1538.
Lee, D. M. S., & Allen, T. J. (1982). Integrating new technical staff: Implications for acquiring new technology. . Management Science, 28(12), 1405-1420.
Lu, K. Y., Zhu, J. X., & Bao, H. J. (2015). High-performance human resource management and firm performance The mediating role of innovation in China. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 115(2), 353-382.
Lubatkin, M. H., Simsek, Z., Ling, Y., & Veiga, J. F. (2006). Ambidexterity and Performance in Small-to Medium-Sized Firms: The Pivotal Role of Top Management Team Behavioral Integration. Journal of Management, 32(5), 646-672.
Lukas, B. A., & Ferrell, O. C. (2000). The Effect of Market Orientation on Product Innovation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(2), 239-247.
Lynn, G. S., Morone, J. G., & Paulson, A. S. (1996). Marketing and discontinuous innovation: The probe and learn process. California Management Review, 38(3), 8-37.
Madrid-Guijarro, A., Garcia, D., & Auken, H. V. (2009). Barriers to Innovation among SpanishManufacturing SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management, 47(4), 465-488.
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87.
McDermott, C. M., & Prajogo, D. I. (2012). Service innovation and performance in SMEs. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 32(2), 216-237.
McKenney, J. L. (1995). Waves of Change: Business Evolution Through Information Technology. Harvard Business School Press.
Melton, H. L., & Hartline, M. D. (2010). Customer and Frontline Employee Influence on New Service Development Performance. Journal of Service Research, 13(4), 411-425.
Menor, L. J., & Roth, A. V. (2007). New service development competence in retail banking: Construct development and measurement validation. Journal of Operations Management, 25(4), 825-846.
Menor, L. J., Tatikonda, M. V., & Sampson, S. E. (2002). New service development: areas for exploitation and exploration. Journal of Operations Management, 20(2), 135-157.
Minetti, R. (2010). Informed Finance and Technological Conservatism. Review of Finance, 15(3), 633-692.
Nagji, B., & Tuff, G. (2012). Managing Your Innovation Portfolio. Harvard Business Review, 90(5).
Nasution, H. N., Mavondo, F. T., Matanda, M. J., & Ndubisi, N. O. (2011). Entrepreneurship: Its relationship with market orientation and learning orientation and as antecedents to innovation and customer value. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(3), 336-345.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Ordanini, & Rubera. (2010). A Resource-Based Perspective on Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation. 24(1), 169-196.
Ordanini, A., & Parasuraman, A. (2010). Service Innovation Viewed Through a Service-Dominant Logic Lens: A Conceptual Framework and Empirical Analysis. Journal of Service Research, 14(1), 3-23.
Ordanini, A., & Rubera, G. (2010). How does the application of an IT service innovation affect firm performance? A theoretical framework and empirical analysis on e-commerce. Information & Management, 47(1), 60-67.
Perks, H., Gruber, T., & Edvardsson, B. (2012). Co-creation in Radical Service Innovation: A Systematic Analysis of Microlevel Processes. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(6), 935-951.
Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co‐creating unique value with customers. Strategy & Leadership, 32(3), 4-9.
Prajogo, D. I. (2006). The relationship between innovation and business performance—a comparative study between manufacturing and service firms. Knowledge and Process Management, 13(3), 218-225.
Rhee, J., Park, T., & Lee, D. H. (2010). Drivers of innovativeness and performance for innovative SMEs in South Korea: Mediation of learning orientation. Technovation, 30(1), 65-75.
Shelton, R. (2009). Integrating Product and Service Innovation. Research-Technology Management, 52(3), 38-44.
Sok, P., & O'Cass, A. (2015). Achieving service quality through service innovation exploration – exploitation: the critical role of employee empowerment and slack resources. Journal of Services Marketing, 29(2), 137-149.
Song, L. Z., Song, M., & Di Benedetto, C. A. (2009). A Staged Service Innovation Model. Decision Sciences, 40(3), 571-599.
Stock, R. M., & Zacharias, N. A. (2010). Patterns and performance outcomes of innovation orientation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(6), 870-888.
Stocker, M. (2004). Articles and thoughts about all things innovative and strategic. Business musings. from http://www.stockerpartnership.com/blog/ambidexterity-the-skill-every-conqueror-needs-to-master/
Wernerfelt, B., & Montgomery, C. A. (1988). Tobin's q and the Importance of Focus in Firm Performance. The American Economic Review.
Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185-203.
Zahra, S. A., Nash, S., & Bickford, D. J. (1995). Transforming Technological Pioneering into Competitive Advantage. The Academy of Management Executive, 9(1), 17-31.
Zhou, K. Z., Li, J. J., Zhou, N., & Su, C. (2008). Market orientation, job satisfaction, product quality, and firm performance: evidence from China. Strategic Management Journal, 29(9), 985-1000.